>>31051 I see that you are now resorting to namecalling to overcompensate for the lack of substance in your feeble protests . Looking at that thread, hardly convincing compared to the research I have seen. Onlyfan girls grifting for money from leftist payers who want them to present themselves as nazis for even more degradation or racial betrayal factor. Adopting aesthetic for marketing your porn vids to leftists hardly means you have genuine beliefs. I could make the same comparison of american non-white women wearing the tradtional clothing of their ethnic group while fucking White men. Wearing the clothing doesn't mean they are huge into their culture back home, it just is used for sexual thrill by those who get thrills from sort of thing and the people behind BNWO are much more likely to get sexual thrills from your threads than the group behind raceplay.

>>31050 When I say moderate/apolitical (which is where I fall politically), I actually mean someone who either truly doesn’t care about politics (the average American, only chronically online weirdos care about politics on a day to day basis) or is legitimately in the center as a Classical Liberal (ie someone who sees freedom as the highest order value and uses institutions to protect said freedom) and hates both sides equally for different reasons (that’s my personal viewpoint, I just like contrasting skin tones in adult content and could care less about the racial dynamics). That crowd is largely pretty vanilla in the bedroom and they account for roughly 80-90% of humanity. Meanwhile, a rightoid that puts on a show about caring for "famiky values", "monogamy", and "monoracial relationships" gets off to the destruction of all three of those things through this kink by engaging in Interracial swinging which is what this BNWO stuff is a part of (the BNWO is what happens when a rightoid sexualizes The Great Replacement Conspiracy btw). A Leftoid, on the other hand, will publicly state that their for "equality" but you will usually learn that they engage in BDSM and actual raceplay in the bedroom with a White Guy usually in charge of the whole shebang (no pun intended) and a Woman of Color being dominated (they may want to be a slave in the bedroom but still want a normal partner outside of it). This is exactly why Vaush had to explain what both sissification and the BNWO were all about to his audience on stream (here’s the link: https://youtu.be/GiZJGc5GMWI?si=sjiJ0hjmpsoSJy4F) since his audience members had no clue what the hell this kink was actually about. Everything related to this stuff points to it being a right wing fetish and really fucking obvious to any outsider.

>>31062 > That crowd is largely pretty vanilla in the bedroom and they account for roughly 80-90% of humanity. Meanwhile, a rightoid that puts on a show about caring for "famiky values", "monogamy", and "monoracial relationships" gets off to the destruction of all three of those things through this kink by engaging in Interracial swinging which is what this BNWO stuff is a part of (the BNWO is what happens when a rightoid sexualizes The Great Replacement Conspiracy btw). A Leftoid, on the other hand, will publicly state that their for "equality" but you will usually learn that they engage in BDSM and actual raceplay in the bedroom with a White Guy usually in charge of the whole shebang (no pun intended) and a Woman of Color being dominated (they may want to be a slave in the bedroom but still want a normal partner outside of it). This is exactly why Vaush had to explain what both sissification and the BNWO were all about to his audience on stream (here’s the link: https://youtu.be/GiZJGc5GMWI?si=sjiJ0hjmpsoSJy4F)[Embed]

[Embed]

> since his audience members had no clue what the hell this kink was actually about. Everything related to this stuff points to it being a right wing fetish and really fucking obvious to any outsider. Vaush is a leftwinger who put out tweets fantasizing about raping rightwinger ch**dren. Most know him for his horse porn habits, but he is even more disgusting than that. All the evidence points to leftist into the bnwo stuff, and the other side into the raceplay stuff- the chart I just posted is very damning for leftists. Rightwingers don't get off on commiting moral violations and corrupting in their mind purity(which is what white women and white families aesthetically represent in the leftist mind). That vaush and other leftists are so adamant that they aren't the ones pushing it and trying to do some weird frued nonsensical explanation for why it is actually rightwingers into bnwo and not them even though the vast majority of cucks and trannies belong on the left polticial side shows how sexually insecure they are deep down inside.

this is ludicrous, are you really going to keep standing here and yap back and forth on wether leftists or rightoids are addicted to blacked? theres many different reasons and fetishes that lead up to watching bmwf, its not exlusively right or left, it clearly has many appeals for either party. a lot of people lust over it because its perverted and because theyre perverts, let it go man

>>31071 The amount of people who lean left who are into this sort of thing is much bigger than on the right, you see the rights influence on things like raceplay or wmaf/wmlf and so on, but bnwo and interracial in general is a leftist product. Remember it was the left who pushed for the legality of porn in the first place and one of the first things they did with that was puch bmwf in their porn just like they now push it in media and commercials. The left is behind most of these things and the right has been pushing back against it for decades and now they counteract that with raceplay and politcal play and so on.

>>31052 Really wasting time out here worrying about insults on a board like this? Do you stroke your wiener to some sort of fo moral superiority on an interracial board? Research you have seen like what? Presented with an insight into the mind of the argument you are trying to defend and you just say "nah" how about you actually try and break down somethings you saw in that thread and refute it. Lmao Literally none of those examples are only fans girls you genius you cant push nazi imagery on OF or any other type of OF site. All those types of pics are leaked or personal pictures. Literally nothing you have said disproves anything ive said just useless sophistry "Wearing the clothing doesn't mean they are huge into their culture back home" Wtf are you even talking about we are talking about right wingers being proud they like black cock while hating black people >and the people behind BNWO are much more likely to get sexual thrills from your threads than the group behind raceplay. Yea rightoids

>>31075 >counteract with raceplay more like cum at the thought one of the most popular BBC hotwifes on OF btw

>>31067 >Rightwingers don't get off on commiting moral violations and corrupting in their mind chart clearly shows right winger brain firing up like a flare, arousal is not only in the groin bud

>>31093 >>31094 >>31095 Desperation is an ugly look anon and with that, another 3 posts of yours showing your lack of taste and substance(also your inability to understand an analogy) - if you want to actually prove what you say and not just show a desperate hail mary of a coverup, then you would actually provide evidence; not a thread with little less than a few pics of photoshops or posting an onlyfans model who never said she voted for trump, only in the mind of you and the twitter poster who want too so desperately believe a flag alone means a trump voter. By the way, do you know how many pornstars and onlyfan models say leftist talking points on their twitter while fucking White men? A lot more than you would think. >>31095 The brain flaring up shows higher activity levels from a developed amygdala , something that leftists lack, rightwing people get anger and disgust at seeing moral violations. Leftists don't, instead they get sexual thrills from it. It is why both sides never see eye to eye and why leftists will always view rightwingers as oppressive, and why rightwingers will always see leftists as regressive and degenerate. You will never be able to dispute this no matter how many posts you make. You are out of your depth and a few cherry picked photos like the one you posted - that doesn't verifiably demonstrate the narrative you are desperately trying to promote, will not help you. Instead it shows the limitations of your thoughts and intellectual rigor. You say things because they appeal emotionally to you, and you are also insecure about how people view leftists, you don't want non-politically minded people to think that what rightwingers say about leftists is right, after all leftists already have a hard time dealing with rightwingers even with their domination of media and education and their broad plans to groom the next generation into doing their bidding. What will happen to their power if people see right through them and see their degeneracy they hide behind a faux philosophy of tolerance and enlightenment? The answer to that question is what propels you to make as many posts as you can to cover up what you and your political allies are deep down inside.

