>>1030282
>>1030314
If they're making these claims, then they know they fucked up and no one is having any of it. So they're trying to "salvage" the reception of the game by blaming the "original creators" as being the "reason" why the remake isn't as good as the original. But this also goes down the direction I said earlier of why didn't they just hire the original developers in the first place?
But then I also see this go down horribly as well. Of course the people who made the game are going to change things because the biggest critic is yourself. And these people have now had 20+ years of experience from when the game first came out, having learned much since then, and can see areas that they believed themselves to have "Fucked up" and wanting to fix that or do it better. However then comes the problem of asking if it was a "problem" in the first place. As was stated earlier with
REmake, people consider that to be a "perfect" example of what a remake should be, but very few talk about the fact that
REmake is itself not the same game as
Resident Evil. It has a completely different tone, story delivery, color pallete, etc. Yes, it is still a good game, but while
Resident Evil went down the path of being a campy B-movie horror game,
REmake tries to be a legit zombie horror game. Yes, fighting the giant shark and snake is still a silly concept in
REmake, but it's still treated as more serious.
Similar thing would have happened here. So the question becomes, why even bother remaking something in the first place when you're not going to measure up to the original instead of making something new?