/tot/ - Toddlercon

Smaller Lolis

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0.

US Election Thread

8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.


(460.39 KB 1200x1058 86300219_p0_master1200.jpg)

(595.47 KB 1200x900 84379277_p0_master1200.jpg)

(800.60 KB 1532x1069 47fdc5c343659c26.png)

(1.57 MB 1000x1500 85151859_p0.png)

Straight Shota Tods and Babies Anonymous 01/27/2021 (Wed) 15:59:28 No. 465
serious lack of ss toddlercon lets fix that
(219.74 KB 493x658 81525414_p0.jpg)

(330.73 KB 1372x1194 441cc5cc0dd55d73.png)

(1.03 MB 1531x1070 39b6f6c49a54f692.png)

(3.31 MB 1920x1080 c02d7e969a79409d.mp4)

Woah woah woah anons, let's all be friends here. I'm not fan of straight shota, but toddlercon is too niche of a genre to nitpick over what variants can be posted on an entire board dedicated to it.
>>478 Babies need dick.
>>478 Agreed. Infighting like this is retarded.
Tiny dicks are cute, but SS toddlercon is something I've rarely felt is for me. Sometimes it works really well, other times it's aggressively off-putting to me. I love the kanna one in the OP, this one >>467 Though the lips aren't very good in that one. I have specific tastes with this sub-category I suppose. I'd share some if I had any, but my small-dicks folder is actually 99% non-shota. I'm actually rather disappointed my boyfriend isn't small. Maybe the fact my focus is "cute small dick" instead of "cute small toddler" is a component to most of it not working with me.
If we're throwing our opinions into the void on this topic specifically for some reason, I may as well chime in. In my opinion, if you're using your dick, you're no longer the subject of attraction: you're now extrapolating from the subject. In the event there is no subject, it's just poor form. Subjects of attraction should be getting dicked-down. If you make the one doing the dicking cute, it's just dishonest content. Obviously people disagree with this, even though it's simple dichotomy. You can have your yin and yang symbol where both sides are blinding white. There is no compromise, so both sides are the best they can be. But a cute dom is like a saturated dark side of a yin and yang symbol. So it is a compromise. Even if you're emotional about it?
>>497 Since this is nonsense, I almost think you're geometry man, but there's no geometry being brought up
>>498 I am geometry guy. I was actually intending to fuck off from the board, but plebbles fed my request in the drawthread, so I replied, and stuck around, and ended up here. When I said I wasn't a social retard in the other thread, what I meant was you are incapable of cornering me in argument, and the actual rationale for your limp dick cowardly bullshit was you were emotional about unprovoked spewing your zero-justification hate towards furries, and as soon as I acknowledged it at all, you had to slink away, because you can do nothing in a context that could potentially lead to dissent. Go back to your hugbox thread where you don't need to have the testicles to do anything, because no one acknowledges you. And if they do, you post a laughing emoji, therefore you're correct, and it's the not-even-dissent-yet that is wrong. >this is nonsense I concede. I am truly wrong.
>>499 what
(203.74 KB 800x850 1588157872310.jpg)

(355.44 KB 800x950 98598.jpg)

(983.41 KB 1644x996 9399ecabe567c61c.png)

Less fights and more pics. Thank you.
Ok. I had to do a double-take at what just happened. But I'm fine with that. All I will say is that the level of discourse I offer is using my words to justify things. No one will be able to say otherwise. Anything that degenerates below a straight back-and-forth was not my doing, nor do I even reciprocate the precedent of that. I don't feel my replying in any other way was possible, considering the context of my giving the opposing party the benefit of the doubt until they rendered rational discourse impossible, at which point I left. Then they raise an ad hominem fallacy against me here, in a different thread. But to be considerate to the thread topic, I won't engage any further unless there's a containment thread for it, or they take it to the sticky, or something. I was over the note the original "conversation" was left on, considering I professed as much at the time, and left.
>>502 what
>>468 more of this
>>468 Just went from flaccid to diamonds tbh
>>539 0.25 inches of steely fury
/ss/ is the best. Grown Women who prefer the superior small and undeveloped penis of a boy who's yet to experience the 9th year of his life. The truth about penis size in intercourse is that it really doesn't matter, for women, it's mostly psychological. The most sensitive parts of the female genitalia are on the outside, same goes of the female anus, and the female mouth (the tongue can be stuck out, so it doesn't count for either). The effect of large penises is shown time and again to be psychological, for example, how a woman who is having sex with an average penis but thinking he's small will be less satisfied than a woman having sex with an average penis while thinking he's large, experiment with a lot of sizes, and you find that the woman's expectations and perceptions are what color her experience, not the actual reality and physical sensations. Since it's psychological and not physical, it is fully possible for a woman to be more satisfied by a small penis than a large one, if she prefers small penises psychologically, such as due to her being a pedophile with an interest in young boys that are yet to even begin puberty. In that case, she perceives it to be more sexually satisfying, and so it is. That little bud between his legs is going to be just as physically pleasurable to her as an elephant cock, but psychologically speaking, it's going to do a much better job on her by comparison. The issue is not endowment, it's the boy himself, he seems smaller, weaker, dumber, less capable, more dependent, more submissive, and more feminine than the woman herself, even if the truth is the reverse, the fact that he seems that way to the woman's subconscious is going to be the thing that turns her off. like a househusband, for women the most sexually appealing thing in a man is his superiority compared to herself and other men.
>>549 >best worst total shit women being pleasured is boring little boys are boring your walls of text about how it doesn't matter you have a microdick are boring kys
>>550 >Only the things I like are good, everything else is boring Sure thing, buddy. The whole world exists only for your enjoyment.
>>551 I'm not your buddy, tiny dicked cuck.
>>552 I'm not your tiny dicked cuck, pal
>>553 I'm not your pal, small peckered fella.
>>554 I'm not your small peckered fella, friend.
>>555 I'm not your friend, miniscule penis guy.
>>549 >>468 >>465 yup definitely didnt expect little babies being sucked off would make me nut hard af
>>912 Once you take the /tot/pill there's no going back
>>935 SS shit isn't very /tot/pilled, it's grannyfucker shit. When he wants to suck off a babby then he can be slightly /tot/pilled albeit less /tot/pilled than cunny licks because boys aren't as good.
>>468 hey, i was looking for the artist name on google, but i can't find the artwork or username, could you tell me where the source is
>>936 >boys aren't as good That's an understatement, shit's fucking gay bro
>>549 Adult women should be fucked by little boys and little girls should be fucked by adult men. It is the way of nature
>>1074 troof
>>1073 gay shit is okay if the boy is older or it's with a nepi bro >>1074 Adult women should just have cute tots and fuck off.
>>1076 >gay shit is okay if the boy is older or it's with a nepi bro where does the bible say that?
>>1077 idk never read it
>>1090 How do I find their animations without giving them money?
(991.10 KB 1782x1080 85144346_p0.png)

(1.03 MB 1456x1992 85678788_p0.png)



Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply