/vb/ - /b/ but with video games

Just like 4chan's /v/ :^)

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0.

US Election Thread

8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

Reminder that 8chan.se exists, and feel free to check out our friends at: Animanga ES, Traditional Games, Comics,, Anime and Video Games

ITT: Post the Most Reddit Opinions that You Actually Have Anonymous 03/22/2024 (Fri) 22:12:57 No. 695
>Ocarina of Time is legitimately the best 3D Zelda game and possibly the best 3D action game ever >JRPGs have generally been better than western RPGs since the early 90's >Crash 3 > Crash 2 >BioWare in their prime was better than Obsidian in their prime >depending on the genre, story and presentation can be just as important as gameplay >censorship is bad but it doesn't automatically make a game unplayable
(205.30 KB 418x569 smile.png)

>>695 I think videogames are good.
>>695 >>censorship is bad but it doesn't automatically make a game unplayable This is true, tho. For instance the Metal Slug 2 and 3 which had the soldiers bleeding water. It's really fucking retarded but it doesn't render the game unplayable,
(111.67 KB 500x219 AAAAAAAABRg.png)

>>702 In most of Europe, Contra was called Probotector. The playable characters were replaced with robots and the enemies replaced with aliens, with some pretty good re-sprite work. The rest of the game is identical, functionally no different to Contra barring the censorship. Konami must have thought this was cool because the Probotectors are canon now, being playable in Contra games proper including the most recent.
IMPORTANT THREAD >>>/reddit/25
It's your moral duty to buy good video games that you play if you can afford them. The Dragons Dogma 2 DLC stuff isn't as bad as people make it out to be, it's pretty much comparable to how Devil May Cry had DLC for red orbs. Shame about Denuvo and the shit performance, though.
>>695 Sephiroth is epic
There is nothing inherently wrong with microtransactions, the ones that need to be obliterated are loot boxes and gachashit It's the difference between buying an optional for your car and buying a lotto ticket
>>695 Gay tumblr shit doesn't inherently make a game worse.
>>732 They would've phrase it closer to >LGBT+ and queer themes doesn't inherently make a game worse, totally the opposite. you are just homophobic.
>>732 That reminds me. I heard that the Bug Fables devloper was going to make an entire video game out of the tranny that was in the game; "Madame Scarlett" or something.
(565.49 KB 368x640 baby jew.mp4)

>>731 >There is nothing inherently wrong with microtransactions
>>740 Monsieur Scarlet is more femboy than transgender and is portrayed as a fucked up villain. Still pozzes the game, but no more than Chrono Trigger with Flea, and the game's generally apolitical. Never heard about the spin-off, where'd you hear this? Not saying you're wrong and if true the devs should hang, but it's easy for unverified rumors to spread online. t. beat the game and lurk the fandom
>>748 I looked it up again and well,... it was a comment on reddit. So take it with a grain of salt I guess. https://www.reddit.com/r/BugFables/comments/16ab5to/comment/jz7qpyr/ https://archive.fo/TkFc8
>>767 Based source provider. Dunno if I trust some retard on Reddit who last posted "it's not pedo to fuck the bee" but even if not lying to give clout to fanon it sounds like he pestered devs with his donut steel Discord faggotry until they said "oh that's cool" so he'd sod off. Fans like this are fucked in the brain and when jilted with a "wrong answer" they see red and try to cancel you for phobia, dealing with them is like defusing a bomb.
(80.58 KB 512x754 GLAD.jfif)

I fucking love modern videogames and i have an optimistic outlook of the current state of vidya.
>>695 >Ocarina of Time is legitimately the best 3D Zelda game and possibly the best 3D action game ever This isn't even reddit. This has to be bait, I refuse to believe someone would be so blinded by nostalgia or whatever this mental illness has to be. >best zelda game This I can get behind. But the best 3D action game?
>>769 what are your favourite games released in the last 10 years?
>>695 >>770 OoT has an argument as the best game ever, period. There are good reasons it long held Guinness WR for critical acclaim. >>695 My most Reddit opinion is someone whose tastes are "I oppose the Reddit thing" is a NPC with no thought beyond "Grug tribe good, Grog tribe bad." Games don't suck just because some faggot tranny retards like them and games with global appeal often have it because they're good.
You asked for it. I'll go full mask-off. >>695 >censorship is bad but it doesn't automatically make a game unplayable Censorship's good when it serves my causes. The problem isn't censorship, it's that the left controls it.
>>777 Ironically this is the exact same opinion the people you hate also hold. Maybe you aren't so different :^)
>>778 No shit. Read the thread title, retard.
Dark Souls 2 isn't a bad game. It's a terrible Dark Souls game, but by itself it's not a bad game, especially when compared to it's contemporaries like the original Lords of the Fallen.
>>866 >It's not a bad game, it's a bad X game The most reddit opinion of them all, upvoted and gilded my epic sir
>>868 >>866 There can be entire list of games described as "good game, but bad X game" it do make sense that game veered too far from its genre/series >devil may cry 2 is a bad cuhrazy game, but a good game nonetheless
>>922 Of all games to use as an example, you use a genuinely bad one lmao How about Prey 2017? Terrible as a Prey reboot but decent as a System Shock clone
>>923 Still been meaning to try that. I've heard really good things, even for its dlc too.
>>866 >>868 >>922 >>923 Star Fox Adventures
>>940 Similar to how Prey 2017 wasn't meant to be a Prey reboot, that literally wasn't meant to be a Star Fox game. Corpo meddling is some bullshit.
>>942 Dinosaur Planet got leaked and is being restored by fans, you can try it on an N64 emulator.
>>957 N64? I thought Dinosaur Planet was being made for GC like Starfox Adventures was, the architecture of those two consoles aren't very similar.
Skyrim was fun
>>975 I'm not sure many deny Skyrim is fun - that's not really the problem with TESV. Its issues stem from continuing the trend of not caring about the lore and further dumbing down of RPG mechanics.
Skyrim wasn't fun, it was a walking simulator. A scenic walking simulator, but still a walking simulator.
>>979 That's not Reddit at all! >>931 It's mediocre >>978 Skyrim is fun for 4 hours until you realize just how shallow and repetitive everything is.
>>981 The Reddit opinion was that Skyrim's fun, the 2 posters after weren't Reddit-posting.
>>1000 Nice get on those trips, /vb/rother.
>>923 okay thats >prey 2017 >star fox adventures I'd add Max Payne 3, which originally was meant to be a different 3rd shooter but rockstar merged it with max payne series since it was collecting dust. It honestly would have been better as a separate franchise set in grimey and decadent brazil instead of old bald depressed monologuing man
>>1029 hes not bald hes just clean shaven
>>775 Not that anon but: Katana Zero Return Of The Obra Dinn Sekiro Lies Of P NEO: TWEWY TEVI
>>1034 >Return Of The Obra Dinn It's sad this game doesn't work as well on repeat playthroughs, it's the kind of thing that only works on the first playthrough by its very nature.
>>1000 Nice trips!
>>1036 its mechanic can be reused as the next level, it doesnt need the monochrome artstyle too
(450.87 KB 1920x1080 Reddit-Life 2.jpg)

>>695 I like to listen to anyone's else opinions that could twist my point of view and start shitting on games that I used to enjoy.
(285.83 KB 1536x2048 GJzUEjKWAAA0iUF.jpeg)

>>1229 Woah, he's literally me!
>>1229 name 3-5 games and i'll see what i can do
>>1239 Not him but how about: >Doom II >Tetris >SS13 >Spider Solitaire
>>1242 Don't forget Minesweeper and Space Cadet Pinball
>>1250 I'm a brainlet and thus I dislike Minesweeper. >it's literally just counting!! Yeah, and I'm a brainlet
Buying games is better than piracy
>>1242 these games old
>>1256 I'm litterally shaking and shitting myself right now, take it back take it back
>>1257 im sorry. im so sorry
(459.98 KB 776x622 itwasme.png)

>>1257 these games older than my grandpa these games so old Adam and Eve used to play them these games so old Jesus got them for his first Christmas gift these games so old the Dead Sea was just getting sick when they came out
More good games came out in the last decade than any other. It's only half-Reddit as I give the W to other decades for n games chosen at random.
(11.31 MB 320x240 angery.webm)

>>1267 >as I give the W to other decades for n games chosen at random. Which decades? If you were to pick any random NES or C64 game it'll more than likely be borderline unplayable garbage, while picking a random PS3 game will probably only be mediocre. Gamers of today forget how much unfiltered junk released on retro platforms. I can't remember who said this, but I once heard it's easy to say the 80s had good music when all you've listened to is Earth, Wind & Fire's Greatest Hits.
>>1278 C64 maybe, NES no. Your argument about junk and 80s music applies now too. Modern games are borderline unplayable garbage, anon. There's no gameplay. 80s graphics sucked but NES carts were playable because there had to be an actual game there. Today's games are better movies, that's all. Even Game & Watch is more fun.
>>1278 >>1278 >Gamers of today forget how much unfiltered junk released on retro platforms. Anon, you live in the age of Steam, RPG Maker, and Unity. There's magnitudes more garbage released every month these days than in an entire year in the 80's, 90's, or early 2000's. But you ignore those just like others ignore the trash of yesteryear. People always ignore the trash (unless it's funny) and instead compare the best with the best and the best of today isn't as good as the best of the past.
(725.48 KB 666x1023 356867967.png)

I've decided that I will no longer be autistic regarding Steam. Yes, many of their games have DRM but I can still play them whenever I want, I can play them offline and I never interact with the Steam community so I'll probably never have my account deleted. For all practical purposes, I own the games I buy on Steam.
>>1945 This is the most Reddit opinion so far, you win.
>>1945 How is being against DRM and control over a user's access to purchased games "autistic?" >I never interact with the Steam community so I'll probably never have my account deleted. This is the most dangerous part of your belief, and to think that bad things could never happen to you simply because you're a good goy is naive and foolish.
(20.55 MB 1280x720 Taliban Winner.mp4)

>>1955 I live in Europe, I own those licenses. Their EULA cannot stand in an EU court.
I like Dead Space 2 more than Dead Space 1.
(68.91 KB 600x900 5s1pWUZnjtufXMlaUb1YaIzG6Rb.jpg)

(23.58 KB 190x270 ca0d2312.jpg)

(82.47 KB 1024x1322 7-3802400466.jpg)

Its actually good that old ass franchises take a new direction installment, get a remake, or get an adaptation in movies or shows. Yes 70% of the time they're cashgrabs, suck ass and lack the soul of the originals, but atleast they introduce the new generation of clueless lemmings of what used to be in the past, in a somewhat bastardized way atleast. People need to realize that new generation of people will not know about good things of past by mindlessly praising "woah Deus ex was such a red pilled game" "woah planescape had the best dialogue" "woah new games suck we had unreal tournament in our times" if they have never experienced it themsevles. And a new adaptation/release is the easiest way to do it. Otherwise the past will be forgotten just like 90% of Wii/PS2/PS3 exclusives like The Last Story, Rule of Rose, Wangan Midnight
>>1957 Have fun taking them to court after they already revoked your access. Much better than just not "buying" digital goods in the first place.
(354.69 KB 959x1400 pppp.png)

Furshit is okay as long as it stays 2D and doesn't use garish colors and other horrid fetishes.
I think this just gave me cancer.
>>2394 >Poorly shaded chink looking 3D CGI >Soft round edges >Fedora Spoiler that shit, goddamn
I actually like modern consoles, especially the Switch. In addition, I don't think the Switch needs to be any more powerful than it already is. Nintendo Online being paid is also not really so bad. (The "Expansion Pack" is fucking stupid though)
>>2458 This is more fanboy than reddit, I've seen redditors critique paid online and the lack of processing capability for the Switch.
>>2464 I know some fanboys who didn't pay for online since as fanboys they already played the ports. It's more "normie" than anything.
>>2464 Whew, okay, I'm less reddit than I thought
>Not every female character should be hot, and some should even be ugly (not limited to villain characters either)
(41.89 KB 517x857 mfw-.jpg)