>>31020 She’s got a video up where she talks about her life story and what got her into the BNWO lifestyle and really is an epiphany. The girls who do this stuff aren’t into the race elements, they’re feeding off the attention. Being desired, worshipped. The sense of sexual empowerment they feel from seeing their boyfriend or husband beg and plead for it. They don’t care if the guy is black or white or chinese or whatever, they’re not even considering the guy they’re fucking. When they put on the QOS gear, it’s because they know their husband/boyfriend thinks it’s the hottest thing in the world. In effect, the black guy is a living dildo, no different than the silly ‘sex board games’ and nurse+patient roleplay people used to do 40 years ago.

>>31132 To put it another way, girls approach sex and sexuality from the perspective of “how does this affect the man who has the most influence in my life”. She’ll chase a bad boy because she subconsciously thinks her dad controls her sexuality, and wants to get back at him by denying him the psychosexual satisfaction of choosing her mates. She gets into cuckoldry because she loves her partner and knows it will make him happy. They approach sex and sexuality from a fundamentally different mindset than men do. It really explains why this fetish is such a male-dominated one.

>>31108 Youd have an aneurysm realizing how many pornstars are conservative but fuck Black men or cuck thier husbands. See Brandi Love and co.

>>31139 >pornstars >conservative please listen to yourself

>>31132 >>31133 This is an extremely accurate take on reality, but sadly 99,9% of people on this board are not going to be able to accept the truth. Most people here are literal incels who have 0 understanding of how women or relationships even work, and they base their understanding of women on what they have seen in the red pill videos on youtube and the cuckold videos on hypnotube and SS, and the other 1% of people on this board that actually do have a relationship are likely complete brainwashed beta's who put their partner on a pedestal and actually believe their own cuckold fantasy. There are only going to be a tiny fraction of people on this place smart and realistic enough to admit that cuckolding is mostly a male fantasy and that females do not actually desire to "cuck" or humiliate a man. It goes straight against the fundamentals of female mating biology.

>>31132 whats the video called or a source on it please?

>>31050 >A genetic right wing No such thing exists, there is no "right wing" gene. How would the DNA encode information regarding politics? What would be the mechanism? What would be the purpose? Even if you buy the most radical interpretations of genetic determinism, behaviour is only at most 50% genetic. Your view of the world is an elaborate cope, you are appealing to a kind of purity that quite literally doesn't exist. Even taking the most charitable interpretation of your argument, that you are not talking about "right wing" genes but instead talking about low time preference people vs high time preference people, high in-group preference people vs low in-group preference people, the fact remains there is nothing inherent within that set of genes that would necessarily provoke a fetish with such specific characteristics, furthermore, there is enough evidence around to prove the fact a lot of right winger do in fact have this fetish, an by its very nature it promotes and deals with vaguely right wing ideals that would not fly under the leftists mind. As you know, leftists don't believe in the white replacement, leftists do not believe in race being anything more that skin color, leftists actually vaguely believe everyone ought to be treated equally, your very presence within this board gives credit to the idea, you are obviously right wing yet you are discussing this here, in a porn sharing website, how come you are here? >Leftst males love inversion and deconstruction of anything related to the perceived dominant western culture They might, but that doesn't follow they would make a fetish out of it, on the other hand, for someone with masochists tendencies that follows the right wing, inversion of the morals is a potentially sexually stimulating fantasy because it deals with taboo topics that when adopted imply degradation.

>>31144 Did they not elect a man who paid a pornstar to fuck him? Yes, conservative pornstars.

>>31171 No such thing, remember there are only two choices and people can vote for one party or another for various reasons. >>31168 >No such thing exists, there is no "right wing" gene. How would the DNA encode information regarding politics? What would be the mechanism? What would be the purpose? Even if you buy the most radical interpretations of genetic determinism, behaviour is only at most 50% genetic. Your view of the world is an elaborate cope, you are appealing to a kind of purity that quite literally doesn't exist. Nice try, but you are hurting your own argument and favoring my own in your own post. You just don't see it because you take the bespoke term 'genetic rightwinger' too literally. No, there is no 'rightwing' or 'leftist' gene, but there are genes for instinctual behaviors related to resource gathering, use, and accumulation and politics are an expression of that. Same with the aforementioned attributes you described. You add it all up and a person will soon start to sway to one cluster of politics than another. Of course , there are certain political dimensions we have created to try and measure what leads someone to vote for a certain party. From various graphs and arrays to node and point clouds developed from numerous surveys we are heavily realizing a bi-modal approach isn't useful for describing the whole of political participation, but for this specific topic it suffices. Especially with the chart I have provided. You and other lefitsts can't keep forcing a desperate narrative that 'they' are actually into cuck/hotwife/bnwo stuff and not you guys when it is leftist publications that put out dozens of articles on 'how to be a good cuck' or 'why hotwifing is actually progressive', or spotlighting the interracial adult film production of 'blacked'. The chart is not even needed. There is too much coming out of your side to say otherwise. >As you know, leftists don't believe in the white replacement, leftists do not believe in race being anything more that skin color, leftists actually vaguely believe everyone ought to be treated equally, your very presence within this board gives credit to the idea, you are obviously right wing yet you are discussing this here, in a porn sharing website, how come you are here? I am here because I thought this was an actual 'interracial' board that served what 'interracial' is in a broad possible meaning, but obviously on this board only one specific pair is preferred, but to see how you people catalogue everything here in such detail spells out my argument more plainly than I ever could. Also, leftists don't believe in white replacement? Do you really believe that? Leftists came up with the term 'Demographics is destiny' to sum up their perceptions of what their longterm outlook on their preferred political party is. Leftist publications have been putting out graphs forecasting demographic replacement of native american and european people in western countries for a few decades now. They obviously know and the more you leftists post such obvious lies about yourselves in order to protect the image you have conjured up for yourselves, the more you discredit whatever you say here. >They might, but that doesn't follow they would make a fetish out of it, on the other hand, for someone with masochists tendencies that follows the right wing, inversion of the morals is a potentially sexually stimulating fantasy because it deals with taboo topics that when adopted imply degradation. Who is much more likely to have masochistic tendencies? The left or the right? You know the answer. Leftist male masochists prefer bmwf because they feel it degrades them most intensely as men - what we are now seeing as I have said in previous posts here is that gen-z leftist female masochists are now starting to prefer rightwing/fascist domination kink play with in their view manlier White men to serve their appetite as that not only degrades them as women, but also gives them thrills with men who are otherwise taboo to their politics. They also still get to keep their highly valued moral opinions about themselves as enlightened non-racist samaritans intact while they push leftist racial activism(this is also why the males are so adamant about forcing a narrative that the right created bnwo, they don't want their women to look down on them as racial fetishists) - they already hold too much cognitive dissonance - too much is giving them more mental illness than they can cope with. This kink is much less burdensome for them. The vast majority of the right doesn't really get stimulated in the same way, there is no 'inversion of morals' for them - they are not that pathological - they are just taking advantage of what they see at the moment which is horny leftist women who want to try out new kinks and they are fine with roleplaying a dominant authority figure if that is what gets them laid.

