/vr/ - Retro Video Gaming

Old-school Video Game Discussion

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0.

Welcome Refugees!
Don't see your board? Register and create it!


8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.


What is retro? Anonymous Board owner 04/19/2025 (Sat) 14:38:26 No. 187
Games that are allowed to be discussed fit the following criteria: All console games up to 5th gen. All Pinball games. All PC/Arcade games prior to the end of 2004. All 6th gen games provided that they were not also released on a 7th gen console that is not the Wii unless it came out prior to the end of 2006. All DS or PSP games provided that they were not also released on a 8th gen handheld. These last two rules allow for games like Twilight Princess, Baroque, and Godzilla Unleashed to be talked about while restricting games like Guitar Hero 5 and Pro Evolution Soccer 2013. HD rereleases/collections and ports are to be considered separate games when considering if a game may considered retro. eg: Okami HD does not invalidate its retro status on the PS2. Remakes and hd releases may be discussed but only in the context of their originals. Meaning you may not make a thread about the DQ3 HD-2D Remake but it may be discussed when being compared to other DQ3 releases. Adjacent topics may also be discussed. Magazines, guides, hardware, peripherals, tvs/monitors, etc. Keep in mind though that these are not explicitly the topic of the board and so a bit more effort should be put into OPs involving these things. Hopefully these rules seem fair enough to most people. And remember, if things become too busy here or discussion becomes to lopsided to the newer titles then a v2k board will be made. These are the rules as they stand right now but feel free to discuss them or alternatives in this thread if you wish. We might as well have this conversation now. I know most people feel that the term "retro" as it applies to games should be cut off after 5th gen. This is fair, since after that point games really did start to get smoothed down and corporatised. Not to mention 3d graphics got much better in the 6th gen. A lot of people with this mindset usually suggest a /v2k/ board. I have to say though, if you want to talk about dead boards, a board dedicated to only two console generations would definitely be one considering the traffic we get around here. On the other hand some people use a simple rule of if console is 20 years old then its retro. This makes things simple and let's face it, none of us are getting any younger. Even GCCX has accepted the PS2 and Gamecube as retro though they are played rarely on that show. I think the 20 year rule is good but the problem is you will inevitably face the issue where you end up talking about the 360/PS3 and at that point you're very clearly not in any sort of world where things feel retro. That gen had its own fads and expectations that are clearly different from the ones that game before it. So another option, and one I'm pulling a bit towards and I know some people won't like, is that "retro", at least as far as this board would be concerned, will include 6th gen + DS and PSP and that is the absolute cutoff. The 20 year people will have their stuff and it is nice to be able to talk about Sega's entire hardware lineup on one board. And there are definitely a good amount of ps2 games that still have a experimental retro feel to them. The DS and PSP besides the 20 year rule, their major benefit is that they received a decent amount of retro game remakes and it just makes it easier to talk about those games when no one has wonder if they're allowed to talk about them. HOWEVER, in the event that the board does actually get a lot of traffic or there's too much talk of Halo, then a /v2k/ split at that point would definitely be justified and enacted. But tell if you have an opinion different than what I laid out above.
Edited last time by CIA on 04/22/2025 (Tue) 04:21:32.
>>187 I'm fine with PS2/GC/Xbox + DS + PSP. There's so many GBA series that continued on DS or PSP that it becomes awkward to discuss them avoiding the elephant in the room. Fina Fantasy Tactics, Castlevania, Yu-Gi-Oh in general... When (more likely, if) there's enough traffic to discuss starting up /v2k/, the ruleset can be revisted then. I suggest the following rules clarifications: >PC games released on December 31st, 2007 or earlier allowed >Same for arcade games >Pinball is allowed regardless of release date >Romhacks/mods are allowed if the game they're based on is allowed >Homebrew is allowed if the system it's made for is allowed >Remakes can be discussed if the game it's a remake of is retro
How do these rules apply to pc games, is the cut off 20 years absolute for them?
>>193 I'm not 100 percent sure but I'm thinking it should be 2004/5 at the latest and not roll ahead. Just so people aren't talking about 360 era games.
>>194 I agree. Half Life 2 and Doom 3 are already pushing it as it is. Including the likes of TES Oblivion and fucking Crysis has always been ridiculous, which is why the latter was a common vehicle for troll threads.
People say /vr/ went to shit with the inclusion of 6th gen, but I've always felt that was coincidental since the entirety of 4chan was going to shit around that time. Still, I'm fine with a more safe set of rules if that's what people want.
>>199 In a way, I suppose that's true. Had 6th-gen been included from the board's inception, it may not have changed the board's character much simply due to the fact that the brain-rotted zoomers who grew up with those consoles simply weren't on 4chan just yet. The problem is when the rule change happened, it was like the floodgates suddenly burst open and they swarmed in all at once without giving a shit about lurking or acclimating to the existing board culture or etiquette, and unlike what's currently happening right now on this site, there was absolutely no effort on the part of the mods to help ease the transition.
>>200 PS2 games definitely feel retro to me, at least the early ones since they are basically just upgraded ps1 games
>>201 Yeah, I'd say the first couple of years of that generation were still rather firmly rooted in older gaming conventions reminiscent of what came before, even on the Xbox. It's around 2003/4 where I feel like the transition toward more modern game design was ramping up, and by 2005 the games on those consoles are pretty much indistinguishable from 7th-gen games and beyond.
>>202 For me, 2004 is the latest year for what is to be considered "retro".
>>187 There is also the problem that new generation consoles are released before they stop making games for the previous generation. So maybe it is better to go by generation and fixed (not relative) year. I think many would agree that 6th generation have some games that could classify and some that could not and most would agree that it is stupid to keep using relative years.
>>207 So you mean its better to just include all games from the entire generation? I'd might agree with that. It's not like the board would be better off just because you wouldn't be able to discuss sakura wars so long my love for ps2 otherwise.
>>208 Roughly yes, but setting an absolute cut-off year to prevent games released when 7th generation consoles existed but on 6th generation consoles to count, and this cut-off could be set anywhere from the release of 6th generation consoles, so up to discussion.
>>209 There could just be a no multi-plats rule where if your ps2 game also released on the ps3 then it's not allowed.
What about homebrew? Should there be a case where homebrew is not allowed or no?
>>211 Zelda TP fags are not gonna like that lol
>>217 Should Wii be considered retro? It is just a gamecube with slightly more ram afterall
>>218 Only the specs are "retro". Everything else about it is decisively modern, even if its implementation of said modern concepts (with the exception of waggle) was subpar compared to the other consoles.
>>217 There could maybe be an exception where if the only 7th gen console it came on was wii then its fine. This would also be so okami isn't excluded.
>>222 Or better yet, just take into account what console the game was originally developed for. Though the Wii version of TP came out first, it was primarily a GC game and only came out a few weeks later because Nintendo wanted to promote it as a Wii launch title.
>>223 That could be a little harder to identify depending on the case.
All I know is that 6th gen faggotry ruined 4/vr/
>>225 Plenty of /vr/'s faggotry involves the previous generations (SNES vs Genesis console warring, endless "this is how the Saturn could've been saved" threads, etc). It's not 6th-gen per se that was the problem, it's the zoomer /v/ermin that was suddenly given license to come in and shitpost as a result of the rule change. I still think 6th-gen belongs in a /v2k/ regardless, but that wasn't really the issue.
The OP has been updated with the rules that we will go with for now. Hopefully they exclude all games that don't fit the bill and no games that should.
>>235 >All DS or PSP games provided that they were not also released on a 8th gen handheld. I can't imagine there were many psp games released on the vita to begin with tbh
>>237 Yeah that was mostly so I could exclude pro evolution soccer 2014 for the psp since it also released on the 3ds.
(36.17 KB 699x545 1698267924428535.jpg)

