>>1842
Half of BSD is pozzed, too, with some CoCs originating there. The other half is fine in terms of management, and more-or-less kicked SJWs to the curb and let them run to the other BSDs.
BSD has two big issues, though, and several smaller ones. First and foremost, BSD license is a cuck license. GPL actively prevents corporations from co-opting open source and supplanting it. They can develop their own alternatives, but not build on what exists as a starting point. OSX is a great example of why the BSD license dooms your project to failure. If your distribution ever catches on, a company can just repackage it with extra features and you become the underdog in your own ecosystem. For all of the problems with Linux making changes for corporate interests, these companies can only use tweaked kernels internally. If a phone OEM uses Android you can request their kernel changes and they must release them.
Besides that, driver support is a concern, as is the general ecosystem. POSIX is on life support and you can't run most Linux-based software on a BSD without serious modifications even though their interface is nearly identical. And you'll be writing your own drivers. Realistically, BSD is going to die soon unless something radical happens. It's useful as a server OS where sysadmins know the ins and outs but Linux has spent 20 years trying (and failing) to capture the home desktop market. It's only making inroads now because it's dead simple on most DEs and Proton exists for gamers. Even then, it's like 1% market share and some people just can't grok a Unix workflow.
So the answer is "yes" with the caveat of "if you like writing your own drivers for a dying ecosystem where nothing will work out of the box". Maybe in a world where Windows is dead and Linux is king the BSDs would see an uptick as well from people seeking alternatives, and intercompatibility and a new POSIX standard would be desirable. For now, Linux is leeching desktop users from both directions, though. When the current round of greybears retires or dies, BSD will probably die with it.
I think Stallman is still handling GNU despite leaving his post at the FSF. Maybe Hurd will exist in usable form someday, but I think Stallman will die before it comes to fruition. It actually has a lot of neat features that enterprises might find useful, but they've never been demonstrated to work reliably outside of academic environments.