>>257559
>So I’m right then. You are completely hoodwinked into believing that public schools are actually private schools.
You're using prescriptive language rather than descriptive language. You want the words to mean what they logically should mean, and I agree with you that they should, but that isn't how they're actually used in common parlance. It's not a matter of being hoodwinked. I'm using words as they're actually used and you're not.
If you want me to switch to your definition, then yes, I agree that "private schools" are better. But beware! Because every single business that markets itself as a "public school" is actually a public school with the caveat that you have to pay out of pocket for it.
You're being a retard. Look up micro schools and learning pods. They're what you want anyway, and they already have terms that refer to them. If you go around trying to use your terms, everyone is going to be confused, because you aren't using the same definitions as the general population.
Your mind would be fucking blown if you went to the UK, where "Public School" means schools you have to pay out of pocket for, since they were the earliest schools that anyone could go to (if you had the money) as opposed to schools you could only get into through class and connections.
>and apparently think anything outside of it is bullshit and fake.
No, I've advocated for micro schools and learning pods several times in this thread. But they aren't what people refer to when they refer to "private schools." A micro school is a school that is private, but nobody, including the people who are part of them, refers to them as "private schools." That's not the term that is used. It's not a fake school, but it's not a "private school."
>hope for your sake you don’t think that some unelected bureaucrat in an office somewhere hundreds, if not thousands of miles away has the authority to state what “is” and what “is not” a school
No, but the general population does get to decide what terms mean, and they do not use the term "private school" to refer to things like micro schools. We're not arguing over the definition of "school," we're arguing over the definition of "private school." Totally different conversation, but you're having a hard time differentiating between the two. You keep acting like we're arguing over the definition of "school," and we are not.
>I wonder if you would deny what I know because it didn’t come from one of your approved authorities?
I deny what you know because you have displayed a marked inability to read. I've advocated for micro-schools and learning pods several times already, specifically because they are further from "authorities." Being further from "authorities" makes them better. Unfortunately, the people you learned things from did just as bad a job as the child molesters at government approved schools, since they apparently taught you to blatantly ignore what people say and then argue as if they were saying the opposite. It's like they purposely trained you wrong, as a joke.
>>257560
>Not sure if it's true or not, but don't some private schools make the local government collect gibs for them in exchange for free tuition within the school district?
Sounds like you're describing charter schools. Basically they get funded by the government but have more administrative autonomy. These schools are almost always better and then it's hard to get into them, with competitive lotteries frequently being how it's done. However, while they're run more efficiently, they're not free from SJW government influence or SJW teachers. They just molest your kids more efficiently than public schools.
>>257562
>I got banned for baiting for pointing out the manga and European comics outsell American comics.
I once got banned for seeing people complain about Legend of Korra being SJW, and then pointing out that the very first thing that happens in the original Avatar series is Sokka acts as a strawman sexist so his smarter, better sister can call him sexist. First fucking scene. It was SJW from day one, but they were young enough to accept it, and they weren't trained to accept how bad it would become. Fine, but they should be able to acknowledge the early planted seeds when pointed out to them.
>Maybe if they stop pushing SJWs' talking points and expand beyond superheroes American Comics will sell better?
Nobody would disagree with that. Just be careful you don't attract the retard who likes to loudly scream that nobody likes superheroes anymore, despite the fact that even SJW ones still selling relatively well. A thread about that was linked earlier in this thread, and the guy couldn't seem to tell the difference between "yes, there should be more variety to attract wider audiences" and "yes, nobody likes superhero stories anymore so they should stop being made."