>>1125604 Dreamcast and GameCube need some updates when it comes to accessories. Nintendont compatibility is near 100% and Dreamcast could use more mention of the upcoming VMU memory storage and GDEMU

>>1125604 <no super monkey ball 0/10

>>1120800 >>1121736 yeah, looks like that fixed it, thanks maybe it's time to retire SNES9X anyway, this isn't the first time a game was broken on it

>>1129676 SNES9X is normally quite solid, though. As I understand it, its compatibility is nearly perfect, only having trouble with like a dozen relatively obscure games at most. Of course, if you want truly perfect compatibility, bsnes will have you covered.

>>1129696 There's also the widescreen HD version of bsnes too. Mode 7 games look stunning! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WSO0DJR46w I've only tried F-Zero and Super Mario Kart in this version. Games like F-Zero look perfect, but some games like Super Mario Kart have graphical issues on some tracks. The ghost valley and rainbow road tracks have these red lines in the background that kinda kill the immersion.

>>1129676 Well then back to ZNES it is. Reject accuracy, return to windows 98

>>1129696 disabling hi-res blending also fixed the assault suits valken translation not starting at all why is this shit on by default >>1131244 I really had to switch to it from an older version of SNEX9X because toxic seahorse's stage would crash it

>>1131671 I think a few early rom hacks were also made with ZSNES in mind and fuck up on Everdrive or newer emulators

>>1131671 Not sure how that would even happen. All hi-res blending is supposed to do is apply a horizontal blur whenever it detects a horizontal resolution of 512 pixels (known as "pseudo hi-res"). It's on by default because the vast majority of games do not use pseudo hi-res, but the few that do often switch to it on certain screens on the fly, commonly (though not always) so as to add vertically-dithered elements that were meant to be blurred together on composite signals, producing a transparency effect. Pic related is an example: the transparent window, without blending, looks like an ugly bunch of vertical lines. It is also commonly used to help render Japanese text in higher resolution, which is a case where you probably won't want the "blending". More on the subject here: https://snes.nesdev.org/wiki/Uncommon_graphics_mode_games#High-Resolution_and_Interlacing

>>1134794 ffs

>>1134803 Doesn’t SNES Jurassic Park do the distracting overlay shit anyway?

>>1137890 Yes. The point is that for it (as well as the HUD on the bottom) to look right, you need either hi-res blending enabled in the emulator options, or a shader that does the same thing. Goes without saying that you also need hi-res support enabled, or else the overlay will be completely solid, which will obstruct your view.

>finally clear sonic 1 with all chaos emeralds >the ending difference is just robotnik jumping in anger kek, my own fault i guess. it was fun though, so still a win in my book.

>>1138974 It took them a good amount of time to perfect chaos emerald rewards. Sonic 1 was fine challenge but pointless reward. Sonic 2 had super Sonic but the half pipe is fucking ass. Blue spheres will always be top tier

>>1140104 Fuck that half-pipe minigame seriously.

Is Jade Cacoon any good? I've been wanting to try out some lesser known rpgs from 5th and 6th gen consoles.

>>1140367 Not sure but I’ve got another game on the backlog. Also American box art is way different

>>1140367 >>1140652 I fondly remember playing a demo of it for about ten times as long as the demo was meant to be played as a kid. Every time I've looked into maybe trying it, every review says the same thing: the gameplay, world, and art are all fun, but the plot is retarded. Go in for a ruse cruise and you should have a good time.

>>1125604 >no bass fishing games These lists are shit

>>1093910 Vr bros. How is it going?? Just finished sonic cd. Gonna finish sonic 1 then play 2 and then 3. Glad to see some of you guys here

>>1143037 I just finished sonic 1 for the first time. tough 2nd half but very fun

replaying one of my favorites right now. but i'm playing the psp version with the fan mod. knights of lodis after.

Where did the /vr/ userbase go? I personally haven't seen /vr/ threads on other chans, yet this thread is dead af. On one hand its good half the newfags from 4/vr are gone, but on the other hand we don't have nearly enough anons to populate 8/vr.

>>1146074 i think a lot of people havent really started seeking alternatives (to 4chan) yet. i only did just yesterday.

>>1145875 How is the Tactics Ogre series? More specifically, how does it stack up compared to other games in the genre. Keep in mind my only reference for "tactics" rpg are triangle strategy and disgaea.

>>1146250 This is it. The /vp/ thread is in a similar boat. We don’t have the numbers of the horde of /vg/ that populated Moe. Once this thread reaches a healthy pace then a board or two will be made

>>1146074 The problem with a lot of /vr/ threads is that a lot of them devolves into emulators rather than the games. I know there's an emulation thread on thus board so...

>>>/vr/ is under new management so if you want to post there feel free. Since it's a board and not just a thread the discussion of what is retro will have to be hashed out so everyone knows what the rules are. >>>/vr/187 The board will obviously not be terribly fast so the usual rule of putting some effort into your OP will be applied.

>>1147941 Suggestion: Make /vr/ for games up to 5th gen only, except 1 containment thread. This way the board isnt filled with 6th gen threads but the discussion of those isnt entirely forbidden.

>>1151647 That might work but then there's the question of should these games be brought up in music threads, emulation threads, and other threads like that or is just mentioning them outside of that thread not allowed?

>>1145805 Hell yeah man that's cool. Are you gonna play any of the other games??

>>1099456 This list is complete as far as I know. >https://w.atwiki.jp/gcmatome/pages/220.html

>>1151830 >should these games be brought up in music threads, emulation threads, and other threads like that or is just mentioning them outside of that thread not allowed? I mean this happened occasionally on 4vr too, "not retro but game x is like that" kinda posts happened but I dont think anyone was triggered by that. Ultimately its up to the BO to decide I guess.

>>1154645 >but I dont think anyone was triggered by that Yeah it would sort of depend on the day.

>>1154645 It would mostly be for shit like Oblivion, COD4 and any late 2007 game that technically counted but were just made to discuss 7th gen

>>1147941 Well I've decided on what the board will consider retro for now. I've decided to err on the side that will allow more games to be discussed but nothing that seems like it clearly would not fit. Let me know what you think or if you can find any loopholes/unfair exclusions in it.