>>292605
>"loli bad because you wish to become the little girl"
"Sometimes, you want to be the little girl" has been a /tg/ classic for at least a decade.
>>292613
They are absolutely putting mRNA in the food supply.
https://archive.is/dwMi1
<mRNA? In MY food supply?
>FALSE! Only some of the food supply is injected with mRNA! And it's entirely metabolized before meat or milk is harvested!
<How long is that metabolization?
>twenty-one (21) to sixty (60) days
>besides, the COVID vaccine is metabolized in only 48 hours
https://archive.is/jd9dz
<but this says we're finding the shit in baby's stool six months (180 days) after mommy got her vax?
>FORTY EIGHT HOURS YOU FUCKING PEASANT, GET BOOSTED
>>292631
>Its not like its a perfect death sentence it does rise the chances of more problems in the long-term
Well, it overwrites your cells' ability to replicate by making them manufacture the "vaccine" instead of reoplacing themselves. The assumption is that later, your own DNA will reassert itself, and your cells will go back to producing copies of themselves.
The usual problem of a xerox of a xerox of a xerox (ad infinitum) is that sometimes your DNA isn't copied perfect, you get a rogue cell, and your immune system culls it. But sometimes your immune system doesn't cull it, and the rogue cell makes more rogue cells. We call this "cancer".
Since your DNA isn't always copied perfectly even when you're not overwriting it whole-cloth, it seems like the mRNA is a great way to develop a variety of exciting cancers, with more jabs meaning more and faster cancers. At least to me, and I'm definitely not a medical professional.
Hey, isn't there a politician promising to cure cancer in the US? Better keep voting in dems, if you want that cancer cure! They'll totally deliver.
>>292645
>lolicon
Reminder that "loli Complex" is drawn from "loli" which still isn't banned anywhere in the west, to my knowledge.
The reason being that FICTIONAL CHARACTERS DO NOT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS, FUCKFACE.
>>292646
>there’s been no human testing for anything like this
True. Not any that was made public, anyhow.
>all animal testing was total organ failure
Untrue. All the animals "died", but that's extremely misleading, because most of the animals were slaughtered in order to conduct autopsies at the end of the trial.
It would be more truthful to say that there were no longitudinal animal trials (at least, I haven't come across any), meaning 'long term'. So what it will do to humans short term, we can at least make educated guesses. Long term, no one can make an educated guess (past what I just did). Flying blind.
And, in fairness to the "gonna cause cancer" assumption, pretty much everything causes cancer, including sunlight and a lack of sunlight.
>wait a minute Russia is reigniting the 2014 Ukrainian conflict
That was never not burning. Ukraine has been shelling the Donbass for almost a decade after they realized they couldn't retake the province from armed partizans.
They're not going to be retaking them from armed partizans plus Russian regulars, armor, artillery, and air support.
Ukraine should have taken the white peace four months in. The only change it presented to the status quo of the last decade would be them not shelling the Donbass. The territories they'd "lose", they haven't actually held since 2013.
>>292669
Still not sure why, exactly, a Masshole Air National Guard had access to highly classified documents...
... but then again Bradley Manning was just a contractor and got access to them, so whatever.