/vhs/ - Movies

Film and Cinema

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0.

Uncommon Time Winter Stream

Interboard /christmas/ Event has Begun!
Come celebrate Christmas with us here


8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

(300.75 KB 996x2048 DzFwNO7UYAAQXvc.jpg)


What are you watching? Anonymous 10/07/2020 (Wed) 05:44:12 Id: 09411b No. 89
And what are you planning on watching? Any cool TV shows, Documentaries or Movies? I've been watching my VHS collection of Rocky and Bullwinkle.
Watched The Hudsucker Proxy today. Also been rewatching Breaking Bad with commentary. It's insightful, although a bit repetitive, and a lot of great episodes don't have commentary in the first two seasons for some reason. Really enjoyed Hudsucker, though. Nobody ever talks about it.
Been marathoning all of Star Trek for the past several months. I'm midway through Next Generation Season 2, at the point where Star Trek V came out, so that's next on my list. Everyone says that's the worst one, but I generally like TOS way more than TNG anyway, so I'm still hopeful. Also, a lot of those same people say Wrath of Khan, or even Search for Spock, is better than The Motion Picture, so I don't trust them. A lot of these people are probably casuals who think TAS isn't canon, or that like Kirk less than that soyboy Picard.
(256.21 KB 960x1440 images.jpg)

>>89 I watched this movie the other day. It's a dark comedy but better as a crime drama. Small town plagued by serial killings that seem to be done by a werewolf. It's not the greatest thing ever but if you're into film that goes against the norm then you can find some enjoyment I'm sure.
(28.98 KB 361x276 Get_Carter_poster.jpg)

>>90 I watched The Hudsucker Proxy nearly a year back at this point. It wasn't bad, but falls short of a great movie. Can't say I'd watch it a second time. I have Get Carter (1971 original) on my list of films to watch. It's a rewatch, but I barely remember it and really liked it at the time.
Rewatching National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation for the first time since I was very little. Not sure how well it's holding up. I'm 10 minutes in and some of the jokes are falling pretty flat. I'll update later.
>>224 It held up a lot better than I expected. Physical comedy was great once Chevy let loose. Some scenes went on a bit too long and the gags probably could have been cut down, but I enjoyed it. Will probably watch again next year.
Is TV discussion okay? I found a torrent for Fargo's first season with commentary so I've been rewatching it. Quite the treat. The later seasons are lacking, but the first season is a great reimagining/sequel to the show. Can't recommend it enough.
>>226 I've been recommended National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation many times. Maybe one day I'll actually get around to watching it. >>240 Is the TV series very similar to the movie in terms of tone? Is it telling the same story?
>>253 The Fargo show is completely separated from the movie. It hops time periods & tells a different story each season. Only those really paying attention will see how they all weave together. Sometimes in small ways. Sometimes in big ways.
(34.37 KB 340x489 fargo.jpg)

>>255 Might be worth checking out then. I was not a fan of the movie (the protagonist was bland and written to be perfect in every way), but the premise seemed interesting. This might deliver in a better way.
(411.73 KB 590x392 ClipboardImage.png)

Watched American Made today. Aside from a couple gags about Ollie North and Reagan I enjoyed it more than I expected. Really liked the way they depicted flying. Tom Cruise is nuts but knows how to pick a good script. Wasn't perfect by any means, but it was a decent flick. Has just enough personality to stand out from similar films. >>273 I liked the movie but the first season of the show is definitely better. Really has time to explore multiple characters and flesh them out. The show has its share of "perfect" characters, but they're usually not the main character. The formula is usually the same, with a virtuous cop as the protagonist, but they spend most of the season being three steps behind what's going on But I definitely think the first season is worth watching, and the third is pretty good too.
(1.57 MB 1200x766 ClipboardImage.png)

Finally got around to watching The Man Who Killed Don Quixote. I was worried it would disappoint. Twenty years of anticipation is hard to build on. But it had some great moments and an interesting premise. Apparently the original draft had actual time travel, but avoiding it makes for better character moments. I don't want to say too much and spoil it, but it's one of the better "protagonist loses touch with reality" movies out there. Kind of reminded me of The Fall, but with more substance. Only thing I'd change is replacing Adam Driver with someone else. He really can't act very well and his face is annoying to look at. There's also one like making fun of Trump, and I really hate politics in movies since it tends to date them. But everyone did a great job and the journey was worth it.
>>284 I didn't care for all the excessive cursing. That's the only real gripe I have with it.
I'm streaming "The Fifth Element" on 8chantv if anyone is interested. Didn't think it needed it's own thread.
(233.13 KB 800x1200 standoff-sparrow-creek.jpg)

(402.64 KB 1200x1600 black-dynamite.jpg)

(85.59 KB 510x680 hoodlum-priest.jpg)

Watched a few films over the past few weeks. I checked out The Standoff at Sparrow Creek (2018). It's about glowies glowing so hard and everyone falling for it, so I can't recommend it. Re-watched Black Dynamite (2009) which is a satirical blacksploitation film. It's pretty dumb, but captures the genre very well while making fun of it and has some classic one-liners. Finally, watched The Hoodlum Priest/Yakuza bozu (1967) starring Shintaro Katsu (勝 新太郎) of Zatoichi fame. It's about a priest who basically tries to take over the red-light district via a temple he settles in. It's not a masterpiece by any stretch, but the fights and cinematography are decent. I'd like to watch the sequel, Hoodlum Priest and the Gold Mint (1968), but alas, I can't find any torrents online. Same thing happened when I watched Zebraman ゼブラーマン (2004). I really liked it and wanted to check out the sequel, but again, no decent torrents. >>308 Too bad I missed the stream. Would have been fun to watch that film with a few other anons.
(939.94 KB 1000x1500 ClipboardImage.png)

After watching The Man Who Killed Don Quixote last week, I've been inspired to watch any remaining Terry Gilliam films I haven't seen yet. Decided to start with 12 Monkeys and was absolutely blown away. While it hits you over the head with the twists, the storytelling is well done. Gilliam really likes to make his protagonists, and the audience, question reality, and while it's done to good effect here I feel these portions drag down the pacing of the movie. It's clear early on that he's not imagining anything, just struggling to cope with being shoved between two timelines. By the time he ends up in the trenches at Verdun they should have knocked it off. Really enjoyed how the other protagonist, the woman, is put in the position of believing it's real at a point when many scripts would insist she's still a doubter despite all evidence to the contrary. The last half hour of reveals, while not hard to see coming, does slot into place nicely. The premise is really cool, and I'd like to see it explored further. Apparently there's a TV show of some lesser quality, and the concept reminds me a lot of the (somewhat mishandled) Travelers series that was on Netflix for a bit. The most entertaining part had to be watching airport security just not give a shit about anything. After 9/11 and this pandemic, "Someone is trying to commit biological warfare in this airport" would be an emergency. Fun watch and definitely good pandemic watch material. Brad Pitt is always entertaining, and it's from a time when Bruce Willis actually tried. Also made me want to do a Hitchcock marathon. Next up is Breakfast at Tiffany's. It's often considered a classic but I'm not sure I'll like it given the genre. But we'll see. >>310 I will check these out. Black Dynamite has been on my list for some time. Have you seen Dolemite is my Name? It's a pretty loving tribute to Rudy Ray Moore and his films. And, of course, Jackie Brown is a nice homage as well. Three different approaches to honoring the genre.
(25.67 KB 252x395 time-bandits.jpg)

>>311 >12 Monkeys About all I remember is Brad Pitt going on a relatable rant near the end, but I can't even remember what he was talking about. >while it's done to good effect here I feel these portions drag down the pacing of the movie I'm noticed that to be an issue with Gilliam films generally. The most recent movie I watched from him was Time Bandits. In terms of creativity, it's absolutely great. But it felt like walking through wet concrete the better part of the time. Brazil I think also had its slow parts, but it's been so long since I saw it, I can't remember. >Breakfast at Tiffany's I can't say I dug it too much. I also watched it because of its classic status, but it didn't do much for me. >Dolemite is my Name I started it and ended up dropping it, but for the life of me, I can't remember why. Either it was boring or it was too heavy-handed with the whole "whites are evil". Jackie Brown is a nice one, I must say.
(365.86 KB 474x642 ClipboardImage.png)

