>>6782
The silliest part is that the line of logic they use is:
>well, just you don't see it doesn't mean it's not happening
The problem with them using that line of logic is that makes sense at first glance, even in "reverse":
>Jews run the world and consider us as sub-human cattle
<I've never seen a Jewish person act that way
>doesn't mean it's not happening
>those in power to genocide the white race
<I don't seen anyone doing that
>doesn't mean it's not happening
It's decent enough line of logic, but the problem with it,
is that it's sensical, which can dismantle the indoctrination. There's also the fact that no evidence to the contrary doesn't in itself mean that it is' happening; it's just a possibility that needs more proof to strengthen the initial claim.
You could fire back with all of those examples with:
<that doesn't mean it is happening, you fucking retard
Which is also true. So in other words, they just used what's effectively a double-edged sword; that kid's beliefs may not be true because it relies on ignorance, but
Garnet's beliefs may not be true because it relies on presumption. Neither case relies on the truth and could be completely full of shit depending on the reality of the situation.
Also, these fuckers should be hung for trying to indoctrinate children with this bullshit conditioning to set them up for white-hating dogma, but that comes free at this point.