>>460623 >savagery >whites >whites are the phenotype most adapted to high civilization and thus have the best chance of it continuing and advance it >savage Cool, niggers will die off when God wants to make a little cooler but there is not a population of whites maintaining the shit that keeps the cold away

>>460634 The claim of a superior phenotype is confounded by contemporary evidence. In America white conservatives are in full panic-retreat mode, desperate to bring back a fantastic version of the past just so they don't have to confront the discomforts of change, innovation and cultural evolution, which is essential for advancing civilization high or low. They are perfectly comfortable in the wallow of cultural necrophilia that conservative values champions. They cannot wait to take everyone else down with them, and they can hardly wait to use murderous violence to achieve that aim.

>>460633 What is/is not "conservative" or "liberal" depends upon the era, the scene and the voice. Conservatism started as a voice for the working class and agrarian values, giving no voice to the businessman or the corporations. Now the total reverse is hideously true. Liberalism used to be "liberty and justice truly for all & stop killing us" and now it's "You WILL embrace all freakishness OR ELSE!" Christian conservatism is a cultural oxymoron, as a full reading of the Bible, independent of any churchish political ambition, will show you. Likewise, forcing near-universal acceptance only builds resentment and make a situation more dangerous, which is hardly a bombshell revelation.

>>460637 >cultural evolution is important Lmao, IQ is more important and IQ is genetic This population alive now is a dead rotting superorganism that does not know the hard times ahead, it is only capable of stagnation and decline. The niggers are worse off then whites. Whites have been through the cycle enough to get back to eugenic grown fast after the fall Niggers have behavior patterns solely selected for the savannah, and don't even have what agriculture does to your genome

>>460643 IQ might be genetic but it is neither ethnic nor endemic. Whites and conservatives across America prove this every day. I mean really: if they had higher IQs, then when will start using them?

>>460637 >cultural [r]evolution fixed that for you

>>460647 low IQ has been selected for the last 200 years, so no one really has anything to be proud of at this point, and different ethic groups cluster in IQ in different places along the line, bitchtits the thing that makes whites able to use high IQ more when they have it is the behavioral patterns that let them have a much wider bell curve, allowing them to have many geniuses born among them, and because a wider bell curve would suggest a bigger tolerance for genetic deviants, making the geniuses not ostracized, allowing them to use their intellect to help their group. Making shit like the industrial revolution happen

>>460648 Cultural revolution? That's so Maoist of you! >>460651 Low IQ has been preferred since antiquity, for the reason it is preferred today: people lacking advanced faculty are easier to control. And the topic of manifest genius is one of the few things Rand got right: genius will appear where it will, regardless of any limitations invented by men's politics. Simply because you and a genius share ethnicity does not mean you are his natural equal, or that you naturally share in that genius. Conservatives only tolerate genius when that genius can be exploited to the profit of tradition. Throughout Christian history advanced minds were despised because acute reasoning is the natural enemy of mindless faith. Likewise, genius belonging to undesirable persons or groups was erased from the record or discounted, lest the conceit of the majority be offended.

>>460653 the genius helps his ethic group because his group is an extension of his genome, thus him helping his group is him helping his genes prosper, and is more potent in getting more his genes out there then sexual reproduction every animal's behavior is dictated by what has been selected for for as long as life has been things can only be selected for if they facilitate more multiplying not everything is a secret group of elite working with enough time and resources to be effectively be omnipotent much is simply monkeys not being able to understand their composition

>>460657 Are these conservatives in the room with you right now?

>>460658 >>460653

>>460657 >the genius helps his ethic group because his group is an extension of his genome... Bless your heart, you're really stretching for it! But no, genius is proven to be a mutation if anything, otherwise the ingenious names of history would be part of longer lineages of the same, instead of singular standouts. And history proves that genomics are not considered within the larger mechanisms of group identity and politics, probably because the science is too subtle for easy social digestion. And that's too bad: minute genetic examination has proven that the several local genomes are not as exclusive or free of importation as some may insist. Humans use the micro-evolutionary abilities of adaptation and invention to override whatever pre-selections. That's how we populated the world. There are sufficient groups of open and known elites who only work to control the world, to deny the need for any imaginary. We are all nothing but ingenious monkeys! Cavemen who have been taught to shave! hardly anything more than that.

>>460661 Nothing can be gained by talking to you, hopefully your inefficient views die with your genes and it isn't able to get people killed in the future Yes there is an elite club now, they did not influence the evolution of humans however Sorry u are too stupid to understand that man is just like every other animal in base drivers and behavior

>>460672 Is this then the reply of the "superior genome"? Your response to "selection pressure"? *chuckles*

>>460676 superior isn't the word I would use niggers would do better then whites with stone age tech on a Savannah whites do better in high civilization, and are the ethic group closest to evolving out of the cycle, and won't have to suffer the ignorance and inefficiency that comes with it, niggers will be happy on the savannah, and then die off when something happens that makes the savannah disappear

>>460679 If whites thrive better in high civilization, then shouldn't they be doing more to embrace it, instead of reviling it and fearing it because it's not what Granpappy had? You cannot be enchained to tradition and also embrace the future. You have to let all that old shit go and then stride into a better tomorrow, tabula rasa. And please remember that sub-Saharan Africa is much more diverse that just the savannah. The only ecosystems it does not have are Tundra and Alpine. It has lots of everything else, and Niggers thrive throughout, as should be expected.

>>460682 Oops. Forgot my pic!