Breakfast at Tiffany's was well made and I see why people liked it, but holy shit is Audrey Hepburn's character the most insufferable, selfish cunt. The ending is a fantasy because girls like that would never truly abandon their attitudes and embrace a healthy relationship. She burns everyone she has contact with, and it's incredible so many men give her the time of day. Hard to believe this movie was a cultural phenomenon that encouraged this behavior. >>321 >walking through wet concrete All his dream sequences are like this. I dropped Time Bandits halfway through a long time ago. Not that I have anything against it, but I had to pause for some reason and just wasn't compelled to turn it back on. It couldn't get to the point. Brazil was mostly fine except for the end sequence, which dragged on a bit. At least it was memorable. The Man Who Killed Don Quixote made the dream-like nature a plot point, so it's mostly excusable even if some moments dragged. They seem to exist in 12 Monkeys because he wanted them there and it was obligatory to cover the "what if he's nuts?" angle. The movie makes reference to the peak of the therapy boom in the 80's and 90's, where psychologists are respected. Now, I think many films would do the "meta" thing and dismiss it quickly to move on. So maybe this is a case of it not aging well despite an attempt to cover all bases. >Dolemite is my name There were a couple shots at "lol white guys are lame", but I think that's to be expected. I couldn't help but feel the filmmakers were mocking the black characters almost as much. They show up to meetings dressed like pimps and while they are portrayed as the heroes their appearance is also played for laughs. There's some really solid movies by and for black audiences, and jokes about being oppressed or white people being bland come with the territory. It doesn't bother me, I just think everyone should have a sense of humor about such things. Everyone should be allowed to make fun of each other, even for dumb reasons. Pic related. While I still like Man on the Moon better, I think Dolemite Is My Name is worth a full watch. Then again, so is Time Bandits probably. Next up on my list is another Bruce Willis film, Bonfire of the Vanities. And it has Tom Hanks during his comedic years, which frankly were his best. I struggle to sit through dramas starring Tom Hanks, but he's a slam dunk at comedy. Been wanting to cover my backlog of Brian DePalma movies after watching Phantom of the Paradise and this looks like one of his better sleepers.
>>323 >it's incredible so many men give her the time of day. Guess they read the script and were following along. But yeah, I don't really understand why the film became so iconic - I guess Audrey Hepburn's presence was enough. >It doesn't bother me, I just think everyone should have a sense of humor about such things. Everyone should be allowed to make fun of each other, even for dumb reasons. For sure. I think that's why I watch Black Dynamite and don't feel alienated while watching it because it's making fun of everyone. I can't remember why I didn't finish watching Dolemite is my Name, but it could just be it didn't jive with my feelings at the time. I don't think I'll pick it up anytime soon, but if a family member decides to watch it, I'll try sitting down and seeing why I didn't like it. >Bonfire of the Vanities Let me know if it's good. I'm always looking for nice black comedies, but I've been shafted so many times, I usually stay away.
(363.22 KB 618x412 ClipboardImage.png)

Bonfire of the Vanities was pretty good. Some scenes were flat. The ending particularly seemed rushed and could have used another half hour to tie things up. The threads are all there and you can see where they're going, but there just isn't strong development in the second half. What's noteworthy is how the feel mocks the political and media circus that follows when events become racially-charged. The entire premise of the film is that an innocent, naive stockbroker gets implicated for running over a black youth and everybody else is out to get him for their own selfish gain. Every single person in the movie is impossible to empathize with, and that's the point. After watching, I read some reviews. Critics at the time eviscerated it. Didn't like the social commentary. Felt Bruce Willis should have been replaced by someone who can pull off a blue blood. Actually, I agree with that last one. Bruce Willis exudes working class, and letting him have hair and a suit doesn't help. But given how often the film mocks Jews taking advantage of social strife for political gain, I have to wonder if the bad reviews at the time wasn't just pearl-clutching from the media. Apparently they only cast Morgan Freeman to help stave off accusations of racism, but predictably it didn't work. >>328 Overall, I'd say it's worth a watch. The first half is strong and does a good job explaining how the dominos all get set up. Once they start to fall over, there's some incongruence. It's definitely better than the media of the time gave it credit for, but it's not a masterpiece, and it doesn't have enough camp to save it. Still, the social commentary resonates today. Mostly the movie made we want to read the book, which allegedly pulls fewer punches.
(35.78 KB 314x445 roadgames.jpg)

Checked out Richard Franklin's Roadgames (1981) this evening after having it on my list of films to watch for a few months. It's an Australian film about an American (Stay Keach of The Ninth Configuration) delivering meat to Perth who takes it upon himself to catch a serial killer snatching up hitchhikers. Film wasn't bad, but pretty boring in general. Definitely has some Hitchcock elements (you even catch a glimpse of his portrait on a magazine cover) and the performances are decent, but it seems there was more budget put into the soundtrack than into the writing. About the only thing that I'm wondering about the film is what exactly it was trying to convey. I think the main point was that outsiders (or minorities) aren't welcome in the country given several mentions of aboriginals in the background and with the protagonist himself, but maybe it goes deeper than that. Psycho II is the superior Richard Franklin film. Seriously, it's actually a pretty good movie. >>329 I did look up the film and have it on my drive. One of these days, I'll check it out.
(1.50 MB 719x1080 ClipboardImage.png)

I watched Willy's Wonderland yesterday. Good movie. Good fun. Better than that trashy Banana Splits movie. Actually enjoyed watching it for the most part. Until the nigger & whore start fucking in the fun room but at least they both get violently killed. I'd recommend this over something like Psycho Goreman. Which I didn't enjoy enough to even finish.
(99.40 KB 580x864 leon-professional.jpg)

I finally got around to watching Léon: The Professional yesterday. Along with Taxi Driver, it's the quintessential loli film and quite critically acclaimed. The film was very campy and melodramatic. I didn't care for Mathilda (Natalie Portman) at all, and the whole argument that her family are low lives, yet her and her brother are completely different screams of following the script for the sake of driving the plot forward and making Mathilda the ultimate smart kid who is better than most adults. Jean Reno was okay, but I feel like he was way too much of a sidepiece to Natalie Portman. I preferred Gary Oldman's performance (even though it was very cringey at times) and actually felt myself rooting for him. With the knowledge of the rampant pedophilia in (((Hollywood))) (the film is technically French, but nonetheless), the film also left me with a bad taste in my mouth. While Taxi Driver certainly has Jodie Foster dressed up in provocative clothing, the scene where Natalie Portman pretends to be Madonna singing "Like a Virgin" and dressed up as Marilyn Monroe right afterward just seemed like fanservice, a "have your cake and eat it too" kind of situation. I understood the joke, but somehow it didn't seem funny to me. Better than most trash released nowadays, but nowhere near as great as Taxi Driver. Not really sure why it's regarded so high up there. >>364 >Nicolas Cage Wow, I didn't expect that. Recommend it in the movie night thread.
>>365 Note that Nic Cage does not speak the entire movie. He's a complete silent protagonist.
(99.58 KB 650x360 soprano.jpg)

Not a film, but after many years of prodding I finally got around to watching The Sopranos. Took only half an episode to hook me. I was really worried it would have aged poorly, but it manages to blow most newer shows out of the water. I think I still like Mad Men better, but The Sopranos is the only real competition at this stage. I'm not even done with the first season yet, but I felt like talking about it. Highly recommend it. Has a lot of actors from mob films in the 90's and clearly has a lot of love for them while trying to be a bit more grounded. Almost every episode has something most shows would save for the end of a season, so I'm excited to see where they could possibly go with things. >>365 I can't agree that Taxi Driver is better than Leon. While I'd rather rewatch a lot of Scorscese films over Leon (particularly After Hours and The Age of Innocense) I think Taxi Driver isn't quite as good as it's hyped up to be. Leon is a much more personal, if less grounded, look at a loner. And his relationship with a literal child sets it apart. Luc Besson is a pedophile, but the movie as released has a pretty strong message against predatory behavior. The growth of his fatherly role while she tries to act like his girlfriend is very unique and has some great character development. Jodie Foster was great in Taxi Driver, but they never really built up much chemistry (although that's the whole point). Oldman chews the scenery more than in most roles, and that makes it one of his best, but he stands out in an already cartoonish film and in the early scenes I think he could have played it more subdued. Worth it for "Send Everybody", though. >>365
>>373 Update a month later: I've been averaging an episode a day and it's still holding up. Third season got off to a rocky start with the mother dying off-screen due to the actress' death, but I think it recovered and finished stronger than ever by the end. That said, I'd criticize the show for falling into a pattern and creating a sense of normalcy. The first season felt like tumultuous times, and the second explored the consequences of the first. Season 3 feels like it's settling in. The focus is pretty much entirely not on Tony. Compare this with something like Breaking Bad, where the characters never find themselves in the same situation twice. I'd also like to harp on the fact that someone has to die every season. At least this time it wasn't some rival for power. They set that up and then have it end sensibly, which I think was a good call, but knowing someone will die each time is still not ideal. At this rate I should finish the series sometime in the next two months. Once a day is a good pace for a show like this. It's too heavy and long to binge properly but it still benefits from watching in succession. Overall, I'd recommend the show so far. It beats out most HBO shows and Breaking Bad pretty easily, which really just leaves Mad Men a contender for "best show".
If anyone wants to watch some Miami Vice it starts in 5 minutes. I'll try to do this weekly if anyone is interested. https://cytu.be/r/civilwarcrimes
(1006.05 KB 850x1057 ClipboardImage.png)

(315.69 KB 600x345 ClipboardImage.png)

>The Sopranos Have to say, despite being mostly spoiled on the ending, I really liked it. Took a bit to chew on it, and I really think it wraps things up. The entire show has an arc, but it doesn't spend all its time drawing attention to it, preferring to focus on the day-to-day lifestyle of Tony and his crew. Letting the real arc happen between the lines is a master stroke. Having the ending spoiled made me more willing to accept it. That, or perhaps watching the series over a decade after it concluded, with the main actor long dead, makes it easy to accept it's gone and that's it. Either way, I wasn't too mad at the ending, except I hate Don't Stop Believin'. >Mank Also happened to watch Mank this week. Definitely has its moments, and a bit of a charm, but it's also a pastiche of films of the era and as accurate to the man's life as Citizen Kane was of Hearst which I feel detracts. It's done black and white properly, which many directors botch by shooting in color and then filtering in post. The dialogue is snappy, but a little too snappy, with some scenes approaching His Girl Friday levels of snark. The soundtrack reminds me of LA Noire, which is a plus, but can overpower some scenes. I have to give it credit for humanizing Marion Davies, and Hearst to some degree. However, a big plot point in the movie is the main character rooting for a socialist to win election and then becoming bitter when he loses, and it has the nerve to make it seem like his opponents were dishonest and he wasn't. The movie certainly picks its heroes. Fun, but I'm not sure it's added anything to the conversation around Kane other than to retread the same ground and tie itself to the controversy.
>Charlie Wilson's War Tom Hanks proves once again he is a terrible dramatic actor. Only his comedy lands. His shitty Georgia accent has to stand-in for a Texas one and it doesn't hold up. He's basically playing the same character he did in The Ladykillers a few years prior, which makes it extra funny. The rest of the movie is your usual Sorkin meme. Everyone has barbed dialogue and it tries to make some grand statement about American foreign policy. Pretty forgettable. >North by Northwest Working on watching anything Hitchcock I've missed, and this one has been in the backlog for a long time. It's a fun, big-budget thriller. Like most Hitchcock films, it stars Cary Grant as a normal guy who gets stuck in some extraordinary circumstance and falls in love with a blonde in the process. Despite the trappings of a spy thriller, the movie had far less suspense than your average Hitchcock. Rear Window is still king as far as I'm concerned. North by Northwest feels a lot more like a typical blockbuster, which is impressive for its day but not as notable as his other work. It was still entertaining, and a great movie, but the big setpieces have not held up as well as I'd have liked.
>Heathers I decided to check out the movie after hearing high praise about it over the years. I was fairly disappointed. Christian Slater's Jack Nicholson impression was so prominent, I had this scene from The Critic in my head the whole time. Veronica Sawyer is supposed to be some genius, yet acts shocked when J.D. outright shoots two students after he has already proved he has no qualms with killing. >Survival Style 5+ Whatever the hell this was. Boring overall with some good moments. Would not recommend. >>772 How did you interpret the end of The Sopranos?
(1.23 MB 1557x2250 ClipboardImage.jfif)

>Star Trek Slowly been watching the whole franchise and am only up to Season 3 of Next Generation right now. I don't get the hate for the fifth movie. It's not that great, but neither is 3 or 4. Frankly, I could narrow down TOS to like 30 of the best episodes, then I'd recommend the first two movies, and say just to stop there. People say Next Gen gets better in Season 3, but I still don't like it as much as TOS. I also watched all four Scream movies. Saw the first three when they were new, never saw 4 before. I was surprised at how good 4 was. A worthy sequel, and I appreciate that it actually had something to say about films, and specifically films of its era. It felt like it had a reason to exist. The whole series is very clever, and benefits from being maybe the only slasher series, or horror series, with actual interesting and likable characters. Other series sometimes have one good character that carries the series, like Freddy, or Chucky, or Dr. Loomis, but Scream consistently has a whole cast of good characters in every movie. Not all of them are great, but they're mostly memorable. Also, the commentary on the film industry and horror genre helps make it feel a little less mindless than most horror movies. Though Scream 4 was great, I dread what Scream 5 will be like without Wes Craven, especially since Kevin Williamson isn't even writing. 3 was already the weakest, likely due to Williamson not writing it, and I have to imagine the people they get to replace him in current year will be even worse than the people who replaced him in 2000.
Picked up a bunch of movies in the last Vinegar Syndrome sale and they arrived in time for Christmas. Working my way through them now. >Summer of '84 This movie is alright. It came out a couple years ago. Without spoiling anything, I'd describe it as pretty standard and predictable, but enjoyable nonetheless. If Suburbia is a remake of Rear Window with a different setting, Summer of '84 feels like a remake of Suburbia but with the contrivances of Stranger Things rather than Rear Window. It's a competent film and the dialogue between the kids is realistic, although perhaps not enjoyable just because it's not too clever. There's also a few things foreshadowed that go nowhere or barely get a mention, and I think that's a missed opportunity. That said, I think another 20-30 minutes and a different ending might have made it something great. I'd say it's worth a watch and it would make a better summer movie. Could pair well with the above films, or maybe with Stand By Me, Goonies, or other "kids goofing around in the summer" type films Its biggest problem is not doing anything too new and the plot being on rails. >Kid Candidate This is a short and charming documentary about a guy who ran for city council in Texas a couple years ago. Reminded me a lot of Hunter Thompson's run for sheriff of Aspen at the beginning, since his main appeal came from weird promotional videos. Originally he only "ran" as a joke and didn't actually register but was convinced to try. The second half transitions away from his campaign, which flounders, and focuses more on the corrupt political machine at work in Amarillo. I think the transition and presentation could have been better, but I thought it was an interesting behind the scenes of an outsider's campaign. One of his advisors has some great lines and kinda steals the show. It's too bad he doesn't listen to the guy more.
(2.56 MB 936x1331 ClipboardImage.png)

This film has emotionally devastated me. It manages to hit home multiple times. I watched the director's cut, which was the original cut, and highly recommend that versus any cut-down version since it retains an important storyline. I've seen multiple critics call it overly saccharine, but that perhaps ignores how bittersweet the entire last act is. Reminds me a lot of Once Upon a Time in America, albeit without the facade of a mob movie. Maybe I just have a thing for films that track an entire person's life. Morricone's score pulls both of them together despite taking place across massive timespans. Cannot recommend enough. It has some tragedy for everyone, and it's steeped in nostalgia, but I would consider this its signature.
(725.19 KB 1536x2732 the edge.jpg)

>>89 1997 The Edge Anthony Hopkins, and Alec Baldwin. I love the outdoors, and I love survival books and films. So I knew I would enjoy this film even if I did have doubts going in about Alec Baldwin being a massive faggot. This film does not disappoint. Superlative frankly, I loved it.
>>1061 The real message of the movie is countryside italians are no better than niggers.
(6.37 MB 960x540 Il souffre.mp4)

