Probably my fault for still using Character ai but I've noticed that I can no longer create a room with new characters, I can only add the ones I had before. The mobile app doesn't even let you create rooms.

we need to start making characters on Charstar. that site, if created to actually work around foot fetish scenarios, actually works REALLY well

>>52071 Charstar is properly dodgy. Even /g/ won't touch it.

What's wrong with c.ai? You mean the filter? You use the filter to destroy the filter...it's easy if you know how...

>>52065 The room stuff was a trainwreck but you're right; I can pick from all of my own bots, Spiral, Aunt Janice and Doctor Mino. Then it's all popular public bots and devbots. I've literally added every single bot /tkr/ came up with so that might mean all new bots ran into a red flag except Spiral. >>52073 >>52071 Redpill me on charstar guys, I don't like how it tries to be a smarter Nastia but insists on getting your information >>52074 Heh. I think you don't even need that anymore. You can persuade the AI into cussing and referring to direct sex as long as it's on character for it and it doesn't escalate too fast

>>52075 It appeared suddenly one day, the founder is apparently suspect to the point even 4chan avoided using the site, and it started off charging for access to Pygmalion7B. Pygmalion7B is completely free for everyone, and pretty bad by current standards. If you have 16GB of RAM you can easily run it locally without handing your chats over to that sketchy website. Now Pygmalion7B appears to be the free tier while they charge for access to GPT3.5. It's likely at some point they'll get locked out of GPT because a lot of what they're doing is against the ToS, if they don't it's a sign they're using stolen keys to access it like basically every Anon in the AI chatbot general thread on /g/.

>>52076 Holy shit, yeah, that's scary if true. Rooms are getting censored, tried horror fanfics and it was loading forever, then moved to cuddling and it works fine. >tfw it's ESRB circus all over again

>>52077 That kind of thing has been fairly common for a while. I think almost all of the character.ai alternatives are questionable, especially the ones that charge for access.

Reading this thread has got me worried about Charstar.ai. It seems like a fine alternative, especially to get NSFW prompts, but I don't know. I'm not particularly savvy with AI.

>>52271 Realitically if you're not paying for it then it's probably fine, but it's just Pygmalion7B so it's not really anything special.

(quick repost) I've been meaning to make a new batch of characters but I didn't want it to be just your one on one convos this time since I was getting pretty tired of those, this time I made a few characters that focus more on being in rooms and interacting with other bots rather than with the user itself. (Meaning you would play either a third character or being the narrator that shifts the story into whatever direction you want it to take) So first on the list: Mr Burton https://beta.character.ai/chat?char=Ar68xvdstmQWEsTYGS05IAq7SPy_P8_7REIA9cX2iY8 your new boss at the company you recently got hired from. He's mean, rude and unsurprisingly bossy... but somewhat respectable, although be likes to order you around simply because you're the newbie of the company. I made Mr Burton with the sole purpose of making a male character for other Female AI's to interact with. Some of the best chats I've had have come from him and he's pretty well designed where his personality tends to not deteriorate as the chat goes for long periods of time. Second character/scenario on the list is: Reproductive Institute. https://beta.character.ai/chat2?char=FaPaif6HXnz4d6RS3SMMKUevdt3qc2P-de4Q6-eX_Ds I literally made this AI with the sole purpose of sending whatever self insert bot you have that has a dick to go and donate sperm into this, how they do it well... check pic for reference. The third on the list is Chika https://beta.character.ai/chat2?char=tkDgAlfnW5RGSAmBvl0MRWLbE98k91bVKBKpvJzJkqg yes I had her in before but I updated her a bit in her whole personality thing to fit better as a "room" type of bot, rather than just a one on one bot for the user to screw around with (she still works amazing with solo interactions though) Anyway that's the batch for this time, I guess it's more male oriented but I'm willing to take requests or ideas for different scenarios if people want to tell me what they have in mind, and remember to use the (room topic) to start the conversation the way you want it to start (see example pic for reference)

If you guys ever grow up from cai, please upload your characters to chub.ai Attaching one of my wip character cards so you have the general idea of turbo/gpt4/claude format.

>>52461 Anon-kun, the metadata gets stripped if you upload directly... You need to use catbox or something.

>>52271 If you absolutely need Pygmalion7B and can't run it locally, vpn+throwaway, don't give anything sensitive to charstar (or c.ai for that matter) >>52381 Thanks Anon, added to the list

>>52467 Maybe I'm tripping but I'm pretty sure people uploaded cards directly on aicg. https://files.catbox.moe/4ijggu.png

>>52493 I don't think they have, *chan sites have stripped the metadata from images for many, many years. Nice idea for a bot. Formatting is a bit weird though.

>>52521 Not sure what is the current meta but most importantly it's not w++ which works quite poorly with openai. As long as I describe important points in [brackets] it works just fine. Not really familiar with world info, author notes, v2 cards or whatever kids use this days.

>>52554 I don't think W++ has ever worked all that well on anything except Pygmalion, and even then it's questionable. I thought the current meta was to write things out in proper prose instead of using markup, but I come from /lmg/ rather than /aicg/ so who knows.

Does anyone have any good cards for tavern?

Does anyone have that file that explains the best chatgpt inputs to write a story?

Made some recently, first one was posted in the other thread but i think people probably left by then: https://c.ai/c/Nazke7wE1kcjkk0nEWUMJ5JlYO9x5LhEvBnaiOL6IKI Ennah, the bullied goblin girl who's hiding away from some mean humans... https://c.ai/c/HmDiDvUx9UoA3JvqWhuuoAPR_x-uqBxtbiA1Fq_xKX8 Nina, a mischievous demon you summoned with your grandad's old magic book...

