>>982646
>>982649
Part of the problem with the dedicated
Zelda game is that the entire concept feels too "safe" and trying to appeal to "both sides" in a market research type of manner. Because you have on the one hand that the political activists are demanding that Zelda finally get her own game, but then Nintendo needs to kneecap what Zelda is actually capable of (Going so far as to give her an NPC companion in order to "Save the day") so as to not anger the dedicated customers who are hyper-aware of the current goings-on in society. It's just a repeat of the Princess Peach game from last month in execution, where they
ALSO needed to give her an NPC companion in order to save the day.
And I don't mean an NPC companion who effectively serves as the go-between for the player and the game's world. Best example of this being Link's companions (Navi/Midna/Fi). I mean that Zelda/Peach
cannot actually save the day without being given special powers by this NPC. The closest games that I can think of that actually does this is
Sonic and the Black Knight and
Lost Kingdoms. However the former opens with the context that Sonic can wipe the floor with the game's enemies all by himself and Calibur effectively exists just as a gimmick and plot device, and the latter has the princess just
then and there in the game's opening finding out that her family are the only ones who have the right and power to fight the darkness thanks to a magic stone that's been passed down from generation to generation. Meanwhile
'Zelda: EoW and Peach Showtime OPEN
with the fact that Peach/Zelda are imprisonned and need an NPC to save them before' they can even do shit. Compare this to
Super Princess Peach/
Wand of Gamelon/
Zelda's Adventure, where they go into danger of their own accord to save the day.
That's also ignoring what I pointed out earlier:
>>981730
That Zelda can be a well-rounded character if they wanted her to be:
>>981735
She's a princess, so of course she's going to be receiving the best education in order to accomplish her political duties (Because queens and princesses actually
DID DO SHIT and had responsibilities, they didn't just hidaway in a tower eating Bon-bons the entire time). Being a member of the Triforce, she's naturally adept with magic that her education as a princess would only enhance. And her caretaker comes form a secret society of ninjas.
Unless they wanted to go down the path of Zelda's alter ego being Tetra instead of Shiek, then she's a fucking pirate and the point still stands. They could have actually done something unique, making a game about Zelda having to rely upon her own wits and abilities. But what we're getting instead is just another stereotype, that
should anger these political activists if they were actually consistent with the beliefs, and only serves as another step towards destabilizing society by showing that Zelda is a "strong independent womyn who don't need no man".