>>1088842
>They want the characters to be female but not visually. It just doesn't make sense.
Indeed, it doesn't make any sense, but they believe that anyone can "identify as female" no matter how he looks on the outside. So they have no desire to make a female character look feminine, beautiful, or even a little pretty. In fact, some of them might take great offense to the very idea of making that a game/movie design priority.
>Everyone must be visually genderless it seems. It's like this is the eventual end goal, to visually resemble the stalkers from Half Life.
Erasing any ideas of binary sex from society is one of their end goals. That's why they are so against using the term husband/wife/spouse and insist on using "partner", to make marriage and romantic relationships more ambiguous. They push for the use of "ya'll" or "folks" to refer to groups of people instead of "you guys" for the same reason, even though the term has been used to refer to mixed groups of men and women for decades now.
Breasts are, literally and figuratively, one of the forefront ways to visually tell that someone is a woman, whether they are huge or more average sized. If a mentally ill man wants to get breasts so he can look more like a woman, it would involve expensive drugs or expensive surgery. So to appease them, they have consistently reduced the size of female characters' breasts in hopes that it starts to blur the line between male and female. Ironically, they also seem to be the ones that push the idea that breasts are always sexual and should thus be censored, leading to the removal of breast sliders, tight clothing options, and similar gameplay elements. Too bad for any female gamers who happen to have large breasts and want to make the customizable MC look like them.