>>1895 Good God they really are trying to ban everything. They really must be retarded.

Miquetoast Tim did an episode breaking down just how insane this stupid bill that's likely to pass actually is. https://rumble.com/v1cefad-democrats-will-vote-next-week-on-near-total-gun-ban-gop-may-support-ban-on-.html tl;dr- it finds every excuse in the books to ban pretty much everything, with the claim that "guns purchased before the ban are grandfathered in" to try and keep fudds from bitching about it being a total ban on anything that's not a black powder rifle.

>>1897 With the otherwise trajectory of this country, socially and economically, if they pass this with democrat support then I expect the next civil war will commence almost instantly. They must truly want to destroy the country and don't care if they make it either.

>>1898 You have to have two sides in order to have civil war not a uniparty with all the power vs proles with no social cohesion and no organizations willing to support them. If anything it will just be a mass crackdown on anyone politically active followed by Brazilification as crime levels skyrocket among a disarmed populace. I have no faith in Americans fighting anything. It's a completely demoralized society.

>>1898 >Civil war If something like that were to happen you're going to get some small protests that may or may not get cracked down and then slow steady disarmament with mostly rural folk being able to keep their weaponry. I don't want to sound like a blackpillfaggot, but abundance of resources and an easy life has made most Americans completely devoid of any kind of fighting will.

>>1899 >>1900 >implying that a bunch boomers didn't work themselves up into a frenzy and storm the capitol a year and a half ago over what was basically circumstantial, statistical evidence of fraud >implying that 10,000% more wouldn't do it if the government directly and openly comes after their guns >implying that Xi or Putin wouldn't take the opportunity to foment and aid in a rebellion in order to weaken the US's position

>>1901 They aren't taking away your guns which are grandfathered in. They are taking away the next generation's guns so nobody will notice. They did the same thing in Colorado with the high-capacity magazine ban in an otherwise pro-gun state and the result is the entire state losing its 2A drive. They do this every time where they guarantee your rights while promising to destroy them in the next generation.

>>1901 Chimpouts won't accomplish shit except getting yourself arrested months later exactly like what happened to the January 6th boomers. They all got a ride to fed pen without so much as a shot fired. America is already geopolitically weak and Xi and Putin are already taking what they want RIGHT NOW. They aren't going to send the cavalry in to save you for absolutely no additional gain for themselves. This is dumb.

I half suspect that this is a niggerpill thread.

>>1904 I did not intend it as a niggerpill thread, but I apologize if it's interpreted that way. After the red flag laws last month got passed by Republicans I'm a little paranoid and want to make sure anons are aware that HR 1808 currently has Republican backing despite being the most comprehensive gun ban the Democrats have tried to pass since the 90s.

>>1905 I's not so much your OP as it is some of the responses.

>>1906 What? That it will probably pass? That its passage won't automatically trigger le ebin Civil War? These events just seem extremely likely. You were repeatedly warned that shit like this would happen because of certain ever increasing (((influences))) on American institutions. If you smugly said "muh constitution" instead of taking the threat seriously, that's your fault.

>>1895 >introduced 03/11/2021 >hasn't passed house since then Theres a thread for /k/ related news but im not sure if this would even belong there, i.e., whats new about this other than the OP who didn't even proof read and posted the wrong PDF of the bill? Also all this niggerpilling is absolutely disgusting.

>>1908 >hasn't passed house since then They are voting on it this coming week.

A new law to ban all gun sales? Let's check the timing: >Before an election so those receiving backlash can hide far outside the public eye in their bunkers >During a time of highly unpopular austerity, inflation, and shortages due to intentionally bad management of foreign policy >Before winter when COVID restrictions will ramp up right on schedule >After a pro-gun win in the supreme court which might otherwise encourage gun purchases >After the American public has passively cucked to literally every evil policy instituted during COVID It's as good as law. It's been fun shitposting with you all, see you in gulag or more likely in hell.

>>1895 You posted the wrong PDF.

>>1910 >Before an election so those receiving backlash can hide far outside the public eye in their bunkers >During a time of highly unpopular austerity, inflation, and shortages due to intentionally bad management of foreign policy >After a pro-gun win in the supreme court which might otherwise encourage gun purchases How the hell do any of those things prove your point. If anything it would make now the worst time to do this shit. >Before winter when COVID restrictions will ramp up right on schedule >After the American public has passively cucked to literally every evil policy instituted during COVID Over half the populous is completely fucking done with the Corona bullshit at this point. >It's as good as law. It's been fun shitposting with you all, see you in gulag or more likely in hell. You forgot to red text about asses and elbows and how the Jews are our eternal masters.

>>1910 Fuck hell, I'll fight for a glorious death and a place in Valhalla or Folksvangr.

>>1902 >They aren't taking away your guns which are grandfathered in. They are taking away the next generation's guns so nobody will notice. So how does that "stop the next mass shooting" if all the guns in the system continue to be in the system? How is this suppose to pander to all of the Oprah watching leftist voters that want ALL THE AR-15'S GONE RIGHT NOW? Makes no sense. All this does is guaranty that they loose big in the fall and that they give away 2024 as well.

>>1914 >How does this solve anything? It doesn't. It was never meant to. That's the point is the cult wants to take away your guns and will come up with any and every excuse they can to do it. That's why we're in a civil war right now that just hasn't gone hot since it's still lawfare. I will continue to maintain this is a civil war and not a fascist cult takeover until I see the results of the November erections.

>>1895 Would this mean that eastern europe would have better gun laws then america

>>1916 Assuming the law was abided, Eastern Europe would have more variety access to firearms, but most Eastern European countries do no allow the use of firearms in self defense.

>>1917 Here we have it so it's only if you use weapons to not overkill it like shotgun on a knife attacker

>>1918 >it's only if you use weapons to not overkill it like shotgun on a knife attacker Perhaps this is my burger sensibilities, but assault with a deadly weapon is assault with a deadly weapon regardless of the lethality of the weapon in relation to other lethal weapons. The moment they chose to attempt to assault me with something that can take my life whether it be a knife, hands, weight bar, etc. a gun is proportional force; a great equalizer. The idea that a knife is somehow "less deadly" than a firearm and therefore I must fend off an attacker who has chosen to turn me into his/her victim "fairly" is ridiculous to me.

>>1919 I think it's retarded too. But honestly I don't know much about it, might ask a someone who knows more stuff about that

There's no way this is actually going to pass is it? This is too much, all at once, in a socially weakened country, that will be usurped or at least lose its place as the largest superpower in the coming 3-10 years, where the original sense of identity for the country is dead and people are finding new ones. Is there an ulterior motive here or are the politicians going crazy too and absolutely no more intelligent than the cattle they rule over?

>>1921 Make no mistake I fully believe if everyone remained silent the Republicans would pass it in an instant. That being said several personalities have been raising a stink about it so it's possible that will be avoided. The reasons you listed are exactly why the establishment elite are considering passing it since they think this might be their "last chance" to shove it through. >Is there an ulterior motive here or are the politicians going crazy too and absolutely no more intelligent than the cattle they rule over? In my opinion the political generation from the 60s to the 00s knew what they were doing and did it intentionally, but the current generation of elites were handed a silver spoon and you are witnessing the equivalent of an incompetent son/grandson blowing his father/grandfather's fortunes on hookers and blow losing it all, but on a national level. It used to be intentional but now it's just a mad grab to remain in power by a dying political class. Same reason the Democrats have become a woke cult.

>>1922 There are still plenty of boomers in senate and house so I figure they're either getting antsy, senile, or just throwing their hands up and going along with the late gen x'ers and millenials they stand by. The two-party drawl is losing ground to walk on but what happens interim of these dying days and massive change where the country is only held together by a hair rather than rope and glue if not just an anxious calm before the storm.

>>1918 You do realize you can stab someone once and they can bleed out and die within seconds to a few mins you can watch many vids of pp being over confident when someone has a knife then get stabbed once and just fall out and die

>muh laws Who cares? if you already have guns they can never be taken away unless you cuck out. Heres what will happen >law bans all guns >mass insurrection happens >feds get BTFO on every street >new government installed Oh wait, that wont happen, you'll cuck out, because nothing happened when they banned full automatic weapons, so im sure nothings gonna happen if they banned all guns, you'd all be good little goyim and give up your rights in fear. >inb4 some internet tough guy comes along and says he would totally kill some feds

