>>43419
I'll give it to marvel, they atleast had the foresight to focus their equivalent of the compact collection titles on the quality silver age stuff. DC continually fucks this up by fixating on more modern titles, all of which continue to fail to garner the interest and attention of kids because they're all written for late teens and twenty somethings. DC continually remains ashamed of their kid friendly history while Marvel is just out to make a quick buck. Ultimately their effort with these reader friendly collections is a little wasted since they dont advertise this shit like they should, but I digress.
The dollar store floppy approach is just as bad for the point you mentioned, but from what I saw in person, they're just stocking number ones. Maybe that will help? They're really not putting their best foot forward in anycase.
>Also, didn't DC and Marvel both stop going through Diamond a few years ago? That's why Diamond is fucked now. But they still aren't smart enough to just sell comics in the checkout lanes of supermarkets, and write comics that normal people would like and understand
Yes, yes, and yes. Somehow Archie understands this better than the big two (and even Archie spent the last decade doing retarded shit). People dont direct enough hate towards Archie. Literally the face of all ages comics and they went all in on edgy media adaptions instead of selling their characters to kids. Now what do they have beyond baby boomer impulse purchases? Absolutely zilch.