Apologies in advance, there will be a lot of reddit-spacing used below, I just want this post to be easily legible.
The promotion or discussion of certain ideas is forbidden for a reason, usually be because the idea will win out should its supporters be given the freedom to talk about it on a platform.
The early years of 4chan had allowed discussions of race under the assumption that the racists were being prevented ftom making their case due to it being offensive, rather than because their worldview was both offensive, and more likely to win in a debate against all alternative views.
They had assumed foolishly that just because an idea fell out of fashion, that it was an idea which was indefensible, instead they found that the idea was actually better at outcompeting alternative views when permitted to make a case, respond to critiques, and issue critiques of its own against other views.
Their case was that yes, things would be better for white peple if they were racially supremacist (here defined as putting the good of their race above that of other races).
More specifically, that white people can and should assert their complete dominance over other races, because it would be in their own best interest to do so.
So then we got /pol/, and you know what the real-world impact of that was.
Supporters of sexual degeneracy will win out if permitted to speak because, like the racists, their positions are better at making their case, defemding their positions, and attacking all competing perspectives than any alternate view that could be argued, it is for this reason that they should be silenced, like the racists, all they need to do to wun the debate is be allowed to talk.
We've learned our lesson from what happened after we allowed the racists to speak, breaking ot down to the fundanentals, their position was that white people should consider themselves above other races.
Well, the sexual degens are making the same case, just in relation to other demographic distinctions.
Many pro-pedos say the same for adults in relation to children, what they are saying is that society would improve if children had no rights and were adult property until puberty.
The furries (zoophiles) make a similar case in relation to humans vs other species.
Necrophiles do the same for living vs dead.
("No they don't" yes they do, the problem is you lumping ideologically distinct groups pushing for a similar policy together, ignoring all the dofferences that set them apart.
Kind of like how a lolbert or cuckservative will say that national socialism is the same as communism because both supported some similar economic or social policies.
Then they use the positions of communists against the nationalists and vice versa.
In my case, you know which degens im referring to, the kind who hate fags and faggotry aka male homosexuality, and who also hate trannies.
These guys like masculinity and defend it against perceived attacks, in fact, a large part of their position is rooted in a desire for male well being, via their dominance over the female sex, these guys are all about dominance and supremacy, white / other races, adult / pre-adult stages of development, human / other species, and male / female).
In the broader sense, this is not a conversation about sex so much as it is about the personal benefit of placing one group above another, and arguing that it would be better for those with the power to assert this dominance if they should do so.
Incest advocates are taking eugenic and geneocentric positions of racists to further extremes, and talking about the idea of mixing forms of love that we assume shouldnt be combined (its encouraged to mix friendship with family or romance, but not to mix together romance with family, these guys ask why, then go on to address the answers they receive with a response).
Mysogynists would be pedos if their ideas of male supremacy were taken to their logical conclusion, racists too, why would it be [the shapeshifting shill of darkness] something, but not to fuck it?
The degenerate leftards want to legalize their depraved fetishes by making themselves the object of their interest become equal to themselves.
The degenerate rightoids want to legalize their depraved fetishes by making every group aside from the one they belong to vastly inferior to themselves.
One side is full of fags foids and troons, the other side hates faggotry and trooning, and thinks women should be in their bedrooms/kitchens, naked and pregnant with their next children.
OFC this is hyperbole.