>>1910 >It's as good as law It's as good as suicide for der staat. Humans are cowardly animals who rely on social peer pressure, all it takes is a spark for everyone to join in from one man shooting a cop who would indict or kill him over something petty or unjust, or someone blasting niggers for niggering while screaming that this country is insane or race war now or what have you. Maybe the news will pick up on it, maybe they'll be instructed not to, if it weren't for the grandfathering included in this bill that's guaranteed war, but if pic related doesn't happen then this law getting passed will surely be one of the last straws to break the camel's back. The government knows it too, that's why they pulled out of Afghanistan and are now painting military vehicles from tan to green. >>1925 >nothing happened when they banned full automatic weapons I was shitting in diapers when that and the AWB were in effect, when the water wasn't too hot for the frog. I'm not going to be like father or uncles, they had something to lose, I have nothing.

>>37561 It's a combination of rattling in their cage and disconnected expectations, it's so brash and strong with both parties supporting it that if the populace doesn't pass the litmus test then all the niggerpillers were correct. >>1900 Worst case scenario is that's temporary and rural communities substantially ignore the law, middle case is protests get somewhat violent for how whipped white Americans are and disdain for the government reaches a new level, best case some deaths happen at those protests or people who are told to come quietly get a slug to their chest. >>1901 Those boomers and younger cuckservatives who didn't kill anyone or burn anything down the complied to go to some domestic black site? >>1919 Those aren't biased sensibilities, those are illogical statutes written by people who don't grasp reality and jews forbidding people from self-defense.

>>1926 >man with nothing to lose and I bet you'll still do nothing, amerimutts dont have that drive in them to have an insurgency like europeans do, your neighbor would rat you out the second you even thought of doing something and off you go to the nearest FEMA camp. if americans had it in them to fight then they would have done so already but they havent so that proves they have no drive, nothing to unite them, no culture to save. the only people who seem to have any motivation for change are the japs and shitskins, a few mass shootings and political killings here and there over the years but nothing so far for the white man cometh. If you truly want to change or at least be prepared to fuck around and find out with federal agents then start a militia

>>1928 >amerimutts dont have that drive in them to have an insurgency like europeans do It's more like the police here wouldn't dare try it outside of the most blue voting states. Appalachia alone would be a bloodbath that would make the pullout of Afghanistan look like a teenaged girl's slumber party.

>>1928 Ok, niggerpill. The currently ongoing American civil war is states vs feds in the first place, not people vs feds. That's been clear for about four months now. >>1923 That's why I think this is a last push to maintain power, yeah. There's a theory (forgot the name) that says that when an upstart economy replaces the dominant economy, either global war or civil war break out as the old tries to maintain its power. This feels like a leadup to that as popular support on virtually every New World Order "Liberal Economic Order" policy has been rejected in the last few years by about 70% of the population in America and a plurality elsewhere.

>>1928 >and I bet you'll still do nothing Projection, especially with how hard you're trying to make face with your swastika banner.

Tangentially related, but... Poll Shows Most Voters Would Support a Convention of States to address federal spending, term limits, and constitutionality of federal oversight https://humanevents.com/2022/07/18/exclusive-poll-shows-most-voters-would-support-a-convention-of-states-a-look-at-the-effort-to-make-it-happen/ https://archive.ph/c3HNi

So the guy with the swastika flag is a fed, right?

>>1922 >The reasons you listed are exactly why the establishment elite are considering passing it since they think this might be their "last chance" to shove it through. If they literally think it's their last chance then they are thinking way too small. If that's the actual case then the logical thing to do from their point of view would be to false flag an excuse to implement indefinite martial law. What ever it was it would have to be major like nuclear war, airborne hemorrhagic fever, alien invasion, something that would that would scare the shit out of people and stun them into uncertainty and inaction during the critical period like what 'Rona did for the first several weeks and months. Actually a disease probably wouldn't work because the Covid shit show is too fresh in everyone's mind and many people are now resistant to medical elitism. So it's either got to be start a war with Russia/China or activate Project Blue Beam. That is if they were smart and really had a plan. Which I agree with the second part of your post in that I don't think they really have a plan anymore. I think they have the rote understanding of their predecessors plan and they're like the Admech dick slapping toasters trying to figure out how unfurl.

>>1934 *how the plan is suppose to unfurl.

>>1933 Is that a rhetorical question?

>>1933 >you're a fed!!! This is why white men cannot organize, every time someone suggest "maybe we shouldn't be jew bootlickers" they get branded as a fed. Im not even calling for a race war or any other kike shilling points just stating facts that amerimutts cannot into terrorism because they are so much of a police state and everyone would turn their back on you the moment you even think outside the box >>1929 I'll believe it when it happens, until then no one will do anything that hurts the fee fees of their kike overlords and their golem enforcers >>1930 >american civil war >happening right now It'll never happen, you muh guns mufuggah fags wouldn't dare shoot a fed because all the same people that scream le dont step on me are the same people that support the thin blue line. it will always be people vs feds nothing can change that but what people can change is their government by force then kick out all the feds and or straight up just kill them in a purge >n-niggerpill! clearly you have never met niggerpill and read his shenanigans they are easy to spot, more so than other shitposters >>1931 >p-proection I'll save my country and you can save yours but the truth is if your american then your FUBAR already and have to start real small in order to get anywhere with all the niggers, spics, chinks and demonKKKrats >oh noes he uses a swastika! Aryan man here if you aint using a swastika on everything your powerlevel is low energy! BIGLY!

Where did HR 7910 go?

>>1917 I'm pretty sure we already have better gun laws than multiple US states

>>1939 I'm retarded, meant for >>1916

>>1940 Most of Europe has better gun rights than California. If you don't have a waiting period in your country then Massachusetts too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_the_United_States_by_state

>>1937 >A civil war or intrastate war is a war between organized groups within the same state They are using lawfare to disqualify and intimidate candidates. One side is being arrested for petty crimes while the other is getting away with literal murder. If you want to argue it's state-sponsored terrorism so be it but that's the same as a "cold" civil war. We're in the middle of the civil war right now, niggerpill. >Niggerpill is one person lol no. >>1938 It's being read and rewritten by the Senate judiciary committee. Right now Republicucks are offering to pass HR 2377 in exchange for a no vote on HR 7910. Both are red flag law bullshit. >>1939 >>1940 I still stand by my statement that how the guns can be legally used matters a lot more than the variety available, but as >>1941 pointed out obviously most of Europe has better gun laws than the hard blue states. The funny thing is, the only reason those blue states get away with it is because they control the appeals courts in those states, so whenever a gun access case comes forward they refer it to arbitration or reject the grounds of the appeal to be heard even if on complete bullshit grounds. Colorado for instance has been trying to get a constitutional challenge to the high capacity magazine ban since its inception, but the 10th circuit appeals court throws out the cases whenever they appear since if they make a ruling it can be challenged/appealed at the supreme court level.

>>1927 >niggerpillers were correct They are correct, it's just their defeatism that's disdained.

>>1943 For me it's their conclusions that are wrong even if their observations may be correct. So yeah, the disdain is fairly big.

>grandfather clause WAOW, it's fucking nothing. This regime doesn't have another generation left in it -- and the funny thing is, we don't even have to do anything to ensure its inevitable (indeed, ongoing) collapse. So, ya know, take that, niggerpillers.

>>1945 >the government will collapse in on itself you guys! kek is this what niggercattle actually believe? government that is in every part of human society will just fade away? kek you fags are delusional go pick up a gun and shoot some niggaz god damn

>>1946 You first Mr. Cyalume. I'm not dumb enough to take myself off the board before the game's even begun, let alone for zero benefit or effect. >the government will collapse in on itself you guys! >implying this doesn't happen with some regularity throughout history i sit here to smug at you dot jay peg

>>1947 >it happened throughout history name 5

>>1948 British Empire (coerced by us after the war, but I'm counting it anyway), Mayan civ., Imperial fucking Rome for God's sake, Alexander the Great's empire (like a fucking week after bro's ticket was punched, no less), one or two of the other satrapies whose names elude me at the moment, the Soviet Union, Canadian independence, Weimar Germany (this one's admittedly a bit fucky, but I'm still counting it), the end of the Tokugawa Shogunate (from what I can tell, the Boshin was barely a blip from the perspective of the civilian population who weren't stuck directly in the fucking way), and with that I'm done spoonfeeding you so here, eat up like a big boy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolent_revolution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societal_collapse >>37915 I dunno man, Sharia isn't looking half bad these days... I mean, I'm just Saiyan...

https://archive.ph/3XPtm Well place your bets now I guess. Will civil war/revolt be interrupted by WWIII or will a civil war be the punctuation at the end of WWIII? It seems like it's going to be one or the other.

>>1950 I greatly doubt burgers will revolt because roughly 1 in 5 works for the government in some capacity. It's much more likely a gun grab will just cause worsening of the country to the point of collapse, and balkanization.

>>1951 >Balkanization I am not opposed to the idea of "peaceful" divorce over civil war, but the question then comes to federal property (such as nukes) in the seceding state.

>>1951 Americans are dumb cowed cuckolds but there would still be enough bloodshed in a gun grab to cause a stir.

>>1952 >but the question then comes to federal property (such as nukes) in the seceding state. I've always assumed that if a major nuclear power were look like it was going to hard collapse, as opposed to what happened to the USSR, then the military would either decommission the nukes before before the new regime(s) came to power or if that were not possible then the other nuclear powers would preemptively strike the known nuclear sites to prevent possible nuclear terrorism or a nuclear rogue state from coming into existence. >>1951 >a gun grab There's no way that would ever work without massive casualties. No more that trying to forcefully remove all the illegals from the country would be feasible. The gun's (and spics) are already in the system. Americans and their government are kind of stuck with them, whether they want them or not.

>>1951 What the fuck does "common use" mean? >place your bets Civil war will be interrupted by WW3 except it won't and now the government is going to be fighting a two or three-front war.

>>1953 See this is what I mean by civil war or revolt. I've seen some anons around that entirely dismiss the possibility because the seem to assume it could only be a sudden crossing of the Rubicon by the government and a reply of secession by states or regions like what happened in the first civil war. More likely what would happen is a ratcheting escalation by the government (and it's enforcement agents) and the American people where they trade ever increasing tit-for-tat and then suddenly both positions look around and discover themselves in the midst of a full scale rebellion where neither really had any expectation that it would get to that point. I mean you can just look around and see the talking points from both camps to see what I mean. Both sides expect that ant infringement/rebellion will collapse quickly and the winners will deal decisively with the losers. Which is the perfect setup for a protracted, entrenched conflict to take place. The difference between the US and other places that might experience a civil war or similar event is that the US is the linchpin and keystone in the current social, legal, economic, and military order and if it even seriously stumbles then the whole thing comes crashing down. This ain't like in places that don't really matter (Burma, Morocco, Sri Lanka, etc.). If the US goes down then it's like Rome gong down and with a similar outcome. Only globally. And with atomic weapons in play.

>>1956 >I've seen some anons around that entirely dismiss the possibility because the seem to assume it could only be a sudden crossing of the Rubicon by the government and a reply of secession by states or regions like what happened in the first civil war. My optimistic disposition tells me that Anon wouldn't be so autistic and narrow-minded.

>>1953 >>1956 There's a rather recent example which more or less illustrates your point and it was called the Troubles in Ireland. It's pretty reasonable to expect a similar situation in the US especially given how geographically fuckhuge America is.

>>1958 >the troubles nothing like the amerimutts and their shitty civil war fantasies, IRA was controlled opposition and worked with the feds through (((Peace talks))) and actively stopped killing feds and started to kill each other. only around 3K people died in total over 30 years and more die each year from suicide kek or some other gay form of death like car accidents

A man with no extremist background just tried to assassinate Lee Zeldin and was let free by police without charges. Tell me again we're not in the beginning stages of a civil war.

>>1960 archives or it didn't happen.

>>1959 oh look, a jew >>1960 fuckin who?

>>1961 You can google it, dude. In fact that would have been faster than waiting for my lunch break you lazy faggot. https://archive.ph/KMg1f >Lee Michael Zeldin is an American attorney, politician, and officer in the United States Army Reserve. A Republican, he has represented New York's 1st congressional district in the United States House of Representatives since 2015. He represents the eastern two-thirds of Suffolk County

>>1963 >do it yourself No you want to post it then you do it, anything less is lazy in and of itself. I don't understand why the concept is so hard. >dude Oh, that's why.

>>1960 >and was let free by police without charges I heard that had something to do with NY's absolutely atrocious parole laws but I don't disagree with >Tell me again we're not in the beginning stages of a civil war either.

