why do you need an app to browse imageboards? just use the web-based browser version.....

I've looked at adding explicit site support to a couple imageboard apps, but ensuring support for everything we do is rather difficult, and we simply do not have the time to maintain an app for both Android and iOS. I'm not even sure we have the resources to maintain a single addon for a single app on a single platform at the moment. Instead, the focus is entirely on making the website's mobile layout functional on a touchscreen. The last update made some major quality of life changes for mobile users, and there's a number of additional fixes and tweaks planned. If the developers of any apps would like assistance or clarification on how to interface with the APIs then I would be happy to help. If they support LynxChan, I see no reason why they couldn't support this site out of the box, however.

>>6758 No other reason, just for the convenience of users who like to use the app.

>>6759 Don't spend too much time maintaining this app, this app is maintained by others. All we have to do is how to add our own site domain name, and then package it into an apk. Not every site domain name of the APP they maintain can be applied for and passed.

>>6762 But how, exactly, is it more convenient? What does an app offer that the web version doesn't? Plus, apps just come with the overhead of having to deal with invasive permission requirements that want access to your device's resources. With the browser, you don't have to worry about that.

>>6766 Some people prefer to access with a browser, while others prefer to access with an app.

>>6796 lynxchan users should just neck themselves