>>31176 And that party has multiple people it could elect to represent them. Who did they elect to represent the party?

>>31176 >Nice try, but you are hurting your own argument and favoring my own in your own post. No, i literally pointed out the fact in my previous post that having leftist social values doesn't imply an attraction to an specific set of fetishistic content. This is true the other way around too, for the sake of clarity. >but for this specific topic it suffices No, an appeal to vague genetic components that somehow divides the entirety of humanity within the two options of the political landscape of the us doesn't suffice, it doesn't explain or come close to begin explaining the varied aspects of human sexuality nor the particular aspects related to this fetish. You are literally implying humans are genetic machines that are coded since birth to vote elephant or donkey, and that it somehow is also related to fetishes in a way that just so happens to add to the narrative of the """right""" for the particular political landscape of western countries in the current year, never mind the fact this crude analysis doesn't hold to scrutiny in historical or foreign contexts. Maybe communists in cuba are secret bbc fetishists, right. >You and other lefitsts This is where you show your hand, your intentions are quite clear, instead of trying to argue in good faith, you are adamant about painting everyone with the fetish you don't like as "genetic leftists". This is the conclusion you arrived at the start and you are merely trying to rationalize your way out of that with faulty logic regarding incomplete genetic studies on politics, a lot of them don't even replicate. Just to be clear, i am not a leftists and others reading this will probably tell you the same thing, they are not leftists either. >it is leftist publications that put out dozens of articles on 'how to be a good cuck' Now that you are being picky and bad faith, you should realize the fact we are not talking about cuckoldry here, we are talking about a very specific fetish that at best is subset of cuckoldry. You will never see any publication of any kind talking about BNWO. They will even say this kind of fetishes are dehumanizing for blacks, that is besides the point anyways. >I am here because I thought this was an actual 'interracial' board that served what 'interracial' is in a broad possible meaning It only takes a banner or the sticky to realize that is not the case. Why do you feel the need to lie? Aren't you the same guy that is arguing that porn itself is a leftist thing? You must be a fellow genetic leftist too then if you are looking for porn and interracial porn at that (low in group preference) >Also, leftists don't believe in white replacement? Do you really believe that? Yes, they quite literally say that and argue that all of the time. You must be able to read their minds if you doubt they are being sincere. You actually believe people that disagree politically with you are not uninformed but literally evil too? Pick a struggle man. >Leftists came up with the term 'Demographics is destiny' to sum up their perceptions of what their longterm outlook on their preferred political party is I doubt your average leftist knows who Comte is, i doubt that quotes is specifically talking about race, i doubt all or even most leftist agree with the meaning you are trying to assign to the quote here or with the quote itself within its original meaning. Are you able see how this looks from the outside? You are grasping at straws. >They obviously know and the more you leftists post such obvious lies about yourselves in order to protect the image you have conjured up for yourselves, the more you discredit whatever you say here Stop projecting, nobody is trying to protect an image here, except maybe you, why are you so pissy about the topic? If everyone here is a leftists except you why do you believe anyone would be trying to protect an image here? From whom? The neutral third party casually browsing this thread filled to the brim with black on white sexual imagery? >Who is much more likely to have masochistic tendencies? The left or the right? Who knows? You are of course talking about a very specific kind of leftist, the white college educated progressive, i will give you the benefit of the doubt and say that yes, it is likely this very specific kind of leftist has masochistic tendencies, i don't know that, but lets pretend it is true, how does it follow that this masochism will develop into interracial black fetishism? >Leftist male masochists prefer bmwf because they feel it degrades them most intensely as men What is the basis for this? I have explained the theory of mind of the right winger with a black interracial fetish, what is the theory of mind of the leftist that has a black interracial fetish? They just have the fetish? Surely, something i won't deny is that there are leftists that have a BNWO fetish too, but by the very nature of this fetish, to the extent they do, they have racist beliefs, racist beliefs are essential for this fetish because the idea of the black male as an inferior non equal being that taints a woman after fucking her is a racist idea. This idea is unthinkable within the kind of leftist thought you are mentioning, even for people with an iconoclast streak, in their mind all races are supposed to be equal aside from skin color, remember? >what we are now seeing as I have said in previous posts here is that gen-z leftist female masochists are now starting to prefer rightwing/fascist domination kink play with in their view manlier White men to serve their appetite as that not only degrades them as women, but also gives them thrills with men who are otherwise taboo to their politics Funny how that works, no? I welcome you provide an argument as to why this very thought process would not be possible within the mind of masochistic men from the right. And no, this is not new, leftist women have always had the hots for right wing men, this is a common trope, and it is just a variant of another common trope of women lusting after members of the out group, does Romeo and Juliet ring any bells? >this is also why the males are so adamant about forcing a narrative that the right created bnwo, they don't want their women to look down on them as racial fetishists Yeah, in all likelihood, this thread >>51 was created by scheming leftist men trying to scam their (our) women, the ones that are known to frequently visit this board, into thinking they (we) are not racial fetishists. But you know that, you were in the weekly genetic leftist meeting where we discussed that plan, i saw you! >they already hold too much cognitive dissonance - too much is giving them more mental illness than they can cope with. This kink is much less burdensome for them This is explanation is more convoluted and strange than the one i gave to describe the inner mechanisms of the right winger masochist, but i will take your word for it since it seem you are talking from experience. >The vast majority of the right doesn't really get stimulated in the same way You simply claim this, no proof. >there is no 'inversion of morals' for them - they are not that pathological I know you have not given too much honest thought to these things you are saying because a complete lack of self reflection is evident in every one of them. Maybe Joe the blue collar worker that votes Trump because mexicans are stealing his job is in fact not that pathological, i will grant you Joe doesn't even know anything about porn at all, he might be against it, but the same way there are multiple kind of leftist, there are multiple kinds of rightists. Do you really believe we are talking about Joe here? We are talking about the kinds of people that roam on twitter forcing memes such as Total Nigger Death, the people that spam dead nigger babies to own the libs, the kind of people that find it hilarious to have twitter handles such as hitleriancunnyrapist1488, people whose entire internet persona revolves around demonstrating to others how racist they are, many of them are self described incels too, even if they are not celibate. Do these people smell like perfect mental health? Certainly not to me, they are pathological, and that is not to say i personally have something against them, or that these people are all blacked fetishist, many of them are my friends. The problem with your whole perspective is the fact you take way to literally the concept of genetic predisposition for specific ideologies. I argue that yes, it exists, but that doesn't change the fact the environment has the most influence over that, take for instance the current social climate of the west, were leftist values are very prevalent, in all honesty, do you really believe someone with a genetic predisposition for iconoclasm and contrarianism will adopt a mainstream leftist stance? It makes no sense they would, they will oppose whoever is in power reflexively, and they will maintain the same propensity for mental illness. Do you understand now?

>>31176 Look, guys, just admit that you’re all fans of Nick Fuentes and identify as right wing betas and move on with your day. I know y’all’s kink is dying out but it’s time to move on from the denial stage of grief here and focus on other topics at the very least.

>>31179 >No, i literally pointed out the fact in my previous post that having leftist social values doesn't imply an attraction to an specific set of fetishistic content. It doesn't matter if YOU said that, your opinion about yourself and your political allies is irrelevant as it contradicts the chart I posted so stop trying to do a roundabout and act like I have not posted what I have posted. >No, an appeal to vague genetic components that somehow divides the entirety of humanity within the two options of the political landscape of the us doesn't suffice, it doesn't explain or come close to begin explaining the varied aspects of human sexuality nor the particular aspects related to this fetish. It really does, Leftists are not as hard to figure out as you want people to believe - when you have a sexual pathology and a low inhibition, and when you get pleasure from breaking rules, corrupting the public, committing moral violations - the sorts of things on this board are what you come up with. This is what has lead to leftists leading movements to legalize porn in the first place and after it was legalized one of the first things they pushed was interracial. Just like when they finally captured the advertising industry wholesale and now mainly put interracial couples in all of their advertising and saying it is to get a 'broader audience' eventhough monoracial couples are much more numerous and studies show most people are turned off by interracial couples on screen - they still do it, why? The incentive for spreading their sociopolitical agenda - they don't care if they lose some money in the process. >This is where you show your hand, your intentions are quite clear, instead of trying to argue in good faith, you are adamant about painting everyone with the fetish you don't like as "genetic leftists". It is YOU who is not arguing in good faith and that is why I am now hounding you about it. You are ignoring some of the things I post, misrepresent other things I post, or it is flying over your head which if so then maybe you shouldn't be trying to debate me about this. >This is the conclusion you arrived at the start and you are merely trying to rationalize your way out of that with faulty logic regarding incomplete genetic studies on politics, a lot of them don't even replicate. Just to be clear, i am not a leftists and others reading this will probably tell you the same thing, they are not leftists either. Stop trying to put up a tough front when you have absolutely nothing but asinine conjecture about your polticial opponents to back it up, no substance. YOU try to imply that it is actually rightwing men creating and pushing this content or in tactical retreat mode you say they both do it - when there is a clear history of leftists pushing all of this through their psychosocial activities if not their publications, when there is neurological and genetic evidence, when EVERYONE on this particular board is arguing with me(not coincidental), because I decided to give some much needed pushback to the delusion and forced narrative you leftists tell yourselves over and over as you jack yourselves off to this. Come on now, who are you trying to fool. Maybe yourself, but certainly not me. >It only takes a banner or the sticky to realize that is not the case. Why do you feel the need to lie? Aren't you the same guy that is arguing that porn itself is a leftist thing? You must be a fellow genetic leftist too then if you are looking for porn and interracial porn at that (low in group preference) I didn't lie - you're reaching, you don't know why I was searching it up in the first place. I was talking to a nice chat lady this week and she is a different race than me - she wanted me to post some stuff to her, but I don't collect porn so I was doing a quick look around all the porn pic sites. This was obviously the wrong site, but I found a discord so it's all good. Also, since you don't seem to know this - men can have high in group preference for relationships, but for casual sex all bets are off the table, and as has been demonstrated - women tend to have higher racial preferences than men when it comes to sex. >Yes, they quite literally say that and argue that all of the time. You must be able to read their minds if you doubt they are being sincere. You actually believe people that disagree politically with you are not uninformed but literally evil too? Pick a struggle man. Obviously there are leftist sheep who don't investigate anything told to them and will genuinely believe anything because they are told to, then there are others who see the data and make party slogans out of it and then in a two-faced manner lie about it to the public will giving the wink-wink to their followers. Also, with the right able to elect someone like Donald Trump of all people - it is not just the rightwing who are tired of immigration replacement but swing voters as well - the leftists plan to placate people with the most simple-minded of lies isn't working clearly. >Stop projecting, nobody is trying to protect an image here, except maybe you, why are you so pissy about the topic? If everyone here is a leftists except you why do you believe anyone would be trying to protect an image here? From whom? The neutral third party casually browsing this thread filled to the brim with black on white sexual imagery? You know how I know you are lying about almost everything you say? You keep saying you are not a leftist and are now implying you and others are some neutral third party while invoking racial political content into your porn; even though everything here is steeped in typical leftist anti-white anti-christian anti-western imagery which is what the left has always been about since it's formulation more than a century and a half ago . Yea buddy, you are a neutral third party - that is why you are arguing so hard to defend leftists - just like everyone else here. Again, who do you think you are fooling, except yourself. >I doubt your average leftist knows who Comte is, i doubt that quotes is specifically talking about race, I am talking about the guy who popularized it in the context of modern poltiics, I should have been more specific - my fault. Ruy Texerira regularly talks about how racial diversity and demographic change will ensure their party will keep winning elections and ensure that the overton window moves further and further left. He is definitely not saying that anymore though, his stupidly moronic attitude didn't forecast that gleefully wiping in the face of the working class that you are replacing them for more political power would backfire. >Who knows? You are of course talking about a very specific kind of leftist, the white college educated progressive, Oh come off it. This is becoming a joke on your part. A 'very specific subset'- white college educated progressives - yeah in the context of america or even the west in general that is just a small minority and non-influential part of the party right? Seriously, what am I reading. >What is the basis for this? I have explained the theory of mind of the right winger with a black interracial fetish, what is the theory of mind of the leftist that has a black interracial fetish? You didn't though, you just took a part of the leftist mind and projected it onto the rightwing.

