>>853 >it is the Christians who have the evidence on their side, and their opponents who are appealing to authority. I beleive this is true and it's shocking also the new articles coming out trying its hardest to "debunk" Christianity by appealing to alphabet people agenda as I've seen in social media.

>>853 Only some protestants were against big bang and evolutionary theory. Both of which were discovered by Christians. The big bang theory by a Catholic Priest clearly inspired by Saint Thomas Aquinas and Aristotle.

>>882 Most scientists don't understand that science is a deeply Christian worldview, and many Christians don't either. You have to believe that the world has rules to believe that the world has rules. (Sagan may have believed that Science was a Candle in the Dark, but the only way to leave the Demon-haunted World is to leave the Demon-haunted World.) It is logically invalid to believe that the world has rules from the fact that it looks like it has rules: this is the problem of induction. Ultimately, believing that the universe has rules for us to discover is an act of faith: it cannot be defended through logic (that is the problem of induction). But, you MUST believe that the world has rules, rules that the fallible human mind can discover, or you CANNOT do science. Science is, ultimately, based on a faith. I want to blame evolution as to why science has become so ... dogmatic. Scientists didn't understand why Evolution was the Scientific way of doing things, so they fell back on appeals to authority. They couldn't articulate that Evolution betters represents this aesthetic that the universe has rules, that we as fallible humans can imperfectly know, and that when you apply the rules of Evolution, the world as it appears to us is an emergent property from the initial conditions. Yes, Evolution contradicts scripture, but it better encompasses the idea that God imparted rules upon the Universe, and the Universe operates according to those rules, over Deep Time. And that's another issue: if you believe that the Universe is only six thousand years old, then you don't have Deep Time. But, the Universe APPEARS to be over six thousand years old (could be Satan, but I'm not holding my breath), and it APPEARS to have the kind of time-span on which Deep Time, and thus Evolution, can operate.

>>883 For me? It's swearing. I also want to "give up" having a poor prayer life.

>>417 Actually yes, the shamanism and nature worship in Japan that existed before the Nihon Shoki and Kojiki were written were completely different things. As well, that bears no equivalency to the question at hand in this thread.

>>408 Jesus was Jewish. This is not a problem. People who think it is don't understand the Jewish problem. I say this as an active "anti-Semite".

>>426 What he's trying to say is that Rabbinic Judaism which arose after the destruction of Israel is different to Second Temple Judaism. The former is an enemy of Christ and misleads millions. The latter was fulfilled in Christ.

Feel free to take refuge here if anything ever happens (again?).

>>840 why did it go down?

>>866 You're saying this is a non-issue, when at the same time, it became one that you saw an opportunity for and not realizing that the wrongs that you make are just as much countable and some of which quite concerning. That might be why you are banned in a lot of places, prioritizing only the things that you feel are wrong of others but never anything from your side and completely disregarding others. Which do you think is the bigger mistake to make? Nothing is sacred on imageboards. People could just lie and operate under completely different motives. It wouldn't be worth anything to change the fact people are always going to say the N word. Or how a Christian board should be when the best you can do is simply letting people discuss it with others in good light, and just not let something posted bother you so much. That's probably the better thing you should have done instead of playing a small part in urging someone to believe they're doing something way worse than yourself. Whether you're trying to find honest good reasons here, it's still a bit of a disappointment to witness altogether. Not something that I'm going to continue with you or allow anymore said about it. Maybe with you understanding my disappointment, you'll follow my wishes and not post again. I'll be locking the thread, since it seems a better option.

This is super nice and convenient

>>718 Someone should highlight particular ones of higher note than others. That's a very very long list.

This is very helpful God bless You brother.

