>>974418
>I can go and play Perfect Dark and I know it's not going to hold up to my memory of it, because I'm 20 years older and have been exposed or hundreds of more refined and better-designed FPS games than the ones that blew my mind as a kid, but it's still the same game.
The problem with that is that then you encounter people who
never "grew up" with that material, such as in my case. Outside of ports/compilations, the "oldest" games I had were what was playable on my GBA and GC. With my "newest" game console up through high school being the 3DS. Since them, I've dived head first into newer and older games, and realized just how much better designed and more content was accomplished with older games than the games of today.
>That's still retarded though because it removes the context of when the game originally came out and what the expectations and achievements of it were at release.
That only furthers the argument.
>>974426
>games can have parts that are outdated in comparison to newer games or even new games in from the same series
Excuse me, outdated in
what way? For example, I've often heard of people talking about 2005's
F.E.A.R. as being an "outdated game", but it's never explained what is it about the game that makes it "outdated" in comparison to newer FPS games.
>>974433
>GCs mini disks with much lower limits than regular DVDs, PS2 games usually looked better due to being able to store all the textures and decals at higher resolutions
Are you sure? Are you willing to put it to the test? The next series of images will be taken from different versions of games that I recorded in the best quality possible.
Which version do you think looks better?