>>304 >Why not just go to zzzchan? I do. But I already talked about certain games here, and if I went there to talk about them right after Mark ding dong bannu'd me, other crossposters may take notice and stir shit. Also, I wanted to bitch about Mark freely without being drowned out on /b/, and ziggerchan is no place for 8moe/v/ meta shittery.

>>308 He only deleted Admin (Codexx), not Root (Acid), if I recall correctly which title refers to which. Codexx then deleted Root, which implies to me he and Acid are now in agreement, or close to it, that discussing Mark's behavior and asking about deleted posts in the meta thread is "gayops to ruin the site". If that is true, this whole board could be labeled gayops and nuked, along with my other dead board, and my likely removal from two legacy porn boards for "participating in gayops". Please excuse my retarded assumptions and see >>335 for an explanation on why I am stupid.

>>309 >other crossposters may take notice and stir shit Wasn't it entirely manufactured about how you cannot have the "same threads" on Sleepy/v/ as you do on Moe/v? Because that autism never made any sense. >>310 >and my likely removal from two legacy porn boards for "participating in gayops". What? Care to expand on that because the only thing I've seen lately in regards to porn BOs changing hands was in regards to /sm/.

>>308 >and the site's only gotten worse somehow Elaborate >>309 >ziggerchan is no place for 8moe/v/ meta shittery I thought the purpose of this board was a /v/ free of Mark's tyranny. Not one that exists for the primary purpose of meta shittery Pic unrelated.

>>312 > Care to expand on that I've pretty much already summed it up. If Acid and Codexx agree with Mark's strategy of deleting the questioning of post deletions even in the meta thread, even if you're the god damned site owner capcoding, all because "it's gayops", then the entire existence of this board would by that logic be "gayops". In that case, not only would this board be liable to be removed, I most likely would be labeled a bad actor and have my other boards stripped from me. Granted, I'm a pessimist, so I see the worst in everything. Please excuse my retarded assumptions and see >>335 for an explanation on why I am stupid. >>313 It's dual purpose. People only use this board to be free of Mark, and don't want to use zchan for whatever reason, therefore most of them when they first come here will be complaining about Mark because they cannot complain about Mark on his boards. Now generally, such complaints ought to be limited to the meta thread here, at least if they drag on, but in the spirit of this board being half /b/, I've made no such mandate.

>>313 >I thought the purpose of this board was a /v/ free of Mark's tyranny. Honestly, I don't see myself posting anywhere but here for vidya content when Mark is removing random ass posts for absolutely zero reason.

>>317 You say that now, but give it time. You'll be dying for the kind of engagement that a board that isn't dead gives you. Just like slow forums, slow boards can be comfy, but ultimately, they are the last stage before death.

>>318 >You'll be dying for the kind of engagement that a board that isn't dead gives you What "engagement" when regular ass posts, that say abosutely nothing offensive, get deleted?

>>319 Those deleted by fagmods will always be in the minority. There's still tons of engagement in spite of the meddling.

>>310 For such a short paragraph, you got nine different things completely ass backwards. I'm actually impressed.

>>318 >>320 Go fucking kill yourself mark, stop trying to gayop your own goddamn anons you miserable piece of shit.

>>322 >>322 lol

#Trolled

>>323 Oh its head gayopping. Yeah you know what? Maybe having head make the new /v/ was the most retarded fucking idea ever, if I wasnt so desperate I would have said something. Fucking to hell with it. Just let it all die.

>>325 >Being pessimistic is a gayop I guess I was niggerpill all along.

>>327 Ironic shitposting is still shitposting.

>>328 >Ironic You mean facetious, and it isn't, because I'm genuinely pessimistic. Also, shitposting is cool, yo.

>>329 Your concerns are genuine? Well shit. I just come here to joke around man, but. Well if you are indeed serious. Reply and say exactly that, and you will get an actual response to those concerns. Its april first so I can bend a few rules.

>>330 I do not observe April Fool's day, because I am always a fool. But yes, I think imageboards are probably doomed, but this one is probably the most deplatforming proof, so this is my favored site.

>>331 Check ur trash

>>332 i dunno, i think having a public slapfight might help to shame the fat fuck into realizing what a retard hes being, especially since he has the habit of trying to bury his shame over and over again like nobody will remember it

>>333 >Check ur trash No need, everyone can see deleted posts if they have a thread open before a post is deleted. And I don't see a need for you to delete your post either. This board is half /b/, it doesn't need to be very neat and tidy with certain topics kept hidden away for fear of derails or what have you. If you really want a private conversation for whatever reason, I don't think this is the place for it. >>332 >Codexx and Acid are both Root Ah shit, I always thought just one of them was Root and I just couldn't remember which. I rarely see Codexx capcode though. >Codexx forgot his capcode was on and was just trying to anonymously bitch at mark, he deleted his post cuz his capcode was in fact on. Okay, that's good. My fears of Mark's "everything is gayops" fever infecting the administration are quelled. >Now ask another question Do I have to? If I have to state some other more minor concerns, it would be a bit about transparency. This site is far more transparent than most when it comes to how moderation works, but I think a few tweaks may be necessary, like adding post restorations to the public logs, and I think something needs to be done about the potential shady that shit could be conducted with post editing since absolutely no one can see what was in an edited post as far as I know. Huge potential for sneaky shit, but I do take advantage of it to censor pedo links from deleted posts, so I guess it's a double edged sword? On the non-technical side, I think I've already stated on /site/ what I think of how Acid has handled the new Esther situation. Found it, >>>/site/10107 I really was not expecting any admins to visit this board for any reason, let alone be concerned about me doomposting to an audience of maybe three anons at best.

>>335 Oh, there's something I didn't know about editing posts. Post links retro-actively edited into a post do not generate the reverse link on the referenced post.

>>334 There is something to be said for that for sure. And yeah, a good point. >>335 Well we are never on irc at the same time so here is where it will have to be. Globals are forbidden to namefag or capcode, a policy I am obviously trying to change. Transparency is important. Tbh I think the policy was just to stop kaz sperging and embarrassing everyone, but hes years gone now As for your suggestions, they are excellent, I'll raise them tonight with the guys. Id love restorations to be in the logs, along with a patch or two to prevent unlogged deletions a mod trick kaz taught me, we never found a practical use for it though and forgot about it til recently when codexx asked how was mark fucking with anons and not being logged doing it, fucking jackass that he is, anyway thats already being patched Post editing has yeah, recently shown itself to have some bad uses >>336 Including this one I didn't even know about, yeah ima look into this. >I really was not expecting any admins to visit this board for any reason, let alone be concerned about me doomposting to an audience of maybe three anons at best Yeah but I'm one of the anons, you have no idea how intensely frustrating it is to watch an entire website but not be allowed to actually post with anons because marks a giant cock sucking bastard, who has prolly banned me more than any other anon. So I do appreciate someone giving me a place to interact with the anons I watch out for all day. I don't mind working so you guys have somewhere you can be free, to talk about what the fuck ever, but to do the work and know its pointless.... Well its goddamned demoralizing tbh. So I appreciate you having a board for vidya where I won't get banned just for saying breath of fire 5 is dogshit, and as my earlier post said, zzz blocks me fallout from kaz. He's still angry at me, a shame. I really do think of him as a friend and still miss him so. Where else would I be? I think even Acid would like somewhere to talk about vidya without the kike causing problems So. This is enough stuff to maybe get me in trouble, but idk. I wanna talk too sometimes, and transparency is important. Anyways your boards safe, and you have an advocate, personally, on your side. Just do me a favor and lemme know if /b/ is ever in trouble, I really don't know what I'm doing there I gotta get back to the site now, busy day.

>>337 >Just do me a favor and lemme know if /b/ is ever in trouble, I really don't know what I'm doing there I hardly every look at look at it.

>>338 In fact, I can't recall why I ever took over /b/ in the first place. To shit on LCP and ban niggery? Yeah, that sounds probable.

>>338 Okay then join the board ring. The ring of non aligned boards has only one requirement for entry, and thats adding the other boards to your banner message. [Weapons](/k)|[Queen Grace's Royal Palace](/monarchy)|[Politically Incorrect](/polk)|[Video Games](/abdl)|[Books](/lit)|[Role Playing Games](/tg)|[comfy posting](/comfy) Thats /b/s code I worked out with Chai back in 2020, actually looking at now reminds me I need to update it to active boards, anyways, for obvious reasons you can add your own boards you think are similar in temperament to create cross flow.

>>340 >[Video Games](/abdl)

>>340 >Okay then join the board ring. k done >[Weapons](/k)|[Queen Grace's Royal Palace](/monarchy)|[Politically Incorrect](/polk)|[Video Games](/abdl)|[Books](/lit)|[Role Playing Games](/tg)|[comfy posting](/comfy) Oh, so that's how that works and is formatted.

Was the Nintendo Switch 2 thread really just locked because there was too much criticism of Nintendo?

>>347 Most of the "criticism" was unironically niggerpill IP hopping. That being said, we do have our own thread: >>>/bv/344

>>349 Yeah it definitely was, but there is legitimate criticism too, I wonder why the niggerpill posts weren’t just deleted? And thanks, I’ll check out the thread.

>>350 And most people can tell the difference between the two. I think Mark does too, but just pretends not to so he can lump all the posts he dislikes with niggerpill and delete them.

>>356 He definitely does, its just a convenient excuse to lump them together.

>>358 and maintain plausible deniability*