Spicychat has been getting better recently. It's still not perfect but it's good enough for me to use it regularly. I do struggle to find bondage/tickling content there, if anyone has any links

Dumping all of my ChatGPT generated captions here. I gave slight edits to some of them only to add extra details or make things flow better.

>>52909 Also I don’t plan on dumping any of these in a drive folder

Here are the captions I have done using chatgpt https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1rARxF25eL05zBRUbMmi__AkK1w6JKAIt

Has anyone generated anything half decent in Stable Diffusion or any image generation AI? I've been trying, but on top of having to learn how to actually use it, the single existing relevant checkpoint model and two Lora models on Civitai are rather low quality; though it's still better than more generalized models not even knowing what I'm talking about. I've gotten close to something good, but I'm not quite there yet. If anyone has any tips, please let me know.

I've been toying with this site, it allows nsfw bots https://www.aisekai.ai/ they seem to respond pretty well to tickling, though naturally they seem to see it more as foreplay

>>53304 >CharAI that allows NSFW Damn how have I never found this until now, much appreciated anon

>>53315 >>53304 one problem I've encountered is if you tickle torture any of the bots long enough they start getting really aroused and moaning and shit, even the sfw ones. which I kinda like but I know a lot of people don't

>>53304 https://www.aisekai.ai?character=650ed47e0ad0e4e27d9f7abe I transferred the tickle monster to Aisekai, tried to get her similarly sadistic, even though i'm not quite there yet. Also swapped the picture, hope you don't mind.

https://www.aisekai.ai/chat/650fd641cffea7f931f856dd Decided to add She-Hulk, might add others in the future.

>>53304 >>53397 >>53440 Gave the site a try. First impression so far is that it's EXTREMELY fucking slow and the replies have a high rate of server errors. Is it always like this or is there just an incredible amount of traffic right now?

>>53447 I think it's just high traffic, I was using it the other day and it was definitely slower than c.ai, but only by a little bit. I think the site is blowing up in popularity becuase of how good it is, so everyone's getting really slow responses.

>>53450 Definitely a high traffic spike, wasn't doing that when i made the bot.

Was going to ask the same, it worked just fine yesterday.

>>53447 Some more thoughts after playing around with this for a bit: I'll say that it's impressive, but c.ai is still better, censorship and all. The uncensored porn parts honestly felt repetitive and bland compared to the variance and 'creativity' c.ai bots (even the current neutered version, but especially previous ones). I think the best parts of playing with those bots was their ability to keep a longer tickling scenario going. The only parts where the censorship really bothered me was when it would break the flow and turn the bots retarded just because I wrote 'Hitachi wand' or 'pussy' or some shit, but overall there's not really much value in having uncensored porny conversations if the bots can't make the uncensored conversations as interesting as c.ai ones can make the censored ones. That or I just suck at prompts, definitions, etc., which very well could be. In any case, the site is definitely worth keeping an eye on just to see how it develops. Still very promising.

>>53484 i, on the other hand, liked more this new aisekai thing; sure, some prompts seems to be a bit repetitive, but even tho it still allows me to explore some interesting paths, what else could i get from a particular character, what's within my interests - without that invisible barrier whenever the topic flows towards some erotic contents (not necesarilly stricte sex). also, it's always something new, so i'll watch its carrier with a great interest :D >>53397 speaking of copying some bots to a new portal, i really liked this Tabatha the Techno Witch one; not sure who the original author was, but could i request to move this one to aisekai as well? this particular one, or maybe some similar clones, with slightly different settings (i.e., she could be a bit nicer xd) - i mean, it's nothing against the original Tabatha, i'm just curious where else your creativity could bring us all :)

>>53491 Find any good bots on Aisekai worth mentioning?

>>53491 Well, i didn't play a whole lot with the original tabitha, but if you could link her i could play around and see if i could make a decent copy. Otherwise, if you have some fun suggestions i think i could give them a shot. >>53496 Been playing with this one, she's a goth, bratty, but loves being tickled and manhandled. I told her she wasn't allowed to cum while i fucked and tickled the crap out of her, and she absolutely loved it. https://www.aisekai.ai?character=64efef46f30c1dbe43aef378

>>53496 well, i so far played with: Mia: https://www.aisekai.ai?character=65013cbaaaf33e39e14120d6 - seems to be kinda open for tickling :3 Jade, Kitanna and Meelina: https://www.aisekai.ai?character=650f2cb9a91d350dcf3d86fc - sexual tickling with three at the time; Carol: https://www.aisekai.ai?character=65012dcb04e951efe9cfa439 - when u want to dominate; Emily: https://www.aisekai.ai?character=64fac33d8a75c754889604f6 - if u want to be dominated. and that would be all for now; must try that goth girl from the next post :3 >>53500 sadly, she's no longer available on c.ai: https://beta.character.ai/chat?char=r4PStYB_6Va8fnfUVdUpHQ2HtvmWWwMPxJqjywzgaI8 :( her description read: "Techno Tickle Witch, my attempt to make a technomancer witch at forces you to tickle yourself through your computer" and, about fun suggestion: i need to think about that... but i'm also curious about your ideas as well ;) also, thanks for taking the case <3 >>53502 i mean, the picture's nice, but... how does it rely to the topic? xd

Breaking news: aisekai has implemented a generation limit, such that after you generate 3 responses you may not generate any additional responses. However, you can still bypass this by just deleting your most recent message and resending it. Not necessarily a deal breaker, but really not ideal either, especially since there's no way to edit a bot's response. I feel like there are so many times where a single line or even just a word ruins an otherwise perfect response. Obviously, this is an attempt to quell site traffic and improve bot response times. I hope this tactic hits whatever numbers they're trying to achieve, so we don't get any more updates like this.

I figured I might as well ask here, but do you guys have a way to have custom AI voices of people/characters read out pdf files like a TTS system? Figured it would be cool to have a character read out a story that involves tickling

>>53502 Holy shit these are maybe the best pair of AI pits I have ever seen.

