>>3653
Any rationale for this particular brain fart?
>What do you think about how GNU/Linux has changed over the years?
Sound support's better but still too complicated. OSS was the right solution.
Wireless support is great. I can finally install an OS without a second PC to Google how to get the internet working.
I thought there would be a single-user alternative to X windows by now, but there isn't (I don't consider Wayland a serious effort based on their track record).
Graphics drivers, dualhead and OpenGL support are much, much better (and simpler) than when I started. GL stagnated after they went to programmable shaders though. jwz was right about the API
Games are a lot better after the example set by Humble Bundle. Le furry jew really did us a favor by requiring no DRM, cross-platform builds, and compiling everything static.
I don't use a desktop environment, but every time I upgrade I give them a try and they've literally gone backward every year since 2001. Linus was right about XML
Audio players, ebook readers, etc. have stagnated because people focus their efforts on the mobile versions.
Still haven't found the perfect file manager.
Overall, the best development is the adoption of Linux by anyone doing serious work. The worst development is the proliferation of scripting languages.
>When are you switching to BSD?
When I see people making themes based on bands and sports teams.
If there are no desktop themes, or they're based on some marginalized pariah group like antifa or anime fans, that means the system hasn't achieved wide adoption and is still a theoretical circle jerk.
Software can't be a sekrit klub because there's no hard-and-fast rule for recognizing a good programmer. You have to make it easy for everyone to contribute and then the good stuff will rise to the top.