>>31179 >They just have the fetish? Surely, something i won't deny is that there are leftists that have a BNWO fetish too, but by the very nature of this fetish, to the extent they do, they have racist beliefs, racist beliefs are essential for this fetish because the idea of the black male as an inferior non equal being that taints a woman after fucking her is a racist idea. Everyone has subconscious 'racist' and 'sexist' beliefs. Since in this day and age racist and sexist can be applied to anyone who notes even a small difference in races or subspecies of homo-sapiens and genders. By such definition - I would aloofly classify all leftists as racists - I have seen over and over how leftists react to positive stereotypes about black and asian people - even though both of those positive stereotypes by their noted existence imply that another race doesn't have as much of whatever attribute the positive stereotype represents in abundance. A noted difference, a racist judgement. The left doesn't practice what they preach, and they never have. The left will in one moment preach racial diversity, but in the next gleefully fantasize about Trump deporting his Hispanic supporters because diversity didn't fully serve their agenda like they had hoped. The left espouses people to live among diversity, but everyone who has seen a demographic map of major city in the US shows that the leftist hotspots of each city are racially segregated. Leftists will say that all people are genetically the same in intelligence, but studies note that they 'talk down' to their minority political allies and also use more basic elementary language. Leftists tell us we need to let in all illegals who claim they are asylum seekers, but when a texan governor sends them to their neighborhoods, something everyone else has been dealing with for decades - they ask the mayor to call in the national guard. Leftists say they are the things they are because they believe it can serve their social expediency and their political agenda. If you truly are a neutral third party like you claim you are - you will understand this and stop defending them as if they are what they claim they are. >Funny how that works, no? I welcome you provide an argument as to why this very thought process would not be possible within the mind of masochistic men from the right. And no, this is not new, leftist women have always had the hots for right wing men, this is a common trope, and it is just a variant of another common trope of women lusting after members of the out group, does Romeo and Juliet ring any bells? Shakespear codes as a genetic leftist in many ways so I wouldn't be surprised if he was exploring out group preferences within the boundaries of the conservative society he lived in through his work subconsciously. Also, I wouldn't say that many or some leftist women always had the hots for rightwing men specifically, just more masculine men than their male counterparts which is an easy enough bar for anyone to clear. Obviously, nowadays a subset of leftist women are exploring political play, but that is for different reasons as I have noted above. >You simply claim this, no proof. The evidence provided shows that rightwing people don't get sexual thrils from moral violations or an 'inversion of morals' as you put it. They experience anger and disgust. The left on the other hand experiences the former, and that is just one more incentive for them to act the way they do. > Maybe Joe the blue collar worker that votes Trump because mexicans are stealing his job is in fact not that pathological, i will grant you Joe doesn't even know anything about porn at all, he might be against it, but the same way there are multiple kind of leftist, there are multiple kinds of rightists. Do you really believe we are talking about Joe here?We are talking about the kinds of people that roam on twitter forcing memes such as Total Nigger Death, the people that spam dead nigger babies to own the libs, I am talking about which group is largely responsible for what we see on this board and which group is not and somehow getting blamed for it as a means of subterfuge. Point taken on how at least some on the right can be pathological though, when I used that word I specifically meant in the sense of sexual gratification. Obviously though, according to my chart , a rightwing person who spends too much time online could be spamming pics of your example in reaction to what he sees as a large moral violation - the inclusion of a racial group in western society he feels is morally corrupt and regressive. Again though, all this does is showcase the pathological differences of how leftists and rightwing people interact in regard to moral violations and the thrust of my argument. > in all honesty, do you really believe someone with a genetic predisposition for iconoclasm and contrarianism will adopt a mainstream leftist stance? There are extreme people like this who swing one way or another based on political climate, and these people tend to be sociopaths. Studies have noted that leftists display more narcissistic tendencies at the moment. Wouldn't be surprised if many sociopaths have grouped with the left since they basically own much of the infrastructure to facilitate political power or moral grandstand which is what sociopaths like to do. Of course, these people are a very small sliver of the population - maybe leftists are naturally more narcissistic, when you develop an ideology to justify why resources gathered or created by other men should instead be redistributed towards you even though you don't pull your own weight then you are displaying very selfish thoughts. >>31186 Nice try. Here is your participation trophy.