You just need to take the iodine pill https://forum.agoraroad.com/index.php?threads/the-iodine-pill-free-your-soul.4368/

>>1963 >walks up slowly with chinkshit edgelord knuckleknives >mocks him to his face and halfassedly tries to raise his flabby arms to his neck >gets tackled by a dozen rednecks instantly >"assassination" what a joke lmao

>>1958 >>1959 Judging by your posts, neither of you know shit about Ireland, the Troubles, or the IRA so you should shut the fuck up. >>1960 A civil war in which only one side is actively fighting is just oppression. The republicucks are controlled opposition set up to fail by the (((powers that be))). Any resistance to the upcoming power grab / Great Reset fuckery will come in the form of disjointed rebel groups formed either by necessity of survival or a chance at regional power. The problem with seeing the American people as a coherent group is that they have no factor drawing them together especially given the large geography. No one in rural Kentucky gives a fuck about the hardships of dissident Californians for example, even if both groups in question are right wing.

>>1968 I think by Troubles he meant that people will casually and without announcement of any form just revolt or cut off their communities from the rest of the country where SWAT and militarized police will come in to stamp it out only for citizens to become masked guerillas and slaughter them leading to isolated communities and gunfire in the distance become a part of life until it reaches cities and bigger towns.

>>1968 >you know NOTHING about the troubles or the IRA Honeypots for communist faggots, betrayed their own in favor of the british state and other gay shit no one ever tells you about because /k/ is gay for the IRA >>1969 >without announcement the IRA announced their terror campaign >cut off their communities they did that in derry until one faggot threw away their guns and let the british roll in on their APCs >SWAT and militarized police PSNI is already a militarized police shitstain on society, they still have terror alerts and are afraid of getting shot at, extremely paranoid that would put schizos here to shame >stamp out citizens to become masked gorillas and slaughter them I thought most of the military and police in muttland was on the side of the people in the event of a civil war whilst the rest are diversity hire trannies? its different in ireland because you got scottish/english heritage faggots in military/police roles and they hate native irish people >isolated communities and gunfire in the distance becomes a part of life still is in northern ireland and literally no one cares because they're all drug dealers shooting each other claiming to be the next future step in republicanism >bigger towns i'd say derry is a bigger town and they successfully fended off british army advances until they made a deal with the british government to let them roll in no shots fired >TLDR Muttmerica is nothing like the shithole that is northern ireland and doesnt have the racial cohesion of the communities around them. chances are if there is a civil war in america it would be rednecks vs the world with city slicker cucks bowing down to the police state whilst cleetus kills commies for jesus Also watch out for faggots trying to subvert you or make deals with (((them))) anyone that tries to do things a political conversational way in times of civil war is most likey a backstabbing fednigger jew

>>1970 >I thought most of the military and police in muttland was on the side of the people in the event of a civil war whilst the rest are diversity hire trannies? They've systematically purged the police over the last two decades (which Republicans are finally realizing and taking down those stupid thin blue line flags), and they started the military purges with the jab. Now only the nasty girls in rural states have an inkling of being for the people instead of for the feds. >because you got scottish/english heritage faggots in military/police roles and they hate native irish people It's unironically the same thing in Burgerland, just along class lines I hate that word instead of racial lines. Make no mistake they hate blacks and hispanics, but they hate white trash just as much since it's about culture/income rather than race specifically and most police (the military rejects aside) are from police families. >chances are if there is a civil war in america it would be rednecks vs the world with city slicker cucks bowing down to the police state whilst cleetus kills commies for jesus Probably, but then that's how the Taliban won in Afghanistan both times.

>>1971 >Probably, but then that's how the Taliban won in Afghanistan both times. Honestly I doubt the US government will try to use direct violence against dissidents because of the massive humiliation that Afghanistan was because if they couldn't take out a bunch of goat fuckers with 40 year old soviet shit they don't stand a fucking chance against Cletus and his friends who make explosives for fun.

>>1901 >>implying that a bunch boomers didn't work themselves up into a frenzy and storm the capitol a year and a half ago over what was basically circumstantial, statistical evidence of fraud Exactly. And even then they just made noise and walked away. Kantbot> Imagine storming the Capital of the United States as the government of the country literally fucking flees and then just wandering around the building confused about why the level isn’t ending instead of declaring a new government and issuing warrants for congressmen’s arrest >>1933 Well, he may be a provo4 or he may be a retard. But does it matter?