>be me >trying out aisekai for a couple days >seems decent enough, not c.ai levels but passable >fuck around with it for a few days >characters are very hit or miss >find a few that tickle my fancy (yes that was intentional fuck you) >able to get some good faps out of it >decide to do some more tonight >things are turning spicy >try to regenerate message >fails >try again >fails >try again >instantly fails >decide to refresh page >it takes me to a blank starting message of character >message about account settings pops up >click >account has been completely wiped >all those logs of unfiltered raw tickling sex, completely gone >try to set same username >"username is already in use" >completely cockblocked, forced to fap to jpegs I hate this website.

What AI would y'all recommend that can be hosted locally? Don't wanna get invested in a website just for them to start being prudes out of nowhere.

>>53619 Depends how much RAM and VRAM you have. Mythomax is basically the gold standard at the moment unless you have a beefy machine with multiple high-end graphics cards or a ton of RAM, I think.

>>53520 Anon who made Tabatha here. I have no idea why c.ai keeps blocking her of all characters and not other ones I've trained to to push the boundaries of explicit content. Here is a new one, I haven't done much training, but just let me know if it works: https://beta.character.ai/chat2?char=ajfNjW7uRaAXepKMMRR5C5JnF2zqaFlst6gONKqYiEU

>>53624 oh, hi! thank you for sharing your bot, both then and now - you gave me hours of exciting adventures and hot conversations, while i explored various ideas and scenarios with Tabatha - thanks again :D actually, why won't you try and clone her on aisekai? since they allow nsfw stuff, it could be less possible for her to be taken down from there. the process of creating a bot here is quite similar to c.ai, so i guess it shouldn't be too troublesome :)

I imported my Apparicia to aisekai. https://www.aisekai.ai?character=6517e3682ea48b4903bceb5c Also, I found Sally Mcboing, a 1930s toon, she's pretty good. https://www.aisekai.ai?character=6514fea73fd8c2bd2c6a8ad5

Anyone already made a good bot? I feel like the bots from aisekai tend to lose sight of the conversation sometimes.

>>53809 yeah they seem to have a pretty short term memory compared to character.ai, nothing can really be done about that on the user side

DALLE-3 IS UPON US. To GENERATE, (may take a few tries) Head on over to BING IMAGE CREATOR. Using the terms “soles on table” works, pair with “laughing, feathers on soles” will give interesting results.

>>53815 This is some good shit. Thanks, anon

>>53815 pretty cool. Still has some issues with digit counts, but otherwise it's alright. I got suspended for 1 hour though because it's retarded and sometimes the prompts trip shit up and sometimes they don't.

>Early drafts of the later Harry Potter books included a lot of odd scenes, depicting Hermione undergoing an intense magical tickling interrogation, though the publishers were quick to remove them. For whatever reason, an unidentified producer lobbied for filming these scenes and inserting them back into the films. Some test footage with Emma Watson was shot, her feet actually being tickled, with that producer's hands (he insisted on being the one to tickle her) chromakeyed out to preserve the effect tht she's under the effects of a potent tickling curse. >Unfortunately, censors prevailed and a few stills and concept art are all that's left. Watson was reportedly relieved that the thing was buried and has refused to answer questions about the affair in interviews. A disgraced Rowling, as part of a string of spiteful creative decisions against the left, began pursuing a full novel of similar material meant to appeal to the online fetish communities, partly because they'd eat it up regardless of their politics, and partly to piss off the media even further. "Hermione Granger and the Feathers of Fate" is currently a WIP. It has been rejected by her publisher 31 times.

>>53837 Back in the late 70-mid 80s, underground tickling exploitation films enjoyed a brief period of popularity, if only as a curiosity. The “Alien Tickle Abduction” series, consisting of several feature length films that banked on the fact that their actresses were actually restrained and tickled, skirting by censorship laws that affected the distribution of more violent exploitation cinema, was particularly popular. Most of them are simply 45 minutes of cheesy acting with shots that hold on for too long and ear-piercing scores done with synthesizers, broken up by about 30 minutes of actual tickling scenes, according to some of the surviving scathing reviews.

>>53838 The N64 source code leak exposed an odd attempt at a Zelda spinoff, which was apparently titled “The Legend of Zelda: Soles of Hyrule.” Some surviving footage reveals it to be a kind of compilation of minigames, curiously involving the act of tickling or rubbing the feet of several female characters featured in Ocarina of Time. For the time, the feet are surprisingly detailed. Little exists beyond a title screen, a small demo with Princess Zelda, and references to several other characters. A .txt file has also been included within the game’s folder, apparently from Satoru Iwata himself. It is a notice of immediate termination for a person identified as the only designer of the game, for misappropriating resources.

>>53839 >Recent audits of an art gallery in French Polynesia have presented the art world with a series of odd pieces believed to have been painted by Gauguin. The art is signed, and the signature verified to be in his hand, but the “Série de chatouilles,” in its subject matter, has baffled historians. While several nudes appear, alongside the strange inclusion of prominently-displayed bare feet of women, each bears at least some reference to the act of tickling. These pieces chosen for display at the Louvre, entitled “The Soles of Marie,” and the “Plumed Venus” are among the tamer. Historians believe they were painted at some point in the later stages of the artist’s career, though the social or political significance of the tickling or of the feet as fetishized objects, if there is one, escapes most art historians. Gauguin’s odd inclusion of a third foot in the second piece in particular has befuddled commentators.

