>>328120
>Correct
Then what are you doing here on a freeze peach leaning site that's mostly fetish boards, and what's not fetish boards is full of fetishists?
>Porn 'exists' to promote psychological inadequacy
Nice conjecture and anecdotes.
>“because plasticity is competitive, the brain maps for new, exciting images increased at the expense of what had previously attracted them.”
How is this any different from what happens to the brain when you have a long term husband and wife who can't get off on eachother and
>She wrote about men she had just started seeing who brandished ball gags, ejaculated on to her body and used really nasty language during sex.
>“You don’t want to do those things with someone you hardly know,” she tells me. Men recreating the money shot is something that “has happened to every single one of my girlfriends,” she says. The advertising executive, Cindy Gallop, became so irritated by this very thing that she made it the central complaint of her TED talk when launching her website, makelovenotporn.com, in 2009. The talk went viral.
>Gallop is 53 and “only dates younger men, usually men in their twenties,
This hag is in her fifties and wonders why all the men attracted to her objectively ugly body are weirdo perverts?
>he poor guy is going, ‘That porn actress loved it when he did that, so why doesn’t she?
This is a subhuman thought process. Everyone knows porn actors are
actors and only the same kind of people that can't differentiate entertainment from reality see porn and think "this must be how I should behave in bed". It's on the level of watching capeshit and thinking superpowers are real. This whole article is heavily about feminists being disappointed by men's behavior in bed, blaming porn, yet none of them check their own expectations of men in bed and think their disappointment could be spiked by expectations of men given to women by female targeted romantic entertainment. The only thing of potential value here are Doidge's comments on neuroplasticity, so let's look at those.
>“since neurons that fire together wire together, these men got massive amounts of practice wiring these images into the pleasure centres of the brain.” And, “because plasticity is competitive, the brain maps for new, exciting images increased at the expense of what had previously attracted them.”
This seems quite compelling, except while some people go down the rabbit hole of superdegeneracy in a process likely similar to what is described here, most don't, as has already been discussed. Doidge is a psychiatrist, not a neuroscientist. His expertise is in people with disorders, and he writes from that perspective. Most people don't form the kind of porno disorder he describes here unless you equate it the feminist whinging about men not satisfying women in bed.
>Porn is one of the direct lines to the dopamine and serotonin cycles
And videogames aren't?
>Oh, and of course the obvious reason, jews run the entire porn industry and explicitly want your children to be exposed to it
Just because the Jews think something is bad and attempt to weaponize it based on this idea, doesn't prove it's bad, just that they think it's bad.
>>328121
>Porn video games exist.
Everything videogames exist. That doesn't mean everything is videogames. No one was talking about eroge.
>Maybe it has to do with whatever fetishes you were given in your childhood, some are more destructive than others.
It's common sense that things in your childhood effect you later in life, but this Freudian idea that seeing something totally non-sexual as a kid may give you a weird fetish for it later in life is entirely bullshit.
>Your brain on porn
This still leaves me with the question of why this doesn't happen to nearly everyone, instead of a minority? Men are still going out and fucking real women instead of, or in addition, to watching porn. Furthermore, this says the same about the internet in general, and
VIDEOGAMES
>For political reasons, brain research isolating internet porn addicts from plain old Internet addicts has been very slow in arriving. In addition to the above brain studies on porn users, over 380 brain studies on Internet addicts have been published, and all have reported the same fundamental brain changes as seen in drug addicts. The studies did not assess what percentage of research subjects were addicted to internet porn. However, it would be illogical to conclude that high levels of internet porn use cannot change the brain, when junk food, video games, gambling, and “the Internet” have already been proven to do so.
The site has hundreds and hundreds of studies and articles about "gaming" addiction.