OK one day I hear they're shelving this thing and then the next I hear it's passed the House. What the hell's going on?

>>1974 It passed because of 2 traitor recucklicans even though a small handful of demonrats also voted against it. Never underestimate the ability of the gay old party to fuck their own constituents. It has to pass the senate now which is split 50-50, but you should fully expect the RINOs to slap their cocks across your face at this point. We've been in the stage where these people should be getting lynched and having their families destroyed utterly but nah that's fedglowjoobadbad no good optics or something so better lube up for that banana republic banana.

What happened now.

>>1976 >Where is it currently at You can check congress' website and see where it is at.

>>1914 >first disarm the future >disarm the present >then make up shit about how there wasn't a 2A idea. I think the order is off since they are trying to "explain that the 2A was about NG and hunting and not for armed populous that's craaaaazyyy." type of subversion. >>1926 beto was the best thing for the 2A boomers and fence sitters that thought it wasn't about taking em. >>1928 >amerimutts dont have that drive in them to have an insurgency like europeans do EU needed a rape epidemic and some coal burner that goes out her way to intercept migrant boats and secretly record NGO fags for their smuggling game. You better not be telling me that European has the drive. >>1950 A dead nog or chimpout

https://archive.ph/zzrYI >A new ISO-approved measure will also allow sharing of suspicious purchases with law enforcement >Credit card purchases of firearms in the US can now be tracked and purchases deemed suspicious can even be shared with law enforcement, according to a new measure approved by an organization that sets parameters for business transactions. >The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) voted in favor of creating a merchant code for firearms stores, according to Reuters. >Merchant codes are four-digit codes that categorize retailers across all industries; until now, gun purchases had been classified under “miscellaneous retail stores” or “sporting goods stores.” >While the measure has been lauded by politicians such as Massachusetts senators Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey among others, it isn’t clear how this process will work. >Numerous top level credit card companies such as PayPal, Stripe and Square don’t allow gun purchases. For the credit companies that do allow the purchases, the total cost can be extra high due to interests. >As a result, many gun buyers often use cash for their purchases; potential buyers are often seen asking in online forums whether it’s better to buy guns with cash or credits, with many voting for cash. >Meanwhile, fintech companies such as Credova, built for the purpose of allowing installment plans for gun purchases, shrug off their role when asked about how people like the Uvalde, Texas, shooter purchased guns through their platform using a debit card. >John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for Gun Safety, welcomed ISO’s decision, which was announced on Friday, and said it’s now crucial for this to be implemented thoroughly. >“Today’s announcement is a critical first step towards giving banks and credit card companies the tools they need to recognize dangerous firearm purchasing trends – like a domestic extremist building up an arsenal – and report them to law enforcement,” he said in a statement shared with the Guardian. >Amalgamated Bank, which brands itself as a “socially responsible bank” had requested the codes to the ISO. >On Friday, they celebrated their victory, thanking their partners, including New York governor Kathy Hochul and New York Attorney General Tish James. >Priscilla Sims Brown, President and CEO of the bank, said in a statement that the code will open the path for banks to report suspicious or illegal gun sale activity in a way that will not interfere with legal gun sales. >“This action answers the call of millions of Americans who want safety from gun violence and we are proud to have led the broad coalition of advocates, shareholders, and elected officials that achieved this historic outcome,” she added. >The tracking and blocking of illegal gun sales has already made headway with FBI background checks, according to Everytown. >In 2020, the FBI background checks led to blocking more than 300,000 illegal gun purchases, nearly double the number of 2019. >The same year, gun purchases skyrocketed as people were stuck indoors during the first wave of the pandemic; records show there were 20m legal purchases in 2020, up from 12.4m the year before. >In a statement, the Alliance for Gun Responsibility said: “We are glad to see the financial industry take action to recognize that it has a role to play in helping keep our communities safe. Passing stronger gun laws is essential, but it is just one piece of the puzzle when it comes to addressing the gun violence epidemic.”

>>1979 >implying this is new They were already trackable through cards and have been for years and years, when you purchase something with your card your bank makes a record of the transaction complete with the merchant's name. I already said it in another thread but if you buy guns and ammo with a card you're a retard.

