This new board CSS is actually pretty nice actually. Much softer on the eyes. I'm probably the only person who doesn't want it changed.

>>10399 You can select it individually any time or enable it for your board by copying the .css file if you're BO To force it down everyone's throat as Default CSS is stupid even as a prank, I already explained why: >There are boards with an intricately crafted theme (i.e. /fringe/), by forcefully changing it you simply break the flow for no good reason. >regular anons who change their theme manually get this absolutely nasty blinking side effect.

>>10400 I'm speaking for the Default CSS. Yes, I hope they fix the board CSS for all the other boards.

>>10400 Look im just gonna say it, the css on /fringe/ is absolute fucking cancer, it looks like shit, takes ten minutes to load, and uses the absolute worst color scheme I've ever seen outside of actual street shitting indians. So go cry me a fucking river.

Here's what anons are saying: >>>/v/1084700 >Yeah I noticed that last night. Not a fan of it. >>>/v/1084705 >Haven't seen this happen until recently. Whatever the fuck the retards did they need to reverse it. REVERSE THE CSS ALREADY

Hello. About a spammer problem. A preventive, effective mechanism is to prohibit file upload from new IPs until that IP made at least 2-3 posts of a text content. Note that failed captchas must reset this check, to prevent autosolver.

>>10403 Im actually surprised only two anons on this website are retarded. Well three I guess including you. Still, damned low.

Fuck off wanker, adults are talking. Usability is a thing. Damn, I wish Board Owners at least had the option to opt out of Default CSS in favor of Board CSS

>>10406 It won't be today, it won't be tomorrow, but there will come a day when you realize how little you know, and see how incredibly foolish you were. For me that day is now. LMAO LOOK AT THIS FUCKING IDIOT! OMG LOL

>>10395 I think that's a one-off. The (((anon))) who posted those posted them unspoilered in the first place. When you saw them, and went to the thread, moderation had already retroactively spoilered them.

This is such fucking bullshit, half chan is down for a lame April fools joke and I had the opportunity to move people from my general to 8chan but the fucking email fucking crap doesn't work for FUCKS SAKE.

>>10409 Which is such fucking horseshit. The fuck spoilering do when they still up on the front page nigger? Pointless yo. Y'all trifling.

>>10411 What board do you want to make?

>>10412 Did you reload the front page after seeing they were spoilered in the thread?

>>10414 Yo no doubt, but you knew that y'all, that shit worked the same way for fucking ever yo, least long as the site been up anyway. Spoilering after the fact don't do a motherfucking thing for yalls front page negro, y'all dumb as hell.

>>10415 Then that's a technical issue that needs fixing, as you originally stated. Just asking to be sure. I am not the adminstration.

>>10416 Yuh, obviously you aint nigger, I already knewed that shit son. Trifling ass bustas

Yo til that shit get fixed heres how its gonna work from now on dog. I see yo nasty ass unspoilered bitches, and no questions asked, ima put a cap in yo ass, best believe that.

>>10418 Yeah, yeah, ooga booga bix nood, I get it.

>>10419 Mmm hmm

>>10417 for the love of god I think I speak for everyone at chan when I say: check your fucking mail for fuck's sake.

>>10421 What board do you want to open? tell me the URI and title. I have a validated account, I can open the board and transfer it to your account later.

Finally.

HOORAY! A BUG FIX Previously I complained about an ID selection bug: you cannot click and unclick IDs because the functionality is broken/unfinished. I actually got around and fixed it myself! The code changes the label.onclick function in .static/js/posting.js, lines 268 to 291. label.onclick = function() { var index = posting.highLightedIds.indexOf(id); window.location.hash = '_'; if (index > -1) { posting.highLightedIds.splice(index, 1); var updateCell = C => C.classList.remove("markedPost"); } else { posting.highLightedIds.push(id); var updateCell = C => C.classList.add("markedPost"); index = posting.highLightedIds.indexOf(id); } for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) { var cellToChange = array[i]; if (cellToChange.className === 'innerOP') { continue; } if (index > -1) { updateCell(cellToChange); } } }; That's it. Now I ask codexx to update the old code. As a matter of fact, I have other suggestions in mind and I will be sharing them soon, some with ready solutions.

I also think that this leftover line in >>10424 is unnecessary (can't edit the post) >window.location.hash = '_';

>>10422 A very kind gesture, but you can't transfer boards to users who don't have a verified account (from the start) and that's exactly the problem for several of us who have been waiting for verification for months.

There's a single post in /loli/ labelled "anything." What is it supposed to be? The poster's name is jimm, and it just says "i like anything."

>>10428 Somebody's easy to please.

>>10426 Yes you can.

>>10428 Why are you posting about some old low effort post from /loli/ on /site/?

>>10413 /balk/ Balkans The place where everything went wrong. Username: Mangal Email: 8chan6969@gmail.com

ANOTHER BUG FIX Problem: quoting multiple lines doesn't work properly. When you select multiple paragraphs with your mouse and click on the post number, only the first two lines get quoted. This is not how it's supposed to work. The bug is actually easy to fix. The new code (I borrowed it from 4chan) replaces line 63 in /.static/js/qr.js Old code: quoteString += '>' + selectedText.toString().replace('\n', '\n>') + '\n'; New code: quoteString += '>' + selectedText.toString().trim().replace(/[\r\n]+/g,'\n>') + '\n'; Again, I ask Codexx to update the old code.

>>10434 >Again, I ask Codexx to update the old code. At this point just ask for his job.

>>10424 >>10425 >>10434 I'll apply the patches to the dev branch this weekend. Would you be interested in joining the dev team? I lost my frontend guys and could really use someone. >>10435 I've had very little time this past year and the time I have had has been spent trying to get 8TV to stop catching fire. >>10432 Validated. I can't say I have your e-mail in my inbox, so it must have gotten eaten. Once we put out the current fires, I will circle back to fixing validation e-mails.

>>10437 >I've had very little time this past year and the time I have had has been spent trying to get 8TV to stop catching fire. Yes, you could use the help.