>>31188 >It doesn't matter if YOU said that, your opinion about yourself and your political allies is irrelevant as it contradicts the chart I posted so stop trying to do a roundabout and act like I have not posted what I have posted The chart you posted doesn't prove your point though. I have been asking you numerous times how it is that this leftist masochism develops into racial fetishism and you have failed to provide detailed answers. >when you have a sexual pathology and a low inhibition, and when you get pleasure from breaking rules, corrupting the public, committing moral violations - the sorts of things on this board are what you come up with Would you be so kind as to explain why? how? You are just claiming things, no proof. If politics are determined by genetics what would be the use of "spreading" and agenda? In reality, interracial anything is indeed grotesque, the push for interracial couples is one of the "blackpill" propaganda methods most useful for converting people to the right, as it is obvious it is an artificial push, the same thing could be said about the most deranged aspects of bmwf fetishism, which ads to the idea this is a tool for the right. >You are ignoring some of the things I post, misrepresent other things I post Where? If anything you are the one ignoring my points or arguing against the worst possible interpretation. >Stop trying to put up a tough front when you have absolutely nothing but asinine conjecture about your polticial opponents What political opponents? You are insane. I have already told you i am on the right. >tactical retreat mode No, that is called arguing in good faith, have you heard about that? It involves taking into consideration the best possible interpretation of the argument. You are not interested in doing that because you are sensitive about this (words in all caps lmao), it seems it is sensitive topic for you, i wonder why. >when there is a clear history Not at all, this fetish is very recent. If you really believe this you are operating under magical thinking, there is a difference between people saying there is not anything wrong with dating between different races, and claiming there is something wrong with doing that (a racist belief) and that is why you should do it. >hen EVERYONE on this particular board is arguing with me(not coincidental) Paranoid delusions. Talk about mental illness, you are one projection after another. Most people on this board are jerking off and don't care about anything you have to say, if you are asking me to believe you when you say shit like that, you ought to believe me when i tell you i am not a leftist, and no i am not jerking off here neither. >I didn't lie - you're reaching, you don't know why I was searching it up in the first place. I was talking to a nice chat lady this week and she is a different race than me - she wanted me to post some stuff to her, but I don't collect porn so I was doing a quick look around all the porn pic sites. This was obviously the wrong site, but I found a discord so it's all good Come on now, who are you trying to fool. Maybe yourself, but certainly not me. >Obviously there are leftist sheep who don't investigate anything told to them and will genuinely believe anything because they are told to Do you realize, then, how this contradicts your point? Leftist are not a monolithic group, you are aware. >You keep saying you are not a leftist and are now implying you and others are some neutral third party while invoking racial political content into your porn Holy shit you are fucking stupid. It is sarcasm, the point is that there is no neutral party here, thus, there is nobody whose opinion would be influenced by "pushing" the idea right wingers are behind this kind of porn in a board such as this, retard, the point is you are delusional. There is a hundred explanations as for why would anyone support such an idea, one is because they earnestly believe it, but no, out of all possible explanations, the one where the other is malicious is the one you pick, this is the one that lets you sleep at night. You are an open book buddy. >yeah in the context of america or even the west in general that is just a small minority Uh, yes, do you really doubt that? Some are influential, the majority are not. Is this really a controversial take? I welcome you to read what you are saying, you are simply claiming disbelief without daring to providing the shadow of an argument. >You didn't though, you just took a part of the leftist mind and projected it onto the rightwing. The pattern repeats, no argument to be found here. >Everyone has subconscious 'racist' and 'sexist' beliefs Sure, but from that doesn't follow that they ought to believe that an specific race is inferior to another and that having sex with that particular race taints the involved. One post ago you were trying to imply interracial sex for men is okay, you are not consistent. >gleefully fantasize about Trump deporting his Hispanic supporters because diversity didn't fully serve their agenda Your terminally online overgeneralizations are starting to get tiring. This example is a nothingburger, it is air, some people on the left are vindictive, so what? Every ideology has a theory that struggles to get deployed in practice, but adherents of specific ideologies aim to put them in practice even if they are not able to. The problem with communists is not that they are hypocrites or whatever, the problem is that they aim to put their ideology into practice, and starting from the very theory, their ideology is noxious. You are not as smart as you think you are. >If you truly are a neutral third party like you claim you are You are really fucking dumb. >Shakespear codes as a genetic leftist You don't have an ounce of self awareness inside you, do you? > I wouldn't say that "Every woman adores a Fascist". >The evidence provided shows that rightwing people don't get sexual thrils from moral violations or an 'inversion of morals' as you put it. They experience anger and disgust. The left on the other hand experiences the former, and that is just one more incentive for them to act the way they do Taking that for granted, that doesn't demonstrate your point, as i have pointed out numerous times, i am repeating myself at this point. > all this does is showcase the pathological differences of how leftists and rightwing people interact in regard to moral violations and the thrust of my argument Funnily enough, the internet clique known for spamming dead nigger babies are the same ones known for obsessing over the color of dicks and making hundreds of edits with the usual symbolism of this fetish into their memes.

>>31198 >What political opponents? You are insane. I have already told you i am on the right. Ah so you are on the right? I was talking to someone else here who claimed to be a moderate apolitcal while he was posting vaush vids to me- vaush doesn't do anything except leftist politlcal vids. His content is also extremely unhinged at points when it comes to the rightwing - hoping people get raped. Easy to see through that poster. Now YOU are trying an even more moronic routine. You are on the right and let me guess - that is why you peruse this board and defend it's users so gallantly? Like most leftists - all I am seeing is someone who could benefit from universal mental healthcare, but it will have to be on your own dime, not mine. When you talk and act like a leftist you can't claim to be the opposite. It's not going to work, it's just an underhanded tactic. >No, that is called arguing in good faith, So is this. When have you been arguing in good faith, you are not even reading my posts before trying to argue with me - you are trying to make me repeat myself with concern to this >how it is that this leftist masochism develops into racial fetishism I have given sufficient answers about this to others already and it was met little direct response, you can go back and read if you want an answer to that so badly. >Your terminally online overgeneralizations are starting to get tiring. This example is a nothingburger, it is air, some people on the left are vindictive, so what? Every ideology has a theory that struggles to get deployed in practice, but adherents of specific ideologies aim to put them in practice even if they are not able to. The problem with communists is not that they are hypocrites or whatever, the problem is that they aim to put their ideology into practice, and starting from the very theory, their ideology is noxious. You are not as smart as you think you are. You ignored the other examples I posted. I thought you said you were arguing in good faith? Why not address them then? Why skip over them? Maybe because it reveals a pattern among those you are sworn to protect and because you are not doing what you say you are just like you are not what you say you are.

>>31198 >If politics are determined by genetics what would be the use of "spreading" and agenda? In reality, interracial anything is indeed grotesque, the push for interracial couples is one of the "blackpill" propaganda methods most useful for converting people to the right, as it is obvious it is an artificial push, the same thing could be said about the most deranged aspects of bmwf fetishism, which ads to the idea this is a tool for the right. To rally their own people, to get out the vote, to inspire demoralization and intimidation to the other side, to influence people on the fence, some people truly are more apolitical and only vote for the party they feel will best serve them in the very moment. Donald Trump for instance won the popular vote because of voters who voted for him but didn't vote for him in 2020. Though most people can't be swayed - as all past elections have shown - the bulk of the voting public votes in lockstep for their preferred politics almost their entire life which is what creates the notion of red/blue states in the first place. No matter their environment - most people's politics hardly change - for instance florida transitioned from a purple to red state once a good number of baby boomers decided to retire there - they took their politics with them, people didn't change and now some leftists are moving out of florida making it even redder. Environment has only some effect on how extreme someone will be on their side, not what side they are on in their adulthood in the first place. There is stereotype that as people grow older they become more conservative. That isn't true. What people are misinterpreting is the fact that teens and young adults are highly susceptible to influence from their social environment and since every child's environment nowadays is largely leftist groomers or contains leftist authority figures (so was mine) they follow the opinion they are told too, but these past elections are showing leftists that gen-z isn't voting for them in the numbers they hypothesized they would get especially surprising for them considering how much of a stranglehold they have on education and how much they gatekeep out any one to the right of them. What happens is people's opinions on politics gravitate to what their genes, their instincts lead them to. They become their true selves. If environment truly mattered more than genes, the left would have run away with elections a long time ago, everything from education to media to entertainment is full of people pushing leftist opinion but somehow it is still 50-50 on who wins. The left will never truly understand this - they don't believe in genetics to such an extant - they have to believe genes mainly affect appearance and size and what diseases you are susceptible to and little else - or else they would realize how dysgenic they are and how regressive as part of the genepool they really are and how progress will not come from them, but regression - that they are not the idealistic future of humanity. Such an ego death would force them to all commit suicide. So they will keep stupidly trying strategies they think will get them a supermajority that turn out to be an overreach, inspiring resistance among the right and the apolitical - causing them to become petulant and impatient and try to replace native populations with foreigners and inspire those newly arrived with ethnocentrism to rally against native western populations and vote for them. One day they will realize they are also replacing themselves, not just their opponents. Brown and black people are very unlikely to vote for a white passing leftist in local elections if they are a super majority no matter what they offer - they will just vote for a brown or black leftist, but in the shortterm they might vote for a federal president who promises an end to further immigration temporarily if that immigration is hurting them economically like what many did this election.

