>>71499 >I think he might have a point if he's talking about it from a fantasy biology/history perspective. No, he doesn't. Because, following from the Progressive mindet he appears to be expressing, the "only" reason one would ever care to take pleasure in being a racist, even in fiction, is because you are a racist IRL. In fact, you're even worse than the people who you accuse of being racists because they're at least "honest" about being "terrible" and "horrible" people. You, on the other hand, seek to mask your true intentions by giving the impression that you're an ally.

>>71508 What the fuck are you going on about? How did you get any of that from me rambling about how much I like the dynamics of monster girls eating people?

i wish there was more of say a lesbian couple having strapon se after swallowing someone then viewing to the tiny in the belly with an eternal view

>>71513 >How did you get any of that from me rambling about how much I like the dynamics of monster girls eating people? Because the original comment made was about how fantasy lets be "ironically" racist: >>71486 When that's not how shit works.

>>71517 Again, the whole point of what I was saying is that he might have a point if he was strictly speaking about 'non-cringe race play' from a fantasy biology/history perspective. In other words, I am interpreting his definition of 'non-cringe' to be opposite the type of cringe race play you see now and again (i.e. "You're an oppressor/I'm the oppressed, I'll eat you for racial justice" or other dumb shit that arises now and again). From a fantasy perspective, fantasy biology and how that can shape the history and societies of that world can be interesting to discuss, and lead to all sorts of novel scenarios beyond basic "OMG girl eat person randomly" that defines so much of vore content. I'm not accusing anyone of being racist or masking any intentions. In the first place, I'm not sure how you derived "fantasy lets people be 'ironically' racist" from "non-cringe race play" when that could mean anything based on his definition of cringe (what if he's against the shitty porno tier acting over stuff like BBC?)

>>71518 >I'm not sure how you derived "fantasy lets people be 'ironically' racist" from "non-cringe race play" Because the ONLY people who I see unironically and literally using words like "cringe" are Progressives. No else talks like that. It equivalent to how you can tell the difference a Canadian and an American by how they pronounce words like Toronto.

>>71519 You gotta be at least 18 to post here bud

>>71519 I'm almost certain that the usage of cringe online started with people making fun of morons online and people who were into shit like vore, so I'm not following you here.

>>71522 >the usage of cringe online started with people making fun of morons online You mean the very same idiots who started the "Okay, boomer" meme?

>>71523 No, I'm talking about the people making fun of dipshit liberals who threw pissy fits over shit like the 2016 election. Now I'm starting to question if you're over the age of 18. Do you seriously not remember how popular stuff like cringe compilations of progressives was in 2016? That was only 8-9 years ago.

>>71524 >Do you seriously not remember how popular stuff like cringe compilations of progressives was in 2016? You mean the endless vids of Progressive screaming at the top of their lungs because they don't get their way? That stuff stopped being funny after the first week, especially when they've been doing it in everywhere, from public square to literal senate hearings, have been doing it nonstop for the past decade. Also, normal people still never used words like "cringe" to describe those compilations. It was always referred to as salt mining.

>>71525 Anon, you are the definition of cringe

>>71491 I am an actual racist, at least by modern standards, but race-play based off of American race relations is just so tacky and cliche that I can't enjoy it and only manage to tolerate it. I'd much rather imagine a feisty goblin girl humiliating and eating an arrogant elf, or a human noblewoman eating some tiny faeries that she thinks of as little more than dumb animals, that kinda stuff.

>>71525 If I'm understanding this correctly. We've gone from 'The ONLY people who I see unironically and literally using cringe are progressives' to "It was used by people to make fun of morons in the same context as the dipshits who came up with the term okay boomer'. Finally, we arrive at 'It was used endlessly with videos making fun of progressives throwing a pissy fit, but it stopped being funny after the first week AND the real term is salt mining and normal people don't use cringe to describe those compilations despite the fact that the term has seen consistent and continuous use". Are you absolutely certain you are the normal one here, especially since you are on a vore board of all places?

>>71529 >It was used by people to make fun of morons in the same context as the dipshits who came up with the term okay boomer' Except I never said that. >Finally, we arrive at 'It was used endlessly with videos making fun of progressives throwing a pissy fit, but it stopped being funny after the first week AND the real term is salt mining and normal people don't use cringe to describe those compilations despite the fact that the term has seen consistent and continuous use". Doesn't it show the weakness of your argument when you have to put words in my mouth that I never said?

>>71532 >put words in my mouth that I never said >>71523 >>71525 Anon, we call it paraphrasing.

>>71533 >we call it paraphrasing By making a longer post than what I actually said?

>>71534 By combining your statements into one? Yes. Would you rather my post have been: If I'm understanding this correctly. We've gone from 'Because the ONLY people who I see unironically and literally using words like "cringe" are Progressives. No else talks like that. It equivalent to how you can tell the difference a Canadian and an American by how they pronounce words like Toronto' to ">the usage of cringe online started with people making fun of morons online You mean the very same idiots who started the "Okay, boomer" meme?'. Finally, we arrive at 'You mean the endless vids of Progressive screaming at the top of their lungs because they don't get their way? That stuff stopped being funny after the first week, especially when they've been doing it in everywhere, from public square to literal senate hearings, have been doing it nonstop for the past decade. Also, normal people still never used words like "cringe" to describe those compilations. It was always referred to as salt mining." Because I can certainly start doing that, if that's what you want.

>>71535 >Yes. So you have no argument and have to make one out of thin air in order to defend your point? On top of showing that you have zero ability to understand how an imageboard works. Who's the newfag in this scenario?

>>71536 I don't think I've called anyone a newfag, or implied I frequent boards often. I just wasn't sure if you were over the age of 18 considering you aren't aware of common language and online trends. This is all especially moot when an anon who presumably the guy you threw a hissy fit over has come out and said he isn't into dipshit progressive crap.

For fuck sakes, can we stop just ranting about shit that people aren't even talking about. This is the third thread I've seen where someone brings up something and then someone else has to start shit becuse they see a hidden message that wasn't their to being with. All these messages over someone saying "non-cringe race play". They were adding on to the discussion, not trying to start shit. I don't even know how you can believe those words would indicate their beliefs and then claim it as a "Progressive mindset" on a fucking fetish board talking about their fetish. He isn't saying he wants a black dude to cuck him for equality or some shit like that.

>>71537 >I just wasn't sure if you were over the age of 18 considering you aren't aware of common language and online trends. I'm sorry but I have a life, with bills to pay and shit to do. I don't see it as productive nor beneficial to care about that latest drama over what some jackass said on Twatter, or the latest Titkok challenge that retards are doing. >>71538 >This is the third thread I've seen where someone brings up something and then someone else has to start shit becuse they see a hidden message that wasn't their to being with. Where do you think you are? >I don't even know how you can believe those words would indicate their beliefs Because the words and terms you use in conversation DO indicate your own beliefs and lifestyle.

>>71542 >because I am better than you kill yourself

>>71544 >I am better than you How did you get that out of my saying that I'm too busy for social media?

>>71542 >drama over what some jackass said on Twatter, or the latest Titkok challenge that retards are doing How exactly did we get to that from only progressive people use the word cringe?

>>71546 >anon1 expresses his kinks >anon2 you should be ashamed of your kinks! >convo devolves

>>71542 >I'm sorry but I have a life, with bills to pay and shit to do. Then why are you on here starting stupid arguments?

>>71542 Where do you think you are? You're on a fetish board. You're the only guy here making it political, and people are sick of it. 90% of this board is about vore, sharing pictures of vore, things similar to vore and talking about vore, you think this is fucking 4chan or some rage bait baord but it's literley just a fetish board for vore. Your arguments are as bad as those people who think art is political. You see something that could link to an argument and focus on that one detail rather than any other part of the conversation. I don't care, and I doubt anyone but you cares about your or anyone else's beliefs on this thread or 90% of threads. This is a thread about opinions on vore and discussions on vore, not about how retarded you think people are. So please, just shut the fuck up and take it somewhere else. Make a thread for this shit rather then derailing this or any thread. Or better yet, go to Off Topic; that is what it was made for.

>>71547 >you should be ashamed of your kinks When is this never NOT a rule to live by, if your kinks are anything more than pregnancy and sex in the missionary position for the purposes of procreation? >>71549 >Where do you think you are? A imageboard that's an offshoot of the original offshoot created specifically for the people who are "too extreme for Cuckchan". >You're the only guy here making it political, and people are sick of it. Isn't there like five other threads on the board's first page that have devolved into political shitflinging? >Your arguments are as bad as those people who think art is political. Those people are correct, just not for the reasons they want. >and focus on that one detail Because details matter? >This is a thread about opinions on vore and discussions on vore <not about how retarded you think people are Isn't that exactly what opinions are, though?

I love slimy insides. Goo-stuffed stomachs are amazing. Haven't seen lots of it but would like to.

>>71551 I like it too, but there's an upper-limit to it for me. It's nice when it's got a very specific type of viscosity to it, but when it starts looking like phlegm, I find it a little off-putting. Also feel like there are too many artists that make slimy insides look too much like drool.

>>71550 >>71544

I haven't been part of this autistic argument but I honestly think you may be retarded if you genuinely can't tell the difference between "monster girl eats humans and calls them inferior" and BLACKED

>>71555 True. It's fiction at the end of the day. If you enjoy characters eating and digesting other people, there really should be no problem with fictional racism. Being racist in real life is bad, but eating people in real life is also bad.

>>71557 >Being racist in real life is bad No, it's not.

>>71557 >but eating people in real life is also bad. Source?