>>67303 https://x.com/RaveNSFWalt/status/1708251720952750129/photo/1 https://www.deviantart.com/retrobelly/art/Samwich-Pixel-Animation-895476716

if anyone has anything else of theirs, feel free to contribute

>>67306 their stuff's pretty good

>>67303 why does retro even care about what a bunch of trannies thinks?

Didn't he get exposed for grooming kids on discord?

>>67376 No

i was in their server for a very brief period of time very quickly realized how many people in there were obviously children and dipped!

>>67461 Wait seriously?

>>67462 Gotta be real with you chief, I'm not sure if I believe you. You'd need to verify with Retro in a dm by showing your ID Card (At least only the date & birth with everything else blurred and blacked out) There's no way any children would be able to access her server without an ID which they would need to be an adult for that

>>67463 >her

>>67475 ?

>>67461 so the age verification thing was just for fishing out who is a kid and who's not? >>67463 it's possible for them to get in by using someone's else ID. >take pic of parents ID >born 1981, a 43 year old who uses discord? hmmm >childish behavior then they figure it out, but could also be an autistic manchild. >someone born 1990-2004, generation that grew up with internet probably just some loser. >>67476 retrobelly isn't a woman, he is just larping.

>>67376 >>67461 After looking into their post history. start to suspect retro either is a Nice person in denial or was "groomed" by the lgbt-mafia to be their goon.

>>67461 leak it all.

>>67543 "bogbog" becomes "faggot" "pdf-file" becomes "nice person" lol what is this site?

>>67543 >the passive aggressive Capitalizing Like This combined with emojis This shit pisses me off so much, it's such a distinctly condescending typing style that only the most annoying faggots use. Genuinely grim to see Retro became one of THOSE people.

>>67545 Deviantart. Also they deleted that frisk animation a long while ago

>>67302 god i still regret not asking them for a noelle animation back when they did free requests and didn't freak out over character ages

>>67542 Idk this just seems like blatant trying to go after Retro. Sure they're not free of sin, but still. They've moved on and haven't done anything crazy. Been friends with Retro for a while now and been in their server for just as long too. And there's little proof you of anything you just said.

>>67542 Can't accuse someone for anything like that if there's no evidence. And the screenshots up here is just a nothing burger, she deleted that Frisk animation and if someone asks her why its not around she'll just tell them that it featured a minor and that's why its not around. >>67461 And also, I still don't believe you. If you were really in her server and got to even bother to know the people there, then you'd know that's not the case.

>>67551 >>67552 getting awfully defensive. >she deleted that Frisk animation and if someone asks her why its not around she'll just tell them that it featured a minor and that's why its not around you can see that someone asked retro why he created the animation in the first place if he is so against using minor characters in fetish art. he suggest retro is being dishonest, hints that retro is only doing this to comply with DA's new policy out of fear. why do you think he mentioned "DA warning", "make a sharp turn" and quoted Aristotle? Don't know if retro is a ESL and just didn't understand him. sure he delivered the message in a very indirect way, but it boils down to if retro was okay with the frisk animation for so long, what made him change his mind? because people just don't just change like that out of the blue Retro just dodge the question and said he realize it's bad. this is akin to living next to a hardcore libtard who just suddenly becomes a hardcore cuckservative, he tells you he realize the side he was on was wrong. I hope you can see why this raises eye browns.

>Artist with no limitations suddenly decides to limit himself and deletes everything with objectionably-aged characters >Upload schedule becomes drastically slower than before, and art generally becomes more boring to look at Now where have I seen this before?

>>67557 who's this?

>>67551 >They've moved on and haven't done anything crazy. hi undernom/retrobelly moderators, how are you?

>>67580 >severely retarded adult dates a minor named dahlia no way its just like my ace attorneys

>>67580 >happen 2 months after wailing on blazekiller19 You know this makes retrobelly a massive hypocrite. >berating lolicions >while dating a 14-15 year old IRL retro is the same as blaze, the only differences is that retro is dishonest about it. >looking at the DESIGN its clearly a child retro is aware of that this argument could be made for most of his characters, right? Celeste is 19 in her game, but her design reminds people more of a child rather than a young adult. retro's behavior reminds me of the creator of Mighty Magiswords

>>67545 They cried too much about loli being Nice person, so they wordfiltered it. It's really the user fault at this point

>>67578 SpaghettiZ

>>67461 Same, I joined before there was age verification on that server and left like a day later because it made me uncomfortable. It's hard to explain but you could just tell the server was full of kids. The fact RB got outted as a "big fan of kids" didn't surprise me.

>>67613 How could you even tell?

>>67606 damn, you've just opened an old wound, his old artstyle was great why the fuck did he change it?

>>67606 What did he do?

>>67615 Hard to explain, but kids act different on the internet. Generally more immature, have pfps that include the latest internet fad slop, etc. I guess the way they spoke and what their discord profiles looked like made me think the server was full of kids. Again, it was an educated assumption, it's not like I asked, but I trust my own judgement. I could be schizo and it was all just manchildren, but whatever.

>>67617 It sucks man, his art genuinely doesn't even feel like vore anymore. It always feels like the vore aspect was just slapNice personn as an afterthought to a piece that was primarily intended to be WG. And this only really happened after he limited himself. I don't know if it's connected or not but it sucks either way.

>>67621 This fucking word filter I'm not trying to say the philia word you dumbass I said Slapped and On.

>>67619 Most likely manchilden. Especially one of them, never seen anything you've seen in the server and I've been there for quite a while. Regardless, I'm uncertain given the lack of evidence other than word of mouth. Can't go off of assumptions alone

>>67598 >celeste >she Oh dear

>>67625 >Madeline(MC of Celeste) is trans guys! >announced 2 years after the release of the game. it's never explicitly confirm in game. the devs are just trying to earn some social brownie points.

