/b/ - >Though the pictures were taken with her consent, in 1981 Shields’s mother sued Gross on the grounds that his continuing sale of them was damaging to her daughter’s reputation, and she obtained a provisional ban on their further use. >By then Shields, wh

Name
Options
Subject
Message	Max message length: 12000
files	Drag files here to upload or click here to select them 0.00 / 50.00 MB Max file size: 32.00 MB Total max file size: 50.00 MB Max files: 5 Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

Name

Options

Subject

Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password	(used to delete files and posts)
Misc

E-mail

Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Anonymous 08/09/2024 (Fri) 05:04:12 No. 461771

>Though the pictures were taken with her consent, in 1981 Shields’s mother sued Gross on the grounds that his continuing sale of them was damaging to her daughter’s reputation, and she obtained a provisional ban on their further use. >By then Shields, who began modelling at 11 months, had achieved national notoriety: she starred as a child prostitute in Louis Malle’s 1978 film Pretty Baby, which included a scene in which her virginity is auctioned, and in 1980 she starred in Richard Avedon’s provocative advertising campaign for Calvin Klein Jeans. >“You know what comes between me and my Calvins?” the 15-year-old Shields asked in one ad, which was censored by American TV networks, “Nothing!” >Gross’s lawyers argued that his photographs could not further damage Shields’s reputation because, since they were taken, she had made a profitable career “as a young vamp and a harlot, a seasoned sexual veteran, a provocative child-woman, an erotic and sensual sex symbol, the loli of her generation”. The judge concurred and, while praising the pictures’ “sultry, sensual appeal”, ruled that Gross was not a pornographer: “They have no erotic appeal except to possibly perverse minds.” That decision was overturned by an appeals court, but in 1983 the original verdict in Gross’s favour was upheld. Man, the 70s and 80s were crazy times. A child naked in a playboy magazine? That shit is unthinkable. How did they get away with something like that?

Quick Reply


Sage Bypass Check