>>96 No citations, I see; however, even if you are correct, it was the DOCTRINE of the Pharisees and Sadducees that was evil, not their race. >"How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees." Matthew 16:11-12 KJV Israel's national transgressions are littered throughout the OT, from Israel himself (Jacob, who deceived his father to steal the birthright) onward. Their purity of race had nothing to do with their holiness or wickedness. Intermarriage may have provided additional temptation/opportunity for wickedness, but before any intermarriage occured, Jacob's sons wickedly deceived and slew the men of Shechem's city (Genesis 34) and sold their innocent brother Joseph into slavery after considering fratricide (Genesis 37)... and this is only the first two generations. >>237 Keep your healthy skepticism about this topic. It draws more crazy theories than anything else, maybe even more than Daniel & Revelation. >>288 >they became modern jews. The purest racial descendants of the ancient Biblical Canaanites are alive today, in modern Lebanon: (disable javascript to view the whole article) https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/dna-from-biblical-canaanites-lives-modern-arabs-jews tl;dr: Modern Lebanese are 90%+ Canaanite, Jews and Arabs are 50%+ Canaanite.

>>21 Modern Jews are the mongrlized descendents of Judah of the Bible. Their story begins with Esau, the race mixer twin brother of Jacob, the father of the 12 tribes of Israel. He had a quarrel with Jacob, Jacob fled and in the meantime Esau took canaanites as wifes >1This is the account of Esau (that is, Edom). 2Esau took his wives from the daughters of Canaan: Adah daughter of Elon the Hittite, Oholibamah daughter of Anah and granddaughter of Zibeon the Hivite, 3and Basemath daughter of Ishmael and sister of Nebaioth These and their descendents are the known as the Edomites. Among the Edomites there are the Amelek >12Additionally, Timna, a concubine of Esau’s son Eliphaz, gave birth to Amalek. These are the grandsons of Esau’s wife Adah. which later became the enemy of Israel and are seen as their eternal nemesis. This is who they are, but how did they become known as the Jews, the descendents of Judah and Israel? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edom >The Edomites first established a kingdom ("Edom") in the southern area of modern-day Jordan and later migrated into the southern parts of the Kingdom of Judah ("Idumea", or modern-day southern Israel/Negev) when Judah was first weakened and then destroyed by the Babylonians, in the 6th century BC. The original ones were conquered by Babylon and carried away. The Edomites settled there and took things over, and after the original Judahites returned they fought and eventually >They were again subdued by John Hyrcanus (c. 125 BC), who forcibly converted them, among others, to Judaism Notethat "Judaism" isnt here the modern Judaism. Somewhere in the meantime the Pharisee were founded whichs tradition is based on the oral law which became the talmud and very likely was influenced by babylonian teachings the Judahites brought back and is the foundation of modern Judaism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees >The Pharisees preserved the Pharisaical oral law in the form of the satanic bible known as Talmud.

The jews call Europeans esau and amalek and wish to blot out the name of Europe. This is the source of black washing history. This is the source of shitskin migration to white lands. Anti-whitism is encoded into their religion. The anti-white agenda is nothing other than judaism. "wokeism" is nothing other than tikkun olam judaism. Feminism in white countries is tikkun olam and therefore judaism. The androgyny agenda is kabbalistic and therefore judaism. Reminder to all non-jewish, non-Euro gened people as well. Jews are not stopping at white people. Ultimately ALL non- jews are esau/amalek. They only target white people first, primarily, because they are butt hurt about the romans destroying their stupid temple. They will destroy the cultures and genotype and pheno-type of ALL peoples if they are not stopped. Reminder that COMMUNISM is jewish, and so cambodia's khmer rouge was jewish. Vietnam war was jewish. China's one child policy was jewish. Nuking japan was jewish. The transatlantic slave trade was jewish. Ect. TKD. Kikeeeeee...

>>210 because God decided everything that ever will happen in the past.

>>205 > And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent I believe The Lord is making a point that the gospel is no longer limited to one nation (the Israelites), but is now to be read by all nations. Ethnostates are neither condoned nor condemned by God. The Lord only demands that you treat the foreigner as yourself.

>>569 >The Lord only demands that you treat the foreigner as yourself. So he condemns ethnostates then.

Yes, I believe it means something akin to the accuser, doubter, some title that means something akin to "one who stands against God". Which is essentially just a description of him in Job. I forgot the exact phrase. The later attribution of the Satan in Job to the Satan in the New Testament was only done by Jesus or later Jews. Like how the snake in the garden is seen as Satan, though not explicitly mentioned.