>>340394
>Plenty of "red blooded" men don't spend their life chasing 18 year old girls
And those are the losers that every society spawns from time to time.
>respectable men don't do that because it's fucking embarrassing
How much of a retard can you be?
>they adhere to basic cultural standards
Hence, losers.
>in reality you're just a slave to culture like anyone in a society
Only losers are. You just outed yourself as a slave, with slave mentality, who thinks that society somehow can order you around, instead of doing whatever you want like winners (that is, free men) do.
No wonder your types are being erased from the genetic pool. You go there be a slave, while winners fuck minors and make more children with them, spreading their winner DNA.
>In what context are parents going to tolerate adult men trying to fuck their 16 year old daughters?
Superior men, who don't get chained to any women, will. The girls' parents might not want it, but both the girl and the giga chad want. And they will always find a way to have sex. Unlike you, or the girl's parents after marriage.
Single men don't care about what the fathers of any girls think. Fathers are providers. that is, fathers are slaves. Just like you.
>At no point in history was this ever a thing
It literally was accepted all over the world for the most part of humanity's existence.
>Yes parents married off their young children, but that is fundamentally different to random men pursuing 16 year old girls in a society
So you know nothing about history or any civilization besides your own urbanite/demented place. Got it.
>So they don't do it not because of a basic cultural standard, but because people might not like them
We used to not do it under the threat of violence. Now, we are fighting back with violence too. Enjoy the war. You could have avoided it by simply letting girls have sex as they are meant to.
>Why should you have the legal right to fuck my 16 year old daughter while being absolved of all criticism?
Because I want to. simple as that.
Your laws won't change my nature. and my nature is sacred. In fact, my nature is the ONLY sacred thing in the whole world.
Your daughter is not sacred.
>to rip power away from families
Those who get in our way will be torn apart, yes. Deal with it.
>corrupt innocence
There is no corruption in natural acts and in human nature. It is what it is. Your fake notions of "corruption" are nothing more than vague ideals that never existed in the first place, as they are incompatible with human nature.
>You don't want a good wife, you want a state to point guns at parents who let you do whatever the fuck you want to their children
Yes. And that is called being a winner and being free.
Unlike you, loser and enslaved.
>Day of the rope soon
For you and your old hag of a wife, yes. The strongest military complex in the world, as well as all law enforcement, their guns and their use of violence, are all on our side, to enforce OUR will against you. Good luck trying to keep your dumb family. It will be funny to see you try. And fail.
"No argument fag" is a guy who literally never presents a coherent argument while flinging shit everywhere
So, you. Anyone reading your demented post can see it.
>>340395
Some old cranky retard who has no sex anymore due to having married an old hag is angry that there are actual men having sex with his young daughter and making her have some fun in her life, unlike his.