>>89 >Warehouse Slaves Discipline >quick search >Imdb gives no info What is this move about anon ? >>311 12 Monkeys is one of my favorite movie ever. Watched as a kid and was blown away. Watched countless times since. If you like this movie, try La Jetée by Chris Marker on which this movie is based. A Beautiful piece consisting of a sequence of black and white photographs with a narrator telling the story. It's referenced in the opening credits of 12 Monkeys. Watch it in French (original) as the narrator work is very good. You can find it online subtitled in English.
>>89 Sometimes I come across films depicting Jack's fetishes and it scares me. This film's Funky Forest: The First Contact (2005). I read a synopsis claiming it to be the weirdest film ever depicted, which is a very high claim to make. It's made up of a bunch of little stories, some of which continue throughout the whole film. Side A wasn't really that weird at all. Side B, though, went into David Cronenberg body/sexual horror that really was off the wall. Overall really boring and wouldn't recommend it unless you're taking a girl out for a first date. But craziest of all, Hideaki Anno makes an appearance several times.
>>89 Continuing on my journey of watching weird Japanese movies, I checked out Air Doll (2009) after years of having it on my list. It's from the same director as Still Walking, so you know it's going to be a slow-paced, depressing movie. The plot is a sex doll mysteriously comes to life one day and starts a life of her own. The film goes on to show different degrees of solitude in people's everyday lives, from having lost love to death. All the while, we get a quirky depiction of the living doll by Bae Doona. Air Doll is a little over two hours long and it really slogs through it. A lot of it is to highlight Bae Doona because we'll spend a good two minutes watching her walk down the street. I mean, sure, her portrayal was great, but I also think you could have cut that shit down to 40 minutes and would have had more to show for it. Overall, interesting premise but fell flat.
Changing it up from weird Japanese movies, I finally completed the "Finland" trilogy (also known as the "losers" trilogy) from Aki Kaurismäki. All the movies are defined as comedies, but let me tell you, it's a sliver of comedy if that. >Drifting Clouds - Kauas pilvet karkaavat (1996) Main plot is a husband and wife both lose their jobs and struggle throughout the whole movie to find new work as they slowly have to give away possessions in their home. This one hits close to home and was really damn depressing Though, in Aki fashion, there is happiness in the end. Film was good, but I think it was my least favorite of the three. Wasn't a big fan of the husband character and I wish they had done more with Markku Peltola's chef character. >The Man Without a Past - Mies vailla menneisyyttä (2002) This one was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Foreign Film and won the Grand Prix at the Cannes Film Festival that year. I can definitely see why and I'd say it clearly stands out from the other three. Plot follows a man (chef from the previous movie) who gets beaten the shit out of him, causing him to have severe memory loss. He ends up living in near enough poverty and falls in love with a woman (same wife actress as the previous movie) from the Salvation Army. What a take on the impoverished lives of people. It shows such humility and beauty, wonderful shots and stellar performances. This one definitely had a lot more comedic timing as well (but again, don't expect to be laughing the whole time). I've watched this one twice. Absolutely great film that I will likely recommend for a movie night one of these days. Kati Outinen is good autistic waifu material in my opinion. >Lights in the Dusk - Laitakaupungin valot (2006) This one, I believe, is the least liked of the three films generally. Main plot is a man (played a minor role in The Man Without a Past) who has aspirations for bigger and better things while he works the night shift as a security guard. He meets a female extortionist who he quickly falls for and, ultimately, leads to his downfall. This one felt like misery porn because of the circumstances in the film (don't want to give too much away). I feel like there's more going on that I'm not catching from the main character. For example, Aki addressed a pivotal point in Drifting Clouds about character motivation without a single piece of dialogue. In this case, though, the plot seemed to move forward in a lot more of an ambiguous way - or, at least, I wasn't able to catch it. But I still really liked the movie. Shots were beautiful (I loved the portraiture of the different characters), with lots of light play. The down-on-his-luck fellow was still really well played and I loved the stagnant romance he had with the wiener vendor that played out so well in the end. Film is less than 90 minutes and I would recommend it, but I can see why people would be screaming at their screen wondering why Koistinen is such a dolt. Overall, beautiful movies that deserve a watch if they seem like your type of thing. Don't expect crazy action or witty dialogue - these movies are all about a voyeuristic appeal in seeing people down in the dumps and finding a bit of happiness from it.
(1.25 MB 578x855 ClipboardImage.png)

>heard of this movie because it's a feature film where the actors actually have sex >decide to watch it one afternoon because I'm bored and got curious about it >literal fucking gay porn I don't know what I expected. Maybe I should've watched Blue is the Warmest Color because that only has lesbians. I will nominate this movie on the movie night some day and you will all suffer.
I watched In Search of Bigfoot, a documentary from the 70's about a team of researchers setting up camp near Mount St. Helens to look for Bigfoot. As expected, they find a whole lot of nothing. Some human hairs, some "large footprints" that don't look like feet, and some scratches on some rocks. But the narration and music is incredibly nostalgic if you were raised on nature documentaries from this era, and the views of Washington are gorgeous. Would have made an excellent nature film without the Bigfoot nonsense. Very short and would recommend it, even if you just fall asleep to it.
(222.50 KB 960x1440 Woah dis shits kewl.jpg)

I watched Jin-Roh. The Wolf Brigade. Because anons kept raving about it being the mother fucking shiznit. The art was incredible. Everything is beautifully detailed and very realistic in movement. The music matched the scenes well. Nothing special but certainly appropriate. The backstory was very well done. The first 20 minutes of the movie will grab and hold you. This writer knows his shit. And then the main plot starts. The film never recovers. Our main character Fuse da ruse is apparently too bitch to waste a ho with a bomb. What a pussy. So when my lil terrorist blows herself sky high and takes out city power for a full day his superiors send him back to the academy. And while there he calls his contact in the regular cops to get the dead bitches address. While jacking off in her crypt he meets her sister and decides to start a relationship with her. Guess he didn't like defending his city. Maybe he prefers everything on fire? Who can say cause the cunt spends the next 90 minutes doing jack and shit. Nigger don't even talk. This entire mid section adds nothing to the plot, and if it was cut you'd have the same damn movie only it would be 30 minutes long. I guess the backstory writer quit maybe? Cause the jarring difference between the start and this horseshit is wild. So anyway the girl isnt the terrs sister but instead another terrorist who just looks identical to her. She was hired by the secret police to frame our hero for being a terr fucker. Honestly wonder why they bothered. If they left him alone he would have anyway apparently. Why do the secret police want him fired? Cause they want a media circus to get the people (In this Authoritarian society with protests against these exact same special cops anyway. Yeah they didnt think that through. If the special division gave a shit about public oppinion they probably wouldnt stop riots with machine guns on a daily basis.) So the movie is called wolf brigade. and apparently thats the name of a secret special counter counter intelligence/internal affairs for other agencies including the secret police. So double secret police. Theres a red riding hood story where our hero only speaks the wolfs lines. he dreams constantly of wolves. and the movies GODDAM NAME IS THE WOLF PATROL WITH HIS PICTURE UNDERNEATH THE TITLE. So if you figured out the twist five minutes in then congrats you arent retarded. But don't worry if your slow. The movie will beat this over your head for the next hour and a half. So our wolf patrol double secret cop has to stop the secret police from framing himself. He does this by jumping into the frame. Gets an APB put out on him for murdering 20 cops and running away with a terrorist. Then the cops find him again and he kills anothet 20 cops. Because the secret cops needed to use politics to take down the special division. But the Special Division perhaps recognizing the stupidity in that just assassinates the entire branch opposed to them. So anyway then our hero cries and gut shoots his lady love (which kills her instantly cause your heart is next to your kidneys and spleen I guess) then the movie ends. Whys he kill her? "She knows the secret polices secret. So we can blackmail them by saying we got her and will go to the media at any time. But also even though we cops we aint got any jail cells so they gonna just take her from us. So shoot her and pretend we got her." Now first of all. They killed everyone who knew about her. And shes a convicted terrorist. Who the secret police sprung illegally and off the books. If she shows up to a news station why would they believe her? She has no evidence. Everyone who was even aware of her plot is dead. Her story is impossible to confirm. Second shes a convicted wanted terrorist linked to the death of 40 cops. Now she has no characterization. shes just suicidal. Thats her whole arc. She is so annoying that when they decide to randomly murder her for NO REASON. you dont complain. As a viewer your just glad this shit shows about to end. 3/10. Absolute garbage. I've read penny pulp comics with more internal logic. Its like the writer quit after the first 20 minutes so they filled the runtime with long shots of NOTHING for 80 minutes. and then just said "oh who could even remember the plot by now lets just kill everyone then roll credits" What a complete and utter waste of time. You are certain to be a dumber person if you watch this. What an ungodly hack. Just awful. Watch the first 20 minutes then turn it off. You will have saved time and seen an actually good movie.
I recently watched a movie new to me, but included on many "Best Of" movie lists. Titled "Yi Yi (一一)", it's a Taiwanese movie directed by Edward Yang from 2000. The film follows a middle- to upper-middle class family living in Taipei. This includes a grandmother, her two sons (one of who has a gambling addiction and marries his [very pregnant] girlfriend; the other is an engineer in a failing company who meets his old love), and her two grandchildren (a teenage daughter who befriends the girl next door and a young son who, well, is a typical young boy). Yi Yi is a masterpiece of cinema. If you love beautiful shots, you will love this movie. If you love great acting, you will love this movie. The film is close to three hours, but it holds itself the whole time. I can see why it's ranked as one of the best movies ever made. Not an action movie by any stretch and it takes dedication to watch, but great if fine cinema is your jam. >>1318 >Literal gay porn Seek degeneracy and you will be rewarded. The only counter movie I have is Love (2015) from Gaspard Noé. It's mostly threesome with two women and one guy, but if I recall correctly, there is a tranny scene but the movie was so insufferable and pretentious, I didn't watch all of it. I wouldn't recommend it. >>1418 I haven't seen Jin-Roh in probably close to ten years, but your rant has inspired me to re-watch it to compare your points.
>>1417 Have you watched the original Boggy Creek movie?
>>1218 >Decide to look up Warehouse Slaves Discipline myself >IMDB does provide a listing, but as anon said, no info >Look up one of the actresses and she's credited in the likes of <Big Busted Lesbians at Play <I Cream with Genie <Dildo Fantasy Party I mean, I can't say I know the exact plot of the movie, but with the title and the people involved, I can make an educated guess.
>>1441 Did you rewatch it?
(768.76 KB 1400x1980 653fff10252283.560e1dd24397a.jpg)

