>>14232
>Whether or not something is ethical/good or bad depends on the perspective people adopt personally
This is just not true, people have evolved to find things disgusting, and abhorrent based on evolutionary pressures. It's why we find the smell of shit, certain non-procreation sex acts (like homosexuality), and also race mixing disgusting. Having an attraction to these thing is abnormal, and a sign of a mental illness, because people that engaged with these thing didn't pass on there genes. This is what we can define as "good" and "bad" ethics.
>Censorship doesn't work because you can't objectively define things as objectively good or bad
As stated above, we can define anything dysgenic or any behavior that would lead to a genetic dead-end immoral. these are usually defined as "anti-social" behavior, though it's been perverted by ideology, and death-cultism, through propaganda that our current sick society propagates.
>It's like defining hate speech, you can't define hate because everyone has a different perception
There are good definitions. just because the left uses it for stupid and often spiteful reasons, doesn't mean that it has no role in our society. Even without "hate-speech" laws all societies have taboos, that if crossed, will result in ostracization and mob justice.
>Freedom of speech is most efficient because it allows for people in a society to collectively come to terms with what is good or bad in general which automatically roots out things that are actually cancerous.
This is just not true, when left to the free marketplace of ideas, the most intolerant always wins, which is ironically enough the "left" (even through they pretend to be tolerant and open). Without becoming as intolerant as them you'll never win.
>>14233
>Your disgust doesn't unequal unethical, dumb cunt.
as stated above it usually does.
again, your argument about censorship not working is wrong. just look at my previous example of France and Russia, it's only because of tolerance and appeasements that these government failed. China will only collapse when it relaxes it's censoring laws, and starts tolerating counter ideas and narratives to their own. you should never tolerate your enemies, you should marginalize them whenever possible.
>>14236
>>14237
>>14433
I've stated previously about how china is a shithole compared to other countries, and how they can only maintain themselves through censorship, like every other nation/ideology/narrative and exists. Truth is only a convenient weapon, good to have but not needed.
So in conclusion we should ban /interracial/. you should never tolerate your enemies, and always tolerate your friends so long it's convenient.