Oh, and if you are interested but don't live in northern Europe, then pls bump

gonna be staying in københavn for a week and a half in September, its a ways off but i'd be down to meet in a secret scandanavian horse brothel or something

This person is probably just talking to themselves. Never bring your animals when meeting people. Never trust someone you only know online. This person is hoping to entice or lure people into making foolish decisions.

>>12701 Oh he is almost certainly some Norwegian cop or some shit, or some bored vigilante. Thats why he wants them to bring an animal, so he has evidence to use to get a conviction, its basically >Hey plz come to my countries police station where this is a crime and plz bring evidence you intend to violate the laws of my country so I can charge you. The local board rule set by chai was that users are discouraged from posting any personal information, and its a bad idea to have a meet up, but all that being said. It isn't illegal. My natural response was to ask whether a BO has any ethical obligation to shield their anons from obvious honey traps and other things people do to entrap anons, like the story thread for example, it is almost certainly a datamining thread, asking users to name their real world locations. I believed then and still do that a BO has a personal obligation to try and protect anons, even at the cost of limiting free speech of those who intend harm to anons. Chai disagreed. In his opinion the board should allow whatever is legal, and anons are personally responsible for being smart. I respect that, but I am not a libertarian. I have no idealistic obligation to shield my foes, and as your protector any enemy of yours becomes one of mine by default. I am a National Socialist, and that means i will shatter any ideal if it hurts my people or ties my hands from attacking my foes. I usually delete these threads on that principle. I left this one up for... I don't know. I guess guilt for changing Chai's policy. Even though my guilt for failing my duty to him means I am now neglecting my duty to you anons instead. In my pity i have failed you all. I apologize and promise to not let my questions on board operating policy leave you vulnerable again. Our borders are strong, and our army strong! Long live /zoo/!

>>12690 which newspaper do you work for there was a big zoo bust in norway a couple years back and since then the media has infiltrated zoo spaces, most recently they doxed a bunch of norway group members on zoovilleforum

How about you spend that manpower and taxpayers' money to chase actual dangerous criminals and not harmless people who treat their animals better than you ever did

>>12690 Assuming you are a real zoo and not a piece of shit zoophobe, well... I mean, good luck on your search, I guess. It's difficult for us European zoos, piece of shit continent that, while maybe not enforcing it all that much, still hates us existing. Sweden was still based right up until 2014, that's when they banned animal sex. I hope to see a zooey uprising soon. If it's okay for people to love the same sex then it should be okay to be in a loving interspecies relationship.

>>12702 That's a lot of words to say "Ur a cop and u stink". I am not with the Norwegian police. I was charged with burglary three years ago, and would a cop have pictures of dog cookies and knotting videos on his personal phone?

>>12716 I fucking hate the legal system, zoophilia is persecuted almost everywhere because of the norms of judeo-Christian societies and how they don't even try to separate their toxic Christian religion from their lawmaking process. I want to leave Norway and go to Finland soon, in Finland zoophilia is legal (and plus, I am a musician and I'd make it much further in Finland than here).

>>12710 Bitch, I AM the taxpayer.

>>12710 And also, I treat my animal with equal amount of care (three healthy fillings of hot cum per night)

>>12724 It's not legal in finland anymore, the law changed 4 months ago.

source?

>>12725 > unironically posts edgy Kristian quote after the pussy fled to France

>>12742 fuck, seriously? 1 less country where it's legal i guess. not that it really matters if you keep it to yourself, but still disappointing. why does this keep happening? is it PETA or some shit? does the average person really care enough about this that they feel the need to vote for a law prohibiting anyone from doing it (without any good reason i might add)? iirc in the past countries have rushed to ban it after some sensational story pops up in the international news about how "X country STILL hasn't banned bestiality, how HORRIBLE is that???" or "OMG SEX TOURISM GUYS!!!1!!" how many libertarians would vote to ban bestiality i wonder? even in USA where "muh freedom" is all the rage it's banned in almost every state.

Usually, it's bc some anon gets caught, and the prosecutor finds out there is no law specifically against bestiality, so he calls his legislator who advances a bill that is an easy slam-dunk- who would vote against a bill outlawing bestiality? Who? Nearly every normie thinks it's horrible, we're horrible, and they *hate* us even though they don't know we're secretly their bosses, best friends, wives, sons and daughters, etc. So the law is swiftly passed with zero questions or opposition. No debate. Not: Do we need this? Isn't there existing cruelty legislation that covers harm to an animal? No, none of that. Anything involving pleasure is outlawed, why, just because. Well, they say, animals can't consent. Sure. Go try to fuck a mare that isn't in the mood, fella. I'll visit you in the hospital. Then they have to carve out some language to make actual animal abuse ok, as long as it is couched in the guise of "animal husbandry" i.e. farming. It's perfectly ok to forcibly shove your whole arm up a cow's ass or vagina as long as it's for "farming" purposes. Or to place an animal in a truss so they can't move while you inject sperm through their abdomen directly into their uterus with a giant syringe. Perfectly ok, yep. But don't get on a stool and get your penis into that cow, man. Then it (gasp) is about pleasure for both parties. Why, that ought to be illegal! (law passes) In the eyes of most, just getting a penis or vagina near a dog is harmful to the dog. People think sexually mature animals are "babees" or come from Disney with no genitals nor sexual urges and needs. They want them that way. If they could turn them into animated stuffed animals with no hint of genitals or anus they would do so in a second. Why do you think "fixing" is so popular? Removes (uncomfortable!) mentions of sex and desire from their squeaky-clean ideal of a "pet" i.e. animated stuffed animal- all love but no slimy bits. People are dumb and I dislike most of them. Zoo is the ultimate cheat code. I can get all the love and sex any man could want and I don't have to deal with people and the games and bullshit. They may think I'm stooping to a "lower level" but they're mistaken. I am elevated far above the madding crowds of filthy unthinking humanity. Where I stand in my quiet circle of love, respect, and affection with my companions, I am free of all of them.