>>31199 1. Leftoids, if they’re involved in anything sexual, are by and large fans of BDSM which is why Kink at Pride is such a common discourse topic for them, why BDSM porn Network Kink.com is headquartered in San Francisco, and a lot of Feminist girlboss women are into super rough sex since that’s how they let loose. They simply don’t see the point in swinging unless there’s a queer element involved (no focus on race though, communists and socialists hate overt racism) and they avoid any interracial fetishism unless it’s a woman of color wanting to be submissive. Leftoids also hate BBC Fetishism because they and their racial activist allies see it as degrading towards Black Men. This lead to a lot of snowbunnies who tried to bring up their kink at the George Floyd Protests getting booted out of the movement within the 1st day or 2 (I remember progressives on Twitter being pissed off about it). 2. Rightoids are the ones who engage with swinging and cuckoldry the most because it goes against family values. Prime examples of this are Marjorie Taylor Greene being in a throuple (while a Democratic House Rep had to resign for being in one), Televangelist Pastor and Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr having to resign for cuckoldry (he enjoyed letting the poolboy bang his wife in front of him) and swinging, and the various news stories about Conservative HOA Board Members being in charge of swinger clubs and use HOA facilities for their after hours activities.

>>29741 self-harm is the whole point of this fetish you're simply in denial.

>>31199 >Ah so you are on the right? I was talking to someone else We have ids, you can see which posts are mine and which posts are not, are you an AI? Also why are you dividing your posts? You realize this is not 4cuck right? >that is why you peruse this board and defend it's users so gallantly? Who is defending users? Can you please look at my id and point towards an instance of me defending any user here? I am simply defending my point, you are so desperate and pathetic i almost pity you. >all I am seeing is someone who could benefit from universal mental healthcare Are you watching a mirror? Maybe your screen is turned off, turn it on. A couple of posts ago you were talking about how porn is a leftists thing, now you are acting all uppity even though you came here looking for porn, stop being such an hypocritical faggot and have some humility. >I have given sufficient answers No you have not, you are simply giving studies that don't support your point and leading questions intended to hide the fact there is a leap in within your logic, as i have repeatedly pointed out. >You ignored the other examples I posted Instead of shitting your pants and whining like a baby about me ignoring your examples you should point out how it is that your other examples are important to the matter at hand, it is my opinion that they are not, and they all are answered with the quote you are greentexting. A quote that you don't even address funnily enough. >To rally their own people, to get out the vote, to inspire demoralization and intimidation to the other side Are you reading the text you are quoting? Are you really trying to imply people in this board are trying to sway people into voting left? How deluded can you be? >Though most people can't be swayed - as all past elections have shown Americans are insufferable. The rest of your rambles are inconsequential to the discussion and would have some value if you were not a downie and fetishist in denial trying to cope your way out of this board.

>>31227 >Rightoids are the ones who engage with swinging and cuckoldry the most because it goes against family values. Prime examples of this are Marjorie Taylor Greene being in a throuple (while a Democratic House Rep had to resign for being in one), Televangelist Pastor and Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr having to resign for cuckoldry (he enjoyed letting the poolboy bang his wife in front of him) and swinging, and the various news stories about Conservative HOA Board Members being in charge of swinger clubs and use HOA facilities for their after hours activities. Following your logic, this would make leftists more likely to be into racial bnwo style porn because on the surface they uphold racial equality/equity as a main pillar to justify the righteousness of their cause and bnwo goes against such values and implicitly villianizes black males as a regression of western society and values instead of progress.. Since racial fetishizers keep turning up at blm type rallies, certainly a lefty thing they are trying to keep in secrecy. Obviously though, both the right and left mind work differently in how they perceive breaking what society teaches are moral violations(brain scans can detect what politics you support) - I like that you brought up jerry falwell since that was such a scandal because that is not a normal or acceptable thing amongst those circles. Shortly afterwards, he was essentially ousted from campus and banned, and then sued. Of course, jerry falwell says what the pool said was made up and his wife had an affair and cheated on him implying he was not a cuck, and he was blackmailed instead, but most likely that is a lie. If he was in leftist circles it would not be a big scandal, he would just be made fun of by the right just like that famous leftist youtuber Destiny who is also a cuckold. Imagine someone like Joe Rogan being found to have such a relationship with his wife, the right would drop him in a second, he wouldn't last long enough to release another episode. It just couldn't happen - one is acceptable on one side and not the other. On swinging ... eh the left pushes polyamory pretty hard in publications as they do cuckoldry. Leftists partake in cuckoldry so much they (especially at their filthy communes) created something they call 'compersion' where one partner(usually the male) enters such a spiritual state of bliss and empathy for his partner partaking in sex with another partner(usually another man) that he feels what she feels and so while he is in the chair in the corner in his own leftist view he is partaking in sex though it seems a little gay to want to spiritually connect and feel a girlfriend who is having sex with another man, but leftist males are more sexually fluid than most men so eh. Leftist have always been into cuckoldry, bnwo is an extension of that now since they place racial politics on a much higher level than economic politics nowadays. And the left has a hard time separating any of their social politics from degenerative fetishization. As for bdsm, do they push that? Yes, but with a big focus on empowering women through what they call femdom. Hell, nowadays there is dom/sub political play onlyfans where a dominatrix plays a maga women and tortures the lefty male sub into supporting/voting trump. It is a huge hit among leftists. The left has their finger in every kink you can think of but with their own degenerate spin on things. The right built western civilization and all of it's pillars by hand and mind. Pillars that the left did not build and now try to tear down or in the name of 'combating oppression'(seizing power) and now also fetishize into degeneration - western prestige, western economic power, western families, western masculinity. The right has clearly not been oppressive or responsible enough if these degenerates are allowed to flourish in society. At least red states now are putting age limits on porn so younger people don't accidentally stumble upon leftist mental illness such as this board. Liberalism was a nice experiment, but without genetic screening - the left will continue to exist in the western genepool, and so it can not continue without that liberalism being used against the native populace. >>31233 You are getting really boring. You whine that you are repeating yourself, but you go out of your way to essentially post the same things over and over. Whiny little one sentence responses that try to nitpick but just make you look obtuse and dumber in the end and weak for ignoring the huge parts of replies that are too inconvenient for you - responses not able to offer any logical counter points - starting to see you are limited and you might just be a truly simple mind creature with the brain the size of a peanut. Also, this little charade where you pretend to be on the right while arguing with someone on the right about how it is not the left who are pushing cuckoldry/bwno, but the right is beyond silly. And then you say you are arguing in 'good fatih' on top of that while doing all of the above. Tsk tsk. No actual rightwing person would invest so much time, energy, emotion into trying to protect the image of the left especially when there is too much evidence to argue against. Face it, you are just a typical slimy leftist possibly tranny.diarrheaing word vomit all over the boards. Take a breath and then get a new hobby or start posting something of substance that I or anyone can actually reply to.