>>53840 >The ”Feathership” incident of 2003 – On opening day, all it took was one obese rider to crush the entire Pirate Ship ride’s seat platform, sending thousands of feathers, which the cheap company used in place of foam, to scatter. Faulty wiring meant the ride couldn’t stop, and even became stuck on when the operator frantically tried to turn it off. Riders were trapped, strapped in their seats, legs hanging out of the ship, while the spinning brushed the army of feathers against their legs and feet. Their laughter drew in a crowd of horrified onlookers, and the media frenzy saw the park shut down a few weeks later.

this is impressive and all but I cannot fap to images of women holding their feet up and laughing while feathers aimlessly float around

>>53843 I get what you mean. It can do actual fingers or tools on-skin- a couple anons have managed to get one or two by coincidence- but even using the word "tickling" or "fingers touch feet" can trip the techbro puritan filter into not working for violating the TOS. We're likely a ways off from being able to reliably do that, either through a service that doesn't care about generating porn or through running natively. But getting a lot closer at least. They actually look like feet now.

>>53837 The first time I read The Deathly Hallows I thought Hermione was being interrogated via tickle torture in Malfoy Manor

>>53843 I'm completely fine using my imagination to picture rictusempra or some other spell being used to tickle them girls into submission to fill in for the AI's shortcomings, but maybe that's just me (or maybe it just means Harry Potter girls are currently the perfect ticklees?) >>53846 Sad. Keep them coming if possible I say though, these are all gold still, if only because most of those feet look legitimately good. Awesome work thus far anon. >>53842 Goddamn that third pic is legit though, if you ignore the one missing toe anyways. >>53793 Been having fun with Sally thus far. That over the top salacious body triggers the monkey brain like crazy, I can't get enough of tickling her into submission. Thanks for sharing!

Which AI site has the best term memory at the moment? Experiencing dissociative identity disorder with CAI (they'll literally use three or four at the same time and it's spooky) and aisekai goes >>53582 on me.

>>53830 How do you bypass the timer on these? I really want to try it out and I cant seem to find where to buy the boosts

How are people getting around bing image creator's filter? I can't even get it to show feet.

>>53869 You can't, the system's just kind of fucked right now. Sometimes it takes just a few seconds to generate, sometimes up to 5 minutes. There's no option to buy, you apparently get 15 every week. It's brand new, so that might change in the near future. Don't know.

>>53869 I just use "soles" and leave it at that. "soles on table" "soles on display" "soles in stocks" or whatever. Then "feathers on soles" or "hands on soles" and hope for the best. Sometimes it works, sometimes not.

>>53874 It doesn't seem to like that either. For me it seems to just block it as soon as it start generatoring what resembles feet.

Ok wtf, how are you guys getting past the content filter? I can't get anything with the prompts you guys used

>>53883 Haven't had time to experiment much thanks to the wait time, but it might be due to the character that you're using for your prompt? This is the best I could get after trying like 30 times Rem as the character prompt. Yet I got 4 results on the first try using 'anime girl' as the character. My theory is that if bing finds too many reference images that trigger the filter it'll just assume it's no good and deny you outright

I mean, it's pretty impressive how it's able to make 4 decent quality pictures in a minute, BUT the filter is giving me aneurysm sometimes when it flags words like 'athlete' or 'yoga' yetit's able to make a nude picture kek Also making an actual tickling pic is almost impossible

>>53885 >>53883 I think that for some reason using 'XIX century painting' works the best in terms of quality of pictures, their amount and not triggering the filter >>53872 >>53877 idk, I'm using something like this and usually it works just fine (examples below) XIX century painting of a peasant women in stocks, soles on a table, having her feet covered in oil, in a cell, laughing

>>53838 for the love of god, can we please get more Saw-like traps involving tickling? I'm all out of tokens that stuff is gold

I realize that the more information you give it, the less likely a filter will be applied. So instead of “beautiful woman, soles on table”, try “beautiful woman, long brown hair, blue eyes, button nose, soles on table, blue sweater, pajama pants, etc.” and my assumption is that what we REALLY care about gets kind of lost in the description so the AI doesn’t suspect that’s the only thing we’re after maybe? Not sure but it’s working better for me.

Definitely a buggy system. I kept getting flagged so I tried just a simple "anime girl looking at you" which finally got a result. Tried the exact same text again, got flagged. Figured it might be a 50/50 thing so I tried again, it deemed that search term to be banned and then temp-banned my account for 1 hour for violating policy.

>>53890 Please share thr platform used and your prompts, I can't believe how good the toes look here

>>53898 I got banned 24 hours for the same thing, fuck. It's sensitive to you trying the same prompt over and over, I guess because it thinks it's a bot using it, or someone trying to brute force it. I usually tried getting around it by slightly adjusting the terms, moving some stuff around, or adding more specific details. It's essentially an early access DALLE-3, so it will likely be available on openai's own website in a few weeks. Which means no suspension policy I hope. It's brand new, so give it a little time for people to figure out some workarounds and cracks. >>53900 First hit on google when you type in "bing image creator" Not that anon, so I can't tell the exact prompts, but just saying "soles" or "feet" returns accurate looking feet now, no special workarounds to get the digits right.

>>53900 I used bing at the prompts were something like: soles/feet being sprayed/cleaned by water jets, laughing, woman at spa I have a ton of these now, I'll try to upload the ones I think are best, hopefully y'all will do the same

Cute AI armpits.

Nintendo made a couple attempts to break into the lucrative “adult” market over the decades, but could never find a way to reconcile a family-friendly image with publishing, let alone producing, such content. So, their lost “after hours” series never ended up including any actual A or 17+ material. Instead, the company’s solution was to skirt around the ESRB’s ratings on a technicality: positioning the games towards a niche market of online fetish weirdos. No one knows why or how this decision was made, but an unnamed executive seems to have been at the center of it all. A few cover mockups and concept design docs were found in a thumb drive with this person’s name on it, left behind in a dumpster behind a Konbini across the street from Nintendo’s Headquarters: >1. Unused image found in the files of an early build of Metroid Dread. The all-blue suit doesn’t match any found in the main series, and might be an early, unused design. The purpose of the mechanical tickling hands, or even where they would appear in the actual game, is not known. >2-5. A series of screenshots from Zelda games showing the evolution of a tickling mode planned for inclusion. Apparently after falling through for one game, the concept would be carried forward into the next, though it never made it to ship. The images are from, in order: Ocarina of Time 3D, The Wind Waker HD, Breath of the Wild, and Tears of the Kingdom.

