>>163485
> the new /b/ BO who enables their shit and hasn't been kicked out for rules skirting bullshit.
What rule skirting? I've been very open with how I run the board, both publicly and on IRC. I will allow just about as much free speech as the Admins are willing, as stated by their global rules--
>Blame Rain for this situation
Unironically. If he never locked my Alina thread I probably would have gotten bored with his dead /b/ after a day or two instead of sticking around for weeks to argue for it's unlocking--
>>163486
>The people spamming CP are the ones complaining about the pedos
Obviously. Why would people who just want a place to talk and share interests try and antagonize one of the few hosts allowing them to do so? Doesn't make sense at all, there.
>>163491
>The funny thing is that Kazu going on a banning spree really showed that it's only a handful of people who are causing issue.
Yes, the mods going on the banning sprees against things that broke no rules were the ones causing problems. If something is going to change, it will be from the global rules and not retard moderators who try and enforce their own biases on the users of a site they don't own.
>>163494
>unless you are a faggot infiltrating to shit on the site from the inside because of ideology or the lulz.
This is a big thing, and another definite future problem. No real way for the Admins to prevent people "infiltrating" the global team, really, though I recommended the board owners be given global opportunities. At least those who own boards have something to lose if they abuse their power as global moderators, whereas random people applying for it have no reason not to kamikaze things after they are burnt out on being a mod--
>>163501
>Currently right now the vast majority of users are here to share illegal material.
There is no illegal content, retard. In fact, even Instagram videos get deleted because that site allows more than this one. The pictures are very tame, and even the most tame studio content is deleted (for the simple fact that there is money involved there, I support, despite many studios being completely legal to buy in America)--
>>163504
Why would the former /hebe/ BO care about that? And in here, no less? He didn't seem like a shit-disturber to me.
>>163506
>Rain kicking Kazu off /b/ for taking care of the problem was where all this shit began
Rain's board was double-digit posts per
DAY because of the decision to rulecuck things that didn't break any rules. It wasn't only Kazu deleting the PGT which simply caused /hebe/ to be created. They were both shit on that board because neither of them cared to try and defend free speech.
>the new BO that is being a rules skirting faggot enabling this shit.
The rules are enforced. Period. There is no need to skirt, as I've said above in the first statement of this post.
>Didn't that guy get v& soon after setting up his site?
No, his host told him they contacted the local authorities on him under suspicion of CP. He closed the site 2 days after that. There is no proof he was arrested; my guess is he decided it wasn't worth the risk and burned the site (understandably)--
>>163510
Chai wasn't the /hebe/ BO, and Chai is still a local mod on /b/. Not a very active mod, but he is still alive at the very least.
>>163520
>The questionnable thing is Acid keeping that fag around even if it's obvious to everyone why the BO should not be tolerated besides "it's /b/"/Free-speech
Enlighten me? The majority of deletions there are me, not the globals. So I have no idea what you're on about with that one--