>>29292
>Having a villain use religion as a weapon for dogmatic zealotry beliefs is not anti-Christian.
Gonna have to backtrack for this one.
>>28844 said it was anti-Christian.
>>28850 said Christians that read the comic for /ss/ will not like the anti-Christian message, in spite of the fact reading a comic for /ss/ is very non-Christian
>>28851 said no, it's about blind zealotry.
I replied that most Christians are normalfags which are blind retards anyways, since most people are normalfags. But even walking back that statement of mine, and accepting it's about zealotry, not Christianity, the second post I reference is still the source of my overall focus on the hypocrisy of complaining about about anti-Christian themes in an /ss/ thread. He believes it to be anti-Christian, and that's what makes him a strange hypocrite.
>But everyone sins
Yes, you're right. That doesn't make it any less hypocritical to be mad at something for being anti-Christian when he's reading it for the purpose of indulging in a Christian sin.
>Enjoying pure fiction isn't anti-Christian
So? It's still a sin to enjoy lustful fiction as is the purpose of this thread. Or are you telling me it's not a sin to jack off to porn if all the porn is drawn? Oh, is masturbation a sin? So it's fine as long as you don't touch your dick while looking at tons of illustrated erotica? That seems like an odd line to draw in the sand, but whatever ultimately justifies you being upset about anti-Christian sentiment in a fetish thread I suppose.
>>29293
Thanks anon. I could of sworn I saved it. I have some lolified cape stuff, but practically no shotafied characters.