>>460682 >and Niggers thrive throughout sub-Saharan Africa The native niggers aren't actually nigger niggers though. They're their own special breed of niggers that kind of look like chinks. Nigger niggers are mostly a jungle thing with a side of savanna.

>>460685 Hooray! That makes no sense!

MARCH OF THE TITANS

>>460688 Don't evoke the Titans. The name means the 'stretchers', an epithet given them by Uranos as he judged his usurping children were 'stretching' beyond their capability as they assumed rule over the Kosmos. hoi Titanes were overthrown and cast into Tartarus, becoming the symbols of the defeated past. If you think you're bad-assed, don't name yourself after the biggest losers in Euro mythology.

>>460682 Your biology degrades every generation under a the ecology of a high civilization, thus a population that lives for too long under it, will develop a psychology that is the antithesis of their society due their society being the source of thier problem Whites have been under dysgenics for too long to have healthy ideas Don't care niggers are found, they are evolved to live in the savanna

>>460704 So then ... you're saying that the niggers in Africa have the superior social/ecological model, being more organic and fundamental, and that whites have advanced themselves into inferiority.

>>460712 Being tied to one ecology is inferior to being to cope with more then

>>460714 More then one*

On the one hand, I can sort of understand the race = IQ thing. I noticed that Blacks stick to herd mentality a lot, are quick to follow trends, quick to unnecessary aggression whether that be in real life or online, and tend to have a hard time understanding other people's points. Not to be demeaning, but for the sake of the point I will call these behaviors "low IQ". Blacks also tend to ostarcize those who don't fit in the herd. On the other hand, I've seen people who usually bring up race's relation to IQ usually tend to exhibit these same behaviors. If you assume that most people who say that race = IQ are white and not Indian or Black or Hispanic or any other race of course. They get into internet spats with people who aren't there to argue in good faith, they tend to lash out at anyone who slightly disagrees with them, they tend to lack the patience to try and understand the points of others and so on. I noticed this behavior a lot on halfchan. I haven't seen behavior like this on 8chan. It's possible that a lot of halfchans current user base isn't white/is not of age. Just some food for thought.

>>463919 Niggers have no foresight. They kill themselves through thoughtless foolishness. That they are children is readily apparent to even the most casual observer. These things are not in question. So why do you question them? Your powers of observation reveal more about your own intellect than it does that of others. Know thyself, and know you are a fool.

>>463920 I think you've got my points misconstrued. It is true that most blacks lack foresight, even the ones who don't like in urban areas. That's why they cling to materialism and tend to spend a lot of money chasing it instead of saving it. My main point was a questioning of the master race theory. The majority of transgenders are white, and whether you want to mention medically transitioning or committing suicide is up to you, but both of these are actions without a lot of forethought. Of course, transgenders are a bad example since they are a small amount of the white population and the people who bring up race relations are normal and not transgender. I would mention male suicide statistics but it seems like whites don't take the lead in that category. It's always Indians in every stat I've looked up. You can still say that whites do make decisions that lack foresight, but most of those examples are extremely anecdotal, don't apply as widely to whites as they do for blacks, and aren't as severe or obvious.

>>463947 I don't think suicide rates necessarily equate to lack of foresight. Sometimes you may look ahead and correctly see that your life sucks and isn't likely to get better. People on this site should understand that. And those indians you cite? If I was indian I'd kill myself.

Good question

>>463948 >I don't think suicide rates necessarily equate to lack of foresight. Sometimes you may look ahead and correctly see that your life sucks and isn't likely to get better. If the male suicide rate was more skewed towards younger men, I would disagree completely. However, it skews towards older men. That makes it pretty reasonable, if you don't have any family or relatives or anyone around you when you are 70+ or up, why should you keep going? Why wait until your natural clock runs up? You've lived a longer life than most, so it's reasonable to think about suicide. Especially when your physical/mental health is declining. However, I don't it's very reasonable for the average user base of this sight to commit suicide. Unless things are extremely grim for you (no family, friends, extremely bad health conditions, extreme isolation), I think there are still reasons to live. Not for the normalfag reasons like contributing to society, but for your own personal gain. Everyone that comes here probably has some sort of hobby or interest that keeps them going. Even the act of going onto the site could be a reason that keeps you going. Let's say, you like video games and you feel jaded about the current gaming industry/the state of modern video games. You could try to revisit some of your old favorites to try and rekindle that love you once had for the medium, or you could try to find older games that you haven't played/heard of before that are similar to the games you once loved. Most people can find something to live for, but some people are less fortunate and don't have anything. Though, I feel like cases like that are rare and people in those positions somehow keep going on, the people here are a testament to that despite being on the brink. I feel like most suicides (for younger men in the US) are driven by unstable mental states and issues that can be solved with time like relationship issues.

Whites and niggers alike I'm this thread are retards barking and niggery retards and back. It's not a race issue, it's a class issue. What's was. Thought everybody knew that by now. That said, why do niggers glorify being the lowest class in the West?

>>463954 >It's not a race issue, it's a class issue hmmmmmmmmm. race is biology, and biology is fundamental to everything about us If I had to throw you a bone, it depends on if you're person who solves things from the top-down or the bottom-up these problems are from our meat, and that tried talking point won't work in multi-ethic states but I do agree that the rich make problems

>>463954 >That said, why do niggers glorify being the lowest class in the West? Guys have done that since the original Robin Hood legend. When the law is corrupt, it's the criminals who make the best heroes.

>>463952 >relationship issues Or rather lack thereof. Lack of family, or even reasonable prospects for one, is a major factor.

>>464010 Are you kidding? Families are a leading cause of depression. Fuckers are usually more trouble than they are worth.