>text games AIDungeon 2 is pretty great for this. >post toddlercon reading books This is probably the closest thing I have to that.

The only reason I care for toddlercon is the tummy. I have to imagine toddercon literature would more focus on scale and sexual incompatibility than anything else. But I guess the sfw parts would be more about themes like clothing and slice of life for a toddler. But can you elaborate on the CoC mod? I didn't even know CoC had mods. I don't even remember who Isabella is.

>>401 >The only reason I care for toddlercon WHAT THE FUCK DID YOU JUST SAY ABOUT... >the tummy Oh okay, good taste. They do have cute tummies.

>>402 Dude, lol. I'm a newfag here, so since this place seems kinda slow, I may as well say I'm the dude who made the other latest thread as of now, about the geometry of toddler tummies. I really do imagine a round tummy as being a halo that exerts gravity outward. I think the sustainability of the geometry makes me interpret it as happiness. In a similar way, the "oval" shape of puffy vulva, I see that as the negative space of a halo exerting its gravity inwards. So that's sustainable, too. And I interpret that as happiness, too. I feel like no one says this out loud in this way, but the geometry exists in art regardless, so... makes sense to me.

>>403 I've never seen it described in such a fashion before, but whatever makes you happy anon.

>>404 I mean, of course. But on some Freudian shit, I'm completely uneducated on the topic, but from what I understand he had an incest fetish, and dedicated his life to retroactively explaining why. So I tried to do the same. Except citing geometry for why something makes me happy is bottom of the iceberg shit that seems 3deep5u. But what else is there. It's literally just round tummy and toddler pussy to make sense of. Not to drag you into an irrelevant conversation that doesn't go anywhere cause, again... Idk what reason I can come up with for liking it besides geometry.

>>401 >But can you elaborate on the CoC mod? It's called /hgg/ edition. Adds loli demons (punished succubi that aren't able to have endowed bodies, thus unsexy by that world;s standards), playing as a child, fucking a bunch of your offspring, especially the shark lolis you make with Izma, and of course the human babies you can make with your human (technically) companion Isabella. >I don't remember Isabella A human from not-Germany who crossed into Mareth some time in the past and slowly TF'd to being a cow girl, but like the player she is still a human at her core,so she breeds whatever race she mates with. You being a human too, that makes her a source of toddlercon. Pain to get though because her pregnancy lasts ages. You need to recruit her, wait 10 days, then tell her you want to make a baby and she shouldn't use contraceptives. She feels comfortable enough after settling into your camp to accept this. That's where the base game pretty much ends, you make a baby and it becomes a stat. The mod adds some sex stuff. There was more in the submission list too, I think. They update relatively often. Other CoC mods are like Xianxia (updates dead), Revamp(updates used to be yearly, now dead), while hgg is more like monthly, but sometimes more or less. I think Paraphore has toddlercon, but they're also rancid furry shit

>>405 Hey if you like it, you like it. I love round tummies and toddler pussy myself. They're quite pleasing shapes. I like a lot of things about tots. Pic related, tot tummy and pussy I like immensely.

>>406 Dude, I actually recognize none of this. I only played vanilla CoC so long ago, it was basically a decade ago by now. Had no idea it's still getting content in the form of mods. What was the writing for the baby fuck mod like? I've never read toddlercon literature, so I dunno what makes it good/ bad. >>407 I mean this doesn't have shit to do with reading, which was all the OP asked, but cheers, lmao. Always great.

>>408 >What was the writing for the baby fuck mod like? A lot of the writing in the mod is a little better than vanilla CoC, but the baby-fucking part specifically was written by someone that just takes requests of anything and didn't really care for babies. I think it works, but I'm also lacking much to compare to. The toggles in the options menu defaults to loli on but babies off, also gore is disabled by default. The most blessed thing is that furry is disabled (furry characters become humanish with ears, tail, and some other small details) and also semi-animal furries like hellhounds got turned fully animal. I like the mod. Gets my recommendation, for what it's worth. Not many people ask for more toddler content though, so not much gets written. A random person from here could just write toddler stuff and send it and it'll go in after some back-and-forth proofreading (they send back notes on mistakes, errors, so on, you send back a corrected/revised version)

>>409 You like ferals but not furries? You even like nekomimi but not furry. Again, I only care about geometry, so I think a feral dog is cool, but a human, I don't care for. To me there is no difference between a furry and a human or a nokomimi. But you seem to have context for the scope of toddler content, and you've read at lead the baby-fucking part of this "Isabella" character. Can you provide context to what the writing was like? I have no frame of reference at all, even if you also have little.