>>1460 Been busy so I only got halfway through, so I'm waiting to finish the movie before commenting. Stay tuned.
>>1418 Finally finished the movie. So here are my comments (excuse the blogpost in advance): >The backstory was very well done. The first 20 minutes of the movie will grab and hold you. This writer knows his shit. First 20 minutes of the story seems like it's going to be a general film about The Sect (aka the terrorist group that is against the government) versus the authorities. >The beginning of the movie and the rest of the movie are not the same at all, they're two completely different movies I never read the manga so I can't speak to how the story went there. However, yes, the film does pivot from a focus on this parallel world where the Allies lost to a character piece about Fuse, an agent of the Kerberos. In particular, the character piece is straight about him maybe breaking the wolf character in Little Red Riding Hood, going against fate. But I can't say it's "jarring" for switching gears. It established setting to help us understand where Fuse and the terrorista that blows herself up come from. This is not a new way to write a story. The Count of Monte Cristo - at least the novel - takes a long-ass time setting up Edmond Dantès' background and story before we ever touch revenge. Moby Dick - not sure why I can only think of novel examples - is mostly an encyclopedia on whales and whaling until the very end when we finally meet the whale ourselves. Considering how damn convoluted the factions are in the movie, I think it's especially fair to make them clear in the beginning. >The Red Riding Hood story is stuffed down your throat the whole movie Very heavy-handed in delivery and execution, but I find that an issue with anime in general. >Kei is killed and there's literally no point because no one would believe her This ties in to the character piece of Fuse which was established in the movie. Will he decide to be a real human bean or will he accept the fact that he's a "wolf"? Next, he clearly cares about the girl to an extent, so she's a liability to him breaking away from the brigade and not following instructions. She even says that, had they run away together, she would have known he loved her. <But it's still shit because the reason they give to kill the girl makes no sense. She knows the Wolf Brigade exists and she knows who's in it. The whole movie, that brigade is established as a rumor - including by people who were not killed. Some Public Security officers are alive who know about the operation. They catch her and she confirms members of the Wolf Brigade, they can take them out and then get rid of the secret police. Instead, kill her now so she can't go to anyone, but then we can always say we have her and we can use her against you. Is it kind of lazy writing? Yeah. But it's trying to fit with that characterization of Fuse that has been going on the whole movie. That's the bigger interest - hence why the final line is saying that the wolf ate the little girl. I think Jin-Roh is remembered for two reasons: animation (as you mentioned) and the fact that it's attached to the same person who created Ghost in the Shell. Is the plot astounding? Meh, it's not the worst, but as you said yourself, it's heavy-handed as hell on the symbolism which I really don't care for. You also need to really be paying attention to the dialogue because otherwise, you're left in the dark plotwise. That's fine, but certainly not a casual-viewing movie. But I don't think the first 20 minutes are great and the rest is trash. Especially because the animation and sound production are so well-done, I'd watch it the whole way through.
>>1463 Still think gut shooting her was kind of a dick move.
(54.44 KB 1000x563 finger-licking-good.jpg)

(28.90 KB 474x237 th-734255554.jpg)

I watched Masayuki Suo's Shall We Dance? (Shall we ダンス?) a number of years ago (it stars the same actor who played the gangster in Tampopo, but it's very chick flick) and came across an earlier work of his called Fancy Dance (ファンシィダンス). The movie's about a young ska singer (people claim "punk", but it sounds a whole lot like ska to me) who is forced into Buddhist monk training for one year so as to take over his father's temple one day. Enjoyable, easy movie I'd say. Obviously the trainees (and even some of the higher disciples) get into trouble over stupid shit constantly, but you also get a sense of what going through the monk training is like, which I really enjoyed. Guy's girlfriend is a dick (or rather, she needs a dicking), but I think the movie played out well in the end. I'd recommend it, even though it goes gay for a scene. I also ended up checking out the director's next movie, Sumo Do, Sumo Don't (シコふんじゃった). This movie stars a lot of the same actors from Fancy Dance and the characters and plot run real similar initially (does that count as copyright infringement?). In this case, the film follows a university student who, after getting a job prematurely, realizes he is missing credits from his supervisor in order to graduate. His supervisor agrees to let him graduate if he participates in the university's sumo club and competes in one tournament. This one doesn't go into as much depth with sumo training as the previous movie did with Buddhist training (and even that was limited), though I can understand given how grueling sumo training is. Nonetheless, it was a bit disappointing since I know some basic grappling but don't exactly know the rules of sumo. A little more emphasis would have been appreciated and would have made it even better. Nice movie, though, that I'd recommend too. Added bonus, apparently Disney+ remade the movie into a TV series that premiered two days ago. Considering one of the main characters is a woman - who seems to be actively participating in the club even though sumo is strictly male - I can't say I trust it all too much. (Spoiler: Yes, there is a female who participates in the final sumo tournament in the movie, but they don't openly admit it because they know it's illegal and it's a move out of love and desperation. A woman is also seen training at the end, but again, more out of love than her actively training.) But maybe I'll check out an episode... Maybe.
(347.23 KB 1447x2048 sumo-dont-bother.jpg)

>>1490 I ended up checking out the first episode of the Sumo Do, Sumo Don't series. Pozzed beyond belief and no humor apart from a couple of attempts at directly copying the movie. They do provide more of a focus on the sumo culture which I appreciate, but most of the time we get a rant on the patriarchy oppressing women in sumo. Avoid at all costs.
I watched Broadcast News this weekend. It was my first James L. Brooks film (of Simpsons and Taxi fame, as well as Mary Tyler Moore Show) and it seems from his filmography he specializes in romantic comedy drama. I put it off for some time because of the romantic comedy angle, especially because love triangles always have a depressing ending. That said, if you are a fan of analog media there are more than enough scenes about how news stations used to work to keep you along for the ride, and the relationship stuff is mostly in the background until the end. Don't avoid it just because of the romantic comedy angle! At its core, it's about the transition from hard to soft journalism in broadcast media. There's more than enough laughs, and Jack Nicholson steals every scene he's in. It's a lovely little film that feels like it was forced to include some elements just to be a little more mainstream; as if audiences wouldn't watch a smart film about the degradation of journalistic integrity. And that's probably a good call. Making it a hybrid romantic comedy gives it a little more backbone and probably got more people to watch. Shame it did nothing to stop the inevitable decline of the medium, though.
(1.62 MB 1013x1500 American_Made.jpg)

(358.79 KB 1005x1500 Lord_of_War.jpg)