>>238 >that was mostly so I could exclude pro evolution soccer 2014 Pro Evolution Soccer '14 bros.....
(148.11 KB 640x895 lego star wars 2 GC cover.jpg)

(154.31 KB 640x914 the godfather PS2 cover.jpg)

(100.00 KB 640x913 THAW xbox cover.jpg)

>All 6th gen games provided that they were not also released on a 7th gen console that is not the Wii. I think this unintentionally excludes some 6th gen games from the start of the 7th gen that clearly belonged more to the former than the latter. e.g. THAW, Gun, Burnout Revenge all have 360 versions, but I don't think most people played them or think of them as primarily 360 games. I have a couple ideas for this. One is to allow any 6th gen games that released on 360 in 2006. This probably allows any games people care about. My other idea is to allow anything that released on GameCube and/or Xbox in addition to Xbox 360, because these consoles didn't have the same massive install base as PS2/Wii and were quickly discarded once 6th gen consoles were no longer lead development platforms. A game existing on them is a strong sign they're a 6th gen game first and foremost. I don't know how you would put either of these into the rules without making them overly verbose. The heart of the idea is "allow games that are primarily made for 6th gen consoles and not just backported to them" but sometimes people are stupid and insist on not getting it.
>>270 Good catch. I adjusted the rule. Its starting to sound like a yugioh card.


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply