>>72081
>What do you mean, you are the one who took 4 days to reply.
I merely said that because you regardless of when, appeared again, had you posted that a week ago or an hour ago you're still here.
>Which Morality Code says falling in love is immoral except within the approved boundaries? Sounds like a thought crime if you ask me
What I said is immoral is polygamy which most current civilized moral codes consider wrong, falling in love in itself isn't immoral per se what's immoral is how you act due to it, you can fall in love with how many girls you want, but when you go and actually practice polygamy with them that's when it turns immoral, admittedly reading it again it can be misunderstood as love in itself, my bad there.
Regarding the "thought crime" point, you can think what you want just as I can think what I want about what you think, and I don't think you should be penalized in any way shape or form due to disagreeing with me (or holding views I see as immoral), but I sure will express distaste if I feel like it, we are both humans with free will and freedom of expression.
>Irrelevant when discussing 2D crushes. Let me know when I can get legally married to my waifu, then we can compare 2D and 3D relationships
Aha, finally something that explains what you as an actual individual believe and therefore why we are clashing here, you see to me waifuism is a relationship and a true waifuist would treat (to some degree) his waifu as if she was real, this includes not cheating on her obviously, it seems we have fundamentally opposed views here (at least from this little text, I could be wrong).
>To...?
Refer to my answer to the previous point, you would cause the anime girls pain if they were real, let’s not kid ourselves, most people won’t enter a polyamorous relationship.
>There's no Mrs. Evolution that can be reached out for comments, you are just using the scientific concept to back your personal convictions. Any scientist would gladly tell you that a theory is data + interpretation, and it is always human beings who interpret
Not really? Im just saying that without monogamy we wouldn’t be here (obviously we aren’t here only thanks to monogamy), if it wasn’t so good then we wouldn’t have eventually gotten to it, especially since there’s precedent of polygamy in the past, it was literally rooted out for most humans and even as society’s we have constantly considered polygamy and in general being with more than one partner wrong and immoral (at most “admirable” if you’re a man, something I don’t agree with).
>Yeah, you for example totally sound like a friendly, reliable and understanding person who can be trusted with delicate information.
Again, you can think what you want just as I do, moving on.
>Try being less judgemental if you want people to trust you with their secrets. The way you conflate "honesty" and "immorality" makes it clear that you intend to be heavily judgemental with whatever information reaches you. That's how you get people to whisper behind your back that you cannot be trusted and should be kept at arm's length
I wont be and I don’t care if people trust me or not, and despite what you say I hold enough information (given to me directly by the individuals and not gossip) to make a decent post, but I wont because its personal, even if im judgmental that doesn’t mean ill hate you for it, if anything when someone is honest even if I disagree with it they at least get some respect since they’re being honest.
Message too long. Click
here
to view full text.