>>2512 I'll one-up you there: I do not care if some girl gets her cleavage covered or panties blacked out, it does not fucking matter and the degree to which people get upset about this is completely unreasonable.
>>1945 >pic Wheres the porn with this caricature i remember there being one.
(130.19 KB 620x611 Jerma89 blackface.jpg)

>>2396 If you think that's cancer, wait until you browse the site: They're forcing you to create an account just to show to everyone that it's not filled with bots much like with its vaginal counterpart that is Tumblr. >>2512 Not that reddit-y considering they also tend to urge to clog the site with autistic porn although the game needs to have sex appeal just to go somewhere, like Skullgirls
Doom 4 & Eternal were made with white supremacists in mind Wait, no, that's just stating facts.
(815.56 KB 500x360 I'm interested LA Noire.gif)

>>2533 They just sucked off the fat one and choked on his semen, that's it. >>2573 Resident Evil 5 and LA Noire also are a total yikes, specially when there's a jew drug dealer pulling all the strings around California meaning there was a jewish mafia and didn't hold any punches unlike the guidos. KIKE THIS AND KIKE THAT GOY MOTHERFUCKER, LET'S TALK ABOUT BASEBALL THEN As for RE5, well look at some gameplay, you're a marine spreading democracy to illiterate niggers while the globalist use them as his personal subjects to quench his sadism.
israel is bad actually
>>2514 I don't care about those either, but I care about the precedent. Localizers are woke and if you give them an inch they'll take a mile. Enough backlash makes them think twice.
>>2679 Hey, cool it with the anti-fascism Anon
/vb/ is too slow for 4-in-a-row Tic-Tac-Toe
Wrong thread woops
marvel movies and harry potter movies are watchable
(71.67 KB 600x488 krb.jpg)

>>775 Basically a lot of games i missed out on due to only having a shitty toaster as a kid. More currently stuff like Risk of Rain 2 and Nier a tomato. Plus i also like being able to play and talk about games that anons are playing, after years of only being able to play PS1-era games. Feels good to be an adult with my own money to siphon onto my autistic hobbies, man.
Speaking of Reddit, why does every car have a Shit Reddit Says airbag?
>>2845 What about one in a row? >>3105 Ebin, have an upvote kind faggot
How Reddit is this?
>>3171 That's pretty fucking reddit my man.
>>3171 Hm, ackshually, (white) child labour has been abolished for decades, especially in mines, there's no way she's a minor
>>3175 Good thing she's canonically Japanese.
>>704 >Konami must have thought this was cool because the Probotectors are canon now, being playable in Contra games proper including the most recent. That was less so Konami's doing, and just Wayforward being filed with the kind of Nerd that would make an effort to remeber the Probotector robots existed, and used their opportunity when making Contra 4 and Operation Galuga to merge the to titles so they can coexist. Konami themselves just had to okay their nerd shit, but I doubt they care about any Contra character who isn't Bill Riser, since he's the face of the franchise.
>>3171 Zoomers should be put in concentration camps holy shit.
(370.88 KB 1197x714 Bix Nood saves hentai.png)