>>31227 >1. Leftoids, if they’re involved in anything sexual, are by and large fans of BDSM which is why Kink at Pride is such a common discourse topic for them, why BDSM porn Network Kink.com is headquartered in San Francisco, and a lot of Feminist girlboss women are into super rough sex since that’s how they let loose. They simply don’t see the point in swinging unless there’s a queer element involved (no focus on race though, communists and socialists hate overt racism) and they avoid any interracial fetishism unless it’s a woman of color wanting to be submissive. Leftoids also hate BBC Fetishism because they and their racial activist allies see it as degrading towards Black Men. This lead to a lot of snowbunnies who tried to bring up their kink at the George Floyd Protests getting booted out of the movement within the 1st day or 2 (I remember progressives on Twitter being pissed off about it). Leftists say they stand for lots of things, but very rarely partake in what they idealize. For instance, a racially diverse society? Leftists tend to avoid living in asian, hispanic or black neighborhoods, always voluntarily segregating themselves and schools their children go to while at the same time preaching everyone else to live amongst the same people in the neighborhoods they avoid. Supporting refugees? Leftists want americans to let in anyone who claims asylum, but when those supposed asylum seekers come to their neighborhoods they call the police or the mayor to get them out. Multiracial democracy? Right after the election - leftists fantasized about trump deporting any hispanic who voted for him so they can't vote republican again, at their most emotionally distraught they revealed how fake they are. They support the things on the surface they feel will empower their agenda of taking over america, of shifting the overton window to their favor. of eliminating any criticism to their position in society. Also, side note - on the topic of lies - right or the left - what politics you support is in part influenced by your hormone levels, not just genes. Studies show that men with healthier or above average hormone levels of testosterone support more right leaning politics. People with higher testosterone are also more likely to be truthful and less evasive. Leftist males are more likely to be born with less prenatal testosterone. Explains their cucky behavior and the abundance of trannies on the left. All of the above somewhat explains both men and women and the rates of their lying and the rates of deceit among both the left and the right. The leftist(soviet) playbook is all about using deceit to win political power.

>>31227 >and the various news stories about Conservative HOA Board Members being in charge of swinger clubs and use HOA facilities for their after hours activities. Can I see these? The elderly in general seem to partake in swinging on occasion and HOA is fully of elderly. Something about long drawn out marriages tend to make some people antsy for something different. Ideally this wouldn't happen, but at least it is not too degenerate like leftist cuckoldry is. Especially bnwo style cuckoldry that the left and their trannies want to force everyone to see.

>>31242 >Tsk tsk

>>31243 This one is comedy gold because you could have presented this theory at first but you didn't, meaning you came up with this on the spot, meaning you are still thinking of ways to defend the point you want to defend instead of following the truth, meaning as i diagnosed in my first post, your cringe persona is just an elaborate cope and there is nothing good faith about you. The most obvious thing about you is the fact you keep returning to this thread and making posts in this board. You excuse was that you just had to search for interracial porn (and porn is a leftist thing remember) just a different kind of interracial porn despite the fact everyone knows the very specific kind of porn housed in this board.You literally only needed to use google images lmao. And well, you didn't find that kind of porn, you can't argue for shit and each thing you say gives more credit to the obvious idea you are a fetishist in denial. Why are you still here?

>>31243 Just passing by to say that your point on leftists not practicing what they preach is ONE way to look at it, but the boring reality is that they're faced with the cognitive dissonance (i.e. a decently well-researched part of behaviorism, unlike your random claims) of their opinions versus their experiences. Even if they're technically delusional via opinion, they're relatively high enough in intelligence to realize what's happening in front of them and to avoid it. That's just self-preservation by nature, which you can't physically/mentally fight. The only difference is that they're scared to say "hey guys actually" to their little echochambers because we all know what happens when you deviate from the extremism on that spectrum by even one percentile. btw, projection (despite the buzzword connotation nowadays) is another actual psychological phenomenon that's been extensively studied by people far smarter than you or me. That was the whole basis of the other person's argument - people who *obsess* with a very specific topic (NWO/White Replacement/Violent muh dick niggers) tend to be the same ones who indulge. Churches/purity - school/education for both sides of the spectrum when it comes to pedophelia statistics and domination over social weaklings, for example. There's no arguing against that, so I don't even know how this has went for so long when you're just denying reality lol Lastly, another key factor for projection is that it's important to attribute it strictly onto groups with pre-existing psychological conditions, such as paranoics (1:1 definition of modern-day right wingers) and narcissists (kinda broad, but a direct example is trannies/flamboyant gays being obsessed with kids/school receptiveness while having strong pedophilic tendencies) As >>31249 said, it's actually comical how you're exhibiting the exact same cognitive dissonance as a RWer on an interracial board arguing that it's dominated by LWers with some delusional cope that you're right solely because leftists=degenerates is all the 'evidence' you need lmfao

>>31242 Joe rogan already has heat from having a half black daughter (his wives) and people like this and noones kicked out influencers and pornstars like these >>28439 >>31242