>>67618 He purged his gallery of any characters that could be perceived to be a minor. Don't remember exactly when it happen, but think it was around 2018-19. He used to draw this snow woman accompanied by a smaller one with a pink hat.

>>67557 >>67680 Me when someone decides to stop being a p3d0 (based)

>>67689 hi undernom

>>67689 haven't you learned anything from this thread? >be retrobelly >wail about how bad it is to use minor characters in fetish art. >while dating a 14-15 year old IRL seems to had been done in order to create a false perception of themselves. both for others and themselves. >SpaghettiZ >delete all of his characters that could be perceived as minor out of the blue one day. >but been drawing them for years prior without issue If you think SpaghettiZ had a change of heart just like that, you are naive. bet if your neighbor who took part in a pride parade last day, suddenly tells you they are straight now, you just believe them without doubt. pretty clear he just did it to shield himself from future drama, not because he just one day thought to himself "WTF this is wrong!".

>>67694 Mind if I ask what SpaghettiZ? I never heard of what happened or whatever they did

>>67695 What SpaghettiZ did? Sorry, typo

>>67695 see >>67680 likely not done out of an desire for redemption like >>67689 implies. probably done out of fear of future drama.

>>67697 yeah, but that's not the only thing, his artstyle also declined catastrophically

>>67697 Oh... that's disgusting. How I haven't seen this is beyond me. How long ago was this?

>>67700 2015-2017 on eka's portal. if you weren't a frequent visitor on eka, then it's possible he went under your radar. Him joining twitter and deviantart 2017, might have played a role in his sudden purge. Maybe not personally target, he likely saw others getting mobbed on these site, figure that his art could get himself target. Look retro you share the same "preference" as these people, wailing at them isn't going to absolve you of your own guilty pleasure or make you look "better". MonaYai910 was right you are just doing this to hide being detected.

>>67580 >im 19 let me guess retro is actually much older?

>>67730 back then perhaps, but they're definitely lying about it now.

>>67734 Actually. Raving and Retro are separate people. I would know from speaking to them both

>>67743 >Actually. Raving and Retro are separate people. I would know from speaking to them both prove it. the style is near identical

>>67775 Just clean your eyes. Retrobelly's more polished/has better anatomy

>>67776 "im saying that the artist with a near identical style to retrobelly, hangs around the same group of friends, profuses that they wont draw "minors" after being called out for it, is infact not retrobelly" getting awfully defensive over someone you seem to know. unless of course, this is rave/retro speaking. prove they're different people.

>>67777 I'm with the other guy Assuming the sprites in >>67734 is an example of his style, that shit is NOT on the same level as even retrobelly's older animations The only similarity is that it's vore pixel art that tries to shade it, everything else looks extremely clunky if you compare it at all Not a moralfag or retro or whatever, it's just blatantly not the same artist (unless retro is trying to hide his power level or some shit)

>>67787 interesting how they can apparently be so different that they shade so similarly and draw eyes similarly and also hang around the same group of friends and yet apparently they're not the same person.

>>67790 retrobelly: last known art post, january 2023 ravensfwalt: twitter account made february 2023 pic related, similar bulge style

>>67790 >>67791 >>67792 I honestly find it much more likely he's just trying to emulate retro's artstyle, I don't like knocking newer artists but there's blatantly something missing in Rave's style despite the similarities. I can tell when an artist actually is trying to come back under a new name, like undernom becoming nomminramen, but this ain't it. Again, I could only see this being retrobelly if he's deliberately making his style worse to pretend he's a newer artist. Which then, if he were doing that then wouldn't he change up how he shades and draws eyes too? I'm guessing you just somehow haven't noticed how less fluid the animation looks, since it makes the skill gap really obvious

>>67801 Actually as far as was told by Retro, Raving was kicked from her server. Although it wasn't for this reason. Can't say what the reason is though, as I can't remember the full details she told me in a vc within her server

>>67812 Sounds like youre really bothered that someones noticed the similarities.

>>67801 A clever artist would restrict parts of their style to hide similarities to their old accounts. MysticEmerald, aka Lpixel, did the same thing. Though you might know that, undernom.

ah sweet a schizo thread

>>67790 >they shade so similarly and draw eyes similarly that is just simple shading and generic cartoon eyes, just a simple google search of cartoon eyes will show similar eyes(reminds me of splatoon). this isn't really a hint. Sorry to tell you artists, buy your "unique" style isn't so unique, anyone who grew up with the same media as you can tell where your "inspiration" came from. >similar bulge style Again generic >hang around the same group of friends >retrobelly: last known art post, january 2023 >ravensfwalt: twitter account made february 2023 these on the other hand might actually hint at an connection.

>>67801 >I can tell when an artist actually is trying to come back under a new name, like undernom becoming nomminramen >undernom >artist his stuff is ms-paint tier and bad even for deviantart standards!

>>67816 This post still baffles me lol. I mentioned undernom being nomminramen IN the post, and also accounted for the "could be him holding back his style" possibility in the very next line Why would he make his art shittier but keep defining visual details like the eyes if he was trying to hide his style. That's like if you tried to pretend you're someone else IRL by stopping taking showers. Retro being this dude (and me being undernom) makes no fucking sense.

>>67698 he probably just restrain himself in order to not strike the ire of the deviantart trannies. Seriously, why are vore artists so scared of getting "canceled". >oh no the deviantards have stopped watching my content >this means a few less views are they all attention whores or something?

Here are two things I got that I don't think got uploaded by them anywhere.