>>3185 Cool it with the pranks, /pol/acks
>>3171 Underaged characters aren't actually allowed on R34 so it's the fault of whoever posted that. Though I do remember most posts on R34 getting no comments, it was rare to see a commented post. Something changed around 2015-2017 I want to say and now you see this spergery under every post. So many "I want to RP this!" type comments. >>3188 E-hentai/sadpanda is possibly the worst "porn community" on the internet. Decent galleries can be inexplicably 1-2 stars and everybody acts like a fucking autist. It's a website of scatfags and NTR cucks.
>>3198 >So many "I want to RP this!" type comments. Sometimes outright cringy gay erp too.
>>3198 The slippery slope of normalizing degeneracy, expect faggots who are 10 times worse than JustinRPG pushing leftwing ideologies for no fucking reason: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=fQFcGhbqRq8
>>3198 >E-hentai/sadpanda is possibly the worst "porn community" on the internet. Decent galleries can be inexplicably 1-2 stars and everybody acts like a fucking autist. >It's a website of scatfags and NTR cucks. I pretty much never run into this. Perhaps you just have shit taste? Give me any example of a 1/2 star gallery that isn't severely shit in some way, because I've never once seen this. An no, that NTR gallery doesn't count, because NIGGERED and NTRfags are retarded.
>>3208 Not who you're talking to but I can 100% attest to people acting weird. Go look at the comments of pochincoff's galleries, one OP mixed his vanilla and kink art together and wrote a thesis explaining why.
>>3209 >pochincoff <Inflamed and gaping anuses <Scat galleries <Nigger males Like I said, if you don't have utter shit taste, you don't run into this shit. The panda is a big website, and it's bizarre of you or him to characterize it by the blacked futa scat club's behavior just because you intentionally went into that corner. It's like saying all of 8chan was /baphomet/, or all of 8moe is /vore1/ and /abdl/. The worst thing I usually see in comments are fights over translations purity or transfaggotry, and usually the translation purists and anti-transfaggotry camps are in the majority in those cases.
>>3208 >>3210 Why are you getting so defensive?
>>3211 Not an argument. :^)
>>3211 >Why are you getting so defensive?
>>2514 This
>>1252 Minesweeper's got a learning curve, if you play enough you get fast.
>>695 I don't hate Sony.
>>4701 This isn't a reddit opinion, there's a lot of console warring bullshit on leddit. There's a mountain of seething Xbox fans upset about the neverending bad news, so they screech about a perceived PlayStation bias. My personal favorite is >If Xbox leaves the console market, Sony will have a monopoly! As if PS5 isn't second last this gen, way behind Switch, PC and mobile lmao
>JRPGs have generally been better than western RPGs since the early 90's Don't see how that's a reddit opinion, redditors hate JRPGs that aren't Persona 5.
>>4719 >persona <JRPG I thought it was a fancy Visual Novel with more actions implemented into its sourcecode.
games aren't bad just because 5 lines in 200,000 words are bad translation
>>1955 Yes, you are autistic and care too much about DRM. There's is such a thing where one cares so much that you fail to grasp what this restrictive license provides. Access to these game files whenever. Once downloaded you may redistribute your games wherever. >b-but Steam is drm You miss the forest for the trees.
>>1955 >>5104 April's /v/ of "fuck DRM" meets September's /v/ of DRM apologist faggots shilling Steam. We fell far.
>>5106 I got another one, but it's more lazy. Pc is unnecessary and everyone should play on consoles.
Using reddit isn't inherently bad
>>5110 That should just be the /thread/, but I have more opinions. Video games leaning heavily into movie games are a good thing. I love talking about video games more than actually playing them. My favorites are Sony games with less third person action gameplay in favor of graphics. I pause every five to fifteen minutes or so to scroll Twitter, 4Chan, and Reddit. I played through Chrono Trigger the same way. Anyone who pretends JRPG's with a lot of text aren't the same as movie games are braindead. I play less than 6% of the games I own since I actively buy several copies of games I like to counteract pirates.
>>866 Dark Souls 2 is actually a good Dark Souls game. It's just that DS fanboys are all shit-eating autists who can't recognize good game design if it hit them right in the face.
I've been playing Final Fantasy series in order, currently at FF6. At first I thought it was shit compared to FF5 (And 3) with how limited the gameplay was, but at some point I fell in love with the game and even cried at some points. I am convinced that story and presentation CAN make a game.
>>695 Don't even try to appease redditors and tiktok dykes when you're only known for your edgy humor back then before the liberal purge happened: https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=YodnJ1xZlDw https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=fM7AQr5rVac
>>5134 FFVI has more limited gameplay than FFV but FFV has more limited everything else.
i don't think 3d women are incarnations of satan
>>5242 Show tits.
I'm Christian and I believe women shouldn't dress like harlots. "Censoring" women's outfits isn't bad, it's decency.
>>5264 Yes, we know SJWs are just the modern equivalent of Dana Carvey-esque Church Ladies. Go fuck yourself, Tipper Gore.
>>695 I tolerate when corporations bring faggot propaganda, after all redditors do play online multiplayers and keeping them alive, but that shouldn't stop you from stream sniping them. >>1029 At least it didn't get shelved and later brought back as DLC for GTAOnline. >>1254 They tell you all is free, but nobody bothers to disinfect crack codes from trojan viruses.
>>5265 >fundamentally opposed to "slut-shaming" >believe "sex-work is real work" >believe women should be able to dress like whores in public <SJWs are just the modern equivalent of Dana Carvey-esque Church Ladies There's a reason why saying this 'both sides' logic never swayed anyone back in 2015. Its obviously false.
>>5270 >fundamentally opposed to "slut-shaming" >believe "sex-work is real work" >believe women should be able to dress like whores in public Careful, you will make them sound like the more fun side again.
>>5270 I didn't say "both sides," I said they are the same fundamental type of person. They moved from one ideology to another, but still have the same basic thing of trying to control everybody. Really most of them are just women hopping on trends. All you're pointing to is one new form of hypocrisy they've taken on, but they're still the ones who want to censor everything. Except for themselves, of course. The censors are always exempt from their own rules.
>>5278 The Dilbert guy said it best: >Women get privileges like retards, children and any wastes of space maintained by welfare "terf" literally means not progressive enough.
(14.19 KB 320x349 pov you.jpg)

women won't have sex with you :)
>>5274 <unironically believing sex-work is real work
>>5278 Except they fundamentally don't want to control everybody. They want a complete lacks of control for everyone save straight white males. To even suggest that a woman, nigger, or faggot should control themselves in any way is to be met with howls of anger The only exceptions to this are when one of the aforementioned parties try controlling another which is higher on the oppression ladder.
>>5289 It doesn't matter what's "real" work. What matters is that people want it.
>>5285 >No STD for thee It's so heckin joever
(20.70 KB 350x500 you.jpg)

Physical is annoying and the move to digital was both inevitable and generally a good thing. >YOU DON'T OWN YOUR GAMES This is a problem, but digital didn't cause it. If a physical game has DRM, that fucks over regardless. Go buy a Darkspore disc, see how far you get in playing it. Having a physical copy means nothing. People misplace the blame of media ownership erosion onto the shift to digital, when really it's DRM and perpetual licences which were already present in physical media
>>5303 >he doesn't see the difference between your games being tied to an online service and having something you actually control yourself >he has no way of getting his money back for his purchases Well at least you're fitting the spirit of the thread
(1016.58 KB 1000x950 ZOG the dragon.jpg)

>>5298 >ywn adopt an overgrown adult who'd end up blowing another guy So jelly rn
>>5294 <He unironically wants to fuck herpes-ridden 3dpd whores who've taken a railroads-worth of nigger dick WEW LAD
>>5311 >he doesn't see the difference between your games being tied to an online service and having something you actually control yourself Digital and cloud are not the same thing
>>5340 Most people refer to Steam when they say digital, but either way even if you're buying something DRM-free, you still get less than you would with physical. Shit like large manuals, merchandise, a cool box, a printed disc, and so on. Digital shit just isn't the same.
I think it's okay if game companies shut down their always-online game's servers.
(251.35 KB 1200x1200 nigget.jpg)

