>>31154 >>31169 meant to tag this one

>>31170 thanks!

>>29847 Incidentally, I don't have a particularly friendly disposition towards BNWO trannies. They are generally to reside in their containment threads.

>>29848 >Incidentally, I don't have a particularly friendly disposition towards BNWO trannies Haha well, I respect that, but in that case, damn.., must not be easy to manage this place.

>>31179 >No, i literally pointed out the fact in my previous post that having leftist social values doesn't imply an attraction to an specific set of fetishistic content. It doesn't matter if YOU said that, your opinion about yourself and your political allies is irrelevant as it contradicts the chart I posted so stop trying to do a roundabout and act like I have not posted what I have posted. >No, an appeal to vague genetic components that somehow divides the entirety of humanity within the two options of the political landscape of the us doesn't suffice, it doesn't explain or come close to begin explaining the varied aspects of human sexuality nor the particular aspects related to this fetish. It really does, Leftists are not as hard to figure out as you want people to believe - when you have a sexual pathology and a low inhibition, and when you get pleasure from breaking rules, corrupting the public, committing moral violations - the sorts of things on this board are what you come up with. This is what has lead to leftists leading movements to legalize porn in the first place and after it was legalized one of the first things they pushed was interracial. Just like when they finally captured the advertising industry wholesale and now mainly put interracial couples in all of their advertising and saying it is to get a 'broader audience' eventhough monoracial couples are much more numerous and studies show most people are turned off by interracial couples on screen - they still do it, why? The incentive for spreading their sociopolitical agenda - they don't care if they lose some money in the process. >This is where you show your hand, your intentions are quite clear, instead of trying to argue in good faith, you are adamant about painting everyone with the fetish you don't like as "genetic leftists". It is YOU who is not arguing in good faith and that is why I am now hounding you about it. You are ignoring some of the things I post, misrepresent other things I post, or it is flying over your head which if so then maybe you shouldn't be trying to debate me about this. >This is the conclusion you arrived at the start and you are merely trying to rationalize your way out of that with faulty logic regarding incomplete genetic studies on politics, a lot of them don't even replicate. Just to be clear, i am not a leftists and others reading this will probably tell you the same thing, they are not leftists either.

>>31179 >They just have the fetish? Surely, something i won't deny is that there are leftists that have a BNWO fetish too, but by the very nature of this fetish, to the extent they do, they have racist beliefs, racist beliefs are essential for this fetish because the idea of the black male as an inferior non equal being that taints a woman after fucking her is a racist idea. Everyone has subconscious 'racist' and 'sexist' beliefs. Since in this day and age racist and sexist can be applied to anyone who notes even a small difference in races or subspecies of homo-sapiens and genders. By such definition - I would aloofly classify all leftists as racists - I have seen over and over how leftists react to positive stereotypes about black and asian people - even though both of those positive stereotypes by their noted existence imply that another race doesn't have as much of whatever attribute the positive stereotype represents in abundance. A noted difference, a racist judgement. The left doesn't practice what they preach, and they never have. The left will in one moment preach racial diversity, but in the next gleefully fantasize about Trump deporting his Hispanic supporters because diversity didn't fully serve their agenda like they had hoped. The left espouses people to live among diversity, but everyone who has seen a demographic map of major city in the US shows that the leftist hotspots of each city are racially segregated. Leftists will say that all people are genetically the same in intelligence, but studies note that they 'talk down' to their minority political allies and also use more basic elementary language. Leftists tell us we need to let in all illegals who claim they are asylum seekers, but when a texan governor sends them to their neighborhoods, something everyone else has been dealing with for decades - they ask the mayor to call in the national guard. Leftists say they are the things they are because they believe it can serve their social expediency and their political agenda. If you truly are a neutral third party like you claim you are - you will understand this and stop defending them as if they are what they claim they are. >Funny how that works, no? I welcome you provide an argument as to why this very thought process would not be possible within the mind of masochistic men from the right. And no, this is not new, leftist women have always had the hots for right wing men, this is a common trope, and it is just a variant of another common trope of women lusting after members of the out group, does Romeo and Juliet ring any bells? Shakespear codes as a genetic leftist in many ways so I wouldn't be surprised if he was exploring out group preferences within the boundaries of the conservative society he lived in through his work subconsciously. Also, I wouldn't say that many or some leftist women always had the hots for rightwing men specifically, just more masculine men than their male counterparts which is an easy enough bar for anyone to clear. Obviously, nowadays a subset of leftist women are exploring political play, but that is for different reasons as I have noted above. >You simply claim this, no proof. The evidence provided shows that rightwing people don't get sexual thrils from moral violations or an 'inversion of morals' as you put it. They experience anger and disgust. The left on the other hand experiences the former, and that is just one more incentive for them to act the way they do. > Maybe Joe the blue collar worker that votes Trump because mexicans are stealing his job is in fact not that pathological, i will grant you Joe doesn't even know anything about porn at all, he might be against it, but the same way there are multiple kind of leftist, there are multiple kinds of rightists. Do you really believe we are talking about Joe here?We are talking about the kinds of people that roam on twitter forcing memes such as Total Nigger Death, the people that spam dead nigger babies to own the libs,

>>31188 >It doesn't matter if YOU said that, your opinion about yourself and your political allies is irrelevant as it contradicts the chart I posted so stop trying to do a roundabout and act like I have not posted what I have posted The chart you posted doesn't prove your point though. I have been asking you numerous times how it is that this leftist masochism develops into racial fetishism and you have failed to provide detailed answers. >when you have a sexual pathology and a low inhibition, and when you get pleasure from breaking rules, corrupting the public, committing moral violations - the sorts of things on this board are what you come up with Would you be so kind as to explain why? how? You are just claiming things, no proof. If politics are determined by genetics what would be the use of "spreading" and agenda? In reality, interracial anything is indeed grotesque, the push for interracial couples is one of the "blackpill" propaganda methods most useful for converting people to the right, as it is obvious it is an artificial push, the same thing could be said about the most deranged aspects of bmwf fetishism, which ads to the idea this is a tool for the right. >You are ignoring some of the things I post, misrepresent other things I post Where? If anything you are the one ignoring my points or arguing against the worst possible interpretation. >Stop trying to put up a tough front when you have absolutely nothing but asinine conjecture about your polticial opponents What political opponents? You are insane. I have already told you i am on the right. >tactical retreat mode No, that is called arguing in good faith, have you heard about that? It involves taking into consideration the best possible interpretation of the argument. You are not interested in doing that because you are sensitive about this (words in all caps lmao), it seems it is sensitive topic for you, i wonder why. >when there is a clear history Not at all, this fetish is very recent. If you really believe this you are operating under magical thinking, there is a difference between people saying there is not anything wrong with dating between different races, and claiming there is something wrong with doing that (a racist belief) and that is why you should do it. >hen EVERYONE on this particular board is arguing with me(not coincidental) Paranoid delusions. Talk about mental illness, you are one projection after another. Most people on this board are jerking off and don't care about anything you have to say, if you are asking me to believe you when you say shit like that, you ought to believe me when i tell you i am not a leftist, and no i am not jerking off here neither. >I didn't lie - you're reaching, you don't know why I was searching it up in the first place. I was talking to a nice chat lady this week and she is a different race than me - she wanted me to post some stuff to her, but I don't collect porn so I was doing a quick look around all the porn pic sites. This was obviously the wrong site, but I found a discord so it's all good Come on now, who are you trying to fool. Maybe yourself, but certainly not me.

>>31087 could we talk about Lily Rader all day? she is amazing

>>31087 the photoset doesn't have any pictures of her posing solo in the dress unfortunately but Lily is mentioned at least >limp small white penis status: semi-erect(max)

there is something so powerful about elena's scene♡

>>16767 >>16767 Not anymore.

>>31147 Nice find.

>>31068 first one is just stupid >muh see that countrie? they love muslim cock >see that other country? the love muslim cock At least use different kind of white women, white people from spain, italy and greace are brunette, and have brown eyes. It lacks pregnant bellies as well. The other one is good, I liked it, but you can clearly see it was made by a paki.

>>31101 these are better, specially the third one. we need more black impregnation

>>31068 Anymore ai voice ones?

>>18805 >>31081 gofile.io/d/nBMCIR expired, actual tiger mom cucksex re-up ^

>>31163 This is why so many brothers be gettin' STDs, These snow bunnies fuck a dozen at a time

>>30802 Sorry, I only have them with the Watermark. >>30803 Unfortunately, I don't have it, the majority of the vids I post here are from random twitter pages :(

WN aryandestiny

>>23747 Leftist males are so desperate to score on the right they beg White women online to buy a black dildo, hell they even offer to pay for it themselves. They are so mentally ill, they all need universal lobotomy care.

Discord: whtnatcuk Not into sissy/trans/weird fetishes. Just love watching our women go black/cuckolding/cleanup White pussy is sacred and deserves the biggest blackest cocks

>>30116 tightholestinytits

>>30769 yes what we need is even more thinly veiled fag shit

Does anyone have the link for Pelo's new archive? I don't have Discord and I'm not signing up with my phone number for this shit.

>>31130 bunkr.cr/a/b4tzd0uU - still missing a lot