>>870001
>he actually fucking deleted my post
Refute a single thing I said. The last time you claimed I was "revising" history you ended the conversation saying that I was probably right but you forgot what happened.
Stop being so disingenuous.
>>870005
>I then got into an argument for hours with bad actors and when one of them told me to take a break for a week to get my shit together, I agreed, deleted the board, and just took a break
<leaving out what the "argument" with the "bad actors" was actually about
<calls me a revisionist while he goes out of his way to omit information from his history
Ahahahhaahahhahaahaha holy fuck dude
>>870114
There was no real argument. Mark just accidentally got caught samefagging and Mark bailing on 8kun was massive news at the time so essentially the entire webring was on /v/ making fun of him. The board was at like 500 PPH because there were a lot more anons at the time and it was basically just a massive banter episode and Mark couldn't handle the bullying.
It was just a funny moment and every time I bring it up Mark fucking purges my posts and bans me. Notice how he falls back on
>>870115 "I-I don't actually remember" every time I challenge him to actually point out where I'm revising history. He's done this dance like 5 times already and not once does he ever actually refute anything I say. It's always just "woops I can't remember lol but you're still wrong get banned."
>>870121
I'm looking through the archives and it's mostly just people yelling at you over gondala merch. The fact it was such a nothingburger makes you obsessively deleting my posts that much more fucking hilarious, though.
Also just so you know I'm going to make sure every post you delete stays up for the entire day. Keep testing me faggot.
>>870148
Yup, I'm running a magical hacker script to keep 4 innocuous posts where I agree with you about the argument on fatchan being mostly irrelevant up.
I'm sure anons reading this definitely think that's a plausible narrative.
>>870164
All I'm doing is keeping my 4 posts up like I said I would. Why should Mark be able to respond to a post then immediately delete it so only his perspective can be seen?
>>870303
>>870313
I'm not spamming, I'm just keeping my posts up.
>>870337
I don't care. I will post until my posts are left up. That is the win condition here, not whether or not you personally care. My posts are all identical and can be easily filtered if you don't want to see them.
>>871308
Why would I? The posts I was responding to were Mark's and they were in the GG thread. If Mark gets to have meta arguments in the GG responding to my posts why shouldn't I be able to address him in the GG thread?
Do you think Mark is above the rules?
>>871319
No where in any of my posts do I imply that I'm on some adventure to get Mark to adhere to some sort of consistency or rules. I know Mark will always be like this. That's why it's funny to keep posts up that him deleting by its very nature mocks his hypocrisy.
When Mark sits around deleting generic herdnigger shit its meaningless. When he spam deletes posts that he actively engaged with then proceeded to censor it enrages him. His mods roll their eyes having to deal with it all because he got his feelings hurt.
Mark got bypass generation disabled for almost an entire day the other day all because he didn't want to see my innocuous post that he responded to then censored. I will continue to keep my post up until it stops being deleted, simple as. The win condition isn't Mark changing how he moderates.
>>871324
>Good luck with that, I suppose. It's just a waste of time.
Funny things are always worth the time. And to me this is hilarious.
>>871333
>As the autist that started the trend of remaking posts until the janitors fuck off
You keep claiming this even though I've told you on multiple occasions that you started that shit long after I had already done it. You're just embarrassing yourself every time you say this stupid shit dude.
>On occasion waiting the janitors to go to sleep. But there is a better way, and I've made it work on multiple occasions. Just remake your posts one previously deleted reply at a time, while including in each post a genuine reply to a newer post, IP hopping every two or three posts.
Yeah, unlike you I'm not a fucking retard. You posted your retarded fucking scheme 2 or 3 times now. The difference between you and me is that the point isn't to secretly get the post left up you moronic nigger. The point is that the mods and or Mark buckle and leave them up.
You're a LARPing faggot that has no concept of what a principled position actually is. Kill yourself pussy.