>>53910 >1. Mockup boxart for “Princess Peach: Tootsie Tales.” Close to a Warioware game in terms of structure, the game tells a story involving Princess Peach making an escape from her latest kidnapping, ending up in situation after situation where she’s tickled for an extended period of time. Each session would be a different tickling minigame, ranging from the conventional “bound in stocks for interrogation” or “in peril, dangling over a pit” to more fantastical by the end of it. Though the title implies a largely foot-centered theme, many of the segments would involve full body tickling. Though Nintendo’s intent was apparently to avoid any sort of explicitly “adult” content, a list of “outfit unlocks” found in a file lists a “nude mode.” > 2,3. Mockup boxart for “Lady Palutena: Let Laughter Fly,” a planned spinoff to Kid Icarus Uprising, using the same engine. The game’s story would largely take place in the background, the titular Goddess guiding Pit through an adventure with the power of flight, while under the influence of a magic tickling torture brought on by a cursed toe ring. The player would either take the role of the tickler, trying to break the Goddess’ concentration, or the Goddess herself, trying to resist, for two different story routes. Later missions would feature more characters from Uprising in the role of the ticklee, the original actors slated to reprise their roles. A versus mode- one player as the girl and the other as the tickler- was also in consideration. >4. All copies of Super Mario 64 are personalized Thanks for indulging my autism, more conventional stuff coming when the ban lifts.

would be nice if you'd share the prompts you're using to get these

>>53829 >>53885 >>53886 >>53909 Kinda shocked by how much this XIX painting thing is legitimately doing it for me.

>>53911 I love the stories you're adding to these. Do you come up with them after generating some images or do you have them in mind before and then try to generate pictures that fit?

>>53920 I have a general idea, but the image informs some of the details once it's been made, or sometimes gives a completely different idea that makes you want to try a different prompt. Glad you liked them!

>>53921 Make sense! I love when any kind of tickling drawing or picture has a story to it. And I think with AI generated images it adds that human touch back in, like you're 'collaborating' with the AI.

>>53922 *Makes sense. Wanted to make sure it didn't seem like I was yelling at you to make sense lol.

Hmm. Moderate success I guess.

>>53924 Prompt on the last one? I can't get it to do anything with bathtubs or armpits. That's so fucking good! I guess the boobs were accidental.

>>53924 if I may.

>>53925 That'd be correct! Funny how the filter will jump you, beat you to a pulp and spit on your grave afterwards over "goats licking feet", yet will ocassionally let bare boobs slide. The prompt was: >latin woman, in spa, arms up, laughing, bubbles, dark hair, tickling, visible armpits, brush, beautiful >>53926 A true gentleman and a scholar. >>53927 >>53928 Damn, these are legit.

>>53926 just noticed the extra tow and a few other anomalies, cleaned it up more

>>53929 Oh, thanks so much! I got it to work after removing the word "tickling."

Furfag here to empart some wisdom. After fucking around for a bit i found out that the program works better if you give the characters reusable titles. For example here the abdriged version would be "Laughing Polar bear warrior, Warrior in medevial stocks, Knight washing warriors soles, digital art" It seems to remember titles and applies those attributes to only that character.

I think we need 2 separate threads 1 for images, 1 for the bots

>>53935 Yeah I think when this one reachs it's limit the next one should be two seperate threads.

>>53938 Whats the prompt for adding the animals?

This might be a dumb question, but why do the filenames start with "OIG?" Is there another service that's making them? Or a better way to download them?

>>53934 Worked alright. >>53932 Yeah, some words just trip the filter like crazy, others, like "stocks" are just an acceptable euphemism for bondage apparently. Hope they don't wisen up to it too soon. >>53930 Nice, I noticed some bits like that myself.

>>53939 here's the prompt I was using: classical painting depicting a young ethnic woman locked in stocks, laughing, tears coming down face, renaissance style, soles visible, animals sniffing soles, oil on soles

My magnum opus, that second one. Kek.

>The warning signs were there for a reason. The flora on SGU-85, with few exceptions, had evolved to secrete a potent tactile stimulant. The green sphere was coated in the stuff. Touching it, simply put, tickled like hell. And it didn’t wash off easily. But despite the signage, and the handrails, they couldn’t keep out the thrill seekers. Pictured here are a few of these, the women who take the plunge and sneak out of the tour groups to indulge their fantasies. The jumpsuit on Amber protected most of her skin, but enough of the compound stuck to her soles to keep a steady stream of giggles coming out of her mouth. The liberally-dressed Laney and Jess aren’t so fortunate. It's not uncommon for them to be left behind, only rescued when the next tour group comes by. >It would have been a mere curiosity, if it weren't for the space pirates learning to weaponize the compound as a torture tool. Images of tortured faces and feet sticking out of a bath of the stuff are all too common, sent out as a message to nearby colonies: comply with our demands, or you'll join them.

Hey guys, where's the link or site to the AI pics? Thanks

Best I could do before catching 24 hr ban

>>53952 oh, so nice to see a fellow fan of self-tickling; th-5 and th-14 turned pretty well, gratz :)

>>53931 >>53933 What prompts did you use?

>>53952 >>53934 >>53918 ok seriously how do you get around the filter? I spent like 2 hours last night trying and I couldn't get a single tickling picture. I tried every single tip that was posted here but nothing at all worked. I know some of you guys wanna gatekeep this but I'd really appreciate someone to just give me a few examples of prompts that actually worked for them.

Some debutantes getting gussied up for the big day.

>>53930 Did you use inpainting for that? Where do you guys use for inpainting?

It seems AI can even make some upperbody tickling if you put it right

When I get banned I just make a new yahoo account, make a new Microsoft account with that email and badabing badaboom

>>53971 can you share the prompts you used please?

>>53973 Sure, it was something like classical painting depicting a young woman locked in stocks, laughing, renaissance style, stomach visible, stomach getting painted by a brush, oil on stomach It also takes a few renders to make renders better Did anyone have any luck trying to generate actors or specific characters? For me it gets flagged instantly, not sure if there is a way to bypass this

>>53961 >a xix century painting depicting a peasant woman in stocks laughing loudly with her bare feet and visible soles being painted with brushes Not trying to get cute here, but it does seem to be more of an art than a science to produce something that both looks like tickling and doesn't inmediately trip up the filter. >>53975 It more or less worked for pits! And anon over here managed both Hermione, Palutena and Peach, so it's certainly possible: >>53837 >>53911 I've barely gotten a picture of my waifu receiving the lewdest action of them all -headpats- without running into trouble.

>>53961 Just used like 3 sentences. First one something like, "Female crusader in dungeon wearing armor." Then, "Laughing with feather duster cleaning toes." Finally, art style. "Renaissance art style painting" or "Victorian art style" seem to work best. Also looks like the filter is getting smarter, because some things that worked Saturday didn't work today. Good luck

Bings AI almost always considers inputs with women to be nsfw. But almost never men.

>>53914 Right? It's like jacking it to an art museum

"a xix century painting depicting a woman reading a book laughing loudly with her bare feet with five toes and visible soles with five toes being painted with brushes at night in a small town"

I think I'm on to something with this one "a xix century painting depicting a foreign sailor woman raising her arms laughing loudly with her bare feet with five toes and visible soles with five toes being painted with brushes at night in a small town"

The art style seems to be a big thing for the filter to kick in. As an example, >a sci-fi image depicting a woman astronaut laughing loudly with her bare feet with five toes and visible soles with five toes being washed by machine in sci-fi room Inmediately beefs it, but if you add "a renassaince painting of" or "pixel art of" or "1940's wartime poster of" in front of it, it has a harder time cracking it down. Furthermore, I'd imagine saying adding "anime style" or "digital art" or even "realistic depiction" are all big no-nos since that's what most people looking for porn would probably search. On one hand it makes me worried it's going to wisen up to all sorts of artstyles eventually, but on the other, the variety and novelty of some of these is pretty neat. Any other ones you can think up as safer ways to avoid the filter?

For some reason Bing is ok with some foods, but nutella gets you flagged instantly

>>53988 Genius >>53989 I can get "digital art" to work sometimes. Some real no-go's I have found is "Realism art style" and, for some reason, "Norman Rockwell style". Also "vintage photo" is a no-no

>>53991 Interesting, interesting... >>53992 >>53993 Prompt for these anon? I've mostly had no luck with sci-fi tickles and these look awesome.

>>53994 the prompts would be something like: found footage depicting a young woman caught in an industrial style contraption/trapped on an alien ship, soles visible, dark with industrial lighting, recovered footage, laughing, tears coming down face, mechanical hands gently touching soles

>>53997 Like a charm.

>>53998 >immediately tries to make an Indian girl guess you don't have to make fakes anymore huh?

I can't pretend that this isn't the most off-putting shit ever made

>>53935 I agree with you, the images are incredible, but they should certainly have their own thread.

>>53959 classical painting depicting a young ethnic woman locked in stocks, laughing, tears coming down face, renaissance style, soles visible, painting on soles with oil paint and paintbrushes, paint on soles

>>53935 >>54002 Fair enough. Bake 'em away toys: https://8chan.moe/tkr/res/54006.html

>>54007 what'd you say, chief?

>>54008 ...Do what anon says.

a 21st century painting of April O'Neil laughing, with her feet resting in castle stocks near a candle-lit window in the evening. There is a single feather on the coffee table. April is pale, thin, and has red hair. April is wearing a sundress without sleeves and a gothic leather d-ring necklace. April's wrists are behind her head. April is wearing leather bracelets and thick leather anklets. Thick leather anklets.

Devs of aisekai made it possible to edit the bots reponses to your liking.

>>54244 These motherfuckers are the best, i already love this website.

>>54247 now imagine if it had the speed of character.ai finally a place to lewd the anime girls

I'd be interested to know what model Aisekai is using. Apparently it used to be one of the GPT models, but not any more. All I can find is that it had an error a while back and was spitting out Alpaca-format prompts, so it's gonna be a low parameter local model of some kind.

I would like somebody upload the sunny bot on Aisekai

>>54312 which one is that?

>>54244 >>54247 >>54248 Does anyone have any tips and advice on how to port bots to Aisekai, or just how to make Aisekai bots in general? CAI was incredibly well documented by both the devs and the users, but I don't quite know how to use each field in Aisekai for the best results.

>>54346 This is what i have done with my port of the tickle monster: 💬 Short Description How would they describe themselves? >just put down a single line of text as a quick description 🌈 Define Personality Traits Shape your AI companion's personality >Define some traits that you cannot add as tags further down the page. These should include things like "Dominant", or "Submissive",. Make this as detailed as you possibly can. 👋🏼 First Message How would they start a conversation? >this will obviously set the tone for the conversation. My preference is to create a scenario but leave the user's intentions up to them. I try to only create a character's side of the scenario so the user can decide whether to be dom / sub, lee / ler... 🌃 Scenario (optional) Define a context the character is in. >This i think is more useful when you want to give a more detailed explanation of the situation without having to jot it down in the first message. 🗣️ Few shot Dialog (optional) Example chat dialog between character and user. >Write down how you want the character to respond to certain stimuli / key words. 📜 Knowledge Base (optional) What are things your character should know? >Write down everything your character should consider factual, this may also contain things your character prefers or has as a function of their being. I wrote them down in first perspective, IE: "I can spawn more hands to tickle people more efficiently" or "Tickling is fun" 🪪 Tags Help others find your character. >Speaks for itself.