>>1980 THIS. THIS. THIS. THIS. AND YES THIS!!!

https://archive.ph/UUIsr Biden state of the union address blah blah nothing new, said it in his typical audacious and tone deaf manner. >>1980 Does it count for something when they're now being transparent about it?

>>1950 >>1895 You'd think the DMC exuding like one or two lads who don't want to disarm us and the Rhino republicans would have figured out by now how futile this is law will be in the end. Did prohibition work? No. Has the past few decades of the war on drugs accomplished anything of meaning? Fuck no. What ever happened to "build back better"'? Oh that's right all that money got sent over seas to the Saudi's, Israeli's, and the failed meme state that is fucking Pakistan of all places, I'd unironically prefer we just give it all to niggers that way at least we can save ourselves the cost of shipping it all over seas. But yeah I'm sure the average American citizen will totally go out of the way and send photo's of their AR pistol builds to the GayTF at the risk of having their puppers shot because reasons just so they can potentially get a $200.00 piece of paper cuck stamp that gives them permission to own "their" now recently declared 'SBR rifle' all in the middle of a global economic recession all thanks to Trump and Biden's 'Operation Warp Speed' bullshit, ESPECIALLY the middle class of whom has undergone an outright economic war against them at the request of the UN, Silicon Valley, and the WEF stooges for decades by both political parties with the intended goal of making us serfs who would own nothing and be happy to bow down to powerful Autocrats like Bill Gates and the wealthy members of the CCP. I'm sure the American people totally wouldn't just remove their pistol braces and hide them behind the drywall in their homes or bury them in plastic bags and then just put one of those stupid foam covers over their AR buffer tubes as a substitute instead right? After all the ATF are just such reasonable people who'd never set your home on fire for the LoLz.

>>1948 I'm not going to let you back up until you've learned to read and like the taste of that fucking vibram cunt.

>>1984 >until you've learned to read and like the taste of that fucking vibram I'd rather learn to like the taste of Link's lips nipples and cock.

>>1982 >Does it count for something when they're now being transparent about it? Only if you were fucking stupid enough to have any faith in any of these people or their laws to begin with.

Well are pistol braces B&'d now? You know since abolishing a piece of plastic will do a whole lot to make people safer of course.

>>1987 Apparently, some AGs are complaining. I'm sure that will work out fine under the Usurper-in-Chief banana regime. >pic >Bin that knife, goyim!! we mean only the rapefugees to have them

>>1985 >I'd rather learn to like the taste of Link's lips nipples and cock. Fuck. I actually got hard reading that. He must taste like the Sacred Realm drizzled in mythological nectar. Try to imagine bunking with him aboard a Hylian navy cruiser or something. Sucking that sweet, impossibly smooth cock every morning until he finally cums, shooting the hot, sweet love of the divine straight down your eager throat while he squirms, writhing in helpless ecstasy. Pinning him down and clamping your hand against his mouth to fuck that sweet twinky ass. Kissing and cuddling him afterwards. Fuck I need a /k/ twink hubby, holy shit. >>1987 Wait and see. Don't register shit, dipshit, it's a fucking trap and you'd just be signing up to get raided. Also, don't listen to the fucking niggerpill crowd, positive things are actually coming of this.

>>1919 The “proportionality” argument only exists to make victims second-guess themselves so that they are less likely to fight back, and instead just sit on their thumbs and wait for the (((state))) to save them. It’s conditioning for learned helplessness. There’s a reason why they always have to fall back on strawman nonsense like “you just want to drop a mcnuke on your neighbour for accidentally stepping on your lawn”. They have no good faith argument.

>>1923 Boomers are the “dumb trust fund kiddies”. The people who set the NWO filth up are Henry Kissinger-generation; people born before WW2. Boomers didn’t take control of the government until the 90s, remember that Clinton was the first president born after 1945.

>>1928 *gets arrested for questioning the holocaust and not apologising hard enough to Mohammad as he beheads your children*

>>1952 Molon labe ¾ of US military installations and firearm manufacturers are in the south or otherwise areas that would side against the federal government Fed boys screwed the pooch trying to cut costs and bolster enlistment by laying their stake in heavily right-wing areas

>>1989 got hard reading that and I'm not even a faggot

>>1994 It's not gay if it's an elf.

Man looking back I miss the gun-grabbers of yesteryear since you could just piss on their face and kick them off your property with ease.