>>456301
so basically, you're denying the existence of the unwritten rule that it is peculiar to sit next to a complete stranger in a waiting room when there are plenty of empty chairs that are not next to somebody? that the red chairs depicted in
>>456293 are, in fact, merely white chairs? that they belong to the same 'random' dataset as the other white chairs, with near-equal weighting?
the red chairs are red because they are 'next to' the green chairs. they are defined by being adjacent to the green chairs. if somebody decides to sit in a red chair, they do so knowing that they are sitting 'next to' whoever is sitting in that green chair. and yet you insist that that does not necessarily factor into their motive for selecting that chair? that it was a completely random choice? pure delusion.
the reality is, when a young woman sits next to a young man in a waiting room with no shortage of empty chairs, she is inviting him to make a move on her. that's a fact. imagine if a fat stinky incel playing a handheld console was sitting in a green chair
>>456293- would a hot Stacy sit in a red chair next to him, 'randomly'? of course not. she would sit as far away from him as she possibly could, or perhaps one seat closer than as far as possible to be nice.
>>456307
everybody does here, it's not possible to get anywhere otherwise. there's no public transportation, it's just roads