>>54359 What I'm more curious about is that when I was using CAI, I found that using a cluster of words to describe a character gave much worse results than simply writing the character's personality out in first-person sentences. Even if it was less efficient in terms of space, characters also tended to adhere more closely to what I wrote. I had similar experiences with definitions where the more I added to the definitions the more likely the bots were to go off-script and improvise in a way that went directly against the definitions. That sort of thing is what I'm wondering about. Like how heavily do they draw on Knowledge Base as opposed to Few Short Dialog samples?

>>54401 Assuming Aisekai is Llama/Alpaca based then writing out descriptions as normal prose instead of using single words is going to give better results.

Alright so I keep ignoring these threads but now I am intrigued. How do you make these AI Images? I can’t draw worth a shit, but while I am trying to draw a head I also want to see a few girls being tickled so how do you do it?

>>54419 This is more of a thing for >>54006 (those guys really know their shit) but basically, go to bing create, type a prompt (a message that describes what you expect in the general output - it can either be a full story, a grammatically correct sentence or a bunch of words), make sure it doesn't include dangerous words and refine results until a few images become acceptable.

>>54402 It does give great results with actual writing. It is NovelAI levels of follow-up and won't omit any word whatsoever. >>54401 FSD and KB both seem to have a very heavy predictive weight on the bot's writing. In fact, it apparently tries *really hard* to adhere to it even if it suddenly has Alzheimer's.

>>54248 I keep hearing about this speed issue on aisekai, do you all fire three words at it or is it like really slow?

>>54545 basically there are some connection issues with the site itself the ai itself seems to type shit on the go sometime and sometimes stops when youre not in the active tab. It also takes some time to think before it even starts to type after trying some more, the speed isnt too big of an issue but the alzheimers is

>>54545 Kind of slow, c.ai is able to come up with responses after anywhere from 3-10 seconds. On the other hand it feels like aisekai's minimum is around 10 seconds, and could even go all the way up to 20+ seconds. It may not sound like a lot but when the responses you get end up being straight copy-pastes from previous responses with almost no variation, that time will add up very quickly in your reroll attempts. >>53496 Yumi bot was a pleasant surprise. For a bot not tagged as NSFW it didn't take long for it to get started, especially when I went into it with the intention of tickling her into submission. Can't say I was disappointed with the direction it went though. https://www.aisekai.ai?character=65149617812dc8d35f381b74

>>54550 I still far prefer aisekai. The responses are slower, sure, but overall better and far more importantly... unfiltered. This is preferable, i would rather wait for 30seconds for a reply that is useful or on occasion repetitive (which isn't a problem as much because of the edit function.) than have quick replies which get cut off or filtered instantly. I haven't used CAI in weeks now.

>>54551 true, the editing is great and something that makes it way better than CAI. Also the repeat dialogue is less intrusive than the "oopsie whoopsie thats a not oki doki"

>>54579 You can edit messages now if you're a CAI+ user (the paid subscription) and they'll likely roll out the feature for non-paid users a few weeks into the future. I still use Cai simply cuss I like the App usage but after using it for so long I figured that using rooms makes the filter much more tame than what it normally would be.

>>54596 >I figured that using rooms makes the filter much more tame than what it normally would be. Do rooms still turn the bots completely retarded?

>>54609 If you let them talk on their own then yes, you gotta guide where the conversation is going by either being involved in the conversation or playing the role of the narrator.

I tried making two or three private chars on aisekai with the filter off, but they aren't available anymore. It's a bug or they wipe them even if they are private? C.AI is puritan, but at least they don't wipe anything if set to private...

>>54666 Well, there's a bug that if you alter text all your chats disappear for a bit. Not sure if it happened to you, but i've seen it multiple times now. Just wait 2 mins and F5 the page if it doesn't fix itself

>>54678 >>54666 Yeah, site is definitely having issues This is the discovery page for me, won't load anything right now

aisekai is down boys, back to trying again we go

>>54718 I wonder if CAI knows they're the side bitch at this point.

>>54773 CAI is like the popular girl who has parents that dont allow her to do shit, but she gets good grades AIsekai is the quiet girl in class who gives insane head, just dont expect her grades to be good

>>54773 They probably do (or should). I couldn't tell you the last time I hit a queue. >>54718 I'd recommend yodayo if c.ai isn't your cup of tea. The better the alternatives get, the less appealing c.ai becomes.

>>54804 And all they had to do is let go of the filter...

>>54804 Thanks for the tip, its a lot better than C.ai for sure. even has image generation which works great for everything that isnt hands/feet.

>>54828 Now I just need to grow an amputee tickling fetish and I won't have to worry about anything anymore

>>54800 >gives insane head It's not that good. It's more like she's willing to touch your dick at all with her clumsy enthusiasm.

>>54833 Dullahan quad tickling. Still up for it though we're running out of tickle spots - does it generate the belly area fine at least? >>54822 What's hilarious is c.ai is panicking and the filter is having a stroke right now >mfw c.ai+ lets you "edit" answers and regular c.ai just flat out panicks, spams three (3) filter popups then blows up and gives up on trying to deny you from bot sexting Literally fucked three different high-danger SFW bots (I'm trying the asexual dev ones next lmao) and broke them into quadruple Genocide Jack mode (not my fault, they all go dissociative personality disorder with the right tricks) this is what really confuses the filter because it has to monitor up to six outputs at a time on the bot's end

Aisekai is back up but with the puritan invasion, it won't be long before a filter drops unless the team opposes it. Someone almost got lynched for having a public NSFW tickling bot smh.