I don't really play video games nowadays and If I really need to check out a game, I think watching a no-commentary let's play for a few minutes is enough. No game should take more than 8-10 cumulative hours to play. Cheating to skip grinding or when you don't give a shit about the game is okay. Playing on easy mode is okay. All live service online multiplayer and MMORPGs are gay and people who play them are gay. Multiplayer should only be LAN or splitscreen.
(608.06 KB 917x1300 Commit sudoku.png)

>>695 >>Ocarina of Time is legitimately the best 3D Zelda game and possibly the best 3D action game ever >>731 >There is nothing inherently wrong with microtransactions, >>777 >Censorship's good >>4701 >I don't hate Sony. >>5110 >Spoiler >>5118 >I pause every five to fifteen minutes or so to scroll Twitter, 4Chan, and Reddit. >I actively buy several copies of games I like to counteract pirates. >>5303 >Physical is annoying and the move to digital was both inevitable and generally a good thing. >>5356 >Cheating to skip grinding or when you don't give a shit about the game is okay. >Playing on easy mode is okay. Shit opinions that deserve the rope. Everything else I can agree with, or have an argument that it is valid to a point.
>>5335 They don't actually take railroads of nigger dick Anon. Get offline, you're brainrotted.
>>5356 >Playing on easy mode is okay. This. I don't have the time for hard modes anymore.
>>5361 I pick medium myself.
>>5361 >>5365 That really depends on the game. If it's a big modern release, then "Hard" probably means "Normal". If it's a game from like 1989, "Easy" probably means "Actually Beatable". Then there are games like Half-Life where all the difficulty settings do is make enemies more spongy, no thank you. I prefer combat to not feel like I'm chopping down a tree.
>>5264 I Sort of agree with this, in that as long as the women look like actual women and not trannies, I don't mind how much they're covered up.

(74.45 KB 302x404 IMG_0291 (2).JPG)

(2.21 MB 1904x1960 IMG_0052.PNG)

(479.00 KB 1760x1500 IMG_0303 (2).JPG)

(699.79 KB 957x1000 1614020294413.png)

>>5264 It's arguably heretical. You're telling me that you so loath the body that God gifted you and your spouse with that you'd rather cover it up and hide it in shame rather than proudly display the Lord's work? Much more what you've done to maintain and improve that body's physicality.
>>5379 You'd be surprised how many people agree with you. There are people out there who notice the disturbing and annoying trend of removing the femininity from female video game characters. They also notice that female characters are purposely being made less beautiful in recent years. But they also don't want the trend to swing in the polar opposite direction, where female characters wear skimpy, revealing clothing and their appeal lies in how much skin they show. Such opinions get drowned out in many places online, and you can probably see why. >>5380 Can't tell if this is bait or an actual question.
>>5381 >Can't tell if this is bait or an actual question. It's a legit question. >But they also don't want the trend to swing in the polar opposite direction, where female characters wear skimpy, revealing clothing and their appeal lies in how much skin they show. There is no "polar opposite" in the discussion. Women can either be allowed to be drawn in the nude with their ta-tas and vag showing for all the entire world to see or they cannot be drawn at all. There is no inbetween. Why? Because you're fucking job is being an artist. You are required to draw the human form in all it's possible presentations and forms. It doesn't matter how much it may offender the censors or modern sensibilities. And if you're offended at seeing the sight of the human body, then you can fuck off.
>>5264 >>5270 >>5379 >>5381 I'm 5264, the Christian. I understand many people agree with me and can definitely see why my opinion would be drowned out by degenerates on 8chan.moe, so this thread fits. While I believe woman characters shouldn't dress like harlots and "censoring" outfits is decency, I also believe woman characters should look like women instead of trannies/men, should dress feminine, and should role model healthier femininity than "whore." Regarding baits I simply ignore them.
>>5386 >"censoring" outfits is decency Excuse me, how MUCH censorship is required in order to retain "decency"? >and should role model healthier femininity than "whore." So women exercising are "whores" now. >Regarding baits I simply ignore them. It funny how the modern environment of the internet increasingly has this aversion to having confrontations and hard arguments. Where someone begins asking something, important ideological questions to the subject at hand that have wide-spanning consequences, and you have cowards that dismiss wanting to answer or even counter said questions with the excuse that the person asking is "baiting", "trolling", or "sealioning". And then people wonder why it is that no one ever wants to talk to anyone anymore and why almost everyone is rude wherever you go.
>>5388 Intellectual dishonesty has become the norm, and dodging logical arguments is a favored tactic of the intellectually dishonest.
>>5388 Women didn't need to exercise before the modern age, anon, regular housework and labor was enough, and they didn't need to exercise in only a bra and panties either, that's an advent of the last 20-30 years. Also, if you don't think there aren't plenty of whores at the gym who go in certain outfits to try and get as much attention as possible, you're naive and probably haven't been to a gym.
>>5395 >Women didn't need to exercise before the modern age Yes, they did. In Greece, the Heraean Games (Basically the female Olympics) were used for the purposes of choosing priestesses and brides. The Spartans and Vikings took things a step further by having the girls of their region train alongside the boys in atheltics and combat when growing up, partial to defend the homefront when the men were away at war and mostly to under the belief that a strong wife would produce strong offspring. >and they didn't need to exercise in only a bra and panties either, that's an advent of the last 20-30 years. No, that's stil offensive to some people. Outfits like you in first vid and pic need to be covered up, as you can see in the second vid. >if you don't think there aren't plenty of whores at the gym who go in certain outfits to try and get as much attention as possible Men do the same exact thing, so why do they get off the hook?
>>5360 Pfft. When I was more terminally online, it was easier to convince myself you were right. Interacting with more women just blackpilled me on how disgusting their behavior is. >>5396 Those men don't get off the hook. They get kicked out. The Lunk Alarm is a real thing. But you're making a false equivalence anyway. Men don't do it on anywhere near the scale of women. There are zillions of videos of women recording themselves at the gym clearly just to get internet attention, and if they're lucky, ruin a guy's life by accusing him of glancing in their direction, whether he really is or not. Men do not do this on nearly the same scale.
(132.34 KB 516x683 N_Gamerword.jpg)

>>5388 <Excuse me, how MUCH white-dna is required in order to classify as white Enough to avoid the encouraging of sexual attraction in others. Emphasis on the word 'encouraging' since of course some humans are able to be sexually attracted to anything. Like any societal rule, this may vary depending on where you live. In general however, you can't go wrong with covering the whole-chest and legs up to at least mid-thigh. This is negated somewhat if the clothes are skin-tight. While the social rule of modesty, propriety, or decency is technically not the same as the rule of chastity, the two often go hand-in-hand and it is a good rule besides. If people violate the rules of propriety in their time and place to arouse lust in themselves or others, they are acting against chastity. However, if they do so out of ignorance or carelessness, they are merely displaying bad manners. When they intentionally break these rules to shock or embarrass others, they may not be unchaste, but they are being uncharitable. <increasingly has this aversion to having confrontations and hard arguments. Almost as if every. Single. Time. Any of these are had neither side changes their mind or agrees on anything. I've been on the internet for almost 20 years and never seen it happen even once. <So women exercising are "whores" now. So blatant strawmen are your idea of a hard argument? There's a different between gym-wear and Ivy from soul calibur less so between Ivy and gym thots though. >>5390 Kind of like how you did in that very post. Pic unrelated.
>>5385 >Women can either be allowed to be drawn in the nude No one is saying that artists cannot draw nude females. There is a clear difference between making a sketch of a nude woman and designing a female game protagonist who wears nothing but a miniskirt and bra. The former's purpose is to demonstrate the complexity of the human form for the sake of appreciation, or to practice drawing people so the artist can understand how humans move. The latter's purpose is to evoke lust within the viewer. >>5388 >So women exercising are "whores" now. No one is saying that either. Not a single person believes that in this thread. The female gym clothes that are considered "in fashion" today are nearly identical to underwear. Skin-tight clothes, bra-like tops, very short shorts, stretchy pants that show the shape of the lower body, everything is designed to show as much skin as possible. This is not needed to have a successful, comfortable workout. The reason why these clothes are worn are to show off, to be proud, to make others feel lustful, and maybe even for the woman to satisfy some lustful urge of her own. These are the exact same motivations behind the clothing choices prostitutes make. Sure, many women may wear sports bras and mini shorts and yoga pants because their best friend said they were cool, but the fact that they don't understand the true purpose of such articles of clothing make them even more dangerous. >It funny how the modern environment of the internet increasingly has this aversion to having confrontations and hard arguments. Where someone begins asking something, important ideological questions to the subject at hand that have wide-spanning consequences, and you have cowards that dismiss wanting to answer or even counter said questions with the excuse that the person asking is "baiting", "trolling", or "sealioning". Very few people have an aversion to actual discussion. Especially on an imageboard like this. If you've managed to find this place or have been here for years, you are here because you want to discuss vidya or vidya related topics or just have fun. What people do want to avoid is making a legitimate written response to a post only to find out the other anon was just fooling around and doesn't actually care. Topics like religion and modest female character design are common topics for people to not take seriously. So hesitancy is to be expected. Especially if a post asking about religious beliefs is accompanied by lewd imagery. >>5396 >Men do the same exact thing, so why do they get off the hook? Men, besides the inevitable rare outliers, do not do the exact same thing. Most men wear shorts, t-shirts, sweatpants, etc. to the gym. If a male gymgoer wanted to dress similarly to the average female gymgoer and get a lot of attention, he'd walk in shirtless, wearing only a speedo or tight boxer briefs. And shoes.
>>5388 If they exercise in tight ass clothes, im sorry to be the first one to tell you, but they are whore's.
(480.51 KB 960x540 Comp-1.gif)

(53.27 KB 256x384 Handholding leads to sex.png)

(44.36 KB 680x850 Cute Argonian Maid.jpg)

(475.77 KB 1280x1536 (robotoseckshau5) Meka nude.png)


>>5400 >Enough to avoid the encouraging of sexual attraction in others. What's wrong with being sexually attracted towards someone? >Emphasis on the word 'encouraging' since of course some humans are able to be sexually attracted to anything. That still doesn't answer the question when tongues, handholding, and just being simply "cute" could be construed as "encouraging" sexual attraction. >In general however, you can't go wrong with covering the whole-chest and legs up to at least mid-thigh. So you're telling me that fourth pic would have to cover up? >While the social rule of modesty, propriety, or decency is technically not the same as the rule of chastity, the two often go hand-in-hand and it is a good rule besides. Why? >If people violate the rules of propriety in their time and place to arouse lust in themselves or others, they are acting against chastity. We already have a term and laws for that, it's called "sexual harassment". However those laws have been abused to the point that simply talking to or even correcting a woman is now seen as "sexual harassment" and can get you fired when you legitmately did nothing wrong. >When they intentionally break these rules to shock or embarrass others, they may not be unchaste, but they are being uncharitable. And what if there's nothing wrong with what the person is actually doing, but someone takes offense to it anyway because they're just that damn shallow? Such as wearing a T-shirt that promotes a religious beliefs or a political candidate (Regardless if one actually holds the views expressed on the shirt). >Almost as if every. Single. Time. Any of these are had neither side changes their mind or agrees on anything. >I've been on the internet for almost 20 years and never seen it happen even once. Ever consider that it's because you're asking the wrong questions or having the wrong arguments? Or that your goal is to "own" the other person instead of trying to understand why the person has the arguments that they do? >So blatant strawmen are your idea of a hard argument? Thus far in the argument, you've firmly established that women having anything less than 80% of their body covered is the indications of a "whore". Why is it incorrect to come to that conclusion? >There's a different between gym-wear and Ivy from soul calibur You're right. The reason Ivy doesn't wear clothes is for her own self-defense. Because being in the nude allows her to better communicate with and weild her talking magical sword. >>5401 >No one is saying that artists cannot draw nude females. Yes, it is. That's what the argument inevitable becomes every single damn time. >There is a clear difference between making a sketch of a nude woman and designing a female game protagonist who wears nothing but a miniskirt and bra. No there isn't. It's admiration of the female body. The only difference is the medium that it's accomplished within. Anything beyond that is just people making excuses for why it's acceptable in one circumstance but not in another. This has been the joke about a lot of "moral panics" over the years where it's "illegal" for children to view nude women in Playboy, but it's A-okay to see nude women in National Geographic. The context doesn't fucking matter as it's the same content. >The female gym clothes that are considered "in fashion" today are nearly identical to underwear. Skin-tight clothes, bra-like tops, very short shorts, stretchy pants that show the shape of the lower body, everything is designed to show as much skin as possible. This is not needed to have a successful, comfortable workout. As I man, I disagree. Whenever I go for a hike, the only clothing I have on is short shorts, shoes, socks, and a hat. >The reason why these clothes are worn are to show off, to be proud What's wrong with that? >to make others feel lustful, and maybe even for the woman to satisfy some lustful urge of her own Again, men do the same thing. >Sure, many women may wear sports bras and mini shorts and yoga pants because their best friend said they were cool Or because they're comfortable. >Very few people have an aversion to actual discussion. Especially on an imageboard like this. I take it you haven't visited some of the other boards on the site. >Topics like religion and modest female character design are common topics for people to not take seriously. Probably because majority of the people arguing for "modesty" don't actually understand what they're arguing for, and so repeat the same arguments the baizuo use as justification for turning female characters into trannies. And then you people come here and whine about how there's no more appealing female characters, and people point this out, and you're upset because you think it's "all" about people wanting to jack off instead of it being the simple fact that people like attractive female girls who are not afraid to show that they are attractive female girls. IOW, you're your own worst enemy who doesn't understand your own damn arguments. >Men, besides the inevitable rare outliers, do not do the exact same thing. Yes, we do. >If a male gymgoer wanted to dress similarly to the average female gymgoer and get a lot of attention, he'd walk in shirtless, wearing only a speedo or tight boxer briefs. And shoes. So what men were wearing to the gym from the 1980's to the Aughtd.
>>5404 it's pretty obvious to identify a slut by seeing what they are wearing, sorry you missed that class.
>>5405 >it's pretty obvious to identify a slut by seeing what they are wearing If you need to look at her clothing to identify she's a slut, you really ignorant on the matter.
>>5406 I mean, if you don't know her that's the primary method, i know that there are sluts who pretend to be all christian.
>>5407 >I mean, if you don't know her that's the primary method No, it's not. She's using TikTok, so she's a slut by default.
>>5408 pmuch no arguing with that.
>>5404 >Again, men do the same thing. And they shouldn't
>>5404 What's wrong with censorship anon?
>>5412 It's a method to control people. It controls what content people are exposed it. It controls what topics and content people can create and discuss. In ther more brutal countries like the various Socialist states, it's used for the purposes of turning people into hypocrites in order to delegitimize them if they ever choose to speak out against the state. Or there's other cases like the typical authoritarian regimes that use censorship as a racketeering ring to make money. There has never been, nor will there ever be, a good argument "for" censorship. Because it never ends once you start allowing it.
>>5407 All women are sluts, Christian women just less so.
>>5408 Any woman making TikTok videos for men online is a whore.
>>5413 >It's a method to control people What's wrong with controlling people anon?
Not sure if this counts as vidya
>>5418 Simple, your not God nor my parent
>>5422 That does not explain why controlling people is wrong.
>>5428 Do you want to be controlled?
>>5436 That does not explain why controlling people is bad either. Why would me wanting or not wanting something have any bearing on what is or isn’t wrong? Serial killers want to serially kill.
>>5356 >No game should take more than 8-10 cumulative hours to play. This reminded me that tutorials are cancer.
(3.09 MB 1280x720 Rules of Perception.mp4)

>>5437 >That does not explain why controlling people is bad either. Yes, it does. If there's a reason that YOU do not want to be controlled by someone else, then that answers the question of why controlling people is bad. The only people who don't understand this are brain-dead gnostics who believe that they've seen the "Mind of God" and declare that they should be the ones in charge because they're so "smart", or Sadist who want to be cruel just for the purposes of being cruel because they derive erotic pleasure from lording over others.
>>5439 >If there's a reason that YOU do not want to be controlled by someone else, then that answers the question of why controlling people is bad. How on earth does it answer the question? You could use that logic to “prove” that anything is bad.Anything is disliked by at least one person. you also haven’t explained how not liking something suddenly warps reality into making that thing bad So, if I don’t want to be controlled by people because I want to control people that answers the question of why controlling people is bad?
>>5443 >How on earth does it answer the question? If you do not want it happening to you, then you should not want it happening to someone else. If you do not want to be controlled, then you should not seek to control others. >You could use that logic to “prove” that anything is bad. So just about every society on the history of the planet was wrong: https://infogalactic.com/info/Golden_Rule
(140.52 KB 480x360 really makes you think.mp4)

Also, are you just posting non-arguments to get out of answering the questions in this post: >>5404
>>5444 >If you do not want it happening to you, then you should not want it happening to someone else. Why not? You’re just saying that as if it’s true without explaining what makes it true. > So just about every society on the history of the planet was wrong Not an argument.
>>5446 >Why not? One cannot prove a negative, try again.
>he's on this board too oh god
>>5439 Shut the fuck up, autist.
>>5448 Another thread added to his kill count.
>>5448 >>5453 Who? >>5450 The guy this guy doesn't like? >>5439 But what's the problem? The guy mad there is obviously just shitposting, so it's hard to tell what you mean.
(32.80 KB 1200x630 R.jpg)

>>5454 >The guy
>>5447 Once again, you have not proven any of your claims.
>>5447 <You can't wear a blue sweater on tuesday >Why not? <Uh, sorry sweetie you can't prove a negative try again! This really is the reddit thread.
(137.51 KB 850x1208 stiv~~~.jpg)

(157.33 KB 850x1159 idiot.jpg)

(64.89 KB 850x478 shirt.jpg)

(271.82 KB 792x801 shirt2.png)

(270.28 KB 850x1175 k.jpg)

>>5438 Side note: I'm surprised they didn't go ahead and make Alex a negress. What happened?
(688.24 KB 350x272 refreshing_taste_of_bepis.gif)

>>3076 >Feels good to be an adult with my own money to siphon onto my autistic hobbies, man. Amen. Being a wagie can be depressing at times but after being dirt poor all my life having my own money makes it worth it in the end. I mean I will never have enough money to own a house and start a family, but it's an improvement.
>>5462 The choice to include Alex as an official skin in Minecraft (in 2014) was undoubtedly a political one. Notch wanted to include a female character in Minecraft at least as far back as 2012, but claimed that his attempts at modeling one always resulted in something "sexist." Apparently he was really sensitive about it, since Minecraft was, to him, a game where "gender didn't exist." https://archive.is/sWeCp So when Alex was added later, it was for representation and to show that women could do the same things in the Minecraft world as men (https://archive.is/ScYW5). She's probably white because she is supposed to be somewhat Swedish. Notch's middle name is "Alexej", so her name is probably from that. In 2022 they added a bunch of new official skins, one of them being a negress. Her name is Makena. This was done primarily for "diversity", as you'd expect. All the things happening that year must have made the execs believe it was a good time to cash in on that buzzword and practice their political posturing. https://archive.is/M1rmI
>>5464 If you save up enough money you can put it into term deposits and live off the interest for the rest of your life. I'd probably still have a part-time job after that point because your brain goes if you stop working.
>>5465 >added in 2014 What? I don't remember people talking about her at all from back then. I thought it was a post 2016-2018 thing.
(114.35 KB 1024x1024 Bix Toad.jpg)

>>5468 >There won't be a sequel to the rapping niggers fighting game Is Sticky Fingaz supposed to be Diddy? <Joe Budden LMAO, that sum malarkey mah nigga
i STILL think the 7th gen was the worst era for gaming and i am willing to defend the current gen and the latter half of 8th gen over it.
>>5481 7th gen ruined many generations of gaming, I still remember some bullshit features that would later gain relevancy: >No exclusives >Defective consoles >(((Premium))) memberships for exclusives games that will disappear sooner or later >Shovelware that shouldn't have a price tag >Popular franchises would play it safe in the next entry and so on <(((Microtransactions))) <Pay2Win disguised as harmless cosmetics <DLC that should've been in the main game to begin with
>>5481 The 1st and 2nd gen are the worst eras for gaming for someone being honest about it.
(66.36 KB 216x310 1318562278003.jpg)

>>5311 People blame digital for this and it drives me up the fucking wall. Whether the game is on a floppy disc or a hard disc, the data is the same. The data is ultimately what matters. DRM is agonistic, it can happen on a cart or on your computer. Always online is agonistic. Perpetual licenses are agonistic. None of this has anything to do with digital downloads, which are a different way of getting the same data. I sympathize if you're talking about the ability to own something tactile, a physical vessel of the art similar to vinyl discs and framed photographs, but blaming digital media for the erosion of rights is nonsensical. Ross Scott has talked about this, go watch his Dead Game News series.
>>5396 >3rd vid It's fine when the FICTIONAL character is wearing a skimpy outfit, not this hampig that hit the wall and ready to use the state as her personal army whenever her ego gets punctured. Strong independent women are the equivalent of blackface to these dykes.
>>5465 The only thing I recall is Dream being funny and implied that the nigger skin was the third gender and its name was Tyrone. >>5511 Has he covered Monday Night Combat? I'm surprised someone pulled out models from that dead game and rigged them into TF2 gamebanana models.
In tears of the kingdom, zelda and link should have swaped roles. Remenber banjoo & kazoie nuts and bolts? it feels weird to see the action hero becoming an engineer hero. Zelda as the "paragon of wisdom" would make sense to fight with ancient machines and crafting. Link as the "paragon of courage" would make sense to make the sacrifice and giving up his humanity. Also it would be funny to see cutscenes with a mute link talking with just body gestures.
>>5649 In tears of kingdom, zelda shoud've gotten impregnated by link. Remember banjo and kazooie? Remember how hot gruntilda became after sucking the beauty out of tootie? Banjo should've impregnated her and not saved tootie. Zelda as the "breedable, fertile damsel" would make sense to be bred by link. Link as the "breeder with fertile, potent seed" would make sense to continually mating press and impregnate zelda with 10 children. It would be funny to see cutscenes of a mute link mating pressing zelda and overflowing her womb with seed for five hours straight.
The most Reddit opinion I have is that you have to be racist to actually enjoy victoria 2.
>>695 Both Dead Rising 1 and 2 aged like shit, however it doesn't make sense in the remake when they got rid of erotic points considering Frank West is an apathetic asshole like any journalist, in fact he refused to save the woman who was about to get impaled by Marshall Applewhite.
>>5357 All games should have a journalist mode to maximize profits. You are a clown if accessibility options upset you. The option to buy a native japanese copy v.s an english copy is understated whenever a bad localization is shat out. Complaining about localizers is a skill issue.
(49.34 KB 1593x885 The Gun.webp)

>>5706 There was some ocean soulslike recently that had possibly the funniest easy mode I've ever seen. You're given a gun. Just a fucking giant gun.
>>5707 >it's on his back too lul
>>5707 >Gun has "Squirrel" etched into it Is that a reference to that Squirrel with a Gun game? That crab game has pride flags in it though
>>5712 >spoiler And that's a good thing.


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply