>>81791 I think for a lot of people the end result matters. Sure it's nice to know an artist put 10 hours into a piece and really put a lot of effort in, but if an AI were to make an exact replica (as an example) would you really care? Would you care if the new kandemrem pieces were all AI generated (but looked the exact same)? I think the big issue that people have with AI is that it still looks *off* given people an uncanny vibe instead of it being made with a computer instead of "soul".

>>81794 (Kandemrem pieces DO look all the same though)

>>81791 >implying it was impossible to make mass-produced, soulless art before AI The average person doesn't care about the metaphysical properties of whether the porn they're fapping to was produced with kosher drawing tools or not. They care about the end result. AI is simply another method that happens to have a lot of weaknesses. You can walk and chew gum at the same time, it's not that deep.

>>81796 Not to speak of the crap many artists sell off as content, (and by "sell" I do mean making quite the money) a.k.a. 200 copies of the same image with minimal changes, no narrative, no progression, just a flying feather layer swapped to a flying hand layer amd shit like that. Now I'm not a fan of AI slop, talentless guys with the 'tism bumrushed the generators way too early and swarmed every community with cringe inducing vile shit, but even I admit that the tech keeps improving and half assed, scammy, low-effort artists have a reason to fear replacement. Kusujinn doesn't have to be afraid. Or Bad-Pierrot. Or people with maybe less realistic but unique and well distinguishable style like Bandito or Bombers And we lost some good warriors to the AI slop, GhostOS is truely just a ghost of what Scavenger was, this is unfortunate development. But frankly, if Satur1n, or what's their name these days, wtfeather and such are replaced by AI images that do the exact fking same thing they do, I think that's fair game. Agriculture and the military always needs new hands, boys and girls, if you want to make a living. How can human made art survive in such circumstances? 1: staying unique and intimate. AI can't surprise me. It will give me what I want and exactly that. It will always reflect my requests, nothing more, nothing less. 2: standing out with something. AI tires my eyes with the abundance of the same thing. Be a beacon that attracts and calms my eyes. 3: responsibility of the community. Make house rules to flag AI, warn about AI, hide AI behind filters, isolate AI to protect personal aspect which I still think to be more important. If we give in to brainrot, we fail as a species. Talented artists working hard and people looking to connect with them should never be drowned in an abundance of ai wank material generated during a gooning session by a brainrotted coomer. And this shall be a fundamental right.

>>81791 >>81804 I think that we can all agree on at least one thing, and that is, when the replacement does start happening, it will be survival of the fittest. No such thing as fundamental right, Mr Founding Father. I agree that, to a certain extent, some artists may be irreplaceable, and I appreciate that "human uniqueness" in their art, that you all talk so much about. But AI is still gonna win me over in all aspects, be it by speed or quality. If not right now, then eventually. The main argument here against AI seems the "requirement of human connection", and "uniqueness", and "being surprised" (which is something that some say AI will never be able to do to us, but more on that in a bit). Ironically, the same arguments used for the same discussion on non-porn art. What is there to say about it? Well. Like I said in a previous post, if you're here with an inner need for art that touches you, instead of just you touching your penis, then good on you buddy. All those points are HIGHLY subjective, and I understand if you need human connection on your porn (sorta? personally I don't care but I can understand why you might). But see, as generated images, maybe videos, even, as they improve with time, with years, people will start asking (and this far into it, they are already are asking) if they can live with the fact that no hands drew the girl crying of tickling laughter in some stationary restraints that they're seeing, and it is actually the magic of a machine designed to fulfill human wishes. I can, indeed live with that. And I would very much like to be able to order 5 images of Nanachi's armpits getting absolutely obliterated by tickling hands while she hopelessly thrashes around in a bondage device, and get EXACTLY that, either for free, or for a low price, and in less than a minute. Be honest, anyway. Who wouldn't? We saw in this board how advanced shit is. Let's give it a few more years and see if people that care about humanity change their minds. If they don't it's fine too, point is, some have already changed theirs. If you think AI is never gonna be able to surprise us, I'm happy to tell you that it's literally just because AI technology is so recent that companies are still gatekeeping it hard enough that nothing both cool and NSFW related gets done with them. (Except NovelAI story generator, god bless NovelAI) When that does happen, THEN, you should probably welcome our new robot overlords. Companies will at some point start realizing it, and will capitalize on 90% of people here (some already managing, see FeetGen and NovelAI) because by then real artists, while the good ones won't inherently be replaced, they will be forced to share space with robots that are just as decent albeit way faster. In simpler terms, it's really just a matter 2 things: Time, and personal taste. For now though... I think we can all enjoy some robot-generated image of a cutie being tickled to oblivion if it looks good enough, no?

>>81804 A fundamental right for who? It's already insanely easy to ignore AI art and other "brainrot" if you really don't want to see it.

>>81768 Maybe i'm not some trilobite that consumes detritus shoveled out some soulless corporate machine that insist on charging me to use imagination and creativity. Go fuck yourself, or should I say go get your Iphone to fuck yourself.

>>81813 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7_I6kj9fTc

Personally, feetgen feels kinda revolutionary and it's most likely only gonna improve over time. Can't say much about NovelAi as I have not used it once. However, as fat as chatbots go, I feel like there wasn't that much development over the last months. The only ones improving seem to be spicychat.ai with their news model. That costs money though.

>>81813 Sure, you can enjoy the benefits of the ever improving AI. Sure, you can go "That'll do". It's easier for smut anyway. As for me, I always liked the personal aspect of it. I like discussing stuff like that with living breathing human beings. Like you. I'd probably be more serviced by talking to an AI, but I'd never completely switch people like you for it. I talked to and met interesting people and even had live sessions within the community. It was a rare occasion and even if she wasn't a tall slender Elven princess with ridiculously ticklish size 10s whom I could generate by the dozens for smut thanks to AI, I'd have never got there if I was talking to chatbots instead of finding one of her stories and sending her a praising message. I don't even remember half of the smut I generated yesterday as an experiment. I do remember those sessions. It has always been a little bit more than consuming content to me. Don't get me wrong, if that's as far as you're concerned, you do you, I can easily understand why you're hopeful that you'll be able to make do with nothing but AI one day. As for me, surrounding myself with AI -while it's getting better for just a wank- it just feels kinda lonely. Even more so than having a fetish regularly does. Am I really going to start praising people over writing a prompt? What will happen to our beloved hate/cringe threads? Where will be the drama when mediocrity becomes the new low? And the new peak as well? What will we discuss? Are we supposed to stop chatting with each other only because AI writes a better smut and won't be much to discuss or many to discuss with anyway? I may be an old man yelling at clouds, but I really hope that the community will be able to protect itself from the effects that take the human element out of something like tickling. Without that, I see a very lonely, very sad future for the people who are supposed to be the tickling community. I don't want to say one day that I liked talking to and meeting people before AI made dead internet more than just a conspiracy theory.

>>81828 As far as roleplay is concerned, I do think that on average AI is wayyy better than humans are. A lot of the people in the community are 1 line andy's who barely put in any effort. There are exceptions of course, but I found them a lot more rare than the 1 liners. The community will still be a thing, and I doubt every artist will just quit on the spot for it. We can still hate on artists like Moekeki who is putting his shitty AI stuff behind a paywall now. We can see wtfeather go from same image handdrawn to same image AI generated. I do think you are old man yelling at clouds to since I doubt it's going to be as bad as you think, because people will seek others who are interested in it. I also doubt that AI can't just exist alongside the normal artists and people. I like that there is the option for both. Wanna put in no effort or something instant? use AI want something more personal? hit up an artist or make a rp request in a discord server.

>>81833 >trying to find RP partners on fucking discord of all places Well there's your problem. Discord is just barely better than deviantart in terms of overall literacy. Go lurk on f-list or something if you really want to find a serious roleplay partner. But yeah, for what it's worth, AI does tend to be pretty good in terms of playing out various scenarios like that.