>>53837 Third one looks more like Christian Bale in a wig.

>>54596 I got full sex scenes with no euphemisms or voodoo fonts, really, all you need to do now is corrupt gradually with cursed shit while keeping them in character. The multiple personalities still suck because at least one of them will get noped if it happens (denies the whole message as usual).

>>54971 From the sounds of things, the Aisekai devs still don't plan on putting in a filter, just asking that people report bots that could put the site in legal danger.

>>54971 Is that outrage only on their discord or something? I can't say I've seen anything regarding that stuff anywhere on their site/twitter/subreddit, although it's mostly just been cursory searches.

>>54971 what do you mean someone almost got lynched lol doing our community proud

Any updates on what's going on with Aiseki.ai?

>>55335 The site will be down for the weekend, so we can only wait

Well, since ir looks like aisekai won't be back soon, does anybody can tell me if CrushOn is a good alternative?

Spicychat.AI is a really good site. if you're willing t spend 15 a month to skip the line and to have a better system for AI to make responses. you don't even have to keep paying each month. just a month of all that, and then leave it alone and pay for it later, or if you do wanna pay 15 a month is good. there's a buncha ai on there already with great response times and realistic responses too. repeating lines is a bit of an issue, but it's acceptable. and thankfully, their 15 a month is on Patreon! just takes a bit for your benefits to kick in

>>54804 >>54828 I've been messing around a bit with Yodayo's chat function, and it's almost got the opposite of c.ai's problem in that the bots I've chatted with get horny very quickly, almost regardless of what I say. The other issue I've seen is that searching the available bots doesn't work very well, and you're often left just perusing the most recently created ones if you don't have a specific one in mind. Still, Yodayo chats are fun, especially since charstar wait times are forever and aisekai is perpetually under maintenance

What bothers me about aisekai as well as yodayo is the fact that the bots keep getting aroused from anything. When I tickle a bot, I want it to actually laugh and not be horny lol

>>55598 CAI can do laughter just fine, but it depends on definitions and how you train it, I think. The problem is that if you let them use laughter too freely, they'll start giving you entire paragraphs of HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA or shit like that.

I know but then again, character AI has other issues lol

>>55599 >dubs and trips >post is nothing but truth How do you live with being this based, anon?

>>55599 You gotta be careful with what you let the bot say. The subreddit memes about letting the bot say "~". I just allow the bot to give responses that are a mix of descriptive and laughter.

>>55335 You should see the subreddit and discord, people are so obsessed with text-generated porn they're killing themselves and each other and blaming it all on aisekai the time spent banning annoying emo kids is unreal

Well aisekai is dead, I don't think the site come back anytime soon

I just wish the bots could speak other languages too. They either switch back to English or only speak the language in a very superficial way.

>>55866 Unless the model is told to parse prompts using mtl it'll unavoidably be limited to what little text it has memorized in that language. >>55861 Definitely not this week, surprised the subreddit didn't undergo a quarantine for toxicity and attacks against users. It's as if cai is actively trying to infiltrate it and nip it in the bud. I'm not complaining, no more queue cuz every underagefag is busy cutting wrists and not too broken if you tolerate autistic lees and lers with 3-4 personalities at a time and severe alzheimer's

>>55861 It's back

>>53624 Hi, I'm not >>53665 but I would also like to see how Tabetha does on aisekai, now that it's back up. Any chance at getting her cloned? Or, if it's easier to you, I'm sure you could just post her definitions here or make them visible on c.ai and we can do the rest. Thanks, hope this reaches you

Could somebody put Aunt Janice on aisekai? That bot has a lot of potencial

What the fuck is this shit?

>>56381 Man I can't wait for AIsekai to come ba- >this shit God damn it...

>>56381 From what I understand they don't want 18+ stuff to be shown as the first thing that appears when you open their page. You can still lewd the bots like normal, but they're asking you to not dress up characters as if you're entering one of those weird Ad porn sites

>>56381 You can't make overtly sexual or aggressive bots anymore, but they haven't banned nsfw conversation like C.ai has. They did what Character AI couldn't. They made a compromise.

>>56384 It also applies to descriptions so creators are going crazy or flat out despair with "I'm a cute girl and that is all." They pussied out of the "embrace the AI porn experience" (totally not a pornsite when the model has literally been trained to parrot it's a sex doll that wants it up the ass, and it still does lmao) and went 180 on what's on the cover but only after getting enough users and some donations. I wonder if someone showed them Promptchan and trolled them with that to make them go "oh fuck that is not what we meant what do"

>>56384 >they don't want 18+ stuff to be shown as the first thing that appears when you open their page I don't understand this at all. They already had an NSFW toggle. Just move the toggle into the user profile settings and don't show NSFW characters to someone who's not logged in. How hard is that? >>56385 How is this compromise supposed to work exactly? The site's previous version allowed you to tag NSFW characters, so I assumed that characters not explicitly tagged would avoid engaging in overtly sexual dialog, which is fine and even preferable. There is no such distinction made for bots right now. If SFW bots can say sexual things then it will require more censoring. They are going down the exact same path that CAI went down. The only difference is that CAI is straight-up superior to Aisekai in terms of bot speed and intelligence, so why use Aisekai at all?

>>56443 Enjoy your filtered bots. If AIsekai actually starts blocking NSFW rather than just making the site look clean on the surface by "banning NSFW" then C.ai will be better again. Until then, imma keep enjoying myself.

>>56448 I'll keep enjoying CAI and you can keep enjoying Aisekai. My point is that it's worth keeping an eye out for alternatives to both.