>>419
At the very least, you have
something to say when you post instead of just quoting like the soyjack poster, so okay I'll tell you what. I'll tentatively let it slide for now, but if it looks like you're intentially derailing threads or flamebaiting, you're done. It's hard to tell trolls and avatarfags apart sometimes, and I don't really like either of them, so if you're gonna post here, keep that in mind.
And I'm only giving you this chance because it doesn't look like you're a torposter. The trolls are usually torposters.
>>371
>interesting stuff
Something I forgot to clarify is that the reason I ban posts like this isn't because they're "not interesting". It's because I don't want there to be a situation where someone could post annoying stuff on purpose, then laugh when no one's allowed to be mean to them back or they'd be breaking the rules, like
>>75 tried to do. This requires judging someone's intention though which is never gonna be perfect, so I just look at the context and give it my best effort. Of course, it would be a lot easier to just ban any unpopular or controversial topics, but then it wouldn't really be "Kind
Random", would it?