I don't understand 90% of what's being talked about in this thread, lmao. I'll try and pitch in though. I quite like the top stories on asstr.org (just punch it "toddler" to search). Example story I like, "Molesting Little Sandy" https://www.asstr.org/files/Collections/Alt.Sex.Stories.Moderated/Year2006/54390

>>411 I'm consistently being a faggot by likening myself to Sigmund Freud. It's irrelevant. Can you provide context to what makes a toddlercon story good, though. I still have no context to what they offer.

>>412 Just good writing I suppose? Something that's vivid, can evoke sensations tactile, smell, taste. Major turn-ons involve being reminded of shampoo scented hair, handling soft and pudgy to bodies, etc... of course if you only care for drawn porn that's fine, not here to judge.

>>413 I've never really read anything before ever, but I expected you to kinda provide context to how the literature does it, across time. Cause the medium is strictly linear. Like if there's a sex scene, what does the author write about, exactly. I imagine for a toddlercon fic, it'd have to be disproportionately conscious about the relative scale of adult human penis fucking a baby. I imagine there's be words about the baby crying, and writhing around, and shit. The dude doing it might have a thought cross his mind about the long-term consequences of it, and the immediate consequences of it on her body. etc. To me you've just mentioned subject matter so far, with not much context to possible writing.

>>414 I'm not sure you're using the word "context" correctly here. There's no context to be had, it's just a genre; by definition it's characterised by subject-matter. All I can suggest is just read a story, I can't really say what the typical chronological structure is (as you seem to be asking about), it's different every time.

>>415 I feel like there is a huge amount of middle ground simply stating subject matter, and actually writing a good fic about said subject matter. I did want you to give me a chronological breakdown of something, anything, that makes a fic good. Even just the writing style, you can say that a particular one is great, because the author's writing puts emphasis on touch. So it's more visceral, as opposed to a more conceptual "omg it's a toddler" dialogue. To go back to your first reply, you said "Just good writing I suppose?" "Something that's [word], can evoke sensations[word x 3]". This is like, not enough to distinguish what makes a fic "crème de la crème". Can you not just gush over a specific fic you like, like what about the fic you linked.

I'm not the above anon. I prefer to read stories that dwell on how cute, small and soft tots are. If there's sex more focused on the tot being pleasured is best. There's lots of the alternative but sweet tot love is best, wish I could find more tbh too much of it is rape or violent.

>>417 I mean yeah, I think the girl being happy is better than her being sad. I only mentioned violence cause it seems the most real. You say "if there's sex". You read toddler fics without sex? What are those like? As in, what events happen across the fic, and in which environment(s), etc.

>>418 >You read toddler fics without sex? No not really, just phrased that wrong while trying to generalize what I think is a good tot fic or would be one in the hypothetical. I like softer fics is all I meant, touching/oral/outercourse and things that play up the contrasting sizes, ages, mindsets of the (usually) adult men vs. their toddler girl lovers.

>>419 Nah, in hindsight I can see I could've interpreted your wording that way. The actual act of sex isn't always happening 100% of the time, so it was worth distinguishing from other stuff. I see. I still feel like I haven't really gotten what I wanted, from asking, though. Like the original thread question was "What is good toddlercon writing like?" And though it's not my thread, I feel there's potentially a lot of depth when it comes to defining writing in a meaningful way. Especially since it's inherently toddlercon. I dunno, man. I kinda just wanted a "creepy comment" sorta thing, where someone goes like "this fic is great because first the girl is kinda chubby, so you can see the outline of her tummy against her tight clothing. Then the dude ogles her, pretty blatantly, and the girl notices, and subtlety plays into it. Since the dude was supposed to help with her homework, by the end of it it's basically mutual heavy panting as she sits on his lap, his dick at full mast tenting it, lifting her, and not a single word has been spoke about the context yet." I feel this comment is too much. Normally I'd just delete it and not hit submit. I also missed my own point about fetishizing the tummy, cause I'm a dumbass. But the point was, I wish the conversation would preserve the information that makes the fic worthwhile... beyond just simple tags for subject matter.

>>409 > Not many people ask for more toddler content though, so not much gets written The biggest issue has always been the lack of writers. There were more requests in the past, but most of the time they defaulted to "be the change you want to see" with no one stepping up (apart from that one time). One nice idea that didn't take off was coming across Tamani's giving birth scene in the woods and having some fun with her goblin daughters as they went through their rapid aging to adulthood. Sophie's and Hel's daughters would also offer some good opportunities for content, since they age relatively slowly and live in your camp with you. >>406 I remember trying Paraphore before, but I think nearly every scene with the toddlercon tag was also tagged with guro, snuff, and/or cannibalism. The goal of that game's writing was to combine as many terrible fetishes as possible for shock value.

>>401 >The only reason I care for toddlercon is the tummy. Exquisite taste. That is half the reason I even started to get into loli and tot in the first place.

>>421 There's too much of that vile pizzagate tier shit when you just want to fap to happy babbies.

>>417 >but sweet tot love is best, wish I could find more tbh too much of it is rape or violent. My man, my brother who suffers as I do There was one story I recall, back on the OG infinity chan before it went bust. A babysitter was called to care for a 2-year-old with borderline neglectful/abusive parents (nothing super harsh, just putting off diaper changes for as long as possible, not really caring for her, etc) and a small romance blooms between him and the little girl- unfortunately it wasn't a series, just a one-off story, but it's about the only written toddlercon that was actually sweet and gentle instead of sadistic babyrape. A lot of people seem to mix in other extreme fetishes with toddlercon because it too, admittedly, is an extreme fetish, which is really fucking annoying. Can I just get some sweet, vanilla toddlercon with a decent-looking male?

>>430 Not him, but I want to butt-into this conversation too. >Can I just get some sweet, vanilla toddlercon quite alright >with a decent-looking male? This is where you lost me. I'm the same basically namefag at this point from above, jerking myself off about geometry. In my opinion, the best male for a toddler is a fat guy with a big fat dick (oval-shaped). Thicker in the centre than either ends (the tip, or the base). Cause I find this to be the negative space of a halo exerting gravity inward (a toddler's tummy). So I mean, you can of course prefer when the guy isn't fat and bald and ugly. But I find this to be distance away from the ceiling. Not that anyone asked. At a certain point I should just read the room and shut up.

>>399 ever heard of Paraphore?

>>433 Yes. Here >>406 >I think Paraphore has toddlercon, but they're also rancid furry shit

>>435 I can't help but notice that you responded to that guy, but not me who merely inquired as to the scope of your hate for furry. Feels bad man. You don't have to do me like that on a board with seemingly 5 active posters.

>>436 For making me laugh, I'll try to explain >>410 First, I didn't reply because >Can you provide context to what the writing was like? I couldn't understand what you were asking for at all, nor did I think I really had the answer you were looking for anyway. That other guy you asked context from also got confused. Anyway, I just ignored it since I didn't get it. >You like ferals but not furries? This isn't really inquiring about scope, this is just a confirmation question that would warrant a yes/no. I already made it apparent my tastes on the matter, so that would be pretty pointless. But alright, as to the matter of scope, above all is the distaste toward the people behind them. Besides that, animal faces aren't pretty - often ugly. Human skin is nice, I like it. Aside from certain things like hair on a manly man's chest, I like smooth skin. Feral is when you go so far away from human that it's no longer a factor what human traits are missing. A dog doesn't have a human mind, doesn't have human body configuration, so on. They aren't comparable, they appeal to different parts of me entirely. Bestiality is a depraved act of raw lust distinct from horny sapient romping. It's like getting used but without the mental processing a person would have. But at its core, the style and quality of writing by a furry is so bad that even if there are no furries in the story, you can tell the author is a furry. Either that or they're mid-functioning autistic.

>>437 First of all, I really disagree with a lot of the shit you just said, but I don't know if I should really pursue this conversation. I'll try to keep it terse and pertinent to my noticing that you ignored me. >Can you provide context to what the writing was like? >>I couldn't understand what you were asking for at all, nor did I think I really had the answer you were looking for anyway. That other guy you asked context from also got confused. Anyway, I just ignored it since I didn't get it. This entire thread has been huge blueballs for me. I really didn't think I was asking too much by trying to have context besides copy-pasting tags. I guess I'll largely back off from this thread, because I feel I pursued it so hard, but was ultimately, only ever met with nothing. Or at least not enough. >You like ferals but not furries? >>This isn't really inquiring about scope, this is just a confirmation question that would warrant a yes/no. I already made it apparent my tastes on the matter, so that would be pretty pointless. This is where I'm gonna abstain from acknowledging and responding to every point, because, believe me I would, but I don't think it's fair to the board, or the thread topic. I don't mean to be passive-aggressive. But you seem to imply being a "mid-functioning autistic" is observable in one's literature, and is a rational slight. I've seen this criticism before, and I've seen people articulate it in a meaningful way. I grant it as fair, for my own reasons, and for granting subjective opinions to a certain extent, anyway. But conversation is a give and take. I wasn't writing a letter that takes time to send, and time to receive a reply, where I might've formatted it to more literally communicate my expectations. Had you responded at all, I would've continued pursuing that line of conversation, but if nothing else, I offered my own opinion, which of course (given context of me) grounds the subject matter in geometry. You could've- I don't know, man. Again, I don't mean to be passive-aggressive, but to me this was a fundamental failure in acknowledging social cues, and acknowledging the simple expectation of wanting to hold a conversation. I don't understand how I have to explain this to you, while you slight literature for being written by autists.

>>438 You're hilarious, and really live up to what I expect from the geometry guy

>>439 It is truly a horrible reality, where I've long since forfeit expecting people to use their words to justify things, but even simple conversation, it is asking for too much. It always gets to this point, where, I don't expect people to concede anything on morality. But it always turns out like this anyway. I'm not a social retard. I'm just really tired of human expectation. I don't know what I ever wanted from this board, but I guess I'm over it.

>>435 >>436 he wanted examples of /tot/ writing and paraphore is probably the only real life example i can think of where they write about that kind of thing. if you're interested in the writing aspect, just take the paraphore example and remove the furry part, its that easy. in the world that you play they have these machines that can create mindless toddlers with very basic programming (like scared, horny, playful, etc.) and physical features (like a tail, animal ears, wings, tentacles, etc.), which exists for the sole purpose of being fucked to death or used for one of the other multiple fetishes in the game

>>430 I've seen other tot erotica that isn't violent and etc. but it is rarer than I'd like. I don't even necessarily need it to describe penetration much less rape. Some men just want to lick baby cunny and make them squirm happily, it is said.

>>442 >Some men just want to lick baby cunny and make them squirm happily Literally me. I want to do lewd things with a baby, and I want them to enjoy it. I want them to coo, giggle, and sigh as I lick their crotches, boy or girl, and have them ride my willy like it were a toy, bouncing them on my burning hot, diamond-hard erection. Do you have the links to those non-violent stories?

>>456 >Literally me.... BASED One of my favorites is this one https://www.asstr.org/files/Collections/Nepi_Stories/GIRLS/Soft%20Molesting/Slide%20Ride.txt There are others on this host also, lot of unpleasant shit too though, but a few gems. Also has older girls involved but not why I like it, cough. https://www.asstr.org/files/Collections/Nepi_Stories/BOYS%20AND%20GIRLS/Full%20Intercourse/The%20Toddler%20Prostitute.txt This one is a mix of stuff and some parts veer into non-con but I like most of it for how it portrays the little girl (also a boy) https://www.asstr.org/files/Collections/Nepi_Stories/BOYS%20AND%20GIRLS/Full%20Intercourse/The%20Basement%20Baby%20Fuckers%20Club.txt this is really fucking pervy group baby sex, but not non-con or any of that shit which is basically based as fuck imo Loliwood Studios had/has a good number of happy tot stories also, it got rehosted somewhere but I don't have the link to the new one atm.

>>457 >>First one First off, I'll say this was a positive experience. >I shifted Maddie about until her rubbery ass cheeks framed each side of my aching daddy meat. Rubbery ass on aching daddy meat I really couldn't help but linger on that line >each greasey rope of daddy's special 'milk' that line too > "Will you fuck me tonight, Daddy?" she asked in a whisper. >I nodded yes and motioned with my head that she should leave. Sexual relations with a child rendered so casual you treat it like any other playtime request while busy. "yeah yeah, honey, later, I'm busy" He refers to the four-year-old as preteen several times, and also his penis head as "cock snout." There's a lot of silly word choices, and some minor typos. Still a fun story to read. I wonder if they're pretty well-practiced English-Second-Language or a bit rough with first language. ESL would make sense for the strange word choices. I hope his greasy cum ropes find many loving toddlers throughout his career. Godspeed. I hope you don't mind the humor side I take in this, the last thing I'd want is make based tot anon bothered, you're an important part of this board. I'll read the other two links later

>>507 I don't know about all of his word choices with it but I like the idea of a toddler's butt bouncing on my cock while we watch cartoons immensely. And I like the casual thing/incest tbh. You're gonna get idiosyncratic word choice and weird habitual typos with a lot of loli/tot fiction I find. And no I don't mind at all, I didn't write any of it anyway lel.

>>507 >Sexual relations with a child rendered so casual you treat it like any other playtime request while busy. "yeah yeah, honey, later, I'm busy" if only the world was this perfect

>>519 I know right.

I just found this board and can't believe it's back. If anyone has a ATF account, can they repost Leoc's Vignettes and some of the other stories? I lost my account and I can not make a new one for some reason, I don't know why.

>>1579 why did you bump this dead thread?

>>1580 no reason not to tbh board is so slow and doesn't even have a full catalog leave the guy alone more posts on /tot/ = good

This board is literally full of pedos what the fuck

>>1821 So what exactly did you expect a toddler board to be? A parenting board or something?

>>What is good toddlercon writing like? I don't know since I've never found any. It's always cringe garbage with baby talk or incest. good toddlercon writing to me would be a realistic rape scenario. Toddlers are just good for sex so just do them and dump them. Christmas Parties are a good inspiration for a realistic story idea, but maybe too realistic. I wrote one and it got me banned from ATF of all places.

>>1879 terrible opinion

>>1879 >good toddlercon writing to me would be a realistic rape scenario. Toddlers are just good for sex so just do them and dump them. Ow the edge Don't ask us to feel bad for you

>>1879 >cringe garbage with incest >good toddlercon writing to me would be a realistic rape scenario

Any female age regression stories that end in toddlercon?

>>435 yeah paraphore is probably the only real life example of good erotic tot writing. luckily you can skip the rancidfurryscatgore etc.

I thought maybe somebody was actually going to write a story. Anybody want me to?

>>1906 Can you do one about a woman regressing while getting hornier until she is reduced to a lusty infant?

I'd like to se something like loud house where it's one boy and a lot of sisters. But I'd have them all be his older sisters. Get this: The boy is born to a father, mother, and 12 older sisters. The mom and dad REALLY wanted a boy and so they just kept on popping out daughters once about every year until they had him. While the family is wealthy and the dad just wanted a male heir to his lofty position, the mother was into little boys and incest, each of their daughters inherited the mothers perversion, and there's also the two aunts who are the younger sisters of the mother, similarly perverted. You begin as a newborn, and your mother, aunties, and older sisters start sucking and fucking him immediately, they get off to the idea of providing sexual stimulation to him. You get to see time progress as he and his family gets older, the workaholic father remains oblivious and the boy is just trying to survive the constant snusnu assaults. We can have the story be told from the perspective of a man who is the boy all grown up, so we know he's going to turn out fine no matter how it goes.

Since this seems to be the only story relevant thread, here's links to websites that are currently up and allow toddlercon stories; archiveofourown.org/ - When searching you can use toddler tag (note there's multiple relevant tags) and/or warning 'underaged'. Advise sorting by kudos, bookmarks or comments stories.allthefallen.moe/index.php?title=Main_Page - This sites a pain to search through, you can go through story listing pages and check the story codes for relevant stuff. www.wolfpub.org/ - Don't personally know much about it but it has no content restrictions (search with tags pedo/young)