Any gains made will be overshadowed by the inefficiency of the dumber population It is biological, not education

>>465694 >It is biological, not education Are you suggesting it's an Idiocracy situation -- retards breeding retards? While I agree that's happening, I disagree that it would be the cause of what's happening here, unless we something quantifiable like a blanket reduction in white matter or something. I think it's a societal issue laid bare by niggery and tranny influences on pop culture, which has permeated our educational institutions and lead them astray.

>>465694 It is education 100%. Have you seen what gets taught in grade schools? The curriculum that high schoolers get is what fifth-graders were doing back in the eighties, and that shit was already an enormous step down in terms of complexity from what they had been doing in the seventies. They barely even bother teaching kids to read anymore, and fucking none of them get the barest hint of any logical or methodical systems of thought or research. They are as ignorant as we would have been if we had been allowed to do what we wanted and fuck around playing video games and watching cartoons for our entire childhoods. The problem is doctrinal, and it begins with the idea of "childhood." Childhood is a counterproductive concept that should be abolished. School should not be able allowing kids to have a happy, healthy childhood. It should be about preparing them for the miserable, unhealthy realty of life afterward.

>>465696 >The problem is doctrinal, and it begins with the idea of "childhood." No, childhood was a concept for hundreds of years and things were fine. The problem IS doctrinal and it begins with the idea of "math/reading/good manners/etc is racist"

>>465696 >>465697 inb4 >nuh uh, a random online stranger told me that 5 year olds were considered adults back in the industrial revolution! Brothers Grimm's "Children's and Household Tales" was first published in 1812, get fucked retarded faggot

>>465696 Also, kindergarten was invented in 1837. That is exactly the context we are discussing here, educational doctirine and the idea of childhood. It was literally invented to indoctrinate children to be well adapted members of society. Kindergarten wasnt set up like a fucking college because muh kids are the same as adults if you dont coddle them. Kids are not adults you pedo.

>>465697 >image literally describes a healthy, functioning society where positive actions are rewarded >racist

>>465697 Okay, starting from the top: "white culture" is not dominant except in white communities, where it actually leads to thriving, happy populous.It hasn't been normalized over time so much as evolved, as the groups with that culture have been stronger than others and therefore survived.The concept of one group holding institutional power is not even wrong. There is no test for it, nor proper definition of power, nor proper definition of group, or of this group. "You get what you deserve" has two possible meanings and this whatever it is conflates them. One meaning is that a person should get what they deserve, which is tautological. The other is that every person does end up with what they deserve, which is not a belief common to white culture. "if you don't meet your goals you didn't work hard enough" is not an aspect of this culture, even though it's a common belief. It's not a sufficiently common belief nor is it something that influences cultural values. White culture includes a strong aspect of charitable giving, especially to the "deserving poor" who are poor despite their hard work. White culture is not intolerant of non-Judeo-Christian religions, especially in contrast with religions of other cultures. "wealth=worth" is the same statement discussed above. "your job is who you are" is not an aspect of this culture. "heavy value on ownership of goods" has a double meaning. One meaning is that people want wealth and goods, the other is that people value other who are wealthy. Both of these statements are broadly true of most humans of any culture. "bland is best:" is not an aspect of this culture. White skin and golden hair is universally considered beautiful, in almost every culture and even among babies, who prefer to look at white people to black people. A man's desirability is largely based on his wealth everywhere in the world. There is no "white history". Only history. Despite attempts to revise it. "win at all costs" is not an aspect of this culture. Winning is tautologically valued everywhere. "master and (slave) nature" is an otherwise meaningless attempt to impute the desire to own people. "majority rules" stands without the part about "when whites have power" which is another empty slur. "don't show emotion" is not an aspect of this culture.

>>465695 It isn't just intelligence being selected against, it is pro social and mental stability as well, intelligence just is the most important one. Nature has no answer to a complete collapse of selection other then making the population living under it so stupid and maladaptive that they can't maintain the ecology that is allowing no selection Thier brains are healthy and as developed as thier genes will allow for, you aren't going to find physiological differences between the generations, maybe if you go back to the 1800 and look at thier brains, you might find something but none alive today Your brain is like 80% of your genome, thus a huge target for mutation and you cannot look at someone's brain and tell how smart they are >>465696 I don't understand how to think like you other then you don't like the idea of everything of a person is untimely physics thus you cope by lying The propaganda/getting u used to waging schedule center cannot make a stupid person smart but can make a smart person dumb but they will always be able to do more then dumb-dumbs Wokeness is in the education because of the same reason the population is getting cognitively more unable; dysgenics Don't get me wrong, would love to steam all liberals to death, but wouldn't solve for industrial civilization being fundamentally dysgenic

>>465701 Wrong audience

>>465701 >nor proper definition of power, nor proper definition of group, or of this group. > Nigger, I can take a sample of your DNA and tell you what group you can belong to

>>465697 Children hundreds of years ago were expected to work on the farm or join work gangs to pay their own way. Children now live in this odd little social bubble where they are never responsible for anything, including their own betterment. "Childhood" is not the same concept that it was. >>465698 Oh yes, and look at what parents were having their kids do in those fables. They sure as hell didn't have the kind of childhood that we expect them to now. They had to deal with real shit; they were not walled off from it. >>465705 >I don't understand how to think like you other then you don't like the idea of everything of a person is untimely physics thus you cope by lying If everything is physics, than a "person" is just an arbitrary intellectual delineation from every material element that it comes into contact with. The "person" thus becomes an ill-defined and definitively inconsistent component part of a greater reality.

>>465715 >an ill-defined and definitively inconsistent component part of a greater reality. Now you're getting it, good for u

>>465715 Hey idiot that's post industrial children who would form gangs, pre industrial society wasn't fucked, look at the way the last tribal people live, their children are happy laughing and playing. They don't start work until they're old enough to, and they don't work their children to death, they are simple people who simply exist and gather food. Post industrial african shitholes are not the same so don't even try to compare them to real off-grid communities who aren't in famine conditions with little muddy shack towns filled with machetes and necklacings.

>>465718 Nah, farming is the name of the game, at least for white people Hunting and foraging is shit for survival outside of Africa and agriculture makes people cluster together in towns and cities live around animals and that provides opportunities for disease to cultivate the phenotype, speeding up evolution Grandfather help us

>>465716 And you are failing to understand what that entails. That is unless you are an existential nihilist like Jean-Paul Sartre. Because that's what that shit is. >>465718 You skipped the whole agrarian epoch, spear-chucker.

Fellas, can we get back to the topic at hand, which is how we shall exploit the incoming crop of NPCs. The time to coordinate and prepare is now.

>>465733 It is better and preferable to believe in God but that dont acknowledge reality and won't judge God for how He composed the universe >>465735 Private prison and drug manufacturer

>>465747 But that dont mean dont acknowledge reality*

>>465748 Lel, nope, you can't take that one back.

>>465705 The only dysgenics here is that white people consistently fail their entry back into the gene pool, by relying on insane white picket fence myth. Selection only occurs in the positive when one couple has enough offspring, 6 or more, for all their offspring to have a decent chance to test their mettle in the real world. When people delude themselves that "replacement rate" is enough, that just means that your bare minimum 2 kids ALSO face the risk, and statistical inevitability, that they're not the best kids you COULD have. You have one kid able to be Nikola Tesla but not a good father: that's minus 1 to your replacement rate. Benefit society incidentally but not a recursive improvement. The matter of fact is that "equality" means immense hostility towards alternate lifestyles that are crucial support units in society but only in the short term. And its even stronger cultural baggage in the faux conservatives' ethos, than in wokism. They're constantly trying to gamble on good stock coming exclusively out of their own inbred selves, when it's really a battle of quantity. No matter how fine their best kid is, the worst is pressured to go marry their second cousin who also is a waster, but supports "family values". However they too will not even HAVE the sixth kid who lucked out to dodge all the Hapsburg mutations.

>>465772 >unsourced schizo post Hey that's great, buddy

>>465772 >The only dysgenics here is that white people consistently fail their entry back into the gene poo >Selection only occurs in the positive when one couple has enough offspring, 6 or more, for all their offspring to have a decent chance to test their mettle in the real world. both are dysgenics, whites are more closely related to the people then gave rise to the ecology we now suffer in, and have the best chances of evolving out of the cycle while maintaining and advancing an eternal civilization, and can truthfully call themselves the end of nature biological evolution of mankind, so it is the most dysgencis when whites don't have as many offspring as they can, as they are limiting the possibility of that, and selection comes from being under a harsh ecology also cousin marriages aren't bad, they maintain your phenotype your 3rd cousin is the most optional person you could have offspring with due to you getting more then 50% of your genes into your offspring while maintaining genetic health vaccines are dysgenics, abundance is dysgenics, mechanized warfare is dysgenics, fucking democracy is dysgenics, most things about industrialized civilization are dsygenics also if my child was the Nikola tesla type, he would get more of my and his genes in the world by making things that help our ethnic group, then he would have just putting his energy into sexual reproduction, your ethnic group is your phenotype, your phenotype growing is a form of reproduction ethnic reproduction is the highest and most potent form of reproduction