>>16828 You can probably run the enterprise version as well.

>>16828 UPDATE. unfortunately the internet archive has taken down my upload of the "survival kit" before it has even finished. I'll just upload the vanilla ISO and .txt files. Seems i will have to switch to linux mint way sooner than i anticipated.

>>16730 that makes it much more feasible thank you anon

>>11850 >the official stated limits are usually false, for example I had a 128GB MicroSD in a phone with a supposed limit of 32GB. The manufacturer just didnt feel like validating and guaranteeing anything larger. True for smartphones and many other devices. NOT true for many security/dash cameras, too large of a card will actually result in corrupt/lost video.

>>16865 >Since the archive time field can be modified within Hydrus in the first place, I figured modding the import process to pull the creation dates to that field would accomplish this and avoid having to manually change the date on every single file entry. Sure, but the archive times are meant to show the date a file was put into the archive. Putting the creation date in there would destroy its purpose. Why not use the modified time instead? Would make more sense to me since they have both to do with the creation/alteration of files, but even then, what would make most sense is to ask Hydev to implement a new time type 'source/original creation time' with a way to parse those times before they get copied into db OR copy them but set their creation time to the original after the copy, which wouldn't change the hash i guess since the dates are part of the filesystem. Would be interesting to know what Hydev thinks and if it makes sense. >If the "file modified time" field has no chance of being changed after the image is committed to the .db file then I guess that would satisfy that need. Not sure if i understand, but the 'file modified time' can also be changed within hydrus, just like the archived time. But this stays in Hydrus' DB of course, not applied to file itself. Right-click -> manage -> times -> click on the date button. Within Windows the creation/modified/last access times of files themselves can be changed by tools too. Thats why Hydev COULD potentially implement creation time parsing. I guess you didn't already delete your original files after importing them into Hydrus, otherwise your plan would end here anyway, since all the files in the DB don't have their original date before import. But a somewhat messy way to save your creation times would be to rename your original files with a tool, for example Advance Renamer. It lets you rename the filenames to the creation date for example. Then import them back into Hydrus and apply a namespace tag like 'creation date:' for the imports. So you would have them saved as tag if that would be good enough for you. You can hide that namespace later too if it annoys you to see it all the time. If you rely on not changing the filenames, then this isn't an option. Another way might be the client API which can do alot, but that is above my pay grade. You have to wait for Hydev to help you with that, after he is back from vacation.

The right-click menu on a tab... How about adding "merge left" "merge right" options, which would move the thumbnails in this tab into the next and close this tab? I often have several import tabs from dragging and dropping files into hydrus, would be nice if there was an easy way to merge them after import.

>>16871 It looks to me like the path to bloat the software for a minimal gain. Just select the the thumbs and drag them into the desired tab. Done!

>>16859 hooray, the zionists defeated the marxists.

>>5779 >Look at the Pureism laptops that have Coreboot already installed and ME stripped out Convince me Purism isnt a honeypot and they dont let the NSA bug your laptop

>>6059 No mater where you turn, (((they))) are always in the way.

>>12213 >VP9 YouTube only provides VP9 if a browser or application explicitly requests it. >AV1 Video.js supports AV1, including version 7. That's what the Invidious instances that still work are currently getting if you use DASH. In fact, this is now the ONLY codec that Invidious can use with DASH. >>15899 >And Video.js 8 STILL won't allow for VP9 or Opus. Both Video.js 7 and 8 support Opus, both by itself and with AV1.

>>12213 >Invidious and FreeTube deprecated. use yt-dlp and mpv.

>>16866 >deprecated. Completely untrue, you idiotic retard.

>>12088 >What could cause this and how do I solve it? Some of the math is probably blowing up. Debug it to see where the problem is and inspect the values, or if you don't know how that then add logs to the same extent.

>try to learn Qt for a project >still shaky on C++, but I can make do >try to figure out how to properly exit the main loop >qt example just does QCoreApplication::quit() in some unrelated class >wut >read through documentation again >public slot: void QCoreAppliction::quit() blah blah blah and a few tips to make sure it works >no mention of why you can access it from somewhere else without even referring to the object >wonder if this is some Qt specific bullshittery >fruitlessly try to research the issue >check the implementation of quit >nope, it's just a three line call to exit() >keep researching, still nothing >decide to check the header file >public slots: static void quit() <DSP_woooow.webm >later realize the documentation does include the static part, as a small, hard to notice comment on the side

>>9 Gentooman is kill, but you can download the torrent/mag link on IA.

>>16812 >As the M line was originally designed in Occupied Palestine Nothing good comes from there.

>>16819 >Nothing good comes from >Occupied Palestine edgy

I've got a bat right there that can destroy any computer, 100% guaranteed

>>16568 >anyone knows how to create a .bat file that kills computers? Something like this?: @echo off :uji start goto uji exit What this code basically does is to open a "Command Prompt" window, hide the text output (or at least I think that's what the @echo off was for), open another console window and jump to the second line creating an infinite loop. I can confirm that it works on Windows XP, but I don't know if it still works on newer versions of Windows.

>>16716 I think both of you make pretty good points, newfags are fine, the problem is when it is artificial, none of us can legitimately look back at halfchan and say that what happened was organic, when it reaches the point of say, 2016 or 2012 /pol/ and /b/, the bannings are necessary, whereas if you look at all the bitching and moaning by oldfags before then, they were just annoyed that not everyone cared about desu dolls or duckrolling Also a good litmus test for whether any chan is good is whether it allows raids, any chan that does not allow raids is fake and gay by virtue of the fact and should be ignored completely

If you want to filter newfags just host it on i2p and ban any clearnet proxies.

A site/board culture hostile to tourists/non-integrators. I recall people being told to "lurk more" on /b/ even as recent as 2012 when I started visititg 4chan. Due to that I spent years just lurking threads and absorbing the culture.

>>12945 what would you advise? onionshare? >>13041 no u

>>12449 I'm not OP but a few months ago I downloaded the archive shortly before Anonfiles closed, so I took the opportunity to reupload it at https://big.fileditchstuff.me/b26/TzdHRVXSuBkyWatctuzR.zip (if someone can re-upload it in other places so it doesn't get lost, I'd appreciate it). Unfortunately I have not been able to obtain the password since the programs I was trying do not work with it because the archive was created with a special compression method used by Windows Explorer (or some shit like that).

>>12449 >Attacking corporate faggots for doing corporate faggot shit at our expense with the willingness of the government Based >Soapboxing chuuni shit about how you don't fuck around Cringe You have reached equilibrium with your post, you're a faggot but you did something cool, thank you

Do you guys know anything about moldy thing that lives in nose-throat-ear, goes into your inner ear and makes them able to speak to you through some kind of device? Is it old, who uses it, and how widespread it is?

>>16662 > goes into your inner ear and makes them able to speak to you through some kind of device It also seems to make them able to listen from your ears too.

>>16499 I think the worst part would be the bodies reaction to it, electromagnetic waves are already known to cause depression, but what makes sense is the body responding to this with brain inflammation in an attempt to heal from the "injury"

>>16737 You might have to declare every hour manually yeah, like ads at :53 and :23, and episodes at :00 and :30, if the episodes are 23 minutes long. The top gear playlist should probably say time = 20 for 8:00p/20:00 though? I do wish I knew more to help but I don't have the time.

Also + 30 for the 7:30 programme, I'm assuming -- are comments in lua and don't run code after it. Also commas after each { } except the last in the list, like { {}, {}, {} }

>>16738 >>16739 It's unreasonable to expect you to give me a crash course in not being retarded, thanks for all the help you do give, you've answered the question and I can go from there - I can probably make something with that however pajeeted or yanderedev'd it may be I'll see if I can have ai check my code once I have a basic prototype built

>>16725 Here I thought you got some cool new information about weird government shit but you're just trying to do a terrorism, hullo journalists who will inevitably end up posting here Whatever you are trying to do, doing a terrorism is not currently the solution to any problems we have, how about you take a breath and watch/wait for a while

>>16230 >Glownigger >>16218 If you want change; create it I'm sure there are plenty of forums on i2p that have what you seek, if it does not exist then build it; they will come

>>16218 Do you want a website where you specifically can explore whatever idea you want to, or also other visitors can do the same? And if the latter, what if a visitor wants to explore the idea of spamming that site 24/7 with hardcore gay cee pee porn to the point of making the whole site completely, utterly unusable to everyone else? Or do you want to restrict others' (and maybe even your own!) freedom to do so without the fear of censorship by the site admin? >>16690 >I'm sure there are plenty of forums on i2p that have what you seek There are, the problem is i2p has too few people and maybe too much paranoia (which might be justified, eh).

>>16704 Be the change you wish to see, and get used to slow boards, your attention span may not like it but it's good for you

>>16698 1)Brute force. The .onion address must be random, because generating it is a part of the mechanism ensuring that no outsider can interfere in the site's workings. It is however possible, at the work of significant computational work, to generate a lot of such addresses until you get a few symbols at where you want them. A large organization can do that, especially since it's only done once and the address is then kept indefinitely (domain changes do happen, of course). Meanwhile picking the entire address string is not possible, or at least assumed to be so: being able to do that is in the same category as being able to break encryption of any other things, like banking systems. 2)No. You can create an .onion domain with no mirror in the clearnet. The next problem then is informing others of the address without that message being tied to you. This is why Tor has multiple sites that list .onion domains, and then sites that list those sites (since individual onions often do not enjoy 100% uptime). 3)The danger is real, the extent of it incredibly unspecified. There are specific research cases on using it to extract some information about individual users, but also similar research exists that uses pure HTML5 and so on. The danger is always the danger of being identified, but how dangerous JS specifically is, is a matter of debate with little in the way of clear answers. With that in mind, do consider what identification is: from the viewpoint of whoever tries to identify you, it is a matter of reducing the list of possibilities and concentrating their estimated probability on a single one. Information is measured in bits (as seen on any anonymity testing website): when working with binary possibilities (that is, either possible or not possible) cutting the list of possibilities in half means adding one bit of identifying information. When possibilities are assigned probabilities, the formula is more convoluted, and I'm not here to write a primer on information theory. Now, JS (and, say, HTML5) can be used to give more identifying information. Tor hides your IP, which often identifies you down to a single person or single PC, and Tor also hides some other pretty specific information, but many facts could be guessed about you from other data. For example, imagine that your browser has its time zone set to UTC+26:00, a time zone used exclusively by one Pacific island state because they do not want to have a full day of time difference between theit islands. There are probably very few browsers on the whole web with this time zone. A JS instruction sending your time zone to whichever data collecting group can be pretty identifying in this case, narrowing the question of who you are down to a very short list (the term is "anonymity set"). A browser has a lot of adjustable parameters, and a combination of enough of them can easily go all the way down to singling out exactly one person. Unless, of course, the browser is specifically designed to be used with almost entirely the same set of parameters (like Tor Browser is), and you do not change them. And that's still not all. A big thing in the "use JS to identify users" research is tracking your keyboard and mouse usage. Statistics on your pauses between keypresses seems to be quite damningly identifying if collected is large enough quantities. Same with mousestrokes. I do not know enough about research on these to give you an account, but it worries people whose opinion I do value, and so on and so forth. One additional notion to mention is pseudonimity. This is when a group collecting visitor data over many different sites (what both Google and Cloudflare do) can can be reasonably sure in stating that several visits, on maybe different sites and at maybe different times, are all done by the same person, by comparing browser data, other identifying data, and even browsing habits, without being able to out a name and a face to the visitor, besides "unknown user #1488". Tor can hide your identity, but your data, behavior, and writing style can still make you pseudo-identifiable to people, to data collection algorithms, and now to still-experimental setups using AI to analyze users. God know imageboards have enough "anons" easily recognizable by other board or thread regulars.