>>81833 I feel like this is just a small facet of a far greater problem People are spurning human interaction and aspects of the human experience in favor of machines that will just tell them what they want to hear and show them what they want to see

>>81836 Agreed, and part of the problem is real connections take work and energy. You have to put yourself out there risking rejection, failed relationships, and worse yet, outright hate. The payoff is far greater, but it's much easier to settle for a shadow of the human experience.

>>81836 >>81837 Why you guys so negative? Pixels are Pixels no matter where they came from. Also Would you guys prefer to live in a fake but perfect world or in a imperfect but real world? I prefer the fake one.

Does anyone have good prompts for feetgen? I dunno where to start and don't wanna pay for credits

>>81839 A world that is fake will never be "perfect", and you are fooling yourself if you think settling for a shadow merely imitating the real thing will lead you to a fulfilling existence.

>>81843 If something imitating the real thing is exactly like the real thing, then is there even any difference, and what are the implications of that? That's a known paradox anon. A known one we all know the answer to. If you feel like its' the same thing, then it will never matter.

>>81844 yes anon, we may very well be brains in jars but how many jars deep do you wanna go?

>>81844 Men who do nothing but dream, should just stay in their dreams forever!

You lot sure like to overthink things.

>>81836 Exactly, why would I put in effort for something I might not enjoy when AI can give me a quick nut? The real people are still there for when I do desire it, but that can't satisfy my needs in that exact moment. There can be balance, it's not one or the other.

>>81849 THIS All this mumbo jumbo about what is fake and what has the touch of humanity or not when it's just LITERALLY THIS >>81845 Let me tell you a secret, anon. Both the predicament in question and the "brain in jars" one, only make a difference if you think about them.

idk man, i can fap to this

>>81868 I mean I could too, but tbh the longer you look at these the more empty they feel. I'd rather fap to something made by an artist that has passion you can feel through their work. I don't have all the time in the world to consume porn, so when I do I want it to be good. Satisfying.

>>81890 Nta but you can only say that if you're aware that the drawing you're looking at is Ai or not. Right now I can agree that it's not good enough because even if it looks good, all it takes is for you to spot one mistake, a weird finger, weird background, weird lighting, etc. Whatever gives it away that it's Ai generated for you go quickly lose interest in the image and go look for something else. That's just for now though, give it a year or two more and we'll be no different from those Twitter people that get into argument with artists because nobody can tell if an art piece is using AI or not.

if you're not a footfag, ai is pretty much already there on the tickling, and if you are, it's getting there. you guys just need to actually follow the ai tickling people with custom models they train themselves and start looking into that instead of hoping bing will let you make the pictures or some shit.

>>81921 who is the artist for the fourth?

>>81926 It's this guy right here.

>>81921 This still has that shitty plastic feel inherent to AI porn. Feels like it was made in an assembly line. There's no style to it, no love. Why tf would anyone ever fap to something made by a machine when you have real Humans sharing your kinks and putting out good stuff? I won't ever understand what's so appealing about this crap. It's gray slop. It can technically sate the hunger (I guess) but you could go for a nice steak with a glass of wine and have a way better time instead.

>>81934 I kind of understand your point, and agree actually. So while I support AI porn, I definitely agree with you. I would have a way better time fapping to an artist's work, at least with the current state of AI. I think the whole point is that the person fapping feels in the freedom of coming up with their own images quickly, images that follow their exact instructions, whereas if you're not an artist all you could do is hope someone made what you wanted or pay a lot for a commission. Don't get me wrong, I would way better prefer a steak with a glass of wine. But This is much cheaper and faster, and at some point in the future it might even have the same taste.

More...

>>81768 Actually it is the first one for me. I'm not gatekeeping or shitting on AI smut, but it's hotter when the scenario I'm jacking it to is something a real person came up with

Just wanted to mention since nobody has - Flux is making decent tickling images, at least for my taste :)

>>82046 >Just wanted to mention since nobody has - Flux is making decent tickling images, at least for my taste :) Care to share your prompts? :)

Did Feetgen stop giving free 50 coins for new accounts? I wanted to try it out, and it's asking to purchase coins.