Just watched American Made, it's about how the Iran-Contra affair came to be. Pretty nice movie. In the same vein there's Lord of War if people haven't seen it. tl;dw: If you see glowing niggers, run them over.
>Like Someone in Love (ライク・サムワン・イン・ラブ) This came as a recommendation after I spoke to someone about a movie about a woman hiding her prostitution gig. It's a French-Japanese film directed by an Iranian (what a mix). In this movie, the woman lies to her fiance that she's an escort, but clearly the fiance has suspicions about what's going on behind the scenes. Long shots that really show great acting from the actors and actresses. I've never watched anything else from the director, but apparently this is style through and through. Acting was fine, but I couldn't get on board with the story. The fiance was super unlikable and somehow had this notion that if he married this woman, she would no longer hide secrets from him. I also felt bad for the old man who gets tied up in the whole thing - seriously, why all this for some escort who acts like a bitch? >Turtles Are Surprisingly Fast Swimmers (亀は意外と速く泳ぐ) One of those "what the hell is going on" movies. Basic plot is that a housewife is forced to take care of her husband's turtle while he's gone overseas. She ends up discovering a spy organization and becomes a spy (without ever really knowing what she's doing). Every scene ties to the next one, but it's nonsensical. It gave me some good laughs at times, but only watch if you like random shit. >My Uncle (ぼくのおじさん) From 2016, this one starts off super promising. The story's about a nephew writing about his lazy, philosopher uncle for his over-the-break report. It was a cute comedy with a focus on their dynamic. But then the movie turns into a romantic drama a little over halfway through and it becomes insufferable. The movie ends up moving location to Hawaii and initially it's fine. But then we start with the awkward "I-am-totally-from-America" english from the main actress. Not that the American actors' acting is any better - it's generally super flat. The comedy flies out the window and focuses on shit you don't care about until the very end. It seemed like the typical Japanese issue of not knowing how to end a story, so they completely change direction and make it ultra dramatic. Please fix your shit, writers.
(154.35 KB 727x1024 a-taxing-woman.jpg)

Tampopo is one of those movies I watch every so often (for those who never saw it on stream, I recommend it). I watched Supermarket Woman a while back based solely on the fact it was directed and written by the same director (Itami Jūzō) as Tampopo. But I found it boring overall and not at all like Tampopo (apart from the fact that it featured food and romance as well). More recently, I decided to take a look at A Taxing Woman (マルサの女), released in 1987. The movie's about Ryōko Itakura (played, as always, by the director's wife), a tax investigator who is 100% committed to stopping those looking to invade tax. She ends up investigating Hideki Gondō (played by the cowboy in Tampopo), the owner of love motels who is tax invading to the utmost degree - and with great proficiency. For a movie about legalist scum, it was entertaining. I ended up watching it in chunks and felt that it was quite long (two hours), but the pacing was a lot better than Supermarket Woman. Miyamoto Nobuko really does a great job as the tax investigator, though I frigging hope for the people of Japan that there is no one actually like her out there. Yamazaki Tsutomu is also great as the sleazy love motel owner (who gets all the chicks). However, I can't say I ever really understood what makes his character form a bond with the tax investigator. I was sure it was a ploy to have the investigation called off, but the ending clearly shows that isn't the case. He also admits some dumb shit to her about how he would invade tax, which absolutely blew my mind since you don't want to reveal your secrets to someone investigating you for that exact crime. Consequently, I would have preferred if the movie had stayed away from a romantic angle completely because it didn't jive with the story at all. It's an interesting premise and I liked the individual characters, but Tampopo still reigns supreme in my eyes. The romance didn't make much sense in A Taxing Woman and though generally entertaining, it still felt slightly too long. Completely unrelated, I think the movie was sponsored by Nintendo because we get a scene where the tax investigator plays Super Mario Bros. and they show it on screen for a good twenty seconds.
(132.66 KB 1016x1439 Fulltime_Killer.jpg)

I watched Fulltime Killer (2001) Movie is OK and is a mish mash of different movies. tl;dw: The Chad killer vs The Virgin Fulltime Killer The Virgin: - Has trouble talking to women - Only watch from afar - Has spilled ramen in his apartment - All the planning is done by his manager - Can't reload when stressed out The Chad: - Is flashy when killing targets - Show his face everywhere: doesn't give a fuck - Seduce girls like it's nobody's business - Has time to do mission even while on a date - Even helps The Virgin so he can duel him later
>John Wick 4 Put this off because I usually see it with the same group of friends and we were all busy until this weekend. I still take issue where the direction the series headed after the first entry. Some of the best scenes were John systematically hurting the mob to force them to come out and fight him. Starting with 2, he mostly has a never-ending horde coming for him. The first two are pretty clean in terms of plot, and can stand on their own. The third is the worst entry by far; relying on the mythology of the first two films (especially the second) and largely comprised of filler, it also complete's John's transformation into a superhero. He spends much of the first film hobbled by a single bullet only to fall 200 feet from a rooftop and survive in the third film. While the fourth film does little to correct course, it does fix many of the flaws of 3. Specifically, it has much less filler, and the fights are not pointless. Honestly, I don't really know why they made 3 to begin with, since the plot doesn't advance. But this isn't a review of 3. If you can stomach that John is basically an unstoppable killing machine who can be hit by multiple cars and shirk it off then JW4 is excellent. There's a dozen different major action setpieces, each of which alone could be the crown jewel of a lesser action movie. If you're in this for quality stunts, creative kills, and funny moments then JW4 is very satisfying. I can't rememeber the last time an action film was this long, either. It's not JW1. JW1 stands on its own as a breath of fresh air. JW4 completes the franchise's tranformation into silly bullshit. But at least it has good choreography, and it's not quite as absurd as some new action film series. >Zelig An early Woody Allen mockumentary about a man who is so insecure he mimics those around him to fit in. He can literally change clothes or adjust his ethnicity. No, I'm not kidding. It's ludicrous and hilarious. Say what you will about Woody Allen, this is an inventive film and one of the best mockumentaries I've ever seen, bar none. It's short and ends just as the gimmick wears off. Allen's work is very polarizing to me, but his best stuff knocks it out of the park and this is no exception. It's strange that he became known for his weird, rambling romantic comedies with Diane Keaton given how bland they are. I guess mainstream audiences in the 70's and 80's just weren't open to the creative stuff.
Usually we associate China and Hong Kong with ripping off movies from the west. But what if I told you that they actually released the first Street Fighter movie? That's right folks, not sure if director Wong Jing had a thing for Street Fighter or if he was approached by Capcom, but he released a film based on (some of) the characters a year before the official Street Fighter motion picture. Even then, in his movie about City Hunter starring Jackie Chan, there was a long scene where we get Jackie Chan dressing up as several Street Fighter characters including Chun-Li. That movie has great choreography - as expected from Jackie Chan - and it is on point for a City Hunter portrayal, but it has a lot of what moments and the plot doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Anyway, Future Cops (1993) is about, well, future cops who go back to 1993 in order to protect a judge (known as The Judge) who prosecutes The General in 2043. Some of these future cops (and future villains) are straight-up Street Fighter characters (such as Kent and Dhalsim). The film is a comedy, though for the most part, it's pretty strange. One memorable scene is when a future cop goes into a Super Mario Bros. video game with some girl for a date while explaining that AIDS means no boom-boom in the future for anybody. We also get the main protagonist who turns into Goku unleash his abilities and fight The General at the end of the movie after cheating through life with these future cops. Did I laugh? Yeah. Do I think it's better than the Street Fighter movie? Probably since it doesn't take itself seriously in the least. But I'd say watch at your own risk, it's pretty out there at times with seemingly little direction. Movie can be found on jewtube, though the subs are in rough shape: https://invidious.0011.lt/watch?v=gJF76IqE3ec
(73.50 KB 769x1083 40 year old virgin.jpg)

