>>184102
Nigger, I have no idea what you're talking about, and I don't think you do, either
>does anybody care about COD single player?
no, but I heard both MW4 and Cold War had a pretty good campaign. Even Infinite Warfare, Infinity Ward's futuristic FPS, had single player many people praised, so that is why I am saying they could do Halo justice, as long as they were tard wrangled into remembering that they're not making another COD game(which, again, shouldn't be an issue, I imagine a lot of these devs want to take a break from these games). If they brought over Zombies team, I could expect something even crazier from them, maybe even some sort of follow up to Firefight mode
>>184064
I'm watching people reviewing Diablo Immortal, and it's not that bad, considering how much people hated ever since that "phone" presentation. It looks like an even more mainstreamed Diablo 3 with awful microtransactions, which is exactly what I expected. From the looks of it, if you really want a mobile Diablo game, it is good for about 2-3 hours before the grind forces you to a halt unless you start spending money. The game is free, so it is about what I would expect.
That said, the game still looks shit, because mobile games are shit, and Diablo 3 was shit, but it is not anywhere near on the level of failure we've seen coming over the last few years, much more like TORtanic than Cyberpunk 2077 or The Frontier