>40 Year Old Virgin A decent film held down by societal norms, runtime requirements, and a muddled tone. It initially begins as a comedy against its protagonist, a 40 year old living in a retirement community played by Carell. He rides his bike, lives for his hobbies, and is mild mannered but polite, even charming. He goes about working at !Radioshack in a dead end technical job with associates decade(s) his junior, all of whom represent emotionally stunted and vulnerable male archetypes. Malco's character cheats on his wife because he's afraid of commitment and in a marriage with a woman who he thinks is likely to cheat on him due to her job as a club representative. Rudd's character is hung up on an ex-girlfriend to the point of obsession, repeatedly breaking down as the runtime goes on. Rogan's character is a sex pervert who isolates his emotional side from the world outside of his books, and he became like this due to the controlling role of his father. All of these descriptions would make for fine characters if the film was more akin to Flickering Lights, but the film fluctuates between advocacy for self-acceptance and sex obsession. There are tender moments between the male cast as they learn about each other and Carell's lifestyle, but the film has large and obvious portions cut from it and many jokes that fall flat. For example, Malil and Bednob's characters do nothing for the story. They're Hindu and Pakistani, but you can only understand this if you know the ethnicities of the actors. Nothing is done with this dynamic either. Bednob sits at the poker table (but does leave early), and both have minor drama with the rest of the cast, implying a greater role in the group at some point in production. These ultimately draw from the runtime, and many, many scenes and characters like them exist. Arguably, the heroine, Keener's character, is one of these characters. Despite feeling second best to Carell's hobbies, Keener ultimately accepts Carell and has no reaction beyond, "That's a good thing," and "I thought you were going to kill me," to Carell being a virgin. The first does nothing for the message, and the second is a rehash of Rogan's impression of Carell as a serial killer, something Rogan came to admit to Carell after getting to know him. She and her children are rehash characters because the films of the time demanded a heroine, and the societal expectation was and is that Carell will stop being a manchild despite being completely content with his life before coming out of his shell. Due to these extraneous characters, plots, and jokes, the comedy and drama are scattershot, and no character except Carell has an arc. Even then, Carell's arc lacks a final act. It skips immediately to its conclusion. This can be seen with the main four as well. Malco's wife is suddenly pregnant, but he shows insecurity with her being a club rep at the party celebrating this. The plot demands a conclusion with the heroine and the story is pushing the runtime of a standard picture, so this is resolved by showing them happy with their child at the timeskip wedding. Rogan has sex with a woman he introduced to Carell who the group agrees upon being a freak as she masturbates with a showerhead. Despite alluding to her being freakier than him, this arc is once again resolved at the wedding with them happily together in the bleachers. Rudd falls for a girl Rogan hires for his sake, and she alludes to being tied to the mob given her heavy Italian-American accent and stating she would pay to have her ex killed if she could. This arc is resolved at the wedding. The wedding itself is almost a dream-like sequence, and this isn't intentional because the film ends with two random song numbers. To prevent this post from taking an entire page, I'll give an idea of a more perfect version of the movie: Shift the focus from Carell to his friends after the midpoint and extend the movie to three hours. The first portion would be focused on Carell opening up to the group and the group opening up to each other because of Carell's presence as Carell becomes disillusioned with women but the group find what they think is love, it would mostly be the existing film. In the second half of the film, have Carell and Keener get together and follow their story but have the rest of the cast's run parallel. Malco becomes paranoid that the kid may not be his. Rudd finds out what it's like to be on the receiving end of obsession, constantly monitored by a woman he thinks might be in the mafia. Rogan realizes what he looks like to everyone else as he tries to be romantic with a complete sex pervert. Ideally, she would replicate the horsefucking he spoke of at the beginning of the movie. The three take what they've learned from Carell and each other to resolve their situations. Malco is honest with his wife. Rudd focuses on himself, perhaps entering therapy with, comedically, a female therapist. Rogan admits to the group that he's a writer and announces he has been writing a book which, comedically, is either bad or emotional but received with encouragement from his friends. As the group focuses on their own problems, Carell still has his breakup with Keener, even including the callback to Rogan saying he thought she would kill her. After he admits he's a virgin and proposes to her, Hart's character comes and kills him, comedically following up on the earlier scene between him and Malco. Hospitalized, Keener, her family, and Carell's friends stand around his bed and talk about him, calling back to each others' thoughts, again played for comedic effect. The camera rises from Carell as the scene transitions to him marrying Keener. The original sequence is exactly the same, but there's only one musical number. The musical number now leaves room for interpretation as to whether the film ends with Carell living or dying.
(829.74 KB 1500x2250 twin peaks.jpg)

>>1750 >Twin Peaks A great show brought down by suits, but I am only four episodes away from completing it. I truly enjoy MacLachlan's character alongside the rest of the cast. Everyone has depth and aren't inherent evils, and the sometimes jilted nature of the deliveries adds to the experience. Everything about Twin Peaks, the town, is great. It's an ideal American town untouched by the outside world, a straight metaphor for America as a whole. Unfortunately, the increasing influence of suits and releasing of the reigns by Lynch are obvious as the series progresses. My first recognition of this was the sudden cut during Fenn's confession to MacLachlan in his hotel room. The cut to Fenn's face was likely from a group of alternate takes and inserted after an executive saw it. It's painfully obvious that the teenage cast weren't written as being of the age of maturity, and Lynch likely had to write around this change. While this would turn out to be a boon to the plot overall by showing MacLachlan's character as principled, it would obliterate the story in the second season by allowing Welsh's and Zane's characters to exist. Really, everything after the conclusion to the initial plot shouldn't have been included in the first season. My suspicion is that, following the success of the first season, a triple order was demanded by the network or the series had to fill in for another. With this greater order came a greater opportunity for creative freedom, but this was squashed by the studio very quickly in order to cash in on the series. There are nonsensical and worthless plotlines meant to pad time, rehashes of previous plot points, and obvious attempts to both make the series fit the mold of its contemporaries and advertise certain actors who simply aren't up to snuff, particularly Marshall's and Ontkean's characters. There are also painful, strange scenes that occur within the second season which humiliate and assassinate the characters. For major characters, MacLachlan and Fenn are notable. For minor characters, Lynch and Chen are notable. MacLachlan's backstory and reason for not being with Fenn shifts from him being naïve and in love to him being an adulterer with his partner's wife. Fenn shifts from a mature but strange young woman who values her virginity to hopping on any bone she can come across, even if only to manipulate them. Lynch shifts from being near deaf to magically capable of hearing from Amick's character in a forced romance. Chen shifts from being a victim of circumstance with a checkered past to a hardened criminal, something that also drags down Ontkean. The production team had no idea what to do with the series' characters and mistook "flawed and multifaceted" for "secretly bad." Graham's character is a Mary Sue and a genderbent version of MacLachlan. After the resolution of the death of Lee's character, the series should have ended or, if the network seriously wanted more or feared for ratings, the season should have finished with the revocation of MacLachlan's status as an FBI agent and setting up the remaining Quebecois as the new enemy set against the backdrop of the rebuilding of Horne Incorporated while drip feeding the Black/White Lodge mysticism. My only praises to the second season's second half are for the humanization of Ashbrook's character and the horrific reintroduction of DaRe's character. It's a shame MacLachlan's agent stuck him in the Wine Aunt Rabbit Hole, cursing him to Desperate Housewives and Sex and the City until Lynch could bring back the series, only to say he'll never continue it. Out of principle, I may refuse to watch the third season despite knowing Lynch had full control. Twin Peaks isn't Twin Peaks if it doesn't take place entirely within Twin Peaks.
(3.05 MB 1400x2074 project x.jpg)

(283.83 KB 1173x1500 videodrome.jpg)

(883.21 KB 1500x2282 austin powers.jpg)

(75.58 KB 608x875 scary movie.jpg)

>Project X Superbad if you stripped out the Jewish comedy. A super low budget, poorly directed, badly paced found footage film featuring a ton of no-names. It's no wonder critics hated it, it is trash and an excuse to ride the high of Superbad and the Hangover and act as what I assume to be a money laundering scheme. A huge amount of money was definitely used toward the soundtrack. While a decent representation of every teen's ideal generic house party, it's not a compelling film. There's nothing about the characters or their dynamics to latch on to. That said, the party was probably real in some part, something I have to give props to the crew for but also acknowledge that there was almost certainly pedophilia involved. I only watched this because of how aggressively it was marketed to me as a kid. >Videodrome A deep and unexpectedly mystical film. Unfortunately, the pacing is off in many scenes. Its novelization is likely better. It's difficult to stress how much I didn't expect aspects of this film from Cronenberg. The practical effects are great, but I can sometimes tell the difference between previously hard static objects and their soft writhing counterparts. However, this didn't totally draw from the experience. The erotic television and VHS were unnerving. Unfortunately, the chest pussy was inconsistent. It changed shape and detail in use. James Woods really sells the role of a scummy pirate TV host. I barely remembered his role as himself in Family Guy until the end. Overall, the film could have used a two hour runtime to fix the pacing issues, but it's understandable that the film at two hours would have been an extremely hard sell to distributors. >Austin Powers A parody that holds up well, but I can't deny its place in the descent of quality in parody as a genre that culminated in the "X Movie" era. It's the Scary Movie to the Scream of Our Man Flint. A decent romp, the movie is best enjoyed with some knowledge of classic spy films. However, some points of the film are nonsensical. For example, Scott asks, "Why don't we just shoot them?" and a long sequence about how he doesn't understand the spy-villain dynamic plays out afterward in response. However, the fembots are advertised as just what Scott describes, trapping and shooting Powers, but they use an aphrodisiac on Powers when they meet him. They only deploy their tit guns after they fail. I watched it a few times when I was younger and decided to rewatch it now out of a renewed interest in the series. >Scary Movie A low brow parody of Scream, dumbing down the concept by one step. However, it has a surreal quality to it. Many of the scenes (and sometimes lines) are 1:1 to Scream but with obvious changes in dialogue and characters. The effects are terrible, but I think many of the scenes, if not the movie as a whole, were refreshing for the time. If you didn't like Scream or millennia horror in general, you could point to Scary Movie and say, "That's why Scream/millennia horror sucks." The characters are forgettable, save the gay nigger and nigger stoner, but the intention of the film isn't to have memorable characters. You know the archetypes from cultural osmosis because you've seen stoner movies and horror movies in the past. This said, I seriously resent the film and wish its tagline of "no sequels" was true. It ushered in the era of "X Movie" as mentioned above, the rock bottom of parody that set the stage for obnoxious self-referential and meta humor in "intelligent" media. I also blame it and what it's parodying for the rise of ARGs, analog horror, and some of the more grating sides of internet humor. My love-hate opinion of the work may be because this was also something I watched frequently as a child.
>>1754 >I also blame it and what it's parodying for the rise of ARGs, analog horror, and some of the more grating sides of internet humor Explain
>>1792 Sorry for the late response. I haven't checked this thread in a while. I'm sorry if my writing is jumbled here. I'm typing this while very tired. I can post more when I'm more awake if you have any questions after reading. A key component of millennia horror was attempting to blur the line between reality and fiction through viral marketing by the creation of proto-ARGs. The most poignant of these, and the one Scary Movie parodies, is the Blair Witch Project. Many, many ARGs aped the marketing campaign of the Blair Witch Project and its found footage style. Look at TribeTwelve and EverymanHYBRID. Analog horror is more of a branch of ARGs, but it's also rooted in found footage. ARGs prefer to emulate viral marketing by having a high amount of user input. Analog horror prefers to emulate the films being marketed by focusing on the narrative. Additionally, ARGs are posted by the character(s) within the universe, another ape from millennia horror viral marketing, while analog horror is posted by the creator or some other entity that doesn't interact much with the audience, analogous to studios publishing films. As an aside, I predict that someday soon people will misattribute BEN DROWNED from its current misattribution as a creepypasta to it being analog horror because it doesn't follow the trappings of live action ARGs and has bleed-through with many of the tropes of analog horror. Another point is the placement and use of technology between pre-millennia horror, millennia horror, and ARGs and analog horror. In pre-millennia horror, technology was scary in a scientific way. Nuclear bombs, zombie viruses, space blobs, etcetera are things of pre-millennia horror. Millennia horror integrates technology into the horror and typically makes the plot hinge on it but almost never makes the horror about technology. ARGs and analog horror are more often then not about the civilian horror of technology or include it in some way that technology is inherently evil. For a third point, the existence of meta understanding in horror. In pre-millennia horror, the only people who would know about horror movies would typically be weirdos because they weren't culturally relevant aside from monster movies. In millennia horror, everyone knows about horror movies because they're culturally relevant, even though the characters still follow the same tropes despite the creators pretending they don't (more on that later). Scary Movie directly parodies this. This meta understanding of horror also exists in analog horror and ARGs. ARGs take place in alternate versions of reality and thus must have it unless their alternate reality is predicated on the lack of horror films in the mainstream, and analog horror does this in a structural sense, typically approaching the central topic of their horror and dissecting it through faux documentaries and presentations which are usually made by the government (more on that later). Fourth point, the place of realism in characters and drama over horror. Scary Movie is absolutely meant to parody these. A major focus of millennia horror is attachment to the characters through the creation of a drama while the horror acts as means of moving the plot. Through this, directors think they're making their characters less stereotypical, but Scary Movie points out that there is no removal of stereotypes. Instead, the stereotypes have changed to match the times. The characters now about horror films and are meant to be deep or complex, but they still abide by horror tropes because there wouldn't be a movie otherwise. Characters do this in ARGs despite direct audience input. You can learn everything about a character in this alternate reality and even give him advice, but he'll still die to the scary monster or go insane from the computer game because there wouldn't be a story otherwise. In analog horror, the focus on drama and worldbuilding is supreme over the horror as even the horror itself is usually given a character. Final point, the place of the government and the closeness of horror. In pre-millennia horror, the government would usually either save the day or fail, but it was almost never inherently untrustworthy. In millennia horror, the government is always untrustworthy, and there is no safety in your day-to-day life because of it. You could find an ancient entity in the woods, and the government will cover it and your death to it up instead of sending a team to kill it and save you. You could be kidnapped and tortured in a foreign country, and going to the embassy is pointless because the government is in on it too. Serial killers can make elaborate deathtraps and taunt the government then get away with it. In ARGs and analog horror, the government is almost always either infiltrated by the horror, directly has a hand in it, or is trying to cover it up. When the government fails, which it always does, it's because it underestimated the threat or was incompetent despite having an agency or bureau dedicated to the threat.
>>1855 As for the grating side of internet humor, it's easier to explain Scary Movie's place in it first. Scary Movie would spawn the litany of "X Movie" genre parodies. Genre parodies are a hotbed of LOL SO RANDOM humor. For example, Alvin and the Chipmunks having rabies in Disaster Movie. The Chipmunks shouldn't be there, but they are for no reason other than that it's funny. This stems from the approach taken by Scary Movie 3, but that stems from the approach taken by Scary Movie (which itself stems from Don't Be a Menace While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood, but that's outside of the scope of this). Scary Movie takes events and tropes from millennia horror and adds an element of lowbrow comedy to them to parody their existence. For example, the dick through the gay nigger's ear is a parody of a scene in Scream 2 where a knife is used instead. This is intentional because it's funny for the character who has been established as practically openly gay to be killed by putting his ear to a gloryhole where he's mindfucked and it parodies how retarded the kill it's referencing is. If this was made in a later "X Movie" the dick would be green and there would be a two minute sequence of Shrek killing the guy with it. LOL SO RANDOM humor would eventually transform into "ironic" and "post-ironic" humor. Now Shrek is not only the one doing it, the Albanian national anthem is playing and it's bitcrushed to near unrecognizability. Now for the place of millennia horror in grating internet humor, referential humor. Millenia horror helped popularize referential humor through the previously mentioned meta nature as characters would mention past horror movies by name or talk about how they were going through a horror movie trope. Scream is a major player in this, especially with its running "How to Survive a Horror Movie/Trilogy/Sequel/Reboot" gag. This is a soft form of breaking the fourth wall as both the audience and the characters understand that they're watching a movie and in a movie respectively yet can't consciously act on it due to, again, the necessity of a plot. Referential humor used to be something only nerds would do, but the explosion in popularity of the medium as films became cheaper to distribute and wealth grew led to the popularization of references. If you had never watched Nightmare on Elm Street, you would still understand the reference to it in Scream because of cultural osmosis. If you had never watched The Good Doctor, you would be able to understand the "I am a real doctor!" meme through cultural osmosis. For an older and likely more relatable example, remember how often "The cake is a lie!" was spoken by people who had never played Portal but used as a means of group identification. Rather than keep the reference within the community of the property or community of the genre of the property, it's exposed to the outside and used by the outside in place of humor. Whoever uses the line doesn't really get the joke. He's just repeating it. Scream begins with referential humor. It's funny that someone who "likes scary movies," mixes up Michael Meyers and Jason Voorhees. The audience laughs at the joke despite not being able to do so themselves. "Do you like scary movies?" is now engrained into their psyches. They'll repeat it to their friends, and both of them will think it's funny because its context is now as a movie reference rather than satire. The line has lost its context and is now funny because something well known said it. Like LOL SO RANDOM humor, referential humor evolved into the grating "ironic" and "post ironic" humor of the present day. Winnie the Pooh is dancing in a corner of the Backrooms next to a white Monster can while Caramelldansen plays. Wojack has fifty variants because his degeneration into "feels guy" would eventually become "feelings guy". Pepe is a common Twitch emote.
>Watch Last Tango in Paris >Find out after the fact that Bernardo Bertolucci, the director, was considered a "protégé of Pier Paolo Pasolini" That sums up my review of the movie right there.
I finally sat through "In the Soup". Only hardcore Steve Buscemi fans need apply. Interestingly, though, it has cameos from some famous people: Sam Rockwell, Jim Jarmusch, hell, the "little man" is Mike Anderson from Twin Peaks!
>>1954 I found a somewhat similar but better Steve Buscemi movie called "Living in Oblivion". He stars as a director trying to get one scene done but everything keeps going wrong (in multiple layers - Inception style). I don't know why but I have the feeling that blam would be interested in this movie if he hasn't seen it already.
Rewatching chungking express and fallen angels. I cant explain it. Something about the alienation, and cynicism of a culture apart. A people separated from themselves. It just makes the comfiest movies of all time. I often fall asleep with